Re: The Game of Champions 2018 [Day 3]
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:01 pm
Also, I don't really put any stock in "she was almost lynched twice" as an additional indicator of suspicion.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
SVS just looks like she's jumping on an easy wagon that nutella started. I don't like it.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
Nope, not by the end you weren't. It was tied between Bob and quin up until the end and if you thought Bob was town and quin was scum you had no excuse bc I'm pretty sure you were out of danger for at least the last half hour or so.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 9:36 amI was almost being lynched. I believe it's called a "self-preservation" vote.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
Oh gosh, that makes me look terrible. Maybe you should lynch me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:39 pmNope, not by the end you weren't. It was tied between Bob and quin up until the end and if you thought Bob was town and quin was scum you had no excuse bc I'm pretty sure you were out of danger for at least the last half hour or so.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 9:36 amI was almost being lynched. I believe it's called a "self-preservation" vote.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
Wait what? Do you have info on LC or something? Or that Luna is innocent?colonialbob wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:54 am @JaggedJimmyJay
@sig
@juliets
@Long Con
@S~V~S
@nutella
Do you want to make a point or do you want to make a change? Do you want to get something off your chest, or do you want to get something done?
How fake is it now you stooges?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:24 pm+1nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:07 pmThis is a fake opinion.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:05 pmMac was prolly killed for this post I'm thinkin'. So I'ma look at these three kings.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:34 pm Confirmed Mafia =
Juliets, Quin and DharmaHelper
Possible Mafia =
Sloonei
Except you weren't about to get lynched, unless someone moved off of you later than I thought. As I recall it was 3-3 bob-quin with you at 2 for a while.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:20 pm All you people trying to lynch me for my GTH list should really think about this: I made it under pressure on DAY ONE, and it was literally because Sloonei was holding a gun to my head and I was about to get lynched. I am terrible about reading people on day one. I put it out there and immediately regretted not just refusing to make one.
You sincerely believe the mafia gave us a roadmap to their lynch like this?speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:44 pmHow fake is it now you stooges?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:24 pm+1nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:07 pmThis is a fake opinion.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:05 pmMac was prolly killed for this post I'm thinkin'. So I'ma look at these three kings.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:34 pm Confirmed Mafia =
Juliets, Quin and DharmaHelper
Possible Mafia =
Sloonei
Hmmm if you really think this it's the most town thing you've said all game lol.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:29 pmSVS just looks like she's jumping on an easy wagon that nutella started. I don't like it.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
[VOTE: S~V~S] aubergine
you can't argue that quin was bad, and Mac died after calling him out.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:45 pmYou sincerely believe the mafia gave us a roadmap to their lynch like this?speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:44 pmHow fake is it now you stooges?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:24 pm+1nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:07 pmThis is a fake opinion.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:05 pmMac was prolly killed for this post I'm thinkin'. So I'ma look at these three kings.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:34 pm Confirmed Mafia =
Juliets, Quin and DharmaHelper
Possible Mafia =
Sloonei
LolLunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:42 pmOh gosh, that makes me look terrible. Maybe you should lynch me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:39 pmNope, not by the end you weren't. It was tied between Bob and quin up until the end and if you thought Bob was town and quin was scum you had no excuse bc I'm pretty sure you were out of danger for at least the last half hour or so.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 9:36 amI was almost being lynched. I believe it's called a "self-preservation" vote.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
Given that it's possible only one of the three were scum, that some people wanted to WIFOM their way out of it, and that even suggesting it is giving me blowback?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:45 pmYou sincerely believe the mafia gave us a roadmap to their lynch like this?speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:44 pmHow fake is it now you stooges?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:24 pm+1nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:07 pmThis is a fake opinion.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:05 pmMac was prolly killed for this post I'm thinkin'. So I'ma look at these three kings.MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:34 pm Confirmed Mafia =
Juliets, Quin and DharmaHelper
Possible Mafia =
Sloonei
When I said "Mac was killed for this post", it meant "mac was killed for his suspicions and for being on the right trail, here's a list of the suspicions"ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:51 pm Speed, which is it: only one of the three were scum, or Mac named more than one? You use that post initially to say “Look at these people.” You are not saying that in the post above.
Quin-nutella: antagonistic. Could be distancing, but that's not my opinion.Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 7:37 pmhow are u even agreeing with a post that literally says 'you look town so you're probably bad'
In retrospect, was Quin intentionally maintaining a light touch in the thread because being a baddie in a Champions Game is srs bsns?Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 7:41 pmi mean i am kind of busy but in full transparency i was in bed all day playing Ys VIII on my Switchjuliets wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 5:38 pmI wasn't throwing out suspects, I was naming people who hadn't said a whole lot. I was asking Jay why HE did not see them as suspect based on his reasoning for c-bob.nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 4:48 pmI’m not a fan of this post - you claim to have a hard time with suspects, yet you throw out three names “to name a few” to JJJ? And the last paragraph is not adding anything. Who are you leaning civ on? What hard time are you having, besides regular Day 1 difficulties, if anything? Who is meh? What does meh mean to you, maaaaaan?juliets wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:41 am So I looked at c-bobs posts because of Jay's letter and what Jay says is true but there are another 5 or so people who haven't said much either. Jay this may not fit into your letter writing but is there a reason you picked c-bob as opposed to say Turnip Head or blooper or nova or Quin to name a few? They've made comments but not said much.
I'm having a hard time with suspects, there are a couple of people I'm leaning civ on but then I have a whole lot of meh. I hope we have some good participation today.
In the last paragraph I am just saying I'm having a hard time with suspects. As I said before I'm not a good Day 1 player. I don't think I've ever caught a baddie on Day 1. There are baddies out there but I'm not seeing whatever nuances there are that make them bad.
I'm leaning good on nutella and S~V~S and Mac. A whole lot of meh means a whole lot of "could go either way". For example, Quin's posts seem consistent with his civ posting but he's not posted very much. Is he hiding or was he just busy yesterday? JJJ's posting gambit I found clever and his content seems ok but I'm starting to wonder if he's hiding behind a persona. That's what I mean by meh - could be bad, could be good. Nutella used the same word in a post (and I think it means something different to her) but I notice you did not say anything about it, much less make such a big deal over it as you did here. Why do you suppose that is?
linki
What is this? Quin doesn't like a vote for TH? I don't know if he ever mentions TH anywhere else. Quin doesn't like Luna being "forced" change her vote? He's disappointed in her? No, I think he doesn't like the vote on TH here, and there was not a good reason for his wagon. Slight tick against TH for this one.
Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:25 pmreally interesting theoryMacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:22 pm I have a thought.
What if Sloonei is actually Mafia pretending to be town?
[VOTE: macdougall] aubergine
Interesting couple of posts with folks we now know were town. Just for your Quin databases, some Civ interactions from baddie Quin.Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:28 pmim just buddying sloonei dont worry about itMacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:27 pm I know it's OMGUS but that was just Quin trying to lolkek his vote onto a nonwagon because he's bad right?
Once again, Colin looks quite Civ to me. Sorry for the glowing reviews, Colin!Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:30 pmi mean this is probably my first on topic post so fairColinIsCool wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:29 pmI don’t like what I’ve seen from Quin so farMacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:27 pm I know it's OMGUS but that was just Quin trying to lolkek his vote onto a nonwagon because he's bad right?
Gotta give nutella the seal of approval on this one. ^Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:58 pmI've had this argument before. My suspicions aren't faked, even when I'm bad. That is the essence of GenuQuin. Forget that shit though, my suspicions aren't faked because I'm not bad.nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:56 pmooooh he pulled out this card! look it has a shiny player-specific vocab word on it that means he can't possibly be badQuin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:52 pmbitch im GenuQuin how dare youMacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:51 pm Quin is literally talking absolute shit. Like how can you read the words he wrote and think they are anything but falsified opinions. He is as scum as I am Strayan.
Another attack on Luna. Are you guys sure she's Quin's teammate?Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:31 pmThat is a fact but it is not a fact that says anything about your feelings about me in this game. Boo.Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:55 pmWhere did you convince c-bob to change? I honestly wasn't sure who switched, and thought for a bit it was you. The reason I voted Sloonei to begin with was because Mac wanted him lynched before he died. Mac also went after Quin, but Quin wasn't a poll option.nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:01 amI must admit I am probably responsible for his demise since I think I convinced cbob to change (unless he and luna were teammates and he would have changed at the last minute anyway but I'm kind of doubting that scenario rn). I feel bad but sloonei looked like shit and he did fuck-all on the curse day when the rest of us were still trying to communicate when possible. I probably should have stuck to my guns on Luna but I keep coming back to worrying that the claim was real.
Quin's final post, made just after his death, accidentally. Still relevant to look at I think. What does it say about speedchuck, and nutella? I'm a little tired of analysis.Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:35 pmthanknutella wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:13 pmOK but I already called this out and he replied saying that he doesn't make shit up regardless of alignment and you know as well as I that that is true. If you're going to call out Quin this is not the way to do it.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:11 pmThis is like multiple tiers of crap. You don't get to claim GenuQuin. It's a title given to you.Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:52 pmbitch im GenuQuin how dare youMacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:51 pm Quin is literally talking absolute shit. Like how can you read the words he wrote and think they are anything but falsified opinions. He is as scum as I am Strayan.
I laughed aloud at this. Spot-on hilarious and witty. This concludes my Quin post.Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:36 pmquindeed.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:35 pmNow you're quindead.Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:33 pmi am always genuquin. you're thinking of the quindar.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:11 pmThis is like multiple tiers of crap. You don't get to claim GenuQuin. It's a title given to you.Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:52 pmbitch im GenuQuin how dare youMacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:51 pm Quin is literally talking absolute shit. Like how can you read the words he wrote and think they are anything but falsified opinions. He is as scum as I am Strayan.
You’re finessing your way out of the question but I got my eyes on you buddy.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:57 pmWhen I said "Mac was killed for this post", it meant "mac was killed for his suspicions and for being on the right trail, here's a list of the suspicions"ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:51 pm Speed, which is it: only one of the three were scum, or Mac named more than one? You use that post initially to say “Look at these people.” You are not saying that in the post above.
I did NOT say "hurr durr looks like Mac picked out the entire scumteam better lynch 'em all."
I was vindicated in that one of Mac's targets was scum. That's why he was killed. Nightkill analysis has been verified, and now I get to pursue the people who were shaming me for scumhunting.
Nightkill analysis used to be my JAM on the Cpi forum.
Clearly you don't understand nightkill analysis. If you and nutella seriously thought I was saying "this is the whole scumteam, got 'em" then I guess you're vindicated in thinking it was fake.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:59 pmYou’re finessing your way out of the question but I got my eyes on you buddy.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:57 pmWhen I said "Mac was killed for this post", it meant "mac was killed for his suspicions and for being on the right trail, here's a list of the suspicions"ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:51 pm Speed, which is it: only one of the three were scum, or Mac named more than one? You use that post initially to say “Look at these people.” You are not saying that in the post above.
I did NOT say "hurr durr looks like Mac picked out the entire scumteam better lynch 'em all."
I was vindicated in that one of Mac's targets was scum. That's why he was killed. Nightkill analysis has been verified, and now I get to pursue the people who were shaming me for scumhunting.
Nightkill analysis used to be my JAM on the Cpi forum.
I have seen it, under the assumption that Civs won't pick up on something too obvious like that. But I have also seen it as you say, "we want to kill him for being so right, but then we'll expose ourselves!"ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:58 pm I just don’t see a world where a scumteam composed of people who are supposedly good at Mafia see a guy list the entire team on D1 and thinks “Better kill him. In no way does this backfire if he and one of us dies”
What? I voted for you Day One before you role claimed (and I believe I was the first to do so), and had you not role claimed, would have voted for you day twoLunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:29 pmSVS just looks like she's jumping on an easy wagon that nutella started. I don't like it.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
[VOTE: S~V~S] aubergine
I think Mac's gut is good, and I value his opinion. But no, I don't think Mac getting killed says much about them after Quin's flip. If Mac was killed by being on the right track, we have no way of knowing whether it was 1, 2, or 3 scum being threatened by him.Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:01 pmI have seen it, under the assumption that Civs won't pick up on something too obvious like that. But I have also seen it as you say, "we want to kill him for being so right, but then we'll expose ourselves!"ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:58 pm I just don’t see a world where a scumteam composed of people who are supposedly good at Mafia see a guy list the entire team on D1 and thinks “Better kill him. In no way does this backfire if he and one of us dies”
Speedchuck, you think that Mac's other suspicions should have a strike against them automatically?
I understand nightkill analysis just fine: mostly a load of junk.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:00 pmClearly you don't understand nightkill analysis. If you and nutella seriously thought I was saying "this is the whole scumteam, got 'em" then I guess you're vindicated in thinking it was fake.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:59 pmYou’re finessing your way out of the question but I got my eyes on you buddy.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:57 pmWhen I said "Mac was killed for this post", it meant "mac was killed for his suspicions and for being on the right trail, here's a list of the suspicions"ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:51 pm Speed, which is it: only one of the three were scum, or Mac named more than one? You use that post initially to say “Look at these people.” You are not saying that in the post above.
I did NOT say "hurr durr looks like Mac picked out the entire scumteam better lynch 'em all."
I was vindicated in that one of Mac's targets was scum. That's why he was killed. Nightkill analysis has been verified, and now I get to pursue the people who were shaming me for scumhunting.
Nightkill analysis used to be my JAM on the Cpi forum.
On day 1, yes, where the hell have you been
Mac being on Quin in other posts is just further indication that nightkill analysis works. But regardless.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:07 pmI understand nightkill analysis just fine: mostly a load of junk. WRONGspeedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:00 pmClearly you don't understand nightkill analysis. If you and nutella seriously thought I was saying "this is the whole scumteam, got 'em" then I guess you're vindicated in thinking it was fake.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:59 pmYou’re finessing your way out of the question but I got my eyes on you buddy.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:57 pmWhen I said "Mac was killed for this post", it meant "mac was killed for his suspicions and for being on the right trail, here's a list of the suspicions"ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:51 pm Speed, which is it: only one of the three were scum, or Mac named more than one? You use that post initially to say “Look at these people.” You are not saying that in the post above.
I did NOT say "hurr durr looks like Mac picked out the entire scumteam better lynch 'em all."
I was vindicated in that one of Mac's targets was scum. That's why he was killed. Nightkill analysis has been verified, and now I get to pursue the people who were shaming me for scumhunting.
Nightkill analysis used to be my JAM on the Cpi forum.![]()
If you are scum, what I’m accusing you of is voicing opinions (look at these folks also named) too eagerly and now dialling it back in a manner that’s not contradictory but fishy imo. It’s exactly what a scum might do if a teammate were caught but innocents could be linked to them, and you can’t tell me otherwise.
Mac was on Quin in a ton of other posts. That one didn’t need isolation unless you wanted to push a focus for the lynch today. Whether that’s because you’re earnest or lying is yet to be seen.
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:14 pm Scumhunting techniques, ranked:
Compatibility matrix
Vote analysis
Deep ISO linkages
Infodump barrage
Voting the opposite from how you feel
Calling random posts “Wild.”
Asking my friend Tim who to lynch
Tarot card reading
Nightkill analysis
Wild.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:15 pmColinIsCool wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:14 pm Scumhunting techniques, ranked:
Compatibility matrix
Vote analysis
Deep ISO linkages
Infodump barrage
Voting the opposite from how you feel
Calling random posts “Wild.”
Asking my friend Tim who to lynch
Tarot card reading
Nightkill analysisGo ahead. Mock the proven-and-not-at-all-coincidental results in this game.
No, I'm not being forced to vote for you. You've been consistently trying to lynch me this whole game, and it doesn't look good. Do you have other suspects at all?S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:04 pmWhat? I voted for you Day One before you role claimed (and I believe I was the first to do so), and had you not role claimed, would have voted for you day twoLunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:29 pmSVS just looks like she's jumping on an easy wagon that nutella started. I don't like it.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
[VOTE: S~V~S] aubergine![]()
You have been the main suspect I have been talking about the entire game.
Are you claiming a forced vote?
Lmao this is literally contradictory to your previous accusation that she was just following me.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:18 pmNo, I'm not being forced to vote for you. You've been consistently trying to lynch me this whole game, and it doesn't look good. Do you have other suspects at all?S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:04 pmWhat? I voted for you Day One before you role claimed (and I believe I was the first to do so), and had you not role claimed, would have voted for you day twoLunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:29 pmSVS just looks like she's jumping on an easy wagon that nutella started. I don't like it.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:26 am@Lunalee
I am requoting this because I am interested in your answer to this, Luna. Voting you for now as this list looks incredibly damning to me in conjunction with your vote. I wish I had not voted Sloonei yesterday but that role claim yo.
[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
[VOTE: S~V~S] aubergine![]()
You have been the main suspect I have been talking about the entire game.
Are you claiming a forced vote?
1. SVS has been on my case this whole gamenutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:21 pm What about her trying to lynch you "doesn't look good" you are not making any sense bc you just made up that suspicion. If you had stuck to your guns on it, or even admitted you were wrong that she was just following me, I may have thought your suspicion of svs looked genuine. But no you just say some contradictory bullshit.
I doubt it. It said he was "assassinated" which makes me think it was a vig and the mafia kill was blocked or protected.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:23 pm If Luna claimed baddie kill redirector, would that make her responsible for the quindead?
That's why I was confused, because I didn't re-direct to Quin.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:23 pm If Luna claimed baddie kill redirector, would that make her responsible for the quindead?
I.....what. She has no reason to want you lynched other than the multiple reasons she has stated and the additional reasons I provided? Wow she must just want you dead for no reason huh. Slam dunk right here.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:24 pm1. SVS has been on my case this whole gamenutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:21 pm What about her trying to lynch you "doesn't look good" you are not making any sense bc you just made up that suspicion. If you had stuck to your guns on it, or even admitted you were wrong that she was just following me, I may have thought your suspicion of svs looked genuine. But no you just say some contradictory bullshit.
2. Her newest reason for being on my case has to do with a post you made about me.
3. SVS is hoping on my train for no good reason other than: she want's me lynched, and you provided her a new reason for wanting me lynched.
And these are SVS's multiple reasons:nutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:26 pmI.....what. She has no reason to want you lynched other than the multiple reasons she has stated and the additional reasons I provided? Wow she must just want you dead for no reason huh. Slam dunk right here.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:24 pm1. SVS has been on my case this whole gamenutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:21 pm What about her trying to lynch you "doesn't look good" you are not making any sense bc you just made up that suspicion. If you had stuck to your guns on it, or even admitted you were wrong that she was just following me, I may have thought your suspicion of svs looked genuine. But no you just say some contradictory bullshit.
2. Her newest reason for being on my case has to do with a post you made about me.
3. SVS is hoping on my train for no good reason other than: she want's me lynched, and you provided her a new reason for wanting me lynched.