Unless I am being severely outplayed I don't think, Hugh and Burns are ever W/W here given their interactions. For them to be W/W, both of them would have to have fooled me individually, and then decided to engage in a completely unecessary bus complete with 500 page novellas scrutinizing the other's ISO. I don't think that's likely at all.
The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
Moderator: Community Team
- Julinook
- Hydra Account
- Posts in topic: 193
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:55 pm
- Location: The ethereal plane
- Aka: Juliets + Nanook
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
- Julinook
- Hydra Account
- Posts in topic: 193
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:55 pm
- Location: The ethereal plane
- Aka: Juliets + Nanook
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I was consciously looking for something on you/Lisa lol. She's my top suspect, you're one of my townreads, and I want to know your thoughts. You had a good read on Homer and I suspect you are correct on Bart and Otto as well (since I townread both currently), and if you have a strong opinion on Lisa I want to hear it.Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:03 pmAgain, briefly skimmed through D2, I’ll probably do multi-isos so I know where I’m at.Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:59 pm @Marge Simpson Where are you at apart from your scumread on Burns? I'd specifically like your take on Lisa, since I don't think you've mentioned her much/at all and she's my top suspect for today. You named Bart and Otto as two people you trusted alongside Homer - have those reads changed at all and/or have you added anyone to your towncore?
I don’t think I have any reasons to doubt Bart and Otto here.
Also, not sure if you were subconsciously looking for something on me / Lisa, but I actually haven’t talked about anyone outside of my town core + Burns and Gramps for a bit.
I’m gonna attempt to do a few reads in a few mins, gonna read Lisa, Krusty, Grumple or the green creature whatever their name is.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
sure, I’ll take a dive in her ISO within the next few hours
- Julinook
- Hydra Account
- Posts in topic: 193
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:55 pm
- Location: The ethereal plane
- Aka: Juliets + Nanook
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I've been rolling around Marge's theory that Burns is Tim. I think it fits? At least the aggressive stance, the threats and pressure against people trying to roll on by him, and the general confidence/towniness in his tone all match up with what I've seen from Tim. I've never played with scum Tim but I expect he has a good scum game based on what I've heard from others. If Burns is Tim, then I will say that I think it's a slight towntell (or at least very firmly within his townrange) for him to cast doubt on the Homer/Marge meta reading Bart thing - I remember he did something very similar in Mafia and Werewolves, and again in Radiohead. He was wrong both times though 
But I don't want to go too far in meta reading Burns like that if he turns out to be not-Tim. I have my suspicions on a couple of other players' identities as well but I'll probably keep them to myself until I have a read to share based on meta.

But I don't want to go too far in meta reading Burns like that if he turns out to be not-Tim. I have my suspicions on a couple of other players' identities as well but I'll probably keep them to myself until I have a read to share based on meta.
- My Shell
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 252
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:23 am
- Location: East Europe
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I think it is absolutely hysterical how mesmerized people are by a single post that can really just be taken at face value.
Allison and Otto did get serious early. I wanted to make a note of it because I remember things better if I write them than if if I just think them, and I expected that to be important...somehow. I legit didn't know HOW it would be important and openly said so...again as much for myself as anything.
Later, when I had more to work with on them I opted more for "sheep" than "suss." I think that was obvious.
Hugh, I cannot tell you what an honor it is being the subject of such a massive project. I am extremely pleased at how many of my posts made you laugh.
One clarification for the record, I did create a MrBurns account, because I had no clue what "sock puppets" meant. That account got dumped and an actual sock puppet account got created...Mr. Burns with a period and a space. Sloonei is apparently a stickler for punctuation, and I wasn't mad at him, I was just in a massively foul humor at my cable company and they had made EVERYTHING ten times harder, including getting that sorted out.
I did read the whole wall, but going back to look for specific questions is too much for a busy man with a nuclear power plant to mismanage, so if you have specific questions you want answered pull them out.
Allison and Otto did get serious early. I wanted to make a note of it because I remember things better if I write them than if if I just think them, and I expected that to be important...somehow. I legit didn't know HOW it would be important and openly said so...again as much for myself as anything.
Later, when I had more to work with on them I opted more for "sheep" than "suss." I think that was obvious.
Hugh, I cannot tell you what an honor it is being the subject of such a massive project. I am extremely pleased at how many of my posts made you laugh.
One clarification for the record, I did create a MrBurns account, because I had no clue what "sock puppets" meant. That account got dumped and an actual sock puppet account got created...Mr. Burns with a period and a space. Sloonei is apparently a stickler for punctuation, and I wasn't mad at him, I was just in a massively foul humor at my cable company and they had made EVERYTHING ten times harder, including getting that sorted out.
I did read the whole wall, but going back to look for specific questions is too much for a busy man with a nuclear power plant to mismanage, so if you have specific questions you want answered pull them out.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Lisa's ISO came back with a thin villager lean based on tone and reactions when pushed.
if you're looking for thoughts on anything specific then I guess I can look into that.
^ That's also a pretty townie post, shows she's thinking about the game.Lisa Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:52 pmHe seems to know what a player salad is but doesn't know what TR means. Just seems odd to me. I don't know why one would fake it though but just putting this down since i noticed alot of his posts D2 are just asking about terminology.Lisa Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:47 pm Is it me or does it feel like Grumple fell down a flight of stairs in the middle of D1
if you're looking for thoughts on anything specific then I guess I can look into that.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
but either way, you're not really attacking the point I'm making
i'm not singling you out for a single thought, I'm saying that your thought, which seemed to be presenting a level of skepticism towards the both of them didn't really translate into your posts when defending yourself against Otto.
You didn't bite back or anything, you were kinda just "you're so good at the game and your reads are sooo good mate (sarcastically)" but as a villager I'd expect you to have a lot more bite and also some push back on Otto if you were ACTUALLY concerned they could've been wolfing.
whereas you just said it and didn't really actually think it based on your reaction (imo) as well as after they kinda stopped giving a shit about you, you town read the both of them without any sort of progression in between.
i'm not singling you out for a single thought, I'm saying that your thought, which seemed to be presenting a level of skepticism towards the both of them didn't really translate into your posts when defending yourself against Otto.
You didn't bite back or anything, you were kinda just "you're so good at the game and your reads are sooo good mate (sarcastically)" but as a villager I'd expect you to have a lot more bite and also some push back on Otto if you were ACTUALLY concerned they could've been wolfing.
whereas you just said it and didn't really actually think it based on your reaction (imo) as well as after they kinda stopped giving a shit about you, you town read the both of them without any sort of progression in between.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
tl ; dr
I believe that you didn't actually think they could've been wolves, given that you immediately town cleared them after you stopped being pushed for no reason, and thus, that post was made up.
also, your reaction to Otto's attack on you doesn't really match any form of paranoia for Otto being a wolf pushing you there.
but I'm addressing this towards townies anyway, you are my wolf read and if you are actually a wolf, I won't convince you that you have a wolf role PM anyway.
I believe that you didn't actually think they could've been wolves, given that you immediately town cleared them after you stopped being pushed for no reason, and thus, that post was made up.
also, your reaction to Otto's attack on you doesn't really match any form of paranoia for Otto being a wolf pushing you there.
but I'm addressing this towards townies anyway, you are my wolf read and if you are actually a wolf, I won't convince you that you have a wolf role PM anyway.
- My Shell
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 252
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:23 am
- Location: East Europe
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
That's the point...I WAS NOT presenting any skepticism. Take it at face value as a pure "either this or that." Suss or sheep. Both equally valid at that point. Went on to investigate. Opted for sheep. Seems so simple and obvious to me that I genuinely don't follow how so many people read it differently...but I am clearly outnumbered so I accept that you all genuinely are reading it in this way.Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:31 pm which seemed to be presenting a level of skepticism towards the both of them
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Thanks for that. Given the game state I need to heavily question my town reads.Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:05 pmUnless I am being severely outplayed I don't think, Hugh and Burns are ever W/W here given their interactions. For them to be W/W, both of them would have to have fooled me individually, and then decided to engage in a completely unecessary bus complete with 500 page novellas scrutinizing the other's ISO. I don't think that's likely at all.
That said, the play style here is different than I'm used to and given the reoccurring theme that syndicate wolves take the game very seriously has me questioning those leading the narrative.
Now I still see a world where they're w/w. On my home site it's perfectly normal for wolves to spend considerable time tunneling eachother, bussing to create distance, appear to be scum hunting then reap the town cred when the other is lynched/vigged.
That style may not be common here, but it's pretty necessary for us because we're a small community, tops out at 20 players, so every single game is played with the same players. It's kinda like playoff hockey.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Grumple ISO is quite the toss-up
I don't really know what to make of it. I'll redo it again in the morning when I'm a lot less tired than I am rn.
I don't really know what to make of it. I'll redo it again in the morning when I'm a lot less tired than I am rn.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Spoiler: show
I think it's worth placing under scrutiny, given that now a lot of the slankers flipped town and Krusty had what amounted to no thoughts whatsoever on any lurker, let alone on an active being scum.
[mention]Krusty the Clown[/mention] can you elaborate on why that small thing pinged you so much? Like, Alison wasn't really pushing anyone specific here, she was just making a comment regarding the state of the thread and how she feels about it. She wasn't really pushing anyone specific.
Did you think a lot of the "slankers" were town, or why did this bother you so much?
Also, I asked you a question that you didn't reply to, so please do it this time.
Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:29 pmwhat out of that post suggested that he did that?Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:13 pm why do you seem eager to put a player in a scum pile simply cuz' you feel their reads are bad?
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
also talk about this when you can, how did the read develop from what you perceived as potential TMI to a town read?
- NurseWilgy
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 155
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Bear in mind that Otto's doubts about me literally just surfaced after I called him a potential deepwolf.Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:56 pmI gave some thoughts on him earlier. I think his entrance into D3 was pretty townie. I think him wailing on Skinner is not as scummy as some have made it out to be - eg. Burns is doing the same, and it's not like wolf Krusty gets anywhere trying to push a Skinner misexe. I liked his posts D1 and D2 - generally, his tone has been good and his reads have been thoughtful. If he has an agenda I don't see it. The one thing that gives me pause about him is Otto starting to have serious doubts about him - Otto knows him from offsite and they have enough history together to give confident meta takes on each other. But if we set the Otto stuff aside, I think Krusty has actually been pretty town.
Spoiler: show
- NurseWilgy
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 155
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Her reaction to my TMI accusation I felt was towny, and just a general feel for how she's been reading the game. I'm sussing her now because of her "oops" post, I was a tad cranky coming into this RD, and I'm looking at scum hiding in the vocal town core.Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:14 pmalso talk about this when you can, how did the read develop from what you perceived as potential TMI to a town read?
Spoiler: show
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
can you reply to the first one too?
- Boringboi666
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 168
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:03 am
- Location: next to some ranch
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers/herself
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
workposting
do any of you guys keep a spreadsheet of voting order that includes initial votes; not just final placement?
do any of you guys keep a spreadsheet of voting order that includes initial votes; not just final placement?
- NurseWilgy
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 155
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
I think pushing slankers in the early RD's is an easy way to mislynch. Pretty sure I've already said this.Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:09 pmA thing I've noticed in Krusty's ISO was this, which obviously looks bad in retrospect.Spoiler: show
I think it's worth placing under scrutiny, given that now a lot of the slankers flipped town and Krusty had what amounted to no thoughts whatsoever on any lurker, let alone on an active being scum.
@Krusty the Clown can you elaborate on why that small thing pinged you so much? Like, Alison wasn't really pushing anyone specific here, she was just making a comment regarding the state of the thread and how she feels about it. She wasn't really pushing anyone specific.
Did you think a lot of the "slankers" were town, or why did this bother you so much?
Also, I asked you a question that you didn't reply to, so please do it this time.
Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:29 pmwhat out of that post suggested that he did that?Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:13 pm why do you seem eager to put a player in a scum pile simply cuz' you feel their reads are bad?
The tone of his post felt like he's was trying to shade you over the quality of your reads.
Spoiler: show
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Proove it. ThanksHugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:21 amThat's not a socialising post, it's a response to 935 wanting to hear where Burn's head is at and his though. I don't care about the Homer kill, see post 946.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:13 am But Hugh was there to socialise, not to find who killed Homer
[VOTE: @HUGH JASS ] aubergine
I'm town, move along. Thanks.
They look cool in red though

- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
idk I'm inclined to say Krusty is a town if I ignore those few concern bullets
i'll rock with it
sup michelle, what are your thoughts on burns
i'll rock with it
sup michelle, what are your thoughts on burns
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
simpsons
Bart Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
probably simpson
Lisa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
whoever is against simpsons
Mr Burns
to look at :
Alison, Grumple, Gramps, Hugh Jass
Bart Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
probably simpson
Lisa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
whoever is against simpsons
Mr Burns
to look at :
Alison, Grumple, Gramps, Hugh Jass
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
caveat is that I feel more confident in Bart than I do Otto
I have otto there because I thought his D1 was very good but I supposed I should check that one out too at some point
I have otto there because I thought his D1 was very good but I supposed I should check that one out too at some point
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
sorry
Bart, what do you think of Mr Burns?
Bart, what do you think of Mr Burns?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Is bad i don't understand the Tim read?Mr. Burns wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:29 pmYou vote for me two days in a row...now you call me Tim and don't vote for me.Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:39 am I kinda wanna say Burns is just Tim?
If he ever inned the game.
Excelllent.
Smithers, follow this blue haired woman and keep reminding her that she thinks I am this mysterious person.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Lemme catch up mom and i'll tell you asap
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Huh I'm in a different world there, I wouldn't call what I saw thoughtful. I'll see where I end up after going over him in isolation. What's your PoE like?Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:56 pmI gave some thoughts on him earlier. I think his entrance into D3 was pretty townie. I think him wailing on Skinner is not as scummy as some have made it out to be - eg. Burns is doing the same, and it's not like wolf Krusty gets anywhere trying to push a Skinner misexe. I liked his posts D1 and D2 - generally, his tone has been good and his reads have been thoughtful. If he has an agenda I don't see it. The one thing that gives me pause about him is Otto starting to have serious doubts about him - Otto knows him from offsite and they have enough history together to give confident meta takes on each other. But if we set the Otto stuff aside, I think Krusty has actually been pretty town.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I will read thise posts Hugh made about Burns after a while, the lack of conclusion confuses me.
I noticed glossing over the wall i refused the soda but i took the cigars, damn these vices and i don't even smoke
Please not a 0 poster again....Marge Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:44 pm Is there some TL;DR to that?
Anyway, I am glad to vote for burns here, as I did last time
Or we could just go for, idk, a 0-poster again
I noticed glossing over the wall i refused the soda but i took the cigars, damn these vices and i don't even smoke

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
It was a fun read. There weren't really questions where I'm looking at answers, mostly voiced out theories and rhetorical stuff. And yeah I figured something was going on since I remember seeing it in the sign up.Mr. Burns wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:16 pm I think it is absolutely hysterical how mesmerized people are by a single post that can really just be taken at face value.
Allison and Otto did get serious early. I wanted to make a note of it because I remember things better if I write them than if if I just think them, and I expected that to be important...somehow. I legit didn't know HOW it would be important and openly said so...again as much for myself as anything.
Later, when I had more to work with on them I opted more for "sheep" than "suss." I think that was obvious.
Hugh, I cannot tell you what an honor it is being the subject of such a massive project. I am extremely pleased at how many of my posts made you laugh.
One clarification for the record, I did create a MrBurns account, because I had no clue what "sock puppets" meant. That account got dumped and an actual sock puppet account got created...Mr. Burns with a period and a space. Sloonei is apparently a stickler for punctuation, and I wasn't mad at him, I was just in a massively foul humor at my cable company and they had made EVERYTHING ten times harder, including getting that sorted out.
I did read the whole wall, but going back to look for specific questions is too much for a busy man with a nuclear power plant to mismanage, so if you have specific questions you want answered pull them out.
Who are you looking at not named Lisa?
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Searching aubergine in the thread is the closest thing to it. Sometimes people don't call votes in the thread or don't use he vote function so those won't show up.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:37 pm workposting
do any of you guys keep a spreadsheet of voting order that includes initial votes; not just final placement?
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I'm doing just that.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
No, i have just a midday VC saved because as anon game the final VC is not enough.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:37 pm workposting
do any of you guys keep a spreadsheet of voting order that includes initial votes; not just final placement?
Not everyone uses the voting button when they vote on the poll

- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
More accurate is to search aubergine in the browser's search, but you have to do this for every page and at the final count there will be some votes that will not be there.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:06 pmSearching aubergine in the thread is the closest thing to it. Sometimes people don't call votes in the thread or don't use he vote function so those won't show up.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:37 pm workposting
do any of you guys keep a spreadsheet of voting order that includes initial votes; not just final placement?
I am all ears
- Boringboi666
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 168
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:03 am
- Location: next to some ranch
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers/herself
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:18 pmNo, i have just a midday VC saved because as anon game the final VC is not enough.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:37 pm workposting
do any of you guys keep a spreadsheet of voting order that includes initial votes; not just final placement?
Not everyone uses the voting button when they vote on the poll![]()
boo. but okay.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:18 pmNo, i have just a midday VC saved because as anon game the final VC is not enough.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:37 pm workposting
do any of you guys keep a spreadsheet of voting order that includes initial votes; not just final placement?
Not everyone uses the voting button when they vote on the poll![]()
something I've been thinking about is the late phase push on CBG that broke the tie. were there any voters other than Homer that were part of that? this is more of a note for myself to look into this later than anything
- My Shell
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 252
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:23 am
- Location: East Europe
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Everybody? Generally the only thing I accept as really clearing is spiking a wolf...so in this clownfest (no offense Krusty) I have no serious clears.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:04 pmIt was a fun read. There weren't really questions where I'm looking at answers, mostly voiced out theories and rhetorical stuff. And yeah I figured something was going on since I remember seeing it in the sign up.Mr. Burns wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:16 pm I think it is absolutely hysterical how mesmerized people are by a single post that can really just be taken at face value.
Allison and Otto did get serious early. I wanted to make a note of it because I remember things better if I write them than if if I just think them, and I expected that to be important...somehow. I legit didn't know HOW it would be important and openly said so...again as much for myself as anything.
Later, when I had more to work with on them I opted more for "sheep" than "suss." I think that was obvious.
Hugh, I cannot tell you what an honor it is being the subject of such a massive project. I am extremely pleased at how many of my posts made you laugh.
One clarification for the record, I did create a MrBurns account, because I had no clue what "sock puppets" meant. That account got dumped and an actual sock puppet account got created...Mr. Burns with a period and a space. Sloonei is apparently a stickler for punctuation, and I wasn't mad at him, I was just in a massively foul humor at my cable company and they had made EVERYTHING ten times harder, including getting that sorted out.
I did read the whole wall, but going back to look for specific questions is too much for a busy man with a nuclear power plant to mismanage, so if you have specific questions you want answered pull them out.
Who are you looking at not named Lisa?
I'm not pleased with Marge. I'm an easy suss and an easy vote. I'm a notoriously hard push. Coming in and dropping an easy to explain vote on me, but not really getting in the back and forth of a push is what people who know me do as wolves. But this wasn't a case of someone who knows me. At the same time, even not knowing me, why does she mark me as top suspect for now a third straight day and NEVER really engage on it? Suss as hell, really.
I'm a little sketchy on Grumpus. I have liked a good bit of his stuff, but on some level that's a problem. Given the piles of total awkwardness and the questions about "up to date" language and all that the times where he comes off smooth are like...too smooth? As in maybe the whole "out of touch haven't played in a long time" is a cover adopted for a sock puppet game and that smoothness showing through is a real player that wants to be underestimated. I dunno.
And even though I know it's wrong I would have had to admit I wanted to kill Skinner if it weren't for that recent brain surgery.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I was around, Otto switch from Lisa to CBG which broke the tie and made it 5 3. Homer made it 6 (might have voted for Lisa first before switching, kind of remember that not sure). Then you voted for Lisa.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:40 pm boo. but okay.
something I've been thinking about is the late phase push on CBG that broke the tie. were there any voters other than Homer that were part of that? this is more of a note for myself to look into this later than anything
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Read my posts. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:26 pm
Game related this time jk, writing is good enough
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I was about to go through my ISO and quote all my posts as a response lol
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Hugh, I am bothered by the effort you made with lack of conclusion on Burns.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
bart can you state your thoughts on burns now
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Why? The point of it is writing my thoughts on a posts by posts basis, there is no conclusion based simply on it since it's only his D1 and I'm still in the process of reading him and engaging him. He's still in my PoE, and if you want a conclusion of that specific part on him it's in the meat of the post.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:33 pm Hugh, I am bothered by the effort you made with lack of conclusion on Burns.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
GTH villager, but is a moment when i can't focus.
I will Iso him in few hours and @ you with an educated guess.
- My Shell
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 252
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:23 am
- Location: East Europe
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I should be too, but I'm not.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:33 pm Hugh, I am bothered by the effort you made with lack of conclusion on Burns.
I think we are all suffering from the same problem.
Day one "well, tone read...I feel like...this post is whatever...just gut" sure. On day one we all do that. By the third day anyone who has played hard and active, when you go through their ISO there is gonna be some good tome and some bad tone, some super towny posts and some just gut wrenching wolfy stuff...and all your gut is gonna come away with is queasy. I feel like if I had ONE solid piece of information outside my own role card it all might click together, but the flips are not only all town, they are town I just don't get anything from.
So Otto was the shifting vote that put CBG over the line...so what? CBG wasn't like a terrible chop that throws shade on everyone who voted there, first, last, or in between. He practically said "sure, chop me." The EoD shitshow day one is no more illuminating.
So, yeah, conclusions are hard to come by. I get it. And I get that we have to make stands so when we do have a red flip we can use it to turn this titanic around. So I made mine...Lisa, Marge, Grumple and if I don't get a hit...good game wolves.
Not that I won't be reassessing, but shit I gotta have a starting point.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
sure thingBart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:48 pmGTH villager, but is a moment when i can't focus.
I will Iso him in few hours and @ you with an educated guess.
lmk about your thoughts on my small case and if you feel it
do a multi-quote of him if you can, please
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Why do you feel the need to take all his posts and analyze them, looks like an unnecessary work.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:46 pmWhy? The point of it is writing my thoughts on a posts by posts basis, there is no conclusion based simply on it since it's only his D1 and I'm still in the process of reading him and engaging him. He's still in my PoE, and if you want a conclusion of that specific part on him it's in the meat of the post.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:33 pm Hugh, I am bothered by the effort you made with lack of conclusion on Burns.
- Marge Simpson
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 139
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 8:11 pm