The Syndicate

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:I have a technical question, and I'm afraid if I ask it, it will maybe clue people to my role/alignment. And I can't ask it in the other game either. Is there someone who I could ask that is not playing either game?

I am the mod, so you could PM me your question, but if you feel like you can't because I am in the other game, I would suggest asking DFaraday.

Lol, I can't contact anyone

Are you having trouble with the Private Message function?

FZ. wrote:Never mind, I think I figured it out. Thanks llama

Oh, okay. Good job!

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:I have a technical question, and I'm afraid if I ask it, it will maybe clue people to my role/alignment. And I can't ask it in the other game either. Is there someone who I could ask that is not playing either game?

I am the mod, so you could PM me your question, but if you feel like you can't because I am in the other game, I would suggest asking DFaraday.

Lol, I can't contact anyone

Are you having trouble with the Private Message function?

Apparently, I am now. Why is the message I sent stuck in the outbox and not in the sent folder

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:I have a technical question, and I'm afraid if I ask it, it will maybe clue people to my role/alignment. And I can't ask it in the other game either. Is there someone who I could ask that is not playing either game?

I am the mod, so you could PM me your question, but if you feel like you can't because I am in the other game, I would suggest asking DFaraday.

Lol, I can't contact anyone

Are you having trouble with the Private Message function?

Apparently, I am now. Why is the message I sent stuck in the outbox and not in the sent folder

That just means the person hasn't read it yet. You can still delete it if you decide you don't want them to see it. When they open it, it will be moved to your sent folder.

Ah nuts, I had a feeling Mongoose might've been a civvie that's why I never felt comfortable voting her. I'm concerned more with MR and Mata now though in light of her lynch.

thellama73 wrote:That just means the person hasn't read it yet. You can still delete it if you decide you don't want them to see it. When they open it, it will be moved to your sent folder.

Ohhhhhhh, thanks

holy shit that was a huge catch up. i had an incredibly busy end of the week, and just didn't read for a while. i'm sorry guys.

Sorsha wrote:

Dom wrote:I think I'll probably vote Epig.

Can you please eloborate?


Nice post on bullz, Epi.

Epig is probably bad.
He has backpedaled on his Mongoose suspicion so hard. He dropped his K4J suspicion. Civvie epig doesn't do this. He is throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. His pasta isn't ready yet, I see, though, because you are peeling everything off for him.

Epignosis wrote:I'll let others talk- I've said plenty.

orly?

Summer wrote:

Summer wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

Summer wrote:

Loulou26 wrote:I'm just gonna vote for MR. I don't feel confident enough to vote for Mongoose and the people bandwaggoning on that concern me. But MR's posts tonight didn't sit well with me.

I agree. If nothing changes, I will vote for him, too. I didn't like how ready with the defense he was over his vote for K4J. I haven't seen anything I find really suspicious about Mongoose, so I disagree with the votes on her and if I remember correctly, MR was in that little nest somewhere, too. I saw a conversation between you and Turnip Head that shed some light on that.

ohhai (kneel4justice) kinda suspects MR

I'm going to be straight up and say I don't know why he voted for you, I haven't found the reason he voted for, not even gonna pretend like I can make a logical analysis on why he voted for you because I don't know, haven't read it, but I did not like how he seemed to be expecting and ready for someone to find it suspicious. That felt like prime scum. Could he still be suspicious if he took the time to explain it to Lou why he was voting her? Well, yes, because maybe then it might look like he was trying to win her over, but he just assumed she was finding him suspicious. MAJOR RED FLAG. I also remember his interaction with Mongoose and what I read between Turnip Head and Lou about the part he played in that so that has me suspicious, too. But before I vote, I want to see his reaction to this.

EBWOP: ...why he was voting to her?

is this a phrase used on KSITE, and if not, where did you learn this phrase?


SVS is also probably bad... she's way too agreeable with Epig of rmy liking.

Loulou26 wrote:I'm concerned more with MR and Mata now though in light of her lynch.

What? Did you read the part where i called him rude, lol? Epi & I can tend to react poorly to each others style. After i called him names this was brought to my attention by, um, a moderating party, lets say. So he & i both are tip toeing a bit. Not totally sure if i should even be discussing this tbh, but since I am being called out for being nice to Epi, I feel i kinda have to.

i think Epi is not bad, actually.

That was @Dom

FZ. wrote: I people seem to trust SVS, and I haven't read anything she said since I left, but her post when she voted for Mongoose felt really scummy to me. I'm too lazy to go find it, but maybe I should...

I also found her suspicious for the way she acted around the topic of Mongoose.

@Dom, interesting what you're saying about Epig. People are steady telling me that he is just being himself! SMH. What is the truth?! BTW- you are killing me with this "probably bad" stuff.

I see I am not alone in my suspicions, and I don't know how to take this. Are people latching onto the easier things, or are we on the right path? Hm.

Dom wrote:holy shit that was a huge catch up. i had an incredibly busy end of the week, and just didn't read for a while. i'm sorry guys.

Sorsha wrote:

Dom wrote:I think I'll probably vote Epig.

Can you please eloborate?


Nice post on bullz, Epi.

Epig is probably bad.
He has backpedaled on his Mongoose suspicion so hard. He dropped his K4J suspicion. Civvie epig doesn't do this. He is throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. His pasta isn't ready yet, I see, though, because you are peeling everything off for him.

The longer you cook pasta, the gummier it gets. If you throw pasta at the wall and it sticks, it's probably overcooked, not undercooked.

Dom wrote:SVS is also probably bad... she's way too agreeable with Epig of rmy liking.

By this point, I'm thinking the word "probably" probably doesn't mean what you think it means.

As of this moment, there is a 32% chance that I am on one of the two bad teams. There's a 10% chance that both S~V~S and I are on one of the two bad teams. There's a 3% chance we're both on The Arrogant Heels team. There's a 2% chance we're both on The Corporation team.

Even if I've failed at math here, all of these scenarios are decidedly improbable.

Mister Rearranger wrote:What about those of us who eat our pasta raw, deriving satisfaction from the audible "crunch" it makes as it breaks between our teeth?

The only thing that sticks to is the nooks and crannies of your teeth.

kneel4justice wrote:

Matahari wrote: I am not suspicious of mongoose because of the mistake or her otw view on lynching baddies. But I do think she might have too many irons in the fire (as in juggling games and chat rooms). I am trusting SVS right now, she seems her civvie self, (I know ppl hate it when their styles get compared, but it's all I have to look at this early) and I don't see a reason right now to mistrust Epig.

If mongoose is bad, then there may be some leads to teammates, so there's that.

Can you explain this "irons in the fire" comment. Was that saying you were suspicious or not, and why? I'm not seeing a definite opinion, but more of a playing both sides.
Also why did you mention leads to teammates but not go any further as to discuss who may have been her teammates.
too many irons in the fire was referring to the feeling I had that mongoose may have been in a chat room as well as two games. The aftermath of the mis-post struck me as a baddie who was afraid she had slipped. I didn't name who might have been her teammates (although I was looking at APerson, Devin, and possibly Boomslang) for a number of reasons, the main one being: one suspect at a time. If I named the others all at once, there might be another free-for-all in the thread, and then the original case gets lost in the shuffle.

Matahari wrote:MP, when I said 'where have you gone' I didn't mean you weren't around much. I meant 'where is the more forceful MP' that I remember. But svs brought up a good point, when she mentioned the lost game. you were a civ there so, feel free to overlook my first impressions. I often do

I noticed that you do a lot of dismissing of your own first impressions and I have to wonder why. It feels like you want to cover yourself in case evidence comes out which later disproves your opinions. It's like an excuse before an excuse is even necessary.
because I have impressions early on, doesn't mean they are always right. (See mongoose lynch)

Matahari wrote:Mongoose's last couple of posts sound like she might be sincere. But I still think somethings have happened that cant be ignored. I'm going to vote mongoose because I don't have any susps that are stronger cases yet. If mongoose is good, then I think there's a rezzer in the game who can fix it.

I have some people to respond to, but I'll have to wait until tonight when I have more time.

Seriously, I do not follow what caused you to vote.

i followed a ping. I could have randomized or self voted because of not being 100% sure but I could do that half the game. I'm rarely 100% sure, so sometimes, I have to just go on gut. It's not always right unfortunately

Epignosis wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:What about those of us who eat our pasta raw, deriving satisfaction from the audible "crunch" it makes as it breaks between our teeth?

The only thing that sticks to is the nooks and crannies of your teeth.

NOT EVERY NOOK AND CRANNY, EPIG!

Matahari wrote:too many irons in the fire was referring to the feeling I had that mongoose may have been in a chat room as well as two games. The aftermath of the mis-post struck me as a baddie who was afraid she had slipped. I didn't name who might have been her teammates (although I was looking at APerson, Devin, and possibly Boomslang) for a number of reasons, the main one being: one suspect at a time. If I named the others all at once, there might be another free-for-all in the thread, and then the original case gets lost in the shuffle.

But...you were bringing up a lot of suspects. Here:

Matahari wrote:Ok caught up. I'm going to give a few impressions because that's all I ever have this early. There isn't a lot of history to draw facts and figures off of yet.

MP, where have you gone? This new MP has me wondering. He is very agreeable, and too flexible. I am aware he has been lynched early a lot lately, so maybe his posts are blendy-bendy because he doesn't want to get killed early again, but it's making me feel antsy.

I mentioned earlier that my first impressions on MR and Dom were not great first impressions. I am still watching them, but first impressions often change, so.... just watching.

I am not suspicious of mongoose because of the mistake or her otw view on lynching baddies. But I do think she might have too many irons in the fire (as in juggling games and chat rooms). I am trusting SVS right now, she seems her civvie self, (I know ppl hate it when their styles get compared, but it's all I have to look at this early) and I don't see a reason right now to mistrust Epig.

If mongoose is bad, then there may be some leads to teammates, so there's that.

Anyhow, that's where my head is for now.

and this one: http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 869#p44869

How is the above different from "naming others all at once"?

DFaraday wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:What about those of us who eat our pasta raw, deriving satisfaction from the audible "crunch" it makes as it breaks between our teeth?

The only thing that sticks to is the nooks and crannies of your teeth.

NOT EVERY NOOK AND CRANNY, EPIG!

Innuendo

S~V~S wrote:What? Did you read the part where i called him rude, lol? Epi & I can tend to react poorly to each others style. After i called him names this was brought to my attention by, um, a moderating party, lets say. So he & i both are tip toeing a bit. Not totally sure if i should even be discussing this tbh, but since I am being called out for being nice to Epi, I feel i kinda have to.

i think Epi is not bad, actually.

I didn't mean "nice". Sorry for the confusion. I mean that you seem to just agree with whatever suspicion he brings up. That's how I'm reading you. Far too agreeing with his thoughts. I have noticed you two have butted heads, but I think you don't want him to think you are bad so much you are mirroring a lot of his suspicions.

Epignosis wrote:

Dom wrote:holy shit that was a huge catch up. i had an incredibly busy end of the week, and just didn't read for a while. i'm sorry guys.

Sorsha wrote:

Dom wrote:I think I'll probably vote Epig.

Can you please eloborate?


Nice post on bullz, Epi.

Epig is probably bad.
He has backpedaled on his Mongoose suspicion so hard. He dropped his K4J suspicion. Civvie epig doesn't do this. He is throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. His pasta isn't ready yet, I see, though, because you are peeling everything off for him.

The longer you cook pasta, the gummier it gets. If you throw pasta at the wall and it sticks, it's probably overcooked, not undercooked.

Dom wrote:SVS is also probably bad... she's way too agreeable with Epig of rmy liking.

By this point, I'm thinking the word "probably" probably doesn't mean what you think it means.

As of this moment, there is a 32% chance that I am on one of the two bad teams. There's a 10% chance that both S~V~S and I are on one of the two bad teams. There's a 3% chance we're both on The Arrogant Heels team. There's a 2% chance we're both on The Corporation team.

Even if I've failed at math here, all of these scenarios are decidedly improbable.

So, instead of actually discussing what I said about you, you explain to me my incorrect preconceptions of cooking pasta (something I have only done once) and epically fail at math (something I am very passionate about) because I never said I think you two are on the same team.

Oh how dismissive, Epig. Not your normal, "look at the contradiction" Epig, though.

Mister Rearranger wrote:

Matahari wrote:too many irons in the fire was referring to the feeling I had that mongoose may have been in a chat room as well as two games. The aftermath of the mis-post struck me as a baddie who was afraid she had slipped. I didn't name who might have been her teammates (although I was looking at APerson, Devin, and possibly Boomslang) for a number of reasons, the main one being: one suspect at a time. If I named the others all at once, there might be another free-for-all in the thread, and then the original case gets lost in the shuffle.

But...you were bringing up a lot of suspects. Here:

Matahari wrote:Ok caught up. I'm going to give a few impressions because that's all I ever have this early. There isn't a lot of history to draw facts and figures off of yet.

MP, where have you gone? This new MP has me wondering. He is very agreeable, and too flexible. I am aware he has been lynched early a lot lately, so maybe his posts are blendy-bendy because he doesn't want to get killed early again, but it's making me feel antsy.

I mentioned earlier that my first impressions on MR and Dom were not great first impressions. I am still watching them, but first impressions often change, so.... just watching.

I am not suspicious of mongoose because of the mistake or her otw view on lynching baddies. But I do think she might have too many irons in the fire (as in juggling games and chat rooms). I am trusting SVS right now, she seems her civvie self, (I know ppl hate it when their styles get compared, but it's all I have to look at this early) and I don't see a reason right now to mistrust Epig.

If mongoose is bad, then there may be some leads to teammates, so there's that.

Anyhow, that's where my head is for now.

and this one: http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 869#p44869

How is the above different from "naming others all at once"?

If I recall, you and MP both asked me to. I'll go back and find your post.

The second one does seem to have been prompted by MP.

The first quote was after your catch-up, the way it reads to me.

Mister Rearranger wrote:The second one does seem to have been prompted by MP.

The first quote was after your catch-up, the way it reads to me.

Oh I see. You said something to me in a post about not answering your question, then later I posted some off-topic, and you asked "is Mata OTified?" I took that as a snarky way of prodding me into sharing my game thoughts. (And don't get me wrong, I love snark! It's my kinda language)

Tell me, MR, have you gone back to look at the actual bandwagon hoppers yet?

Dom wrote:

S~V~S wrote:What? Did you read the part where i called him rude, lol? Epi & I can tend to react poorly to each others style. After i called him names this was brought to my attention by, um, a moderating party, lets say. So he & i both are tip toeing a bit. Not totally sure if i should even be discussing this tbh, but since I am being called out for being nice to Epi, I feel i kinda have to.

i think Epi is not bad, actually.

I didn't mean "nice". Sorry for the confusion. I mean that you seem to just agree with whatever suspicion he brings up. That's how I'm reading you. Far too agreeing with his thoughts. I have noticed you two have butted heads, but I think you don't want him to think you are bad so much you are mirroring a lot of his suspicions.

Epignosis wrote:

Dom wrote:holy shit that was a huge catch up. i had an incredibly busy end of the week, and just didn't read for a while. i'm sorry guys.

Sorsha wrote:

Dom wrote:I think I'll probably vote Epig.

Can you please eloborate?


Nice post on bullz, Epi.

Epig is probably bad.
He has backpedaled on his Mongoose suspicion so hard. He dropped his K4J suspicion. Civvie epig doesn't do this. He is throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. His pasta isn't ready yet, I see, though, because you are peeling everything off for him.

The longer you cook pasta, the gummier it gets. If you throw pasta at the wall and it sticks, it's probably overcooked, not undercooked.

Dom wrote:SVS is also probably bad... she's way too agreeable with Epig of rmy liking.

By this point, I'm thinking the word "probably" probably doesn't mean what you think it means.

As of this moment, there is a 32% chance that I am on one of the two bad teams. There's a 10% chance that both S~V~S and I are on one of the two bad teams. There's a 3% chance we're both on The Arrogant Heels team. There's a 2% chance we're both on The Corporation team.

Even if I've failed at math here, all of these scenarios are decidedly improbable.

So, instead of actually discussing what I said about you, you explain to me my incorrect preconceptions of cooking pasta (something I have only done once) and epically fail at math (something I am very passionate about) because I never said I think you two are on the same team.

Oh how dismissive, Epig. Not your normal, "look at the contradiction" Epig, though.

You know what's normal for me? Cool. I pull different shit all the time. Like spending an entire game posting in video game quotes.

No one will ever figure me out. I intend to keep it that way.

^Then you should be lynched early and often until you conform like the rest of us sheeple!

Matahari wrote: Oh I see. You said something to me in a post about not answering your question, then later I posted some off-topic, and you asked "is Mata OTified?" I took that as a snarky way of prodding me into sharing my game thoughts. (And don't get me wrong, I love snark! It's my kinda language)

I was totally thinking you were posting that random OT message on purpose, which confused the hell out of me, haha.

I did pick out the people I want to analyze further from the Mongoose voters. They are listed in a previous post of mine. If you need further elaboration on any one of those names specifically, don't hesitate to ask.

But for those of you who prefer I "act like a civ" (whatever that means), I'll show that Dom is speaking from somewhere other than his mouth (or fingertips). Observe:

1. "Epig is probably bad."

Again, the use of the term "probably" is unwarranted.

2. "He has backpedaled on his Mongoose suspicion so hard."

Would anyone like to confirm this? I'm pretty sure I stuck by my Mongoose suspicion. By, you know, actually voting for her. After I had considered several angles for quite some time, asking for clarification, and listening to what others had to say.

3. "He dropped his K4J suspicion."

Dropped it? Show me where. I challenge you.

4. "Civvie epig doesn't do this."

Dom has hosted me once. I was Night killed first. I'm not sure what makes him an authority on my "civvie" game, a claim that is even more astonishing...since I don't have a "civvie" game.

5. "He is throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. His pasta isn't ready yet, I see, though, because you are peeling everything off for him."

If you throw pasta to the wall and it sticks, then you have probably...

Sorry, I already told you this. Good luck with your linguine, Felix.

Mister Rearranger wrote:^Then you should be lynched early and often until you conform like the rest of us sheeple!

Matahari wrote: Oh I see. You said something to me in a post about not answering your question, then later I posted some off-topic, and you asked "is Mata OTified?" I took that as a snarky way of prodding me into sharing my game thoughts. (And don't get me wrong, I love snark! It's my kinda language)

I was totally thinking you were posting that random OT message on purpose, which confused the hell out of me, haha.

I did pick out the people I want to analyze further from the Mongoose voters. They are listed in a previous post of mine. If you need further elaboration on any one of those names specifically, don't hesitate to ask.

sorry it wasn't you I should have asked. It was Turnip who said that he hadn't had time to look at the hoppers.

So, I'll try again. TH have you looked yet at the people who voted mongoose without any reasoning behind it?

Dom wrote:

S~V~S wrote:What? Did you read the part where i called him rude, lol? Epi & I can tend to react poorly to each others style. After i called him names this was brought to my attention by, um, a moderating party, lets say. So he & i both are tip toeing a bit. Not totally sure if i should even be discussing this tbh, but since I am being called out for being nice to Epi, I feel i kinda have to.

i think Epi is not bad, actually.

I didn't mean "nice". Sorry for the confusion. I mean that you seem to just agree with whatever suspicion he brings up. That's how I'm reading you. Far too agreeing with his thoughts. I have noticed you two have butted heads, but I think you don't want him to think you are bad so much you are mirroring a lot of his suspicions.

Um I have agreed with one suspicion he has brought up, mongoose. And that was for reasons of my own. During one discussion, when I was trying to pin down an actual opinion from her, she kept trying to change the subject, and posting in OT and changing the topic. Excuse me for thinking someone, in a game with an LD, who keeps trying to change the subject away from a direct question, could be bad.

When else have I just agreed with him? If i recall I freaked out on him, lol. So please show me what other suspicions of his I have just agreed on.

And for what it's worth, I actually disagreed with S~V~S's reasons for voting Mongoose. So there.

Epignosis wrote:
You know what's normal for me? Cool. I pull different shit all the time. Like spending an entire game posting in video game quotes.

No one will ever figure me out. I intend to keep it that way.

Arrogance drips form this post.
You hardly spent the entire game talking in video game quotes after I decided you being alive wasn't in my best interest.
Stop flattering yourself. You point out contradictions in nearly every game. That's what you do.

Epignosis wrote:But for those of you who prefer I "act like a civ" (whatever that means), I'll show that Dom is speaking from somewhere other than his mouth (or fingertips). Observe:

1. "Epig is probably bad."

Again, the use of the term "probably" is unwarranted.

2. "He has backpedaled on his Mongoose suspicion so hard."

Would anyone like to confirm this? I'm pretty sure I stuck by my Mongoose suspicion. By, you know, actually voting for her. After I had considered several angles for quite some time, asking for clarification, and listening to what others had to say.

3. "He dropped his K4J suspicion."

Dropped it? Show me where. I challenge you.

4. "Civvie epig doesn't do this."

Dom has hosted me once. I was Night killed first. I'm not sure what makes him an authority on my "civvie" game, a claim that is even more astonishing...since I don't have a "civvie" game.

5. "He is throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. His pasta isn't ready yet, I see, though, because you are peeling everything off for him."

If you throw pasta to the wall and it sticks, then you have probably...

Sorry, I already told you this. Good luck with your linguine, Felix.

1. I disagree. I think my observations of your behavior points to you being bad. That changes the pure role probabilities.
2. Really? You didn't say you were a little unsettled by the latching onto your case? If I am misremembering this, please, point it out to me. I caught up quite rapidly.
3. Show me where you voted for K4J like you said you would.
4. I have nothing to say about this that would be constructive.
5. How belting of you.

Epig, I don't think SVS is on your team. I just think you are both bad.

You are very seriously barking up a wrong tree, my friend.

1. Of course you think your observations point to me being bad. They don't change probability. Casinos make a fortune on people's observations regarding probability.

2. Doesn't address my response. Your comment shifts to people "latching onto" my case. To be clear: Despite my failure regarding Mongoose, I still hope people latch onto my cases, just as I'm sure you hope people will latch onto yours.

3. Doesn't mean I dropped my suspicion. You even asked me about her.

Epignosis wrote:

Dom wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I voted Mongoose. Rest easy k4j.

Do you still find k4j suspicious?

Little bit, yeah.

My suspicion of Mongoose overshadowed my suspicion of kneel4justice. I only get one vote.

4. I give you permission to say whatever isn't constructive that you need to say. The host or mod might not.

5. I figured you, a theater fan, would appreciate the humor.

Edit: I apologize k4j. That should say "him."

Epignosis wrote:1. Of course you think your observations point to me being bad. They don't change probability. Casinos make a fortune on people's observations regarding probability.

2. Doesn't address my response. Your comment shifts to people "latching onto" my case. To be clear: Despite my failure regarding Mongoose, I still hope people latch onto my cases, just as I'm sure you hope people will latch onto yours.

3. Doesn't mean I dropped my suspicion. You even asked me about her.

Epignosis wrote:

Dom wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I voted Mongoose. Rest easy k4j.

Do you still find k4j suspicious?

Little bit, yeah.

My suspicion of Mongoose overshadowed my suspicion of kneel4justice. I only get one vote.

4. I give you permission to say whatever isn't constructive that you need to say. The host or mod might not.

5. I figured you, a theater fan, would appreciate the humor.

1. So, you've never looked at a spreadsheet or list of alive roles etc. and used observations and such to decide who is likely what role? Based on YOUR observations? Riiiiight.
2. No. drifts to how you reacted to this.
3. i am aware. But It has perturbed me that you didn't vote her like you said you would.
4. I don't give myself permission.
5. I didn't see that last line with the reference...

1. What? I use a spreadsheet when I'm hosting. When playing, I did so on two occasions (Grimm's and Supernatural). I was bad in the former and good in the latter. I am not using a spreadsheet right now. Are you telling me you have a spreadsheet / list of alive roles / observations on NIGHT 2 to tell who is likely what role?

2. I didn't give you the reaction you wanted? Sorry...

3. Voting for someone else is better than, you know, not voting at all.

4. Fine.

5. My last stage role was my favorite: Vinnie from the same play.

Epignosis wrote: 5. My last stage role was my favorite: Vinnie from the same play.

Mine was either Ado Annie in Oklahoma! or Lady Macbeth in The Scottish Play. Woot.

kneel4justice wrote:Guess I am not voting Mata. Lol

Would you vote Bullzeye?

Epignosis wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:Guess I am not voting Mata. Lol

Would you vote Bullzeye?

Honestly, I don't remember who this is. I am at the moment getting Bullz and Dom confused. Were they both arguing with you?
I might, but I need to go check the roles and see who survives nightkills.

kneel4justice wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:Guess I am not voting Mata. Lol

Would you vote Bullzeye?

Honestly, I don't remember who this is. I am at the moment getting Bullz and Dom confused. Were they both arguing with you?
I might, but I need to go check the roles and see who survives nightkills.

You and I should sit around and observe what happens in the thread. Maybe something will happen. Then we can vote together and make other people suspicious of us.

Epignosis wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:Guess I am not voting Mata. Lol

Would you vote Bullzeye?

Honestly, I don't remember who this is. I am at the moment getting Bullz and Dom confused. Were they both arguing with you?
I might, but I need to go check the roles and see who survives nightkills.

You and I should sit around and observe what happens in the thread. Maybe something will happen. Then we can vote together and make other people suspicious of us.

I don't even know what you're talking about. Lol

kneel4justice wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

kneel4justice wrote:Guess I am not voting Mata. Lol

Would you vote Bullzeye?

Honestly, I don't remember who this is. I am at the moment getting Bullz and Dom confused. Were they both arguing with you?
I might, but I need to go check the roles and see who survives nightkills.

You and I should sit around and observe what happens in the thread. Maybe something will happen. Then we can vote together and make other people suspicious of us.

I don't even know what you're talking about. Lol

SHHH!

FZ. wrote:I'm starting to feel much better about Ksite and how often we lynch townies, It's not any better here.

K4J was very sure about his vote for Summer. Why was no one trying to get to to the bottom of that? For all we know, he could be dead next night, even if Summer isn't scum (with someone wanting to frame her), so we might get nothing from him. I know it's easy to say it now, since I wasn't here to do it myself, but I'd expect people to try and understand a little what he was saying.

I didn't like the way SVS talked about Mongoose and the fiasco with the two games. It was pretty obvious that the whole things was a mistake and it seemed like she was using it as an excuse to suspect her.

Devin the Omniscient wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:Mata, Dex, Devi, Epi, Russ. In that order.

S~V~S wrote:Sorry Mongoose. People do tend to misunderstand your game

Of all the votes yesterday, both for and against mongoose, the one who tweaked me the most was Devin; he sounded like he was absolutely fawning on Epi, then he voted before Epi did? There have been a lot of things going on in this thread, and maybe we can sort them out a bit better. I am looking forward to K4J being able to speak again.

Sorry Mongoose I have learned my lesson about trusting Epignosis: DON'T DO IT!!!

Kill me first.

This sounds scummy. You're putting the responsibility on Epig. Do you now think he's a baddie or was he just wrong? Either way, I don't like how you made it about him instead of you.

How selfish of me. Should I have taken the blame for my own actions and then asked everyone to kill Epi? Did I do it wrong? Is that not the correct way to play? Do you request NKs and lynches differently on ksite?
I do it this way: I mistrusted Epi's giant case on Mongoose. So kill me.

Seriously.

Epignosis wrote:1. What? I use a spreadsheet when I'm hosting. When playing, I did so on two occasions (Grimm's and Supernatural). I was bad in the former and good in the latter. I am not using a spreadsheet right now. Are you telling me you have a spreadsheet / list of alive roles / observations on NIGHT 2 to tell who is likely what role?

2. I didn't give you the reaction you wanted? Sorry...

3. Voting for someone else is better than, you know, not voting at all.

4. Fine.

5. My last stage role was my favorite: Vinnie from the same play.

Point taken, but to be fair, I missed the votes in your game too. :P

Thank you host and players! It was fun while it lasted.

and have a lovely Christmas, everyone!

Holy sh*t!

A: Excited for.reasons I cannot express atm.

B: RIPIYwG Mata! I dunno. Dex...was up?

Epi...same question.

Russ: What's your favorite type of robot?

Dev...eff your posts, I'm skippin you for now. I hate reading your posts after SMB Mafia. >.<