The Syndicate

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Roxy was kind and honest enough to point out another error I made, because she is awesome. I forgot to include her on the lynch poll by mistake. I have gone back and added her in. Enrique and metalmarsh, I made some notes about your votes from before (Enrique had voted for Epig, and metalmarsh had self-voted. If you do not re-vote or change your votes by the time the lynch poll ends, I will leave your votes as they are and count them as they stand.

Epignosis voted Enrique.

zeek wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Roxy was kind and honest enough to point out another error I made, because she is awesome. I forgot to include her on the lynch poll by mistake. I have gone back and added her in. Enrique and metalmarsh, I made some notes about your votes from before (Enrique had voted for Epig, and metalmarsh had self-voted. If you do not re-vote or change your votes by the time the lynch poll ends, I will leave your votes as they are and count them as they stand.

Epignosis voted Enrique.

I revoted myself to keep things less ambiguous. It won't stay there long I imagine.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Roxy was kind and honest enough to point out another error I made, because she is awesome. I forgot to include her on the lynch poll by mistake. I have gone back and added her in. Enrique and metalmarsh, I made some notes about your votes from before (Enrique had voted for Epig, and metalmarsh had self-voted. If you do not re-vote or change your votes by the time the lynch poll ends, I will leave your votes as they are and count them as they stand.

Also I believe juliets is dead.

I'm voting juliets again because she laid a guilt trip on me.

I can see everything you say

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Son of a.....okay, I took juliets off. Sorry for making you re-re-vote yourself again, man! It should all be correct now.

And I didn't realize I was wrong about Enrique and Epignosis. I will fix that in my notes then. Thanks!

Thank you. Your father does not smell of elderberries and I fart in a general direction that you are not near.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Son of a.....okay, I took juliets off. Sorry for making you re-re-vote yourself again, man! It should all be correct now.

And I didn't realize I was wrong about Enrique and Epignosis. I will fix that in my notes then. Thanks!

Thank you. Your father does not smell of elderberries and I fart in a general direction that you are not near.

Alright, now you're just being condescending. :P








































Keep doing it.

A R

ET

If it's one or the other I'll retract my R.

Excellent.

I really should go to bed.

Enrique has one hour to tell me why he I should not vote for him. Again.

Epignosis wrote:Enrique has one hour to tell me why he I should not vote for him. Again.

Why? Maybe people would be more willing to agree with you'd if you elaborate. Skimmed through your history, and this is really the closest thing I've seen to an explanation from you:

Epignosis wrote:Enrique did something very specific I did recently when I was bad, and some of his posts don't sound genuine to me.

If you have explained further, I'm sorry I missed it but I'd like a link.

I guess people have said this is your normal play style, but to a newbie it comes across as hostile and overly accusatory.

Mister Rearranger wrote:BWT, why does my Non-Player vote keep disappearing?

Do you not want me anymore...

Because I am a fool and kept making hosting errors is why.

Gotrees wrote: hostile and overly accusatory.

Nice to meet you.

Because I'm good. Honestly, I don't know what more can I say. You're not exactly pressing many arguments against me, and I have addressed the ones that you have. One liners that say nothing but "I think x is bad" or "I don't think x is bad" while neglecting most of the going-ons in the thread aren't really doing a lot for discussion. So yeah, I don't know how you want me to respond anymore You shouldn't vote for me because you don't want a civvie lynched. But as far as I can tell you've had your mind made up for a while and nothing that I say will change that.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:BWT, why does my Non-Player vote keep disappearing?

Do you not want me anymore...

Because I am a fool and kept making hosting errors is why.

s'cool, man! You're doing great!

Enrique wrote:But as far as I can tell you've had your mind made up for a while and nothing that I say will change that.

I have? Shit! I forgot about that.

*Votes Enrique*

AGAIN

zeek wrote:I see Dana, I'd like her vote.

So I'm still quite a few pages behind and catching up, but I did see the Enrique/Zeek conversation about being online or hidden and all of that stuff. I just want to clarify that I keep this thread opened on my phone and on my computer all the time, so a lot of the time it might show me as here when I'm. I agree that we shouldn't use this as a point of suspicion and say "____ was here but they never posted" especially when being hidden is a thing that can happen.

Also zeek pushing this planet vote so intensely is a little concerning. But I don't know how that turns out yet so I will comment again later when I am all caught up.

LOL @ Epig. I'd follow you here, but I just don't see you with the kind of voting record I would need to follow your lead blindly. But I think you don't want to be a leader. I think you want to be having *your* suspicion and not try to influence anybody so that you'll have a history of *something* instead of nothing; little substance with plenty of flair.

Zeek is almost definitely right about Vastra and Jenny.

The Master wrote:T-- ----t t---- att---t- -- --- ---- ---- -- -------. ----- ----t, -- att---t- t- ---- ---- -a---, --- ----/----a-----. -- -- ----- ---, t--- -a-- -T--. --- t- --- -t---- a----t- a- a -----t--t, ---- -- t-- -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- ----t a-t--- t-at ----t t- -- -a------ -------t-- at ------- -t--- t-a- t-- -------- ta---t. T--- -- -- t- a-- --------- ---- att---t-.

The first t---- attempts on his life ---- -- -------.
If that's right, the next word can't be "have" because that has an A in it. Worryingly, that t- word might be three.

Long Con wrote:LOL @ Epig. I'd follow you here, but I just don't see you with the kind of voting record I would need to follow your lead blindly. But I think you don't want to be a leader. I think you want to be having *your* suspicion and not try to influence anybody so that you'll have a history of *something* instead of nothing; little substance with plenty of flair.

Zeek is almost definitely right about Vastra and Jenny.

Who has the kind of voting record you are looking for right now?

Dana wrote:

zeek wrote:I see Dana, I'd like her vote.

So I'm still quite a few pages behind and catching up, but I did see the Enrique/Zeek conversation about being online or hidden and all of that stuff. I just want to clarify that I keep this thread opened on my phone and on my computer all the time, so a lot of the time it might show me as here when I'm. I agree that we shouldn't use this as a point of suspicion and say "____ was here but they never posted" especially when being hidden is a thing that can happen.

Also zeek pushing this planet vote so intensely is a little concerning. But I don't know how that turns out yet so I will comment again later when I am all caught up.

I was just hoping to get your attention and your vote for Alzarius. I can tell you that the effort was successful.

zeek, do you think the planet we are on has anything to do with the secrets that have been displayed to us?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:zeek, do you think the planet we are on has anything to do with the secrets that have been displayed to us?

No. But that doesn't mean it didn't pay off.

Your question makes me feel better about you however.

Enrique wrote:Most of the votes at least I think were somewhat thought out. People voted Alzarius because they thought it was the safest, or nicest, even being pressured is a reason. I never saw any info about Azure other than "it's blue." I don't think it's fair nobody had any reason for voting like they did, when we were supposed to be looking for civvie benefits. If somebody voted for Azure and explained it as they didn't want to fall for zeek's manipulation, I would have taken that as a reason, but in reality all of the votes were random or throw aways. Nobody actually seemed to care about Azure, but they almost won anyway.

Did you even read my post explaining post vote why I chose azure? I'm just going to assume you are referring to others who voted Azure rather than me.

I personally find Dom's explanation perfectly plausible and don't see it as overly suspicious. I suppose it would be possible he did it because he voted the wrong thing instead of what would benefit him. Assuming he had info. I dunno. I haven't been all that pinged by Dom, I guess.

Don't let Epi get to you Enrique. He's always like this and honestly it makes me far less inclined to consider voting for you. If he wants to give some good case about why then I am willing to listen, but ordering us to do it on the grounds he is some mafia hunting genius just makes me want to ignore him. Plus I have not felt like the case against you was all that great.

Come to think of it,I have not felt moved by any of the cases. The only mild pings I have had are as follows:

When Made came in and said there was no difference between those two posts, when what I read clearly one seemed to say she was leaning towards suspecting Enrique and the other said she was not seeing the case at all. She was civ, so it isn't that she was his teammate so this seems less important, but it still strikes me as odd. Perhaps he was expecting her to flip civ and wanted some cred? I don't know, I am not sure how much I am looking at him right now since Juliet's flip.

When DFaraday placed his offhand night vote. I understand not over thinking a night poll. But I just can't see why a fan of the show would not really find anything interesting about the options, not say anything about them at all or even for a fan related reason to vote for one. Am I the only one who finds this vote weird?

I found it interesting that zeek seemed to not understand MPs attempt to get reactions and responses with his move at the beginning of the game, but now he admits to slow playing info because gauging reactions is important in Baddie hunting. I don't know how suspicious it is, because I am sure there was a defensive emotion involved in the first and they are certainly not the same tactic, but it is interesting to me all the same.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Dom wrote: Please tell me what I have to "explain". I have explained what has been asked of me.

I'm wondering, if you just wanted to randomize and didn't actually care about the result, why you didn't just leave your vote on what you accidentally picked the first time. Since you had no disposition one way or another, it would be just as valid as whatever your randomizer said, right?

THIS. So this.

Now I'm gone.

You and I are both purists and you know it. I would be willing to bet if you had accidentally voted differently than your randomizer (if you were to use one) you would have corrected it. I would have too, it's probably why I find Dom's explanation plausible. I can see why others find it suspect, I just don't find it as much so.

Tell me MP, what are your thoughts on DFaraday?

Also, the lack of suspicion between SVS and MP is worrying, they almost always accuse each other in games. I am concerned by this.

Finally, the blind following of zeek worries me. He can say, why would I paint a target on my back like that? The reality is that we still have no idea what that option did. There is a good chance we may never publicly know. What does he stand to lose? He has campaigned for an option waving the civvie banner, but we have no proof of it. If he knew it would not be publicly revealed then not only has his public move gained him some civ cred (because why would a Baddie do something so bold? ) but it has also given him a positive result from winning the poll. I don't feel he is bad, I just think we need to be more wary about blindly believing him without any kind of sound basis for believing he is civ.

I did not have any info on the poll, fwiw.

Oh, I'm a hunter all right.

The first three attempts on his life will be -------. Every night, he attempts to find ---- -a---, --- ----/----a-----. If he finds him(her?), they gain BTSC. --- to --- -t---- a----t- as a -----t--t, ---- -- t-- -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- night action that ----t t- -- -a------ -------t-- at ------- -t--- than the -------- ta---t. T--- -- -- to a-- --------- ---- attempts.

Sorry Master.

Epignosis wrote:Oh, I'm a hunter all right.

Really I'm currently reading you as more of a phony. a BIG FAT PHONY!!!


So let's play ball. *rolls up sleeves*

*votes Epi*

We finna go dirt sauce

Linki- first blank might be blocked? correct amount of characters?

Made wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Oh, I'm a hunter all right.

Really I'm currently reading you as more of a phony. a BIG FAT PHONY!!!


So let's play ball. *rolls up sleeves*

*votes Epi*

We finna go dirt sauce

Linki- first blank might be blocked? correct amount of characters?

I do like to play ball.

And I like dirt.

I was scratching my head over that capital T.

The first three attempts on his life will be -------. Every night, he attempts to find ---- -a---, --- ----/----a-----. If he finds him(her?), they gain BTSC. --- to --- -t---- a----t- as a -----t--t, ---- -- t-- -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- night action that ----t t- -- -a------ -------t-- at ------- -t--- than the -------- target. T--- -- -- to a-- --------- ---- attempts.

The first three attempts on his life will be -------. Every night, he attempts to find ---- -a---, --- ----/----a-----. If he finds him(her?), they gain BTSC. --- to --- -t---- a----t- as a -----t--t, ---- -- t-- -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- night action that ----t t- -- -a------ -------t-- at ------- -t--- than the -------- target. T--- -- -- to a-- --------- ---- attempts.

This could be scientist. He was posing as the scientist Yana when we meet him in the reboot series. Without an A in that word there are far fewer options.

Long Con wrote:The first three attempts on his life will be -------. Every night, he attempts to find ---- -a---, --- ----/companions. If he finds him(her?), they gain BTSC. --- to --- -t---- a----t- as a -----t--t, ---- -- t-- -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- night action that ----t t- -- -a------ -------t-- at ------- other than the -------- target. T--- -- -- to any --------- ---- attempts.

Sorry Master.

Penultimate word might be kill? Kill attempts?

Actually, those FINDS could be KILLS as well.

"Blocked" is definitely good. I like "scientist" too.

zeek wrote:Actually, those FINDS could be KILLS as well.

If he kills him/her they gain BTSC?

Enrique wrote:

Long Con wrote:The first three attempts on his life will be -------. Every night, he attempts to find ---- -a---, --- ----/companions. If he finds him(her?), they gain BTSC. --- to --- -t---- a----t- as a -----t--t, ---- -- the -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- night action that ----t t- -- -a------ -------t-- at ------- other than the -------- target. T--- -- -- to any --------- ---- attempts.

Sorry Master.

Could that be find each dalek, --- ----/companions?

Wait, wait, wait. That capital T (-T--) must be BTSC, right? So he can't be finding companions.

Long Con wrote:"Blocked" is definitely good.

Sorry, what?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Son of a.....okay, I took juliets off. Sorry for making you re-re-vote yourself again, man! It should all be correct now.

And I didn't realize I was wrong about Enrique and Epignosis. I will fix that in my notes then. Thanks!

Thank you. Your father does not smell of elderberries and I fart in a general direction that you are not near.

No wonder you're a newt. You suck at insults.

YOU ENGLISH BULLDOG! :P :P *PFFFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTTT* :P :P

Oh also - I have some SRRS issues with the amount of pizza talk in this thread. Esepcially for Pizza Hut. I can't quite decide what to do with my hate. It may be broken vodka bottles on people's faces time!!! I'm like 6 beers in kids.

Not "each," the "a" isnt' accounted for

zeek wrote:

Long Con wrote:"Blocked" is definitely good.

Sorry, what?

The first three attempts on his life will be blocked. Every night, he attempts to find(kill?) ---- -a---, --- ----/companions. If he finds him(her?), they gain BTSC. --- to --- -t---- a----t- as a scientist, ---- -- t-- -a-- -- -a- ----- ----- night action that ----t t- -- -a------ -------t-- at ------- other than the original target. T--- -- -- to a-- --------- kill attempts.