Page 22 of 84

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:20 pm
by Long Con
Epignosis wrote:Black Rock is dead. That's why.
Aw, if my linkitis worked I would not have entered that quasi-humourous non-committal answer. :sigh:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:21 pm
by Marmot
Ah.

Welcome aboard DP. Bye Shep, thanks for joining in for a bit.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:25 pm
by birdwithteeth11
Hmmmm...good point. Thanks, Epig!

Bye Shep, and welcome DP!

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:26 pm
by Long Con
Turnip Head, why so sure about Zombarella?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:29 pm
by Elohcin
S~V~S wrote:
Zombarella wrote:Today it would be cool to hear more from:

Shep, Bea, A Person, MP, Liz Keen, Sophie, and Eloh.

I'd love to hear more of your thoughts. :shrug:
Any particular reason why these folks? Since it is low posters you are after?

Image

Quite a few people not on your list have posted less than Liz or Bea. Why single them out over lower posters, if that is your quest, to lynch low posters?
My thoughts exactly. Thank you for making a list SVS. And, reading through the thread, I did not see Zomb respond to SVS even thought she has posted since this. I may have missed it, you can correct me if I am wrong Zomb. So...why do you want to hear more from the seven of us when we are not even the lowest posters?

Now, as for the LC, MM thing...
I think LC seems genuine. However I also believe I have proven to everyone on the syndicate that I am very gullible and will believe most defenses a player may give. That said, I am going to move on into the back seat for a few days and only report my thoughts when I am ever so sure that I could be like 90% right in my opinion.

Day 1 self voters...
MP voted 4th, Vomp voted 5th, and MM voted 6th. The question is, would a baddie Reed Bardeen be bold enough to be the first self voter? Also, would Mafia be bold enough to have two (or even three) of their own vote for themselves as to confuse us on who Bardeen is? What do you think about this?

Linki: Welcome DP! And I can't find why LC is asking why TH is sure about Zomb. What is TH sure of about Zomb?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:30 pm
by rabbit8
Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Black Rock is dead. That's why.
Aw, if my linkitis worked I would not have entered that quasi-humourous non-committal answer. :sigh:

What would you have entered if it had worked?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:32 pm
by DisgruntledPorcupine
Hey guys. :)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:32 pm
by rabbit8
TH thinks Zomba is a civvie.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:33 pm
by S~V~S
Elohcin wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Zombarella wrote:Today it would be cool to hear more from:

Shep, Bea, A Person, MP, Liz Keen, Sophie, and Eloh.

I'd love to hear more of your thoughts. :shrug:
Any particular reason why these folks? Since it is low posters you are after?

Image

Quite a few people not on your list have posted less than Liz or Bea. Why single them out over lower posters, if that is your quest, to lynch low posters?
My thoughts exactly. Thank you for making a list SVS. And, reading through the thread, I did not see Zomb respond to SVS even thought she has posted since this. I may have missed it, you can correct me if I am wrong Zomb. So...why do you want to hear more from the seven of us when we are not even the lowest posters?

Now, as for the LC, MM thing...
I think LC seems genuine. However I also believe I have proven to everyone on the syndicate that I am very gullible and will believe most defenses a player may give. That said, I am going to move on into the back seat for a few days and only report my thoughts when I am ever so sure that I could be like 90% right in my opinion.

Day 1 self voters...
MP voted 4th, Vomp voted 5th, and MM voted 6th. The question is, would a baddie Reed Bardeen be bold enough to be the first self voter? Also, would Mafia be bold enough to have two (or even three) of their own vote for themselves as to confuse us on who Bardeen is? What do you think about this?

Linki: Welcome DP! And I can't find why LC is asking why TH is sure about Zomb. What is TH sure of about Zomb?
In between the time she made the original post, and the time it took me to get the screen shot, she added a few more names.

And Hi DisPor :D

Bye Sheepy, hope you try again :)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:34 pm
by birdwithteeth11
Elohcin wrote: Day 1 self voters...
MP voted 4th, Vomp voted 5th, and MM voted 6th. The question is, would a baddie Reed Bardeen be bold enough to be the first self voter? Also, would Mafia be bold enough to have two (or even three) of their own vote for themselves as to confuse us on who Bardeen is? What do you think about this?
I think it's a really risky gambit. Especially if multiple baddies are doing it, then it could potentially allow them to be picked off for all following the same strategy.

Honestly, if I were Reed, I'd be trying to gather just enough suspicion that I'm getting one or two people voting for me every day. But then again, I'm not Reed so idk if that's the strategy he/she is using.

But to your main point, no, I don't really see that happening. At least not this early on in the game.

Linki

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:34 pm
by Epignosis
Elohcin wrote:Now, as for the LC, MM thing...
I think LC seems genuine. However I also believe I have proven to everyone on the syndicate that I am very gullible and will believe most defenses a player may give. That said, I am going to move on into the back seat for a few days and only report my thoughts when I am ever so sure that I could be like 90% right in my opinion.
That isn't helpful. If you're good, express your opinions boldly- they're coming from a civilian, even if they are wrong.

You don't win games sitting in the back seat, and even if you do, you don't deserve to.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:36 pm
by Epignosis
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Elohcin wrote: Day 1 self voters...
MP voted 4th, Vomp voted 5th, and MM voted 6th. The question is, would a baddie Reed Bardeen be bold enough to be the first self voter? Also, would Mafia be bold enough to have two (or even three) of their own vote for themselves as to confuse us on who Bardeen is? What do you think about this?
I think it's a really risky gambit. Especially if multiple baddies are doing it, then it could potentially allow them to be picked off for all following the same strategy.

Honestly, if I were Reed, I'd be trying to gather just enough suspicion that I'm getting one or two people voting for me every day. But then again, I'm not Reed so idk if that's the strategy he/she is using.

But to your main point, no, I don't really see that happening. At least not this early on in the game.

Linki
My #1 man is still Metalmarsh.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:37 pm
by S~V~S
Yes Eloh, take Epis advice and...act like a civvie!!!!!!!

...*runs away*

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:38 pm
by Zombarella
Elohcin wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Zombarella wrote:Today it would be cool to hear more from:

Shep, Bea, A Person, MP, Liz Keen, Sophie, and Eloh.

I'd love to hear more of your thoughts. :shrug:
Any particular reason why these folks? Since it is low posters you are after?

Image

Quite a few people not on your list have posted less than Liz or Bea. Why single them out over lower posters, if that is your quest, to lynch low posters?
My thoughts exactly. Thank you for making a list SVS. And, reading through the thread, I did not see Zomb respond to SVS even thought she has posted since this. I may have missed it, you can correct me if I am wrong Zomb. So...why do you want to hear more from the seven of us when we are not even the lowest posters?

Now, as for the LC, MM thing...
I think LC seems genuine. However I also believe I have proven to everyone on the syndicate that I am very gullible and will believe most defenses a player may give. That said, I am going to move on into the back seat for a few days and only report my thoughts when I am ever so sure that I could be like 90% right in my opinion.

Day 1 self voters...
MP voted 4th, Vomp voted 5th, and MM voted 6th. The question is, would a baddie Reed Bardeen be bold enough to be the first self voter? Also, would Mafia be bold enough to have two (or even three) of their own vote for themselves as to confuse us on who Bardeen is? What do you think about this?

Linki: Welcome DP! And I can't find why LC is asking why TH is sure about Zomb. What is TH sure of about Zomb?
Oh... I kind of did respond to SVS but it was before SVS posted her question. I posted a list. Then I remembered about the post count thing so I went back there and added a few more names in a subsequent post and actually beat SVS to the thread. That's why she said that I ninja'd her. If you look back a page or two you will see how it came in all messy.

This is me officially apologizing for my first list of low posters being incomplete. I made a second list that included the missing names. However, the list SVS posted is better than both of mine cause it's all laid out all nice.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:40 pm
by S~V~S
I just took a screen shot of the who posted list: http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/postin ... &t=570&f=2

And yeah, you must have not read the posts :teehee: where I said I missed a few of your posts.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:41 pm
by Epignosis
S~V~S wrote:Yes Eloh, take Epis advice and...act like a civvie!!!!!!!

...*runs away*
That's not what I said, but I'll take the support. :meany:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:41 pm
by Zombarella
S~V~S wrote:I just took a screen shot of the who posted list: http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/postin ... &t=570&f=2

And yeah, you must have not read the posts :teehee: where I said I missed a few of your posts.
I was getting there :blush:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:44 pm
by Zombarella
I kinda hoped that smiley would have a bigger blush

Here:
Image

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:46 pm
by Epignosis
So MetalMarsh goes and votes for himself. Again.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:51 pm
by rabbit8
Epignosis wrote:So MetalMarsh goes and votes for himself. Again.

?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:53 pm
by Marmot
Epignosis wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Elohcin wrote: Day 1 self voters...
MP voted 4th, Vomp voted 5th, and MM voted 6th. The question is, would a baddie Reed Bardeen be bold enough to be the first self voter? Also, would Mafia be bold enough to have two (or even three) of their own vote for themselves as to confuse us on who Bardeen is? What do you think about this?
I think it's a really risky gambit. Especially if multiple baddies are doing it, then it could potentially allow them to be picked off for all following the same strategy.

Honestly, if I were Reed, I'd be trying to gather just enough suspicion that I'm getting one or two people voting for me every day. But then again, I'm not Reed so idk if that's the strategy he/she is using.

But to your main point, no, I don't really see that happening. At least not this early on in the game.

Linki
My #1 man is still Metalmarsh.
Why's that?

Linki: What?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:54 pm
by Elohcin
Epignosis wrote:So MetalMarsh goes and votes for himself. Again.
Seriously? Hmm....

His reason for self voting in Roger Rabbit sounds legit. But I am beginning to wonder about this game.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:55 pm
by Marmot
Elohcin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:So MetalMarsh goes and votes for himself. Again.
Seriously? Hmm....

His reason for self voting in Roger Rabbit sounds legit. But I am beginning to wonder about this game.
Why don't you look at the poll right now...

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:55 pm
by Elohcin
Wait....not according the poll in from of me, he didn't.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:56 pm
by Epignosis
Elohcin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:So MetalMarsh goes and votes for himself. Again.
Seriously? Hmm....

His reason for self voting in Roger Rabbit sounds legit. But I am beginning to wonder about this game.
:slick:

Come on now.
Elohcin wrote:Wait....not according the poll in from of me, he didn't.
;)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:57 pm
by Elohcin
:offtobed: I'm done for today.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:59 pm
by Long Con
rabbit8 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Black Rock is dead. That's why.
Aw, if my linkitis worked I would not have entered that quasi-humourous non-committal answer. :sigh:

What would you have entered if it had worked?
Well, with the actual answer just flat-out posted already, I would have neither posted the coy jokey answer nor the real one... I would have deleted that post altogether.
Epignosis wrote:So MetalMarsh goes and votes for himself. Again.
LOL stop pulling everyone's strings.
Zombarella wrote:I kinda hoped that smiley would have a bigger blush

Here:
Image
I agree, I would like to see a blush Smiley on this site that looks a lot more like a blush Smiley.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:02 pm
by Turnip Head
Long Con wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Black Rock is dead. That's why.
Aw, if my linkitis worked I would not have entered that quasi-humourous non-committal answer. :sigh:

What would you have entered if it had worked?
Well, with the actual answer just flat-out posted already, I would have neither posted the coy jokey answer nor the real one... I would have deleted that post altogether.
In other words, LC was waiting patiently to deploy his "I would never kill BR on night 1" defense in just the right way.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:03 pm
by rabbit8
OK. I read it as you having something else to say on the matter. I read it wrong.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:05 pm
by rabbit8
Turnip Head wrote:
Long Con wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Black Rock is dead. That's why.
Aw, if my linkitis worked I would not have entered that quasi-humourous non-committal answer. :sigh:

What would you have entered if it had worked?
Well, with the actual answer just flat-out posted already, I would have neither posted the coy jokey answer nor the real one... I would have deleted that post altogether.
In other words, LC was waiting patiently to deploy his "I would never kill BR on night 1" defense in just the right way.

lol, that's what I was thinking. But I could see it the other way as well. That he was not going to post.

Not sure either way right now. Weird exchange was weird.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:05 pm
by Epignosis
Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:So MetalMarsh goes and votes for himself. Again.
LOL stop pulling everyone's strings.
Never! Sometimes you learn things. :)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:08 pm
by Marmot
Could someone explain to me what in the world is going on right now. This marmot's brain can't handle all this wink wink nudge nudge.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:10 pm
by rabbit8
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Could someone explain to me what in the world is going on right now. This marmot's brain can't handle all this wink wink nudge nudge.

People think you're bad. ;) ;)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:13 pm
by Epignosis
I'm people.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:13 pm
by Marmot
rabbit8 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Could someone explain to me what in the world is going on right now. This marmot's brain can't handle all this wink wink nudge nudge.

People think you're bad. ;) ;)
So why won't these fuckers come out and say it? ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) :mad: ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:14 pm
by Epignosis
Epignosis wrote:I'm people.
Epignosis wrote:My #1 man is still Metalmarsh.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:15 pm
by Epignosis
Hahaha- and Black Rock is out Night 1. That's even funnier.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:15 pm
by LizKeen
Epignosis wrote:
LizKeen wrote:It makes an old lady cranky when you take her hearing device. How am I supposed to hear gentleman callers?
Go to your better-looking neighbor's house? :shrug2:

:eek: You haven't seen my neighbors.

I feel your pain Sophie. There's just too much to try and keep a straight head about.


Based on the night post are we supposed to be asking questions of Mr. Fung?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:15 pm
by rabbit8
I don't think your being accused as being a baddie was winked at..... They pretty much straight up said it. :ponder: :smoky:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:15 pm
by Turnip Head
Turnip Head wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I'm people.
Turnip Head wrote:I think MM is the Millionaire, and I think Con is in on it.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:18 pm
by Marmot
Epignosis wrote:Hahaha- and Black Rock is out Night 1. That's even funnier.
I see what you did there.

rabbit, what do you think of TH and Epig right now? They were oddly in sync last night, and they are at it again today.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:20 pm
by rabbit8
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Hahaha- and Black Rock is out Night 1. That's even funnier.
I see what you did there.

rabbit, what do you think of TH and Epig right now? They were oddly in sync last night, and they are at it again today.

I'm starting to think thy may be onto something. What do you think?

I don't know what BRs death has to do with you though. Can you tell me what he did there?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:25 pm
by Marmot
rabbit8 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Hahaha- and Black Rock is out Night 1. That's even funnier.
I see what you did there.

rabbit, what do you think of TH and Epig right now? They were oddly in sync last night, and they are at it again today.

I'm starting to think thy may be onto something. What do you think?

I don't know what BRs death has to do with you though. Can you tell me what he did there?
Two games in a row, my baddie team killed BR on Night 1, though those games were a few months ago. Epig knows this because he helped her return the favor on me recently.

He thinks I'm at it again. Or, he's trying to frame me.


Either they really happen to think I am bad at the same time, or they are trying to set me up. TH pinged the hell out of me last night while Epig seemed on the level, and they have flip-flopped positions today.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:27 pm
by birdwithteeth11
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Could someone explain to me what in the world is going on right now. This marmot's brain can't handle all this wink wink nudge nudge.

People think you're bad. ;) ;)
So why won't these fuckers come out and say it? ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) :mad: ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
Okay then.

Right now, if I had to vote, it would be for you. ;)

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:27 pm
by rabbit8
Good to know.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:29 pm
by birdwithteeth11
Sorry. I'd post something more substantive right now, but I've had a little bit too much bourbon right now. So those kinds of thoughts will have to wait until tomorrow.

I know I've had a touch too much because I had to go through this entire thing 4 times to fix all the awful spelling errors. :noble:

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:30 pm
by Marmot
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Sorry. I'd post something more substantive right now, but I've had a little bit too much bourbon right now. So those kinds of thoughts will have to wait until tomorrow.

I know I've had a touch too much because I had to go through this entire thing 4 times to fix all the awful spelling errors. :noble:
Well thank you for taking time out of your day to come in here and subtly push the lynch in my direction.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:31 pm
by thellama73
LizKeen wrote: Based on the night post are we supposed to be asking questions of Mr. Fung?
Couldn't hurt.

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:32 pm
by Epignosis
I'm drinking bourbon right now too. I bet birdwithteeth and I are evil together. Anyone?

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 2]

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:33 pm
by Turnip Head
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Sorry. I'd post something more substantive right now, but I've had a little bit too much bourbon right now. So those kinds of thoughts will have to wait until tomorrow.

I know I've had a touch too much because I had to go through this entire thing 4 times to fix all the awful spelling errors. :noble:
Well thank you for taking time out of your day to come in here and subtly push the lynch in my direction.
Image