The Syndicate

triceratopzeuhl wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

triceratopzeuhl wrote:

S~V~S wrote:
Plus there is a hell of a lot of secrets, including at least one zany target/role/summat switching power, which I think we saw on night one. Plus a whole team all of whose powers seem to be "loves chaos", lol.

Well now, hold on. After night one you made a big deal about how DFaraday was a bad target to NK, which is why I and maybe a couple other people were looking at you, but now you've entirely changed your position to that it was redirected. Baddie slip up, or just taking your own theories too seriously?

LOL, I said that this was why i said that.

You have been trying WAAAAAAAYYYY too hard to paint me bad. As i recall you were looking at me, and a few people that understood what I was getting at and backed off.

No

More like, there is reason at all to believe that NK was redirected unless it was your NK

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:I fail to see how I should vote for anyone but Vomps at this point.

S~V~S wrote:

triceratopzeuhl wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

triceratopzeuhl wrote:

S~V~S wrote:
Plus there is a hell of a lot of secrets, including at least one zany target/role/summat switching power, which I think we saw on night one. Plus a whole team all of whose powers seem to be "loves chaos", lol.

Well now, hold on. After night one you made a big deal about how DFaraday was a bad target to NK, which is why I and maybe a couple other people were looking at you, but now you've entirely changed your position to that it was redirected. Baddie slip up, or just taking your own theories too seriously?

LOL, I said that this was why i said that.

You have been trying WAAAAAAAYYYY too hard to paint me bad. As i recall you were looking at me, and a few people that understood what I was getting at and backed off.

No

More like, there is reason at all to believe that NK was redirected unless it was your NK

I assume you meant to say "More like, there is NO reason at all to believe that NK was redirected unless it was your NK"

Well, perhaps there were other powers besides kills that did not go as expected night one? Perhaps that might make someone think, along with the very unexpected NK target, that some targets may have been switched? I never changed my position~ as soon as people started saying this line of discussion was suspicious, I clarified my intent, and everyone but you dropped it. Forcing people to spell things out is not the civviest action, Trice.

Unfortunately, i have a tendency to do that myself, lol. A few times this game i have been mid post, writing something like, "Well why do you think that, don't you think there would have been a subtle ***** in the thread if ***** and..." and then realized that what I was actually replying to WAS a sublte ****, lol, and scrapped the post. So I am the last to suspect you for continually pushing this point. But do me a favor, read the roles, and see allllll the non baddie ways someone might know things may have been rotten in Denmark on Night One, OK?

triceratopzeuhl wrote:
It doesn't matter how many ways there are for things to be redirected in your opinion, the fact of the matter is there was no indication it got redirected. I understand that when a handful of newer mafia players call you out on it, you can bully them to drop it and get your teammates to call it "civ svs," but I still don't think you actually have a bridge for sale

DharmaHelper wrote:I'm getting the feeling mob mentality has pretty well decided this lynch already, which considering the track record of the mob votes is pretty unnerving.

But whatever, I'm sure eventually someone somewhere will read one of my posts and be all "You know what, maybe all this pitchforks and torches crap isn't so cool after all"

DharmaHelper wrote:SVS is making me feel icky.

Then my work here is done~

DharmaHelper wrote:You don't think his snarkfest was pingy?

chaindeath wrote:This Mafia thing is harder than chaindeath thought that it would be... Oh well, that's what makes it fun right?

Two people have died. chaindeath hopes that they (being axxon and Illyria, as last time he got in trouble for posting without saying names) have a good time in Sovngrade if you people were good, if not he banishes you to the Soul Cairn. (A Skyrim referance for those who do not know )

In regards to the rabbit vote, he honestly just chose someone who had votes to their name. He was not trying to take focus away from bea, just not experienced with this game, was a little overwhelmed at the time of voting, and to be honest he guessed. He is deeply sorry.

Chaindeath will now attempt a joke to lighten the mood! "My, my birdwithteeth11 you have four and one half eyes to watch people with? So wouldn't you have to be partly or mostly Omniscient? Baddie???" Get it? Because he's watching many people at once? Go here to see the face chaindeath makes when he asks you this: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/ori ... /moray.jpg Without this picture he is positive the joke will be lost.

He is also not sure if it really matters but he would like to point out the sentence that droopy posted: "We need to get some of these non-posters out of the way...I'm getting bored with them." If droopy was a civi wouldn't he want as many people to be with him as possible? Even if they didn't post? This struck chaindeath as odd.

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:SVS is making me feel icky.

Then my work here is done~

chaindeath wrote:

chaindeath wrote:This Mafia thing is harder than chaindeath thought that it would be... Oh well, that's what makes it fun right?

Two people have died. chaindeath hopes that they (being axxon and Illyria, as last time he got in trouble for posting without saying names) have a good time in Sovngrade if you people were good, if not he banishes you to the Soul Cairn. (A Skyrim referance for those who do not know )

In regards to the rabbit vote, he honestly just chose someone who had votes to their name. He was not trying to take focus away from bea, just not experienced with this game, was a little overwhelmed at the time of voting, and to be honest he guessed. He is deeply sorry.

Chaindeath will now attempt a joke to lighten the mood! "My, my birdwithteeth11 you have four and one half eyes to watch people with? So wouldn't you have to be partly or mostly Omniscient? Baddie???" Get it? Because he's watching many people at once? Go here to see the face chaindeath makes when he asks you this: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/ori ... /moray.jpg Without this picture he is positive the joke will be lost.

He is also not sure if it really matters but he would like to point out the sentence that droopy posted: "We need to get some of these non-posters out of the way...I'm getting bored with them." If droopy was a civi wouldn't he want as many people to be with him as possible? Even if they didn't post? This struck chaindeath as odd.

Chaindeath acknowledges S~v~S's rquest for more information regarding his vote toward rabbit8, he directs your attention to the highlighted section above.

DH, chaindeath wishes to know what this "snarkfest" is that you mentioned.

On to the discussion of who to lynch. Chaindeath does not have any theories, and he will likely go with the majority. His brain has not been fully immersed for this day in Avant-Garde history.

P.S. Chaindeath wishes to express displeasure. He doesn't enjoy being referenced in the third person in first person posts(AKA posts that everyone else makes). Where as he does it on a regular basis, it makes you all look silly. However, he would like to make it known that references made in the second person point-of-view is acceptable.

juliets wrote:I'm trying to figure out this poll. What do I click on to see who has voted and for whom they voted.

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Any reason other than the fact that he wanted to avoid a penalty?

Don;t make other people do all the work, man~

You know, sometimes I wonder if people read my posts at all :P I do.

As I said

1. Rabbit defended his contest behavior while bringing up Epig as suspect for posting and not voting. (Even if it was just a joke, Rabbit's on my list and him helping out INH only deepens my suspicions.)
2. His vote for bea seems to me to be more of a "go with the flow, don't ruffle any feathers" vote than anything else. That person had solid evidence behind their lynch, and turned out to be bad.

Adding
3. His defense thusfar has been a very snarky "No U" marathon
No, it hasn't. Sometimes I wonder if people read my posts at all. :P

juliets wrote:I clicked on "View Results" but all I can see is that 2 people voted for Vompatii. I can't see who voted.

juliets wrote:I clicked on "View Results" but all I can see is that 2 people voted for Vompatii. I can't see who voted.

DharmaHelper wrote:You don't think his snarkfest was pingy?

insertnamehere wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

Dunno, as I said I'm not quite willing to buy into the impending Droopwagon, probably exclusively because you seem so determined to get people on board.

DH, Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

insertnamehere wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Lol INH :P

Wow, what a jokey aloof post.

Vompatti wrote:I feel like I should inform in advance I will NOT be voting for rabbit8 this time.

juliets wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I feel like I should inform in advance I will NOT be voting for rabbit8 this time.

Vompatti who do you suspect this time?

Vompatti wrote:

juliets wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I feel like I should inform in advance I will NOT be voting for rabbit8 this time.

Vompatti who do you suspect this time?

BoatsBoatsBoats seems to try to play it safe by pretending to be convinced that I'm a baddie.

juliets wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

juliets wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I feel like I should inform in advance I will NOT be voting for rabbit8 this time.

Vompatti who do you suspect this time?

BoatsBoatsBoats seems to try to play it safe by pretending to be convinced that I'm a baddie.

Interesting. What makes you think he's pretending?

Vompatti wrote:

juliets wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I feel like I should inform in advance I will NOT be voting for rabbit8 this time.

Vompatti who do you suspect this time?

BoatsBoatsBoats seems to try to play it safe by pretending to be convinced that I'm a baddie.

DharmaHelper wrote:I'm torn. On the one hand I don't want to drink the Kool-Aid and join the "coming up with my own suspicions is too much hard work so let's all vote for the same exact person every time" band.

On the other hand, my vote consistently does not matter and my cases are consistently being passed over. I may abstain from voting, I may vote Vomp, I may vote INH.