Re: Watchmen [Day 3]
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 9:48 pm
Rorschach better clean up.
Also I spelled that correctly first go around. Nice.
Also I spelled that correctly first go around. Nice.
Why do you think you should be exempt from examination? Everyone should be examined.Elohcin wrote:*sigh* okay, I am sobering up. You guys are no fun. I am not bad y'all. Look at my voting record. I really thought I could have a little fun tonight and not be looked at b/c I have such a good voting record.. I will vote for cookie with you all on Day 4 if you guys really see her as bad.
> Votes least quiet player (except if you count D2) in the history of the universe.Elohcin wrote:My list is G-Man and any two quiet players.
Read the last page or two, at least, quickly, then let me know what you're thinking.espers wrote:oh shit. it appears I've missed the vote and I may be on the chopping block?
I haven't caught up but if there's anything you'd like me to comment on quickly before the day ends i'm up for that.
What does this have to do with drunk posting?Elohcin wrote:Listen, people drunk post all the time and no one gives a shit. I come in tired and giddy and I go from looking civ to definitely one of the last baddies. Shit. Ah well. Lynch me next then. Whatever.
Because Moloch can kill the Mafia.espers wrote:cookie's vote is one I can't make sense of in the least, press her hard on that.
don't understand elohcin's vote, throwaway votes at this point seem like a way to try to skirt by on wifom and avoid meaningful vote analysis
don't understand G-man's vote, why'd he feel the need to protect dharma?
why does dh think ddl should be left alive if he's moloch?
So you went from having two suspects, not strong, then to reading a series of posts and suddenly having a suspect that eclipsed your thoughts of the other two, with enough confidence to vote?Cookie wrote:What? I decided to change my vote to follow someone else because what they said made sense to me? Once I read the links MP posted, I remembered what DDL had said about DH earlier. How does that make me suspicious? I voted on a hunch. I did not think that my suspicions against DDL or Espers were strong enough to vote for them, especially when I was uncertain of my vote against Golden (and look where that got us - life without Golden). When I reread what DDL posted, I had remembered their conversation. It was quite an easy change of heart.
Oh dang! haha mafia is your mistress.G-Man wrote:We were at a picnic and left much later than I hoped to. I had the pedal as far to the metal as my pregnant wife would allow. Once again, she doesn't know I'm playing a mafia game at the moment. I am a horrible, horrible husband.
I'm sorry, you are right. I will do better. I just need some sleep tonight. Also, sorry DH. I feel like I might could have prevented your death had I not been so out of it. Please forgive me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What does this have to do with drunk posting?Elohcin wrote:Listen, people drunk post all the time and no one gives a shit. I come in tired and giddy and I go from looking civ to definitely one of the last baddies. Shit. Ah well. Lynch me next then. Whatever.
You have no suspects, then cast a vote for me. You even panicked and indicated you might vote for Cookie after I seriously considered it, then you didn't.
It's practically Night 3. You're a lot of fun, Elo, but get your head into the game.
This is good. You're exactly right. The last thing we need to do is fall into a rut and lynch without thinking. I'm all for letting Cookie and Elohcin explain themselves, and I very well may vote for someone else tomorrow. The last thing I want them to do is to stop talking.Russtifinko wrote:Ugh, sorry I went MIA. Girlfriend called and needed to vent.
If I am not a full participant in this game for Day 4, I deserve to be lynched and/or replaced. It is a sweet game. I'll clean up my act.
Oh dang! haha mafia is your mistress.G-Man wrote:We were at a picnic and left much later than I hoped to. I had the pedal as far to the metal as my pregnant wife would allow. Once again, she doesn't know I'm playing a mafia game at the moment. I am a horrible, horrible husband.
I honestly did not have a major suspicion going into this, which is a problem given how much has happened. I'd likely have voted espers, as I said, primarily for lack of a better case.
Geez it looks like that was intense.
Linki: I agree Cookies' and Elo's votes are quick flips. Fwiw I read Elo as genuine, and Cookie, being new to our brand of mafia, may not be aware of how strongly quick flips are frowned upon. Just think it's worth bearing in mind.
Double linki: Dammit. RIP DH
Don't sweat it. I just need you to really help us out here, if you are civilian, because now you're in somewhat of a tight spot.Elohcin wrote:I'm sorry, you are right. I will do better. I just need some sleep tonight. Also, sorry DH. I feel like I might could have prevented your death had I not been so out of it. Please forgive me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What does this have to do with drunk posting?Elohcin wrote:Listen, people drunk post all the time and no one gives a shit. I come in tired and giddy and I go from looking civ to definitely one of the last baddies. Shit. Ah well. Lynch me next then. Whatever.
You have no suspects, then cast a vote for me. You even panicked and indicated you might vote for Cookie after I seriously considered it, then you didn't.
It's practically Night 3. You're a lot of fun, Elo, but get your head into the game.
Was I supposed to just not vote if I wasn't confident on anyone?MovingPictures07 wrote:So you went from having two suspects, not strong, then to reading a series of posts and suddenly having a suspect that eclipsed your thoughts of the other two, with enough confidence to vote?Cookie wrote:What? I decided to change my vote to follow someone else because what they said made sense to me? Once I read the links MP posted, I remembered what DDL had said about DH earlier. How does that make me suspicious? I voted on a hunch. I did not think that my suspicions against DDL or Espers were strong enough to vote for them, especially when I was uncertain of my vote against Golden (and look where that got us - life without Golden). When I reread what DDL posted, I had remembered their conversation. It was quite an easy change of heart.
My problem with it is that you never explained your thought process.
I have zero confidence in my abilities to baddie hunt, therefore, I am following others in their suspicions, mostly. I have played this game before, however, never really had to scumhunt. I've always gone by hunches and power roles and unfortunately, this isn't working out that well for me in this game.You don't really seem interested in baddie hunting.
Is that true?
It appears so.Ricochet wrote:RIP DH.
(Was his self-protection of night use only?)
Too true. Too true.Russtifinko wrote:Oh dang! haha mafia is your mistress.G-Man wrote:We were at a picnic and left much later than I hoped to. I had the pedal as far to the metal as my pregnant wife would allow. Once again, she doesn't know I'm playing a mafia game at the moment. I am a horrible, horrible husband.
I did what I could DH. Sorry no one else believed in you.DharmaHelper wrote:Hey everybody who didn't vote : Fuck you guys
I understand, Cookie. I know how it is to be new to the game. We just need you to really try here. The problem I had with your vote is that you had no accompanying, satisfying explanation. I felt the same was true of your Golden vote.Cookie wrote:Was I supposed to just not vote if I wasn't confident on anyone?MovingPictures07 wrote:So you went from having two suspects, not strong, then to reading a series of posts and suddenly having a suspect that eclipsed your thoughts of the other two, with enough confidence to vote?Cookie wrote:What? I decided to change my vote to follow someone else because what they said made sense to me? Once I read the links MP posted, I remembered what DDL had said about DH earlier. How does that make me suspicious? I voted on a hunch. I did not think that my suspicions against DDL or Espers were strong enough to vote for them, especially when I was uncertain of my vote against Golden (and look where that got us - life without Golden). When I reread what DDL posted, I had remembered their conversation. It was quite an easy change of heart.
My problem with it is that you never explained your thought process.
I have zero confidence in my abilities to baddie hunt, therefore, I am following others in their suspicions, mostly. I have played this game before, however, never really had to scumhunt. I've always gone by hunches and power roles and unfortunately, this isn't working out that well for me in this game.You don't really seem interested in baddie hunting.
Is that true?
DH is dead now so he can't discuss this but we've seen no evidence that Moloch can kill, I really don't think we should give people passes on this kind of basis.DharmaHelper wrote:Because Moloch can kill the Mafia.espers wrote:cookie's vote is one I can't make sense of in the least, press her hard on that.
don't understand elohcin's vote, throwaway votes at this point seem like a way to try to skirt by on wifom and avoid meaningful vote analysis
don't understand G-man's vote, why'd he feel the need to protect dharma?
why does dh think ddl should be left alive if he's moloch?
Actually I was silenced. :P Still catching up from this post though. I see that DH died, and was a good role.Elohcin wrote:So, I honestly don't know who to vote for today. So many people haven't been around. Are they forgetting its a 24 hour day? LC better not come in here with that excuse again. :P
I'm still a little worried G-Man and LC may be mafia. I also wonder about Scotty for reasons others have stated.
i votedDharmaHelper wrote:Hey everybody who didn't vote : Fuck you guys
Cookie, I'm now going to respond to this post.Cookie wrote:This post struck me as odd, especially when he talks about voting late and how it makes people look suspicious. This is interesting because earlier somewhere in this thread, he talked about Espers looking bad because he voted near the end of day for Sloonei. I can't tell if it's a guilty conscience. Other than that and his entire argument with Golden just seemed forced, like he was looking for a reason to vote out Golden (I don't know if that was on purpose or not, would someone do that as a townie?). At this point, I would not vote for DDL but I regard Golden as a good player and if he found DDL suspicious, then I would trust that suspicion. This isn't enough for me to cast a vote upon.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:@Golden
This isn't black and white. I may think you are my biggest suspect, and that you are the best one among the four I have to pick from, but I'd be foolish to be 100% sure if you are mafia. And if you're gonna accuse me, I have to defend myself. If I'm right and you're mafia, then no problem, I'm safe. But if I'm wrong, I'd better start defusing the bomb you're trying to plant on me.
And the reason I voted earlier is that I always do that. I hate voting late, because I know I'll look bad because of it regardless of whether I lynch civ or bad. I'd rather vote earlier and risk my neck, and show I put my vote where my mouth is.
In the beginning of the game, I found Elo suspicious because of her voting to tie up the votes on Day 1, however, she has posted more and I no longer find her suspicious.
Honestly, I'm shocked that MP has not been killed in the NK yet. It seems suspicious because he seems to be a very good player which could possibly turn out to be a threat to the mafia if he started calling them out, unless the Inmates have not killed him because they are high up on his rainbow list?
Honestly, Cookie, if you sign up for a mafia game, you are accepting that if you are a civ, you are gonna try to hunt mafia. Even if you're bad at it. But you have to try.Cookie wrote:Was I supposed to just not vote if I wasn't confident on anyone?MovingPictures07 wrote:So you went from having two suspects, not strong, then to reading a series of posts and suddenly having a suspect that eclipsed your thoughts of the other two, with enough confidence to vote?Cookie wrote:What? I decided to change my vote to follow someone else because what they said made sense to me? Once I read the links MP posted, I remembered what DDL had said about DH earlier. How does that make me suspicious? I voted on a hunch. I did not think that my suspicions against DDL or Espers were strong enough to vote for them, especially when I was uncertain of my vote against Golden (and look where that got us - life without Golden). When I reread what DDL posted, I had remembered their conversation. It was quite an easy change of heart.
My problem with it is that you never explained your thought process.
I have zero confidence in my abilities to baddie hunt, therefore, I am following others in their suspicions, mostly. I have played this game before, however, never really had to scumhunt. I've always gone by hunches and power roles and unfortunately, this isn't working out that well for me in this game.You don't really seem interested in baddie hunting.
Is that true?
You are blaming me, for your mistake. Yes, I made the same mistake. But you are as responsible for it as I am.At the same time, I'm trusting someone who I originally suspected so if they turn out to be wrong, it's just going to add to my suspicions.
I look forward to hearing everything you have to say.Long Con wrote:Actually I was silenced. :P Still catching up from this post though. I see that DH died, and was a good role.Elohcin wrote:So, I honestly don't know who to vote for today. So many people haven't been around. Are they forgetting its a 24 hour day? LC better not come in here with that excuse again. :P
I'm still a little worried G-Man and LC may be mafia. I also wonder about Scotty for reasons others have stated.I would have probably voted MP, Lorab, or Bass is it were happening. If I could have voted.
I agree with DDL's analysis of MP, it's how I feel. Looks like masterful distancing that just didn't work out. I think some of the points made about Eloh are good, and I don't suspect her so much right now.
Still catching up.
MP, what did you mean here by "consistently failed to deliver"? I've been doing my best with the time I've had available.MovingPictures07 wrote:[Regarding espers, here's what I most recently had to say, for reference. As the Day has progressed, I've realized yet again that he's consistently failed to deliver. And despite otherwise meaningful and well-intended content, his D1 switch/vote strikes me as quite suspicious.