Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Did you give up?Ricochet wrote:No comprende.a2thezebra wrote:I can't believe Rico's strategy of making everyone think they're trying to get everyone to vote for them so no one will ultimately vote for them is starting to actually work.
Gonna follow MM and Wilgy with their votes.
I think that Llama's attack on sig might be a crime of opportunity... he saw sig's post and saw that it wasn't very meaty, and decided sig was easy prey. I don't really think a night 0 post, long or short, is the greatest evidence of a person's baddieness. Sometimes a civ just wants to get a post in among a progressing slog of a read - you catch up, finally, and then refresh and there's another page and a half. Your head is spinning trying to get reads out of all the Ricochet nonsense, and so you just make a post to be present.thellama73 wrote:sig wrote:I still disagree with this DH, even if a player skims my post which I'd say isn't that big they'd see the first line.This is obviously a starting fluff, if anything it would make people skip the rest of my post.sig wrote:I want an apology also, I'm not sure what I want it for, but by God I want one!
I had a few OT lines then this.
Another obvious fluff portion. Anyone skimming would see the quotations breaking up the post and at the very least I'd think they would read what I was quoting. Then another quote this time from Llama, and his thing with Zebra, which was done in good fun.sig wrote:Mac has a role from the TH game,MacDougall wrote:Yes Ricochet is most certainly bullshitting hard. This is not my beautiful Ricochet.or I'm getting my old people bands mixed up? :P
So I highly doubt anyone skimming my post would think it had any OT stuff since the OT stuff was between much more noticeably fluff.
Not to mention like I said in my above post it was Night 0 and like many people I was messing around. I still find it very odd that you single out this post, and make it seem like a bigger deal then it is. Not to mention the fact that Llama quickly agrees with you about it.
I mean he could just be doing that since I made light of a post which he didn't want me to joke about and he was mad that I did this, however I don't know his personality enough to know if that is the case or not, and I doubt a mature adult would get pissy that I made a joke about how he was referring to Zebra. This leads me to think he is either budding up to you for an unknown reason, he is mafia and thought this was good to mention, or he wanted to appear like he was more involved in the game and this was a safe way to do so.
I think it is semi likely that either DH or Llama are mafia.
I also still have some reservations about DH/JJJ for the audio posts.
I notice DH mentions my fluff post after I brought up the points about the audio posts, I don't recall him ever directly answering me about my theory on this while I do remember JJJ doing so. This is another ping for DH in my book.
Sig, you're completely misrepresenting what I (and I assume DH) found fluffy about your post. It wasn't the jokey comments. It wasn't OT material. It was the on topic portions that actually said nothing. For example, you said my point about MacDougall was "interesting" and left it at that. Why was it interesting? What was interesting about it? What is your opinion of my point, is it a good one or a bad one, and why? I asked, and you never answered. That's what I mean by fluff - the illusion of contribution.
Rico, I still don't think I get the A World Reborn reference here. I don't know what you mean by "tier". Can you clarify what you meant - are you saying that such a role is something we'd see in one of my games, and not in a Game of Champions?sig wrote:What do you mean by this? That no World Reborn roles are in this game?Ricochet wrote:This is not A World Reborn tier, so your paranoia is unwarranted. But yes, distance yourself, baddie emperor yees yeeessaLong Con wrote:He wants the four of us dead... or all four to vote for him... I'm staying away for now from Blue Eye.
I am happy to have a crack at lynching Rico, but just let it be known that I don't think it'll work.a2thezebra wrote:I can't believe Rico's strategy of making everyone think they're trying to get everyone to vote for them so no one will ultimately vote for them is starting to actually work.
Nope, but baddies aren't being voted right now, so I have nothing better to do but wait.Draconus wrote:Did you give up?Ricochet wrote:No comprende.a2thezebra wrote:I can't believe Rico's strategy of making everyone think they're trying to get everyone to vote for them so no one will ultimately vote for them is starting to actually work.
Gonna follow MM and Wilgy with their votes.
I agree, I have managed to get quite a number of reads out of it so far.MacDougall wrote:There's loads of useful shit been posted. This has been a very productive game so far.thellama73 wrote:They are not really worth reading.Tranq wrote:25 pages already?
Excuse me? What was the first time?Long Con wrote:Also, Zebra, that's another time you have made an assertion that I don't see how you could know. About curse roles.
Why?MacDougall wrote:I am happy to have a crack at lynching Rico, but just let it be known that I don't think it'll work.a2thezebra wrote:I can't believe Rico's strategy of making everyone think they're trying to get everyone to vote for them so no one will ultimately vote for them is starting to actually work.
Which are?Golden wrote:I agree, I have managed to get quite a number of reads out of it so far.MacDougall wrote:There's loads of useful shit been posted. This has been a very productive game so far.thellama73 wrote:They are not really worth reading.Tranq wrote:25 pages already?
I misunderstood your question. I mean he didn't begin his random behaviour under duress. But he could have gone any direction from there, it's fine to start out jokey. After he took heat, I feel like he amped it up to 11.MacDougall wrote:You said he was taking heat early? Indicating that you think his behaviour is a response to the suspicion placed on him right?Spoiler: showYou now say he wasn't put under duress and that his behaviour wasn't influenced by being under duress?Spoiler: show
This a pretty inconsistent viewpoint.
Frequently mentioned in the thread when I've formed them.Ricochet wrote:Which are?Golden wrote:I agree, I have managed to get quite a number of reads out of it so far.MacDougall wrote:There's loads of useful shit been posted. This has been a very productive game so far.thellama73 wrote:They are not really worth reading.Tranq wrote:25 pages already?
Dr Wilgy swings both ways?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
If Ricochet was not an option, do you know who you would vote for?Golden wrote:Frequently mentioned in the thread when I've formed them.Ricochet wrote:Which are?Golden wrote:I agree, I have managed to get quite a number of reads out of it so far.MacDougall wrote:There's loads of useful shit been posted. This has been a very productive game so far.thellama73 wrote:They are not really worth reading.Tranq wrote:25 pages already?
You are "sure" that he is scum wifoming to try to convince people not to vote for him. I don't think he is. I think he legitimately is trying to get votes. I suppose it's a more realistic proposition for me than you because I've played that role and he is doing a lot of the same things I did.a2thezebra wrote:Excuse me? What was the first time?Long Con wrote:Also, Zebra, that's another time you have made an assertion that I don't see how you could know. About curse roles.
Why?MacDougall wrote:I am happy to have a crack at lynching Rico, but just let it be known that I don't think it'll work.a2thezebra wrote:I can't believe Rico's strategy of making everyone think they're trying to get everyone to vote for them so no one will ultimately vote for them is starting to actually work.
Alrighty then!Golden wrote:I misunderstood your question. I mean he didn't begin his random behaviour under duress. But he could have gone any direction from there, it's fine to start out jokey. After he took heat, I feel like he amped it up to 11.MacDougall wrote:You said he was taking heat early? Indicating that you think his behaviour is a response to the suspicion placed on him right?Spoiler: showYou now say he wasn't put under duress and that his behaviour wasn't influenced by being under duress?Spoiler: show
This a pretty inconsistent viewpoint.
Golden wrote:Dr Wilgy swings both ways?
It might, however, work at using up whatever power he has (for instance, a lynch protection.)MacDougall wrote:I am happy to have a crack at lynching Rico, but just let it be known that I don't think it'll work.a2thezebra wrote:I can't believe Rico's strategy of making everyone think they're trying to get everyone to vote for them so no one will ultimately vote for them is starting to actually work.
LoRabDraconus wrote:If Ricochet was not an option, do you know who you would vote for?Golden wrote:Frequently mentioned in the thread when I've formed them.Ricochet wrote:Which are?Golden wrote:I agree, I have managed to get quite a number of reads out of it so far.MacDougall wrote:There's loads of useful shit been posted. This has been a very productive game so far.thellama73 wrote:They are not really worth reading.Tranq wrote:25 pages already?
a2thezebra wrote:Your tone/rhetoric is unnervingly subdued so far, Mac. Where's the shit-flinging and Broadway charisma?
If you recall the ruels, you are not supposed to go down that path in this game. So yeah, you're doing good.MacDougall wrote:You make a valid point though, I haven't had an aggressive argument with anyone that devolved into name calling and got me a MoD warning yet.
I don't think anyone needs to ask for you to share.a2thezebra wrote:Why has no one bothered to ask me about my six other potential votes for the day? Especially since most of us seem to agree that Rico is getting too much attention.
I've considered and made judgements on more players than anyone except Ricochet. It's like middle of day 1, what I think you are describing is something that I do further into the game.a2thezebra wrote:I'm not missing the aggression, but I am missing the all-over-the-place theorizing and speculation about what's going on. With as much that's happened so early in the game, you've only strongly considered a select few possibilities.
linki - rued
That's a good point. I still have post-dead-Zebra Star Wars lingering in my brain.MacDougall wrote:I've considered and made judgements on more players than anyone except Ricochet. It's like middle of day 1, what I think you are describing is something that I do further into the game.a2thezebra wrote:I'm not missing the aggression, but I am missing the all-over-the-place theorizing and speculation about what's going on. With as much that's happened so early in the game, you've only strongly considered a select few possibilities.
linki - rued
No, I couldn't guess one.a2thezebra wrote:For funsies as well as to get an idea if anyone's misreading me be it deliberately (alignment-indicative) or because I post too much (not alignment-indicative).
I'm kind of surprised that you think they don't need to be guessed. You think you can correctly guess all six then? Remember, this is excluding Rico.
Well....Ricochet wrote:I can only hope Golden's ISO will reveal how bad zebra is.
No.MacDougall wrote:I thought he said that you don't need to be encouraged to share ie. just be out with it?
You are correct that neither of them are in my list, although I'm a little surprised you guessed JJ.Golden wrote:I did it and came up with...
None of them will be MetalMarsh or JJ.
That's about it. I don't think you've even expressed a view on me.
Isn't it supposed to be used to create content when there is a dearth of it? This thread is going at warp speed and there is plenty to pick through to find leads.Ricochet wrote:It'd be so easier to do a GTH, but I guess y'all like getting teasted by baddie zebra's distancing moves instead.
You haven't even made mention of some of these players so I'm not sure how we were supposed to guess.a2thezebra wrote:Boomslang
sig
Long Con
MacDougall
Matt
juliets
a2thezebra wrote:Boomslangn
sig
Long Con
MacDougall
Matt
juliets
