Page 22 of 186

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:49 pm
by ika
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Well i have been doign slightly more already or do you disagree?

Also i could say something funny but ill be nice and not embarass you

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:53 pm
by Marmot
DrWilgy wrote:I'm seeing theories suggesting I'm a sock.

Everyone, am I a handsome sock or a beautiful daisy?
Could you not be a beautiful sock or a handsome daisy?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:54 pm
by Marmot
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Are you distancing? This looks like distancing.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:59 pm
by Silverwolf
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Are you distancing? This looks like distancing.
NO

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:59 pm
by ika
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Are you distancing? This looks like distancing.
lol

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:01 pm
by Marmot
Silverwolf wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Are you distancing? This looks like distancing.
NO
Alrighty then, I'll take your word for it. :smile:

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:05 pm
by ika
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Are you distancing? This looks like distancing.
NO
Alrighty then, I'll take your word for it. :smile:
you better take her word on it

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:06 pm
by Sloonei
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I propose some of us also turn and stare awkwardly at ika and Turnip Head until each of them gives us something substantial to work with.
Like what?

I jsut isoed dr and i see him as town right now
silver is town too

anyone else i should be isoing or reading up on right now?

i knwo someone said something about the voting the guy and i know sevral of us has said why.

pedit: silvers town. care to tell me whats pining you?
Tell me about whatever your heart desires, I'm not the boss of you.

But if you really want to do my bidding, I'd be interested in your thoughts on myself, gleam, and/or Epignosis. Or literally anybody else you prefer to look at. Or any thought you have at all about the game.
well gleam im currently voteing so it should be sefl explainotry

episgon i can go iso and i need to iso you consideign how you are voting me and not directly interacitng with me about it before i would say leanign scum.
i'm not directly interacting with you? What are all of these posts then?

And there's nothing self-explanatory about your vote for Gleam. Votes are something you're supposed to explain yourself, not something I'm supposed to piece together on my own.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:08 pm
by ika
Sloonei wrote:i'm not directly interacting with you? What are all of these posts then?

And there's nothing self-explanatory about your vote for Gleam. Votes are something you're supposed to explain yourself, not something I'm supposed to piece together on my own.
well now you are, but your "well we could all look at ika" was not.

i expalined it seveal times already why im voting him. i mean like that you should kinda see why based on what i have said.

i like having some cards close to my chest

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:15 pm
by Sloonei
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:@ika: I'm not seeing any Wilgy ISO. If you looked at him without posting anythijg, could you please share some of your thoughts with is? It's impossible to get a read on you if you're not sharing your thoughts.
i do it without saying most times. dont share thoughts as either aligment openly.

but i just glanced though hsi iso and it has a derpy tone to it that kinda says "meh i dont care about me" type thing
Well then I find everything about your style suspicious. If this is just how you are as town then I'll have to get used to it, but for now I can't really look at your output and say "yup, this guy's town. Giving reads without evidence or reasons to back them up is null to me, and the easiest way in the world for scum to participate.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:18 pm
by Sloonei
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:i'm not directly interacting with you? What are all of these posts then?

And there's nothing self-explanatory about your vote for Gleam. Votes are something you're supposed to explain yourself, not something I'm supposed to piece together on my own.
well now you are, but your "well we could all look at ika" was not.

i expalined it seveal times already why im voting him. i mean like that you should kinda see why based on what i have said.

i like having some cards close to my chest
I had mentioned you several times before that post. My vote was already on you and I'd tried to get your attention long before makig that post.
I suppose you have given some reasons for yojr Gleam vote, but your analysis has been very light all around, at least by my standards. I get that cultural differences are responsible for the differences in our styles, but where I come from (RateYourMusic), reasoned suspicions are the name of the game.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:24 pm
by Black Rock
sig wrote:I don't like this huge bandwagon on gleam, espacilly since nobody has ever actually explained their suspicion of him, or if they have I don't remember it.

I've got a slight mafia gut read on Wilgy.

Also I find it odd how quite Zebra/LC seem to be this game.
I agree with this. I am mostly caught up and I really don't understand how Gleam has so many votes so early in the day. I understand votes are changeable but with this level it's making a statement and I don't understand the case.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:28 pm
by Sloonei
I haven't taken a close look at gleam's posts today, but the swiftness of those votes against him to start the day pretty much deterred me from wanting to vote for him.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:29 pm
by Black Rock
Silverwolf wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Are you distancing? This looks like distancing.
NO
ika wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:OK, ika stop buddying me now.
I can barely tell you two apart.

define buddying, last i recalled im smotheirng you with love and affection ;)
Yes, I see that but I want to see more from you in game than just that. Buddying is when you are being affectionate and by doing so, making me subconsciously look elsewhere for suspicious activity, instead of looking right at you.
Are you distancing? This looks like distancing.
lol

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:29 pm
by Black Rock
What? Where's my words?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:30 pm
by Black Rock
The point of that post was, I can barely tell you two apart. I'm not sure how I feel about that.

Re: [NIGHT 1] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:38 pm
by sig
Long Con wrote:
sig wrote:Also I find it odd how quite Zebra/LC seem to be this game.
Not that odd. I'm co-hosting Arkham (sometimes) and playing in Rocky and Bullwinkle... and RL reasons that I've been busy. Hence the big catch-up and multi-quote posts.
Well know that you've made a good amount of posts with your views it isn't. Early in the game I had forgetting about you altogether which was odd.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:40 pm
by Dragon D. Luffy
Imo Zebra's silence is bothering me more than Long Con's.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:42 pm
by Turnip Head
Black Rock wrote:
sig wrote:I don't like this huge bandwagon on gleam, espacilly since nobody has ever actually explained their suspicion of him, or if they have I don't remember it.

I've got a slight mafia gut read on Wilgy.

Also I find it odd how quite Zebra/LC seem to be this game.
I agree with this. I am mostly caught up and I really don't understand how Gleam has so many votes so early in the day. I understand votes are changeable but with this level it's making a statement and I don't understand the case.
This is where I'm at. Scotty's vote seems questionable to me, I haven't looked at the other votes in depth yet. Scotty said he was voting for Gleam "Because", and then when asked to elaborate, he said:
Scotty wrote:As for me voting gleam: it's mostly a continuation suspicion of my night 1 eyeing of him for being a floppy pancake. But I'm far too lazy to look it up right now. About to enter a poker tournament.

This isn't just. Throwaway vote on a wagon. It's just gut, and he happens to have a bunch of votes piles on as well, so there's that.
So idk, but putting the sixth vote on a wagon more than 24 hours before the lynch deadline, when it doesn't look like a "pressure vote" or like it's furthering the read, well it looks like it's just there. I feel like I can't judge Scotty's motives until the Day is over and I see what else he does with his vote, but right now I feel like he's just gonna keep it parked there until deadline and that feels weird to me for reasons I can't really articulate.

Re: Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:43 pm
by sig
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:I don't like Nero's vote what so ever. It seems like he picked a player who already had two votes. I think one of the other people with two votes is a cop, and Nero switched his vote to save them. :srsnod:
That´s a little far-fetched. We are supposed to catch baddies here, and in that moment Chaindeath seemed to me like the most scummy player. I was not happy with any of the major wagons, so I went with him. Do you believe both me and Ika(and the other players with two votes) are cops then? If so, why didn´t you vote for any of us?

I do agree with some of the above posters that Slooneis vote did seem like an act to save a teammate.

You sound very defensive here. :ponder:

I said I think someone was mafia I didn't specifically said it was you, and I don't recall mentioning Ike at all so I find you bringing him up to be odd. You barely mentioned Chaindeath and your reason for voting him was weak. He was also one of the players who already had two votes so yes it does seem like you just put your vote down on someone who had votes. :eye:

linki: Zebra's silence is also strange and she said I was a civ read. I'm not sure how I feel about that. :shrug:

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:48 pm
by ika
Sloonei wrote: I had mentioned you several times before that post. My vote was already on you and I'd tried to get your attention long before makig that post.
I suppose you have given some reasons for yojr Gleam vote, but your analysis has been very light all around, at least by my standards. I get that cultural differences are responsible for the differences in our styles, but where I come from (RateYourMusic), reasoned suspicions are the name of the game.
ya wel.....

with me you have to lower the standards a lot.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:49 pm
by Sloonei
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Imo Zebra's silence is bothering me more than Long Con's.
Zebra's also in Rocky & Bullwinkle and about to host a game on RYM and she hasn't been around much the last couple of days in either of those places either, for the record.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:49 pm
by Sloonei
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote: I had mentioned you several times before that post. My vote was already on you and I'd tried to get your attention long before makig that post.
I suppose you have given some reasons for yojr Gleam vote, but your analysis has been very light all around, at least by my standards. I get that cultural differences are responsible for the differences in our styles, but where I come from (RateYourMusic), reasoned suspicions are the name of the game.
ya wel.....

with me you have to lower the standards a lot.
Or vote for you.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:51 pm
by Long Con
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Matt wrote: Here's a new challenge. We're all up to date. Does anyone else in the game currently have six players they won't vote for? You don't even have to say who, just yes or no.
Llama
Scotty
Chaindeath
Mongoose
Marmot
Epi
⅄ǝs I po˙
What is this I don't even
Haven't you ever stood on your head before? This is what happens when you type things while standing on your head and looking in a mirror.

It's easier to read if you stand on your head and read it in a mirror.
I get it now, my Chrome obviously needs to update some Character files or something, because I see "□ǝs I po˙"... the "Y" is important for getting it, it looks like gobbledygook to me.

Re: Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:52 pm
by Turnip Head
sig wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:I don't like Nero's vote what so ever. It seems like he picked a player who already had two votes. I think one of the other people with two votes is a cop, and Nero switched his vote to save them. :srsnod:
That´s a little far-fetched. We are supposed to catch baddies here, and in that moment Chaindeath seemed to me like the most scummy player. I was not happy with any of the major wagons, so I went with him. Do you believe both me and Ika(and the other players with two votes) are cops then? If so, why didn´t you vote for any of us?

I do agree with some of the above posters that Slooneis vote did seem like an act to save a teammate.

You sound very defensive here. :ponder:

I said I think someone was mafia I didn't specifically said it was you, and I don't recall mentioning Ike at all so I find you bringing him up to be odd. You barely mentioned Chaindeath and your reason for voting him was weak. He was also one of the players who already had two votes so yes it does seem like you just put your vote down on someone who had votes. :eye:

linki: Zebra's silence is also strange and she said I was a civ read. I'm not sure how I feel about that. :shrug:
This always catches my eye when players tie their own fate to another player (Nero attaching himself to ika in this case). It's like an indirect form of buddying. I haven't scanned Nero's other posts though.

Anyways Nero, in this post you say that Chaindeath seemed to be the most scummy player in that moment. How are you feeling about him now, and why?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:53 pm
by agleaminranks
Addressing some things real quick:

Silverwolf, you spun your wheels pretty hard when I asked you to explain why you voted for me with no prior explanation. Then you said that you refused to elaborate, only when another person chimed in did you backtrack and say it was to see how someone reacted. Then when you were asked about what you thought of my reaction, you said it was just OMGUS.

You also said it was impossible to start a bandwagon that early in the game. I beg to differ. All it takes is a margin of one or two votes to start a bandwagon.

Could everyone else please go back to the very beginning of the day period and look at my criticism of Silverwolf's behavior. I honestly, truly believe she is acting completely irrational, and the fact that no one else is pointing it out is absolutely fucking mind boggling. I honestly thought it would speak for itself.

Marmot, would you please explain your vote too and quit with the shitposting.

Also Scotty, how was I acting like a, whatever it was you called me? Wet pancake or something? The hell does that even mean?

I need to go to work and then to some school matters. I probably won't be around until much later tonight.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:01 pm
by ika
yawn can we lynch this now?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:06 pm
by Sloonei
What so other people think of ika? Am I alone in thinking his behavior stinks of deliberate unhelpfulness? On Day 1 he kept saying he wanted to sort silverwolf first and foremost, which is a reasonable strategy, but on Day 2 he just seems to be saying she's town but not really working together in any capacity with her like he seemed to suggest, and most of the reads he's posting are minimal at best. He is falling back on a meta-defense when I (or anyone else) press him. I can understand differences in culture and playstyle, but this also wreaks of a player who's taking advantage of these differences to hide behind them.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:07 pm
by Sloonei
EBWOP: "What DO other people think of ika?"

Phone posts forever.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:08 pm
by ika
Sloonei wrote:What so other people think of ika? Am I alone in thinking his behavior stinks of deliberate unhelpfulness? On Day 1 he kept saying he wanted to sort silverwolf first and foremost, which is a reasonable strategy, but on Day 2 he just seems to be saying she's town but not really working together in any capacity with her like he seemed to suggest, and most of the reads he's posting are minimal at best. He is falling back on a meta-defense when I (or anyone else) press him. I can understand differences in culture and playstyle, but this also wreaks of a player who's taking advantage of these differences to hide behind them.
well we both have been busy.

i mena if it helps i aslo think luffy is twon

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:09 pm
by Silverwolf
agleaminranks wrote:Addressing some things real quick:

Silverwolf, you spun your wheels pretty hard when I asked you to explain why you voted for me with no prior explanation. Then you said that you refused to elaborate, only when another person chimed in did you backtrack and say it was to see how someone reacted. Then when you were asked about what you thought of my reaction, you said it was just OMGUS.

You also said it was impossible to start a bandwagon that early in the game. I beg to differ. All it takes is a margin of one or two votes to start a bandwagon.

Could everyone else please go back to the very beginning of the day period and look at my criticism of Silverwolf's behavior. I honestly, truly believe she is acting completely irrational, and the fact that no one else is pointing it out is absolutely fucking mind boggling. I honestly thought it would speak for itself.

Marmot, would you please explain your vote too and quit with the shitposting.

Also Scotty, how was I acting like a, whatever it was you called me? Wet pancake or something? The hell does that even mean?

I need to go to work and then to some school matters. I probably won't be around until much later tonight.
This is a major misrep of my actions. I've already explained why I voted you and your behavior in reaction to it, seals it. If you are gonna spend this much time discrediting me, I still don't know why you are not voting for me but instead waiting for support from others before doing so. That's a scum trait IMO because I've seen it before.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:11 pm
by Sloonei
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What so other people think of ika? Am I alone in thinking his behavior stinks of deliberate unhelpfulness? On Day 1 he kept saying he wanted to sort silverwolf first and foremost, which is a reasonable strategy, but on Day 2 he just seems to be saying she's town but not really working together in any capacity with her like he seemed to suggest, and most of the reads he's posting are minimal at best. He is falling back on a meta-defense when I (or anyone else) press him. I can understand differences in culture and playstyle, but this also wreaks of a player who's taking advantage of these differences to hide behind them.
well we both have been busy.

i mena if it helps i aslo think luffy is twon
That doesn't really help.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:12 pm
by Epignosis
What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:12 pm
by Sloonei
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I propose some of us also turn and stare awkwardly at ika and Turnip Head until each of them gives us something substantial to work with.
Like what?

I jsut isoed dr and i see him as town right now
silver is town too

anyone else i should be isoing or reading up on right now?

i knwo someone said something about the voting the guy and i know sevral of us has said why.

pedit: silvers town. care to tell me whats pining you?
Please give your thoughts on Sloonei. I want to see if your thought process matches my own on this.
He gave some of his thoughts, allegedly. What are yours?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:14 pm
by ika
Sloonei wrote: That doesn't really help.
*shrugs*

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:15 pm
by DrWilgy
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Idk, but for some reason I want to lynch both Ika and Wolf.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:16 pm
by ika
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Idk, but for some reason I want to lynch both Ika and Wolf.
Can you elaborate at all?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:18 pm
by DrWilgy
ika wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Idk, but for some reason I want to lynch both Ika and Wolf.
Can you elaborate at all?
Not really. Bad gut feeling from the both of you... Er, you two together more so.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:18 pm
by Turnip Head
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Yeah man I'm pretty lost. I'm thinking I'll toss a vote onto Metalmarmot for now. He's trying too hard to be a good little civ, I see right through his charade :mafia:

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:21 pm
by Epignosis
DrWilgy wrote:
ika wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Idk, but for some reason I want to lynch both Ika and Wolf.
Can you elaborate at all?
Not really. Bad gut feeling from the both of you... Er, you two together more so.
What does their activity in Zodiac tell you about them?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:23 pm
by DrWilgy
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
ika wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:What the hell have I been reading the past few pages?
Idk, but for some reason I want to lynch both Ika and Wolf.
Can you elaborate at all?
Not really. Bad gut feeling from the both of you... Er, you two together more so.
What does their activity in Zodiac tell you about them?
That Imma submit a NK on Epi :feb:

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:27 pm
by Epignosis
DrWilgy

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:27 pm
by ika
Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy
care to explain that one?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:28 pm
by Epignosis
ika wrote:
Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy
care to explain that one?
Not really, since I voted for him last time and my opinion hasn't changed.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:32 pm
by Epignosis
I will say that I don't understand the six votes on gleam. Did he break wind or something?

Re: Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:32 pm
by Nerolunar
sig wrote:
Nerolunar wrote:
sig wrote:I don't like Nero's vote what so ever. It seems like he picked a player who already had two votes. I think one of the other people with two votes is a cop, and Nero switched his vote to save them. :srsnod:
That´s a little far-fetched. We are supposed to catch baddies here, and in that moment Chaindeath seemed to me like the most scummy player. I was not happy with any of the major wagons, so I went with him. Do you believe both me and Ika(and the other players with two votes) are cops then? If so, why didn´t you vote for any of us?

I do agree with some of the above posters that Slooneis vote did seem like an act to save a teammate.

You sound very defensive here. :ponder:

I said I think someone was mafia I didn't specifically said it was you, and I don't recall mentioning Ike at all so I find you bringing him up to be odd. You barely mentioned Chaindeath and your reason for voting him was weak. He was also one of the players who already had two votes so yes it does seem like you just put your vote down on someone who had votes. :eye:

linki: Zebra's silence is also strange and she said I was a civ read. I'm not sure how I feel about that. :shrug:
Right here you said that any of the people with two votes is a cop. I used Ika as an example of one of them because I could not remember any of the others.

I voted Chaindeath for the same reason you believe my vote to be weak: his vote on LC. There was almost no reasoning at all and it pinged me pretty much. Imo he did redeem himself in his last post and I am not pinged by him as much as before.

Right now I don´t know who to vote for. How much time until the day ends?

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:32 pm
by Enrique
I'm so sorry, guys. I hate non-participators, but I simply don't have the time to catch up right now. I'm asking Daisy and MP to replace me, and also want to apologize for taking up a space in this awesome game I couldn't play. If they can't find a replacement and things calm down a bit on my end, then I'll make an effort to play this. I just have so much on my plate that kinda takes priority.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:33 pm
by Nerolunar
Wait, quite a few people have been voicing disagreement against the Gleam wagon. Is this a coordinated cop effort to steer the thread in a specific direction? :ponder:

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:36 pm
by Silverwolf
Sloonei wrote:
Silverwolf wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I propose some of us also turn and stare awkwardly at ika and Turnip Head until each of them gives us something substantial to work with.
Like what?

I jsut isoed dr and i see him as town right now
silver is town too

anyone else i should be isoing or reading up on right now?

i knwo someone said something about the voting the guy and i know sevral of us has said why.

pedit: silvers town. care to tell me whats pining you?
Please give your thoughts on Sloonei. I want to see if your thought process matches my own on this.
He gave some of his thoughts, allegedly. What are yours?
I disagree with his opinion that you are just voting him without interacting with him or explaining it and disagree with his scumread of you. I have been leaning town on you for awhile now.

Re: [DAY 2] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:37 pm
by Silverwolf
Nerolunar wrote:Wait, quite a few people have been voicing disagreement against the Gleam wagon. Is this a coordinated cop effort to steer the thread in a specific direction? :ponder:
I've noticed the resistance to this wagon for awhile now. Just noting this for now as it the opposition seems kind of strong at this point. I'ts particularly troublesome to see the ones voting for him, being discredited for very weak reasons.