The Syndicate

DrWilgy wrote:

Marmot wrote:But I do give you three players who have not been around today.

DrWilgy: Hasn't posted since the start of Night 3.
MacDougall: Hasn't posted since the beginning of Day 4.
TheFloyd73: Hasn't posted since Day 3.

Video games homie

Quin wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I'm a redhead- I have no soul

Me too!

I don't really find Quin suspicious. But then again this is only my second game on this site and there are only a couple people I know well enough to make judgments on. Getting a civ read on LC. Not really sure if going after low posters is a good idea here, but I don't really have any better ideas yet, so it may come to that for me.

I'm a civ and I support Hillary Clinton.

Other than that, it usually takes me a few cycles to start putting things together. If Ron Swanson were in this game, I'd say he's guilty as shit for three days before realizing it was Donna right before I'm killed!

Anyway I'm gonna get back to watching TV and nursing this hangover. I'll check back in periodically.

Discrediting your own opinion on an argument while still making a point of giving it never looks good to me.

Quin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Quin, I feel like you are not taking my efforts to lynch you seriously.

I'm not.

Long Con wrote:

Quin wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I'm a redhead- I have no soul

Me too!

I don't really find Quin suspicious. But then again this is only my second game on this site and there are only a couple people I know well enough to make judgments on. Getting a civ read on LC. Not really sure if going after low posters is a good idea here, but I don't really have any better ideas yet, so it may come to that for me.

I'm a civ and I support Hillary Clinton.

Other than that, it usually takes me a few cycles to start putting things together. If Ron Swanson were in this game, I'd say he's guilty as shit for three days before realizing it was Donna right before I'm killed!

Anyway I'm gonna get back to watching TV and nursing this hangover. I'll check back in periodically.

Discrediting your own opinion on an argument while still making a point of giving it never looks good to me.

On my original read, I was comparing his and S~V~S' posts, and I thought Quin was making more sense than her, in comparison. Now when I look at it, I see Quin's accusation of notsawyer as a stretch. Reading notsawyer's post that Quin is criticizing, I just don't see it that way. I feel more like Quin needed an angle on someone, and put this one together to have something.

Quin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Quin, I feel like you are not taking my efforts to lynch you seriously.

I'm not.

Not much to say here, don't know if Civ Quin or baddie Quin is more likely to dismiss and avoid.

... and this is as far as I have gotten on the Quin ISO. Going to work now.

Epignosis wrote:Llama, you used a curious word in describing notsawyer: "Equivocating." How does this adjective apply to notsawyer? "Resolute" or "stubborn" is the word I would have used.

MacDougall wrote: Also let's just lynch Floyd.

Or someone could replace him if he's too inactive

Is that the reason? I haven't been paying attention

DrWilgy wrote:What do you mean?

Quin wrote: And, both. This is civilian Quin though. I'd be unanimously town-read if I was bad.

thellama73 wrote:

Quin wrote: And, both. This is civilian Quin though. I'd be unanimously town-read if I was bad.

Oh wait a minute! Just when I was about ready to plant Quin firmly in my Civ column, he lets loose with this howler.

"I'm playing exactly like a civvie. Nothing I'm doing indicates in the slightest that I am bad." The universal emotions of a frustrated baddie who feels he's played a great game but is losing anyway (I've been there many times.)

I really, really distrust this post.

Quin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Quin wrote: And, both. This is civilian Quin though. I'd be unanimously town-read if I was bad.

Oh wait a minute! Just when I was about ready to plant Quin firmly in my Civ column, he lets loose with this howler.

"I'm playing exactly like a civvie. Nothing I'm doing indicates in the slightest that I am bad." The universal emotions of a frustrated baddie who feels he's played a great game but is losing anyway (I've been there many times.)

I really, really distrust this post.

It's amazing how much you can take out of a post which says literally none of that

thellama73 wrote:

Quin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Quin wrote: And, both. This is civilian Quin though. I'd be unanimously town-read if I was bad.

Oh wait a minute! Just when I was about ready to plant Quin firmly in my Civ column, he lets loose with this howler.

"I'm playing exactly like a civvie. Nothing I'm doing indicates in the slightest that I am bad." The universal emotions of a frustrated baddie who feels he's played a great game but is losing anyway (I've been there many times.)

I really, really distrust this post.

It's amazing how much you can take out of a post which says literally none of that

It says all of that and more, Mr. Subtext. Clap while you can.

Quin wrote: I recall Long Con be the only one who wasn't also on the chopping block to express any degree of suspicion towards me. Would you not agree that it's unlikely that I'd be a 'frustrated baddie' at this point?

thellama73 wrote:

Quin wrote: I recall Long Con be the only one who wasn't also on the chopping block to express any degree of suspicion towards me. Would you not agree that it's unlikely that I'd be a 'frustrated baddie' at this point?

No I don't agree with that at all. I see lots of reasons for you to be frustrated.

Quin wrote:list them*.

thellama73 wrote:

Quin wrote:list them*.

You know what they are.

Quin wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Quin wrote:list them*.

You know what they are.

No, I don't.

Long Con wrote:3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
I stand on Floyd in the gutter, because that's where I assume he is lying, dead drunk or just plain dead. Does he get some sort of points for just signing up for Mafia games? I don't get this guy.

notsawyer540 wrote:One question I would like answered is: Have I really been forcing evidence to fit my conclusions, or has Epi's Fox-News-style misrepresentation of facts and events fooled too many of you?

TheFloyd73 wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:One question I would like answered is: Have I really been forcing evidence to fit my conclusions, or has Epi's Fox-News-style misrepresentation of facts and events fooled too many of you?

That's Epi's just being Epi. I find it hard to read him as civ or scum, but that's his style of play. To be honest, you also implement forced "false news" as well.

TheFloyd73 wrote:

Long Con wrote:3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
I stand on Floyd in the gutter, because that's where I assume he is lying, dead drunk or just plain dead. Does he get some sort of points for just signing up for Mafia games? I don't get this guy.

Ow, that hurts.

Long Con wrote:

TheFloyd73 wrote:

Long Con wrote:3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
I stand on Floyd in the gutter, because that's where I assume he is lying, dead drunk or just plain dead. Does he get some sort of points for just signing up for Mafia games? I don't get this guy.

Ow, that hurts.

Hmm... that did come across as pretty harsh. Sorry dude. Funny fail.

Epignosis wrote:notsawyer now has five votes. If anyone has motive to lynch him, it's me.

I am not worried about defending him in this way and he comes up bad anyway. I think I've demonstrated I'm not bad and his actions against me show we're not on a team on top of that.

I want to know why he's guilty for gunning so hard for me.

Long Con wrote:Long Con
thellama73
MacDougall
Epignosis
notsawyer540
Dfaraday
TheFloyd73
Marmot
DrWilgy
Quin

This is a basic rainbow that I hastily constructed. I don't even know if it's exactly how I feel.

Long Con wrote:I was thinking about Macdougall's good Day 1 performance.

MacDougall wrote:Let's talk more about how I tone read a Mafia player on day 1 again.

Long Con wrote:Long Con
thellama73
MacDougall
Epignosis
notsawyer540
Dfaraday
TheFloyd73
Marmot
DrWilgy
Quin

This is a basic rainbow that I hastily constructed. I don't even know if it's exactly how I feel.

Marmot wrote:

Epignosis wrote:notsawyer now has five votes. If anyone has motive to lynch him, it's me.

I am not worried about defending him in this way and he comes up bad anyway. I think I've demonstrated I'm not bad and his actions against me show we're not on a team on top of that.

I want to know why he's guilty for gunning so hard for me.

Why are you crediting your vote for no particular reason?

Marmot wrote:

Marmot wrote:

Epignosis wrote:notsawyer now has five votes. If anyone has motive to lynch him, it's me.

I am not worried about defending him in this way and he comes up bad anyway. I think I've demonstrated I'm not bad and his actions against me show we're not on a team on top of that.

I want to know why he's guilty for gunning so hard for me.

Why are you crediting your vote for no particular reason?

Why should you have motive to lynch him, and no one else?

Epignosis wrote:I'm about to pull my hair out.

Stop lynching people for doing things that are weird, inconsistent, unhelpful, or that you just don't like.

Tell me what they have to gain by doing what they do IF THEY ARE MAFIA.

If you are voting notsawyer, explain to me why he did what he did as mafia.

Marmot wrote:My suspect pool in every game would be large enough to swim laps in if I played by that logic.

Epignosis wrote:He wants me dead, that's why. Does he want anybody else dead?

Marmot wrote:

Epignosis wrote:He wants me dead, that's why. Does he want anybody else dead?

What do you think about the second part of this question?

Epignosis wrote:

Marmot wrote:

Epignosis wrote:He wants me dead, that's why. Does he want anybody else dead?

What do you think about the second part of this question?

He isn't going for anybody else.

Marmot wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Marmot wrote:

Epignosis wrote:He wants me dead, that's why. Does he want anybody else dead?

What do you think about the second part of this question?

He isn't going for anybody else.

It appears as if he has just one suspect, that's my point.

Epignosis wrote:

Marmot wrote:

Epignosis wrote:He wants me dead, that's why. Does he want anybody else dead?

What do you think about the second part of this question?

He isn't going for anybody else.