Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 1]
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:23 pm
I should clearly go to sleep. Good night, all.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
What?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:21 pmIs posting excerpts from the Aussie game scum chat bad faith here? Because you are absolutely lying and I am nearing 100% confirmation you are wolf because of it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:19 pmIt's correct. Source: am better at reading Michelle than jack is at reading me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:16 pmIs this legit?
Of course not. But the read is not unique.
<3Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:15 pmRelationship goals.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:13 pmExcuse you I’m an excellent trophy husband, I’m a drama queen and bitchy af
![]()
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:12 pmYou never think about ME. I'm sleeping on the couch tonight. =(
I might talk about it later.
seems to be out of nowhere and dumb.
that is because she is a very cool person and a very good player.Master Radishes wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 6:35 pm SVS seems like a really cool person.
But I don't get why I've seen a number of TRs on her.
: OEpignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 6:45 pmIs that an adjective or a transitive verb?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 11:42 amThat’s not how odds work.sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 11:38 amI’ve been wrong about jack being town 4/5 times so odds are in my favor that you’re not townJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:49 am http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... Australian
@JaggedJimmyJay
@juliets
@sprityo
And anyone else who may think I’m too serious to be townJack or that I could be wrong or lying about Nutella being mafia, read my interactions with Nutella in that link with the knowledge that I am town and she’s a wolf.
This game is practically a rerun.on top of I think all this subway sandwiches I’ve been eating are enforcing a healthier lifestyle
My gut wants less jack in my life, jack![]()
Your gut is wrong. I’m clearly fucking town here and I’m clearly right on Nutella, too.![]()
The part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:24 pmWhat?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:21 pmIs posting excerpts from the Aussie game scum chat bad faith here? Because you are absolutely lying and I am nearing 100% confirmation you are wolf because of it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:19 pmIt's correct. Source: am better at reading Michelle than jack is at reading me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:16 pmIs this legit?
What does this have to do with anything
Like I think I get it but it's irrelevant here? My ability to read Michelle still stands...???
Chances of Juliets and Jack being teammates are now near zero. Postmark it.juliets wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pm ISO of @Jackofhearts2005
I'm spoiling this because it's long. I mentioned just about everything he said some relevant, some not. I tried to capture my comments in blue.
I see pluses and minuses as I expected I would. I think the thing that bothers me most is he went from calling nutella a suspect "maybe" to voting for her in the space of 3 minutes. It seems like his mind was made up so why post that "maybe"? It just rubs me the wrong way. Also, I mentioned before and thought about it as indicated while doing his ISO that he pursued me with a vengeance twice before when I was civ and he was bad and his pursuit of nutella here reminds me of that.
On the plus side though, would Jack link us to another game where he was town and nutella bad and ask us to look at it for comparison purposes? My feeling is he wouldn't. Also he points out that he's read nutella correctly 8 games running. Would he ruin his credibility on that point going forward to get her lynched here?
Jack is very good at being scum. I need to think about and/or get feedback about my points above or other points about Jack but he is a possibility for my vote today.
Spoiler: show
What does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pmThe part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:24 pmWhat?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:21 pmIs posting excerpts from the Aussie game scum chat bad faith here? Because you are absolutely lying and I am nearing 100% confirmation you are wolf because of it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:19 pmIt's correct. Source: am better at reading Michelle than jack is at reading me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:16 pmIs this legit?
What does this have to do with anything
Like I think I get it but it's irrelevant here? My ability to read Michelle still stands...???
It's not anything like that. Btw have you even read anything since you were last here? I'm eager to see your catchup thoughts. Because I don't understand how you can see any similarities between my play here and my scum play (which even I acknowledged was terrible and obvious). And do you have any thoughts on anyone besides me?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:34 pm Lol we are replaying Australian murder mystery.
I’m certain Nutella is scum, we vote for each other and people follow, I leave and return to someone else having more votes than either of us.
Will be catching up in the next hour or four. Just now getting home from game night and apparently, the combination of my work reception sucking and being out of data means I can’t load just this website at work.![]()
What purpose does this question serve?
!!!Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:32 pm Jack, how did your brain make the transition from this:
To this:Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:54 pm Like Nutella is playing what I would expect from her if she tried really hard to mimic her town game.
Or she’s just town.
Like she’s hitting her scumtell a and her towntells.
I would need convincing in here, and no, I'm not going to go read another thread.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:19 am I’ve served a wolf up on a silver platter.
Pay attention.
MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:39 pm Btw Jack is always right about Nutella. It's canon. So either he's town and she's wolf or he's wolf and she's wolf, or he's wolf and she's town. But one of them is always a wolf so we should lynch Nutella.
what?
No.
juliets is my top civilian read in general.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:30 pm Chances of Juliets and Jack being teammates are now near zero. Postmark it.
Your reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pmThe part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:24 pmWhat?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:21 pmIs posting excerpts from the Aussie game scum chat bad faith here? Because you are absolutely lying and I am nearing 100% confirmation you are wolf because of it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:19 pmIt's correct. Source: am better at reading Michelle than jack is at reading me.
What does this have to do with anything
Like I think I get it but it's irrelevant here? My ability to read Michelle still stands...???
I'm downplaying it???? But also overreacting and being "histrionic"? Pick one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:41 pmYour reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pmThe part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:24 pmWhat?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:21 pmIs posting excerpts from the Aussie game scum chat bad faith here? Because you are absolutely lying and I am nearing 100% confirmation you are wolf because of it.
What does this have to do with anything
Like I think I get it but it's irrelevant here? My ability to read Michelle still stands...???
I absolutely have not. I’m temporarily ignoring the rest of your post and my 11 notifications.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:37 pmIt's not anything like that. Btw have you even read anything since you were last here? I'm eager to see your catchup thoughts. Because I don't understand how you can see any similarities between my play here and my scum play (which even I acknowledged was terrible and obvious). And do you have any thoughts on anyone besides me?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:34 pm Lol we are replaying Australian murder mystery.
I’m certain Nutella is scum, we vote for each other and people follow, I leave and return to someone else having more votes than either of us.
Will be catching up in the next hour or four. Just now getting home from game night and apparently, the combination of my work reception sucking and being out of data means I can’t load just this website at work.![]()
Oh look you found a fallacy you can latch on to. Got me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:42 pmI'm downplaying it???? But also overreacting and being "histrionic"? Pick one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:41 pmYour reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pmThe part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:24 pmWhat?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:21 pmIs posting excerpts from the Aussie game scum chat bad faith here? Because you are absolutely lying and I am nearing 100% confirmation you are wolf because of it.
What does this have to do with anything
Like I think I get it but it's irrelevant here? My ability to read Michelle still stands...???
This actually isn't nuts.Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:59 pmAnd you are on the other team then, I presume?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:55 pmUnder duress when immediately forced to observe it and then lolkekked his vote to a wagon that has 0% chance of ever forming.
Nutella
Jay
Radishes
Teammates.![]()
A civillian nutella does what she wants and takes no prisoners.
I don't remember what you're talking about. I'll need more.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:22 pm @Michelle and @Dom probably should have the same read as me on this.
None, it’s a joke lol. Cause 6 year olds ask why a lot.Dom wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:37 pmWhat purpose does this question serve?
!!!Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:32 pm Jack, how did your brain make the transition from this:
To this:Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:54 pm Like Nutella is playing what I would expect from her if she tried really hard to mimic her town game.
Or she’s just town.
Like she’s hitting her scumtell a and her towntells.
I would need convincing in here, and no, I'm not going to go read another thread.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:19 am I’ve served a wolf up on a silver platter.
Pay attention.
MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:39 pm Btw Jack is always right about Nutella. It's canon. So either he's town and she's wolf or he's wolf and she's wolf, or he's wolf and she's town. But one of them is always a wolf so we should lynch Nutella.![]()
This is nothing pretending to be something.
This boils down to this is not civ v civ.
what?
No.
That is the best argument so far against nutella.
I'm not actively downplaying that part, he literally said the words "or she might just be town" lmao. His read was weak by his own admission, then two minutes later he arbitrarily decided it was stronger off of nothing.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:45 pmOh look you found a fallacy you can latch on to. Got me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:42 pmI'm downplaying it???? But also overreacting and being "histrionic"? Pick one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:41 pmYour reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pmThe part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:24 pmWhat?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:21 pm
Is posting excerpts from the Aussie game scum chat bad faith here? Because you are absolutely lying and I am nearing 100% confirmation you are wolf because of it.
What does this have to do with anything
Like I think I get it but it's irrelevant here? My ability to read Michelle still stands...???
You are downplaying his read when you say things like "he even said he may be wrong" and lolling at me telling me to do better than copy his read and you are being histrionic in your dealings with me moreso than him which makes the read even more valid.
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:28 pmI can't believe it's not butter.To quoth the nutella:
"Is your bike broken? 'Cause you seem to be back peddlin' awfully fast"
(Nutella, 201?, The Piano, Unknown Game)
come the fuck on
[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
i got your joke this time, nooky.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:47 pm None, it’s a joke lol. Cause 6 year olds ask why a lot.
There is nothing meaningful about this observation. That is what people should do. Being careful to keep a consistent stream of thought is scumthink.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:49 pmI'm not actively downplaying that part, he literally said the words "or she might just be town" lmao. His read was weak by his own admission, then two minutes later he arbitrarily decided it was stronger off of nothing.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:45 pmOh look you found a fallacy you can latch on to. Got me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:42 pmI'm downplaying it???? But also overreacting and being "histrionic"? Pick one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:41 pmYour reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pmThe part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.
You are downplaying his read when you say things like "he even said he may be wrong" and lolling at me telling me to do better than copy his read and you are being histrionic in your dealings with me moreso than him which makes the read even more valid.
ugh I don't want to fix these quotes but basically it turned out mac wasn't even talking about what I thought he was talking about so it's irrelevant. I thought he was referring to my ability to read michelle, but he was talking about my view of jack's ability to read me. The bit about "remembering wrong" doesn't matter. I can explain more if you really care, but it really doesn't matter.Dom wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:50 pmDyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:28 pmI can't believe it's not butter.To quoth the nutella:
"Is your bike broken? 'Cause you seem to be back peddlin' awfully fast"
(Nutella, 201?, The Piano, Unknown Game)
come the fuck on
[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
There was a recent game that I snap read you scum in that I was right but I could never really put into words a salient reason for it. I am having a similar experience.
Nah, I decided it was stronger based on your reaction to me. Or maybe you pushed Nanook in the meantime.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:49 pmI'm not actively downplaying that part, he literally said the words "or she might just be town" lmao. His read was weak by his own admission, then two minutes later he arbitrarily decided it was stronger off of nothing.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:45 pmOh look you found a fallacy you can latch on to. Got me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:42 pmI'm downplaying it???? But also overreacting and being "histrionic"? Pick one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:41 pmYour reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pmThe part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.
You are downplaying his read when you say things like "he even said he may be wrong" and lolling at me telling me to do better than copy his read and you are being histrionic in your dealings with me moreso than him which makes the read even more valid.
Strengthening his read on me would be fine if literally anything happened in between the two posts. Nothing did. He had previously said he would give it til the end of d1 to decided on me, but he didn't.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:53 pmThere is nothing meaningful about this observation. That is what people should do. Being careful to keep a consistent stream of thought is scumthink.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:49 pmI'm not actively downplaying that part, he literally said the words "or she might just be town" lmao. His read was weak by his own admission, then two minutes later he arbitrarily decided it was stronger off of nothing.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:45 pmOh look you found a fallacy you can latch on to. Got me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:42 pmI'm downplaying it???? But also overreacting and being "histrionic"? Pick one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:41 pmYour reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pm
The part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.
You are downplaying his read when you say things like "he even said he may be wrong" and lolling at me telling me to do better than copy his read and you are being histrionic in your dealings with me moreso than him which makes the read even more valid.
No. As juliets pointed out:Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:54 pmNah, I decided it was stronger based on your reaction to me. Or maybe you pushed Nanook in the meantime.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:49 pmI'm not actively downplaying that part, he literally said the words "or she might just be town" lmao. His read was weak by his own admission, then two minutes later he arbitrarily decided it was stronger off of nothing.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:45 pmOh look you found a fallacy you can latch on to. Got me.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:42 pmI'm downplaying it???? But also overreacting and being "histrionic"? Pick one.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:41 pmYour reaction to him is not the reaction of someone who is being incorrectly read by someone who always correctly reads you. It's way too mundane. Jack misreading you would be a significant happening and you are downplaying it.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:32 pmWhat does the last sentence even mean? He is actually wrong,unless he is just a lying wolf, so if I am right about Michelle then my assessment is true (barring some bullshit about total number of games or whatever)MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:27 pm
The part where you keep downplaying Jack being god tier at reading you. I have demonstrable evidence that you know and highly regard his ability to read you. The lines of logic you are using are fallacious as opposed to what they would naturally be if he was actually wrong.
You are downplaying his read when you say things like "he even said he may be wrong" and lolling at me telling me to do better than copy his read and you are being histrionic in your dealings with me moreso than him which makes the read even more valid.
There are definitely things between “Maybe Nutella is scum” and “Nutella is scum for sure” and not all of those things were in my head.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:54 pm Like Nutella is playing what I would expect from her if she tried really hard to mimic her town game.
Or she’s just town.
Like she’s hitting her scumtell a and her towntells.
These posts are two minutes apart.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:56 pm Specifically, Nutella is showing waffles, wim and opportunism.
[VOTE: Nutella] aubergine
Town thoDyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:01 pm Sabie is thoroughly underwhelming to me. I saw her as more to the point and involved as town before. Thoughts?
[VOTE: Sabie] aubergine
Here’s a post between them that’s a baddie sounding post though.nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:56 pmlol what is this garbage. u bad bro?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:54 pm Like Nutella is playing what I would expect from her if she tried really hard to mimic her town game.
Or she’s just town.
Like she’s hitting her scumtell a and her towntells.
Like “shitshitshit I’m gonna get caught again. Better accuse Jack preemptively.”Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:01 pmHere’s a post between them that’s a baddie sounding post though.nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:56 pmlol what is this garbage. u bad bro?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:54 pm Like Nutella is playing what I would expect from her if she tried really hard to mimic her town game.
Or she’s just town.
Like she’s hitting her scumtell a and her towntells.![]()
OkJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:01 pm That’s between “maybe” and “I’m gonna vote for Nutella” though. Not “maybe” and “for sure a wolf.”
Same thing she admitted to wanting to do to me.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:02 pmLike “shitshitshit I’m gonna get caught again. Better accuse Jack preemptively.”Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:01 pmHere’s a post between them that’s a baddie sounding post though.nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:56 pmlol what is this garbage. u bad bro?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:54 pm Like Nutella is playing what I would expect from her if she tried really hard to mimic her town game.
Or she’s just town.
Like she’s hitting her scumtell a and her towntells.![]()