Re: It's a Mysterious Universe (D2)
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:02 pm
I am encouraged to know that hyena and I are reaching similar conclusions.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:56 pm we /can/ hammer here. there's very little loss of value.
But didn't you say I am playing like last game, were there any moments when people said this.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:15 pm Poison’s lack of posts makes me fairly confident this is a hit
This is an easy early distancjng because vul was always getting scum read right after the 2 pages. I don't see why a scummate won't do this?Does Vulgard treat his teammate like this? No one was really pressuring funnygurl at this point. Vulgard was starting to feel some heat at this point, though. This feels a bit too early for a panic bus on his part. Tentative good look for funnygurl. He substantiates his point here.
what do you mean by the colored part [mention]Sloonei[/mention] i don't think that is necessarily right. I was pretty aggressive while soft shading/distancing TSP early in the game.This does not feel like a staged interaction between teammates. funnygurl's tone is much more aggressive. Vulgard responds a bit timidly, turning her read into a question and then shrugging. If they are partners, I expect them to be a bit closer in tone here. For reference, Vulgard's next post is a similar response to Syn:
Unlike the above post, I think this post makes a fair point and I can agree to it.Post #124 is funnygurl's response to the above post. She again comes off as the aggressor here, and Vulgard is clearly on the defensive in his response. I do not think this is what distancing looks like: vulgard initiated it, but funnygurl immediately spun it back around on him. If they are distancing, I would expect it to be move more consistently in one direction; Vulgard starts as the aggressor and maintains that role throughout, with only slight pushback from funnygurl. Instead, Vulgard made one point about funnygurl, and she immediately started wielding that to push her own suspicion against him, and his only response was to duck and cover.
So this is an assumption and lemme ask you this, do you think a scum would be town reading all town members and scum read his teammate, hmmm, kinda meh right? how about we look at the bigger picture -Let's compare these three player assessments. Alison has "really, really leveled up"; i.e., she looks much better now than she did before. Okay.
Poison "is weird... muted... very, very odd." She possibly has TMI and it "feels awful" despite the hedge about the "hot take."
Marmot is "kinda towny" but we're just gonna chuck that read out of the window because![]()
If one of these is Vulgard's teammate, it's Poison.
The adjective deduction is brilliant, not necessarily right but brilliant. I would definitely take advantage of this to confuse you next game.The Alison read reads as a wolf surrendering on a push against a civilian who has become obvious. Marmot is town because "I read my teammate as town for no reason but I don't care about this read so I'm gonna ignore it and then vote for them" is not a thing that happens.
Poison gets three vaguely negative adjectives applied to her ("weird, muted, odd") before we get to the meaty part of the read, which is itself filled with erinaceous (this is a word and we're gonna make it catch on) language: "It seems...", "possibly indicative..." "I know x, but y." Given the conviction behind Vulgard's previous suspicions (Alison, Syn), the softness of this read makes it feel like he is hesitating and trying not to come off too strong. Also, this is his first mention of Poison in his ISO. Marmot as well, but Poison had been much more active than Marmot to this point.
It would have been said if you had lost energy. And I think you would have lost energy with substantial pressure on you.Poison wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 9:33 pmBut didn't you say I am playing like last game, were there any moments when people said this.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:15 pm Poison’s lack of posts makes me fairly confident this is a hit![]()
I seeTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:56 pmIt would have been said if you had lost energy. And I think you would have lost energy with substantial pressure on you.Poison wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 9:33 pmBut didn't you say I am playing like last game, were there any moments when people said this.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:15 pm Poison’s lack of posts makes me fairly confident this is a hit![]()
You have to find strong reasons to scum read from the people you have found strong reasons to town read, better start early? I mean it does not matter if you lynch me or not, you have to do it either way. Maybe you don't realize but because I'm seeming scummy to you, you are not ready to look around you.
Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:28 pm i don't think i'ma waver from my poison scum read though
I know nothing about my role, lol. Everything is a maybe - maybe not. With no specification what my role is. I targeted mac and nothing happened.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:01 pm well claims don't really help cause roles are distributed semi-randomly but maybe an action claim helps
well something clearly happenedPoison wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:51 amI know nothing about my role, lol. Everything is a maybe - maybe not. With no specification what my role is. I targeted mac and nothing happened.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:01 pm well claims don't really help cause roles are distributed semi-randomly but maybe an action claim helps
is this a scum claimPoison wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:48 amFunnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:28 pm i don't think i'ma waver from my poison scum read though![]()
![]()
So scum loses this game? So early???
Could something obvious have happened?Poison wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:51 amI know nothing about my role, lol. Everything is a maybe - maybe not. With no specification what my role is. I targeted mac and nothing happened.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:01 pm well claims don't really help cause roles are distributed semi-randomly but maybe an action claim helps
The point I was trying to make in the text you highlighted is the same one that I made in more detail immediately afterward (in your post), about which you said this:
By "If they are partners, I expect them to be a bit closer in tone here." I meant to say that if funnygurl and vulgard are partners, then their interactions will feel more coordinated than they were. "Closer in tone", meaning they will both have a relatively similar tone to one another during the interactions, and the relationship between them (vulgard as the aggressor versus funnygurl) should remain as it is.Unlike the above post, I think this post makes a fair point and I can agree to it.
Vulgard was not town reading all the town members. He voted for Marmot soon after the post in question. He pushed for Syn consistently throughout the day and Alison early on. He pushed hard on Mac after LC flipped. I think those are two members.Poison wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 9:53 pm So this is an assumption and lemme ask you this, do you think a scum would be town reading all town members and scum read his teammate, hmmm, kinda meh right? how about we look at the bigger picture -
Day 1, scum getting scum read to and fro, a townie getting scum read to and fro [if you don't believe I'm town just assume here] what would the scum do?
Try to give explanations and lynch the townie as if it's their solid scum read? Or any other thing he would have done?
Is it so unbelievable a scenario?
"I'm going to defend the one partner who's being treated as a piñata but give no solid justification for it and then, in the same breath, turn around and bury my other partner who nobody's even talking about" does not seem like a likely thought process from a member of the mafia team.
the host informed me nothing happened from my role.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:11 amwell something clearly happenedPoison wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:51 amI know nothing about my role, lol. Everything is a maybe - maybe not. With no specification what my role is. I targeted mac and nothing happened.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:01 pm well claims don't really help cause roles are distributed semi-randomly but maybe an action claim helps
If I claim town, would you believe me?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:11 amis this a scum claimPoison wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:48 amFunnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:28 pm i don't think i'ma waver from my poison scum read though![]()
![]()
So scum loses this game? So early???
I'm pretty sure not cause if him getting out of the thread was from my role then how did Alison got out of the thread. Also, the host informed me nothing happened because of my role.Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:39 amCould something obvious have happened?Poison wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:51 amI know nothing about my role, lol. Everything is a maybe - maybe not. With no specification what my role is. I targeted mac and nothing happened.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:01 pm well claims don't really help cause roles are distributed semi-randomly but maybe an action claim helps
What I understood from the first made me say the quoted part. Because, as I said, that part mainly focused on aggressiveness and early distancing, which I still stand by with my earlier quote. I don't think I amde the statement without understanding that part you wrote. Unlike the latter part I agreed to. That part was specified and clear.Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:22 pmThe point I was trying to make in the text you highlighted is the same one that I made in more detail immediately afterward (in your post), about which you said this:By "If they are partners, I expect them to be a bit closer in tone here." I meant to say that if funnygurl and vulgard are partners, then their interactions will feel more coordinated than they were. "Closer in tone", meaning they will both have a relatively similar tone to one another during the interactions, and the relationship between them (vulgard as the aggressor versus funnygurl) should remain as it is.Unlike the above post, I think this post makes a fair point and I can agree to it.
But, as I noted in the next post, which you agreed with, that did not happen. Vulgard started out aggressive, funnygurl responded with heightened intensity, and Vulgard folded and turned defensive.
Why did you say you "dont think that is necessarily right" if you did not understand the point I was trying to make?