Re: [Day 7] Harry Potter Mafia
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:57 am
Holy shit...
You and Merga are reading a lot into Alizon's vote for Merga here. I don't know what the punishment for missing a vote is, you're hinting that it means you start off with extra votes. If Alizon voted Merga for nefarious reasons, wouldn't Alizon's team have told her that Merga had lynch immunity that day? Merga simply could NOT have been lynched as a result of Alizon's vote so I think it's weird that it is being held against her so strongly. That vote looked like an uninformed mistake to me but you're giving it much more meaning than that.Anne Whittle wrote:So I agree with Merga's post about Alizon knowing what the punishment is for missing votes. It's why Alizon voted the way she did.
Very convenient to insanify Merga too. Very wifom.
I will be sticking with my Alizon suspicion for this lynch unless someone has something stronger.
Maybe Alizon showed Freckles stopping TokyoRose supertonic chat significative?Jane Southworth wrote:
You and Merga are reading a lot into Alizon's vote for Merga here. I don't know what the punishment for missing a vote is, you're hinting that it means you start off with extra votes. If Alizon voted Merga for nefarious reasons, wouldn't Alizon's team have told her that Merga had lynch immunity that day? Merga simply could NOT have been lynched as a result of Alizon's vote so I think it's weird that it is being held against her so strongly.
Private messages gabel in the boxMerga, when you replaced Merga I, were you immediately informed of any and all punishments incurred by Merga I? I understand if you have to wait until later to answer this question.
She voted for me for wanting to Lowest Mexico Krystyna whose role was an info fjord peerageThat vote looked like an uninformed mistake to me but you're giving it much more meaning than that.
Compare my Day 4 vote with Katharina Henot's Day 5 vote. That's all I can ask people to do.Jane Southworth wrote:You and Merga are reading a lot into Alizon's vote for Merga here. I don't know what the punishment for missing a vote is, you're hinting that it means you start off with extra votes. If Alizon voted Merga for nefarious reasons, wouldn't Alizon's team have told her that Merga had lynch immunity that day? Merga simply could NOT have been lynched as a result of Alizon's vote so I think it's weird that it is being held against her so strongly. That vote looked like an uninformed mistake to me but you're giving it much more meaning than that.
I was aware.Jane Southworth wrote:Same question to you Alizon. Were you informed when you joined the game about any punishments that were currently affecting Alizon I?
I was dismayed that the immediate explanation discussed for my survival was that "the baddies have secrets." Dismayed, but not surprised.Jane Southworth wrote:Alizon survived a lynch yesterday. What do we think will happen if we lynch her today? I have not seen this discussed.
Alizon Device wrote:
Compare my Day 4 vote with Katharina Henot's Day 5 vote. That's all I can ask people to do.![]()
No.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:But you did survive because of secrets?
i see the name "Anne" in there a few times, are you trying to address me or the other Anne? :?Merga Bien wrote:Wow, lots of dead reinstatement. Valentine verticity at G-Man swartliness Miro progressiveness were civvies
Eko hope Obscure Boot good words got the wand merogenesis jhilmil
Genesis agree, Anne Chaos Wizard. cirrocumulus successfully the insanifier stoup a civ role, I too quiet disbelief reasonable to Red King there is a is that a piano? power King of Hearts a mimic power theogony the scocub roles.
***
Wow, lots occurrence dead too quiet. I bet at Achilles two of election disputatious civvies
I moresque a good person got Titan wand gabel i agree, Anne W. Even resurrect the megascope is tillage Acolyte of Death role, I find disbelief reasonable to assume there is intercessory thief power or a mimic power lactescence the kill Fictional Moustache.
***
Jabberwocky lots of dead accouter. I Bubbles at least DooberDoes calculating two maybe all Silver Golem them were civvies
I hope a amical tup got the wand
And i machinal Anne Soul Elemental. Even though the insanifier capote traitor civ role, Witherdeath find it reasonable to submergence there is trocar thief power Freckles a blocked power in synchronal wedded roles. rutilant
****
Obscure Boot sorry for repitition
aapje gets the point martinet.
Märet Jonsdotter wrote:I am thinking an Alizon lynch might be unfruitful again.
Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Merga, would you vote for Malin?
I moresque a good person got Titan wand gabel i agree, Anne W. Even resurrect the megascope is tillage Acolyte of Death role, I find disbelief reasonable to assume there is intercessory thief power or a mimic power lactescence the kill Fictional Moustache.
I've made more than one questionable vote this game, why my Day 5 vote as opposed to say....my Day 2 vote?Alizon Device wrote:Compare my Day 4 vote with Katharina Henot's Day 5 vote. That's all I can ask people to do.Jane Southworth wrote:You and Merga are reading a lot into Alizon's vote for Merga here. I don't know what the punishment for missing a vote is, you're hinting that it means you start off with extra votes. If Alizon voted Merga for nefarious reasons, wouldn't Alizon's team have told her that Merga had lynch immunity that day? Merga simply could NOT have been lynched as a result of Alizon's vote so I think it's weird that it is being held against her so strongly. That vote looked like an uninformed mistake to me but you're giving it much more meaning than that.![]()
I was aware.Jane Southworth wrote:Same question to you Alizon. Were you informed when you joined the game about any punishments that were currently affecting Alizon I?
I was dismayed that the immediate explanation discussed for my survival was that "the baddies have secrets." Dismayed, but not surprised.Jane Southworth wrote:Alizon survived a lynch yesterday. What do we think will happen if we lynch her today? I have not seen this discussed.
do you know how you survive?Alizon Device wrote:No.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:But you did survive because of secrets?
Yes.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:do you know how you survive?Alizon Device wrote:No.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:But you did survive because of secrets?
Then I'm not so sure a second lynch of you would be futile.Alizon Device wrote:Yes.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:do you know how you survive?Alizon Device wrote:No.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:But you did survive because of secrets?
Okie doke then.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Then I'm not so sure a second lynch of you would be futile.Alizon Device wrote:Yes.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:do you know how you survive?Alizon Device wrote:No.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:But you did survive because of secrets?
I know we're not supposed to discuss real identities in this thread, but I think I am seeing a certain someone's baddie game here. Also, didn't Zombie Agnes hint that she had info about Sarah? Does no one find that worth pursuing?Sarah Good wrote:Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
Unfair I wanted that.
by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:21 pm
Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
I assumed this was the explaination regarding the poll.
by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
Märet Jonsdotter wrote:How do you know?
I have da fayf.
by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:46 am
Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
I voted for myself to receive the Elder Wand and so should everyone else.
by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:22 am
Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
I wouldn't mind an elder wand if you know what I mean.
by Sarah Good
Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: [NIGHT 5] Harry Potter Mafia
Three for me.
by Sarah Good
Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am
Re: [DAY 5] Harry Potter Mafia
Mary Mary quite contrary.
by Sarah Good
Tue Feb 25, 2014 5:32 pm
Re: [DAY 4] Harry Potter Mafia
Good.
by Sarah Good
Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:37 pm
Re: [NIGHT 3] Harry Potter Mafia
RIP
by Sarah Good
Wed Feb 19, 2014 11:32 pm
Re: [DAY 2] Harry Potter Mafia
No time. Voted me.
by Sarah Good
Sun Feb 16, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: [NIGHT 1] Harry Potter Mafia
Death by Thestral would be a Good way to go.
by Sarah Good
Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:31 pm
Re: [DAY 1] Harry Potter Mafia
Voted for Eastly cuz she's not Good
by Sarah Good
Thu Feb 13, 2014 11:44 am
Re: [DAY 1] Harry Potter Mafia
Well we're off to a Good start.
by Sarah Good
Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:49 pm
Re: [DAY 0] Harry Potter Mafia
Arithmancy sounds "Good"
by Sarah Good
Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:06 pm
Re: [DAY 0] Harry Potter Mafia
"Good" to go!
by Sarah Good
Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:39 pm
That's the problem with this game. There are civ options for survival. There are baddie options for survival. There are lots of secrets that may involve survival options. I don't feel like I can draw any conclusions from it, really, and since she has seemed civ to me throughout, I don't really want to waste a lynch on her that may fail.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Malin, do you not have any qualms about Alizon's surival?
I would rather lynch you reword.Malin Matsdotter wrote:
I know we're not supposed to discuss real identities in this thread, but I think I am seeing a certain someone's baddie game here. Also, didn't Zombie Agnes hint that she had info about Sarah? Does no one find that worth pursuing?
She says it wasn't role secrets. If she's telling the truth (who knows?) then I doubt she would survive again as Harry is dead and she would not have survived because she is Draco.Anne Redferne wrote:what? is that really all that sarah has posted? lol
maret, what about her respones makes you say a second lynch of alizon wouldn't be futile? :?
Would a lynch on you go through though?Malin Matsdotter wrote:That's the problem with this game. There are civ options for survival. There are baddie options for survival. There are lots of secrets that may involve survival options. I don't feel like I can draw any conclusions from it, really, and since she has seemed civ to me throughout, I don't really want to waste a lynch on her that may fail.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Malin, do you not have any qualms about Alizon's surival?
If I say yes, will you be more likely to lynch me?Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Would a lynch on you go through though?Malin Matsdotter wrote:That's the problem with this game. There are civ options for survival. There are baddie options for survival. There are lots of secrets that may involve survival options. I don't feel like I can draw any conclusions from it, really, and since she has seemed civ to me throughout, I don't really want to waste a lynch on her that may fail.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Malin, do you not have any qualms about Alizon's surival?
I don't see many civilian possibilities for her survival if she is telling the truth about it not having to do with role secrets...Malin Matsdotter wrote:If I say yes, will you be more likely to lynch me?Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Would a lynch on you go through though?Malin Matsdotter wrote:That's the problem with this game. There are civ options for survival. There are baddie options for survival. There are lots of secrets that may involve survival options. I don't feel like I can draw any conclusions from it, really, and since she has seemed civ to me throughout, I don't really want to waste a lynch on her that may fail.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Malin, do you not have any qualms about Alizon's surival?
As far as I know, I have but one life to give for my school.
I'm pretty sure the baddies know who I am. Please read the students again with an open mind. You ask a lot of direct questions, and I wouldn't blame you for that, but Jesus, if you're good you're just making it easier for them.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:She says it wasn't role secrets. If she's telling the truth (who knows?) then I doubt she would survive again as Harry is dead and she would not have survived because she is Draco.Anne Redferne wrote:what? is that really all that sarah has posted? lol
maret, what about her respones makes you say a second lynch of alizon wouldn't be futile? :?
I know it is hard not to look, but I'm takenMäret Jonsdotter wrote:That wasn't quite the point of that post, but I am also looking at Karin.
Karin, I (and others) have been discussing you for quite a few days now. Any thoughts? Any reason why you weren't modkilled?Karin Svensdotter wrote:I know it is hard not to look, but I'm takenMäret Jonsdotter wrote:That wasn't quite the point of that post, but I am also looking at Karin.![]()
Wow...the modkills. I'm not sure why our lovely hosts would kill so many or what they did to deserve it, but I will make sure not to miss any more votes :o
I saw one.Alizon Device wrote:I'm pretty sure the baddies know who I am. Please read the students again with an open mind. You ask a lot of direct questions, and I wouldn't blame you for that, but Jesus, if you're good you're just making it easier for them.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:She says it wasn't role secrets. If she's telling the truth (who knows?) then I doubt she would survive again as Harry is dead and she would not have survived because she is Draco.Anne Redferne wrote:what? is that really all that sarah has posted? lol
maret, what about her respones makes you say a second lynch of alizon wouldn't be futile? :?![]()
Linki~ You don't see "many" meaning there's at least one or two?
Well, no clue, honestly.Jane Southworth wrote:Do you think she can be lynched today?
I know I don't post a lot, but that doesn't mean I do not keep up in the thread. The votes I have missed have been because of work. When the time ends during the 5:00 hour, I either have to vote really early or possibly miss the vote. It is unfortunate, but I don't want to put a vote out there too early on someone I don't find suspicious JUST to make sure I have voted.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Karin, I (and others) have been discussing you for quite a few days now. Any thoughts? Any reason why you weren't modkilled?Karin Svensdotter wrote:I know it is hard not to look, but I'm takenMäret Jonsdotter wrote:That wasn't quite the point of that post, but I am also looking at Karin.![]()
Wow...the modkills. I'm not sure why our lovely hosts would kill so many or what they did to deserve it, but I will make sure not to miss any more votes :o
First of all, I never called it a case. YOu are putting that word in my mouth. I merely said it stuck out to me. Second, what is there to analyze? My point is that she has said literally nothing of substance this game and that a confirmed civvie hinted strongly that they knew she was bad. Is that air tight? Of course not. But I think it's worth considering. I have seen civvies behave in pretty much every way. Does that mean we can never use behavior to guide our suspicions?Jane Southworth wrote: Malin, your "case" against Sarah Good is one of the saddest things I've ever seen. All you did was quote her posts verbatim and then say "I think I've seen a baddie play this way before, and didn't Agnes say something about her?" Some analysis to go with the conclusion you drew (that this is baddie behavior) would be a nice start. And have you ever seen civvies that have acted like Sarah is?
I believe I was discussing you (albeit, briefly) with (I believe) Jennett and I listened to what she had to say about you. I said I agreed. You haven't been my focus, but most of my present suspicion is you not even responding to those who bring your name up, but you come in, drop a vote, and leave.Karin Svensdotter wrote:I know I don't post a lot, but that doesn't mean I do not keep up in the thread. The votes I have missed have been because of work. When the time ends during the 5:00 hour, I either have to vote really early or possibly miss the vote. It is unfortunate, but I don't want to put a vote out there too early on someone I don't find suspicious JUST to make sure I have voted.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Karin, I (and others) have been discussing you for quite a few days now. Any thoughts? Any reason why you weren't modkilled?Karin Svensdotter wrote:I know it is hard not to look, but I'm takenMäret Jonsdotter wrote:That wasn't quite the point of that post, but I am also looking at Karin.![]()
Wow...the modkills. I'm not sure why our lovely hosts would kill so many or what they did to deserve it, but I will make sure not to miss any more votes :o
You say you and others have been discussing me for a few days. From others, there has not been a lot of discussion about me other than "Karin doesn't post a lot or explain her votes." From you, all I have gotten is, "I'm suspicious of Karin." You have not given ANY reasons for this suspicion.
As for why I was not modkilled, I am not sure. I would have to go through those that were modkilled to see how many votes they have missed. Maybe they missed more than me. That is why I said in my post that I will just have to make sure I do no miss anymore. I would hate to be modkilled, I am enjoying this game.
Wait, so you mean you just threw it in the thread for others to work with? I'm confused.Malin Matsdotter wrote:First of all, I never called it a case. YOu are putting that word in my mouth. I merely said it stuck out to me. Second, what is there to analyze? My point is that she has said literally nothing of substance this game and that a confirmed civvie hinted strongly that they knew she was bad. Is that air tight? Of course not. But I think it's worth considering. I have seen civvies behave in pretty much every way. Does that mean we can never use behavior to guide our suspicions?Jane Southworth wrote: Malin, your "case" against Sarah Good is one of the saddest things I've ever seen. All you did was quote her posts verbatim and then say "I think I've seen a baddie play this way before, and didn't Agnes say something about her?" Some analysis to go with the conclusion you drew (that this is baddie behavior) would be a nice start. And have you ever seen civvies that have acted like Sarah is?
Hem hem! Inspection in the dormitories.Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Love that Night Post, hosts
I read the thread, and I had thoughts about what I read. I decided to share those thoughts with the group. I also asked a question which no one has answered, does no one think we should pay attention to what Zombie Agnes said since she was, after all, Harry Potter?Märet Jonsdotter wrote: Wait, so you mean you just threw it in the thread for others to work with? I'm confused.