The Syndicate

Yeah Sophie, don't worry about it. Heck, some people disappear without even telling us about it

I like the cookie monster gif, Timmer.

FZ. wrote:Just to add, the fact that people keep saying: "let's lynch Bullz already" just reminds me of last game I played here where llama and Epig kept pushing like crazy day after day for my lynch...and were wrong. llama suspected Bullz, that's great. He didn't have information on him, so while I respect llama's opinions, I didn't see his case as any less "crappy" than the case on him (as people called it). It doesn't mean Bullz can't be bad, and I am not as sure of his alignment as before, but I'm still not feeling what you allegedly are. So be incredulous as you wish, and I'll vote as I see fit.

This makes me nervous. You're acting like bullz was a main contender for lynch day 1,which isn't true. It was between epi and llama.

blindfaeth wrote:

FZ. wrote:Just to add, the fact that people keep saying: "let's lynch Bullz already" just reminds me of last game I played here where llama and Epig kept pushing like crazy day after day for my lynch...and were wrong. llama suspected Bullz, that's great. He didn't have information on him, so while I respect llama's opinions, I didn't see his case as any less "crappy" than the case on him (as people called it). It doesn't mean Bullz can't be bad, and I am not as sure of his alignment as before, but I'm still not feeling what you allegedly are. So be incredulous as you wish, and I'll vote as I see fit.

This makes me nervous. You're acting like bullz was a main contender for lynch day 1,which isn't true. It was between epi and llama.

It was a reply to MM who was "incredulous". I didn't say that. I just hate it when people say "let's lynch someone already" like it's obvious that person is bad, which is what MM did. It's not obvious to me, and just because people say it like that, doesn't make it true (and that's why I brought the example from Death Note game).

I think you did kinda take that out of context, BF. I think the waiting has us on edge, Lol. We're all just a little bit jumpy.

I hope MR is okay.

Huh. Guess that hunch of mine paid off.

If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Well done DH!

Spacedaisy wrote:Well done DH!

To be fair, I'm hardly responsible for the Bass lynch being a success. I was just personally correct, which is an achievement for myself. Several others seemed to think he was bad.

Yeah, great job, DH! Really sharp baddie hunting, you caught him red-handed.

Ok, that last post was sarcastic, since I brought him up first. But then I reread your last post, and you aren't taking all the credit anymore. So my sarcasm softened.

DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Same thing happened to me, except it was Rabbit that was trying to discredit the case.

Long Con wrote:Yeah, great job, DH! Really sharp baddie hunting, you caught him red-handed.

Oh I get it, you're being facetious.

linki -

For Reference, SVS practically tripping over FZ to get at the front of the "Save Bass" line.

S~V~S wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

FZ. wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Switching my vote to Bass, because I don't want to vote for myself or Roxy, and from what I have been reading/paying attention to I don't trust Bass.

Why don't you trust him?

He doesn't seem honest.

Don't cheat me a good answer. What doesn't seem honest?

I would like the answer to this. He's fighting pretty hard not to be cheated ( ) which feels pretty civvie-ish to me.

S~V~S wrote:These are some pretty vague votes, tbh.

Yeah, FZ. I would like to see what he's talking about.

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

FZ. wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:I'm going to call shenanigans though, where do these oddball left field lynches keep coming from? The majority of mentions for bass have been in like the last 30 mins.

That might be true, but it's almost the end of the day, and with a lack of a good lynch candidate, there will be more gut voting than usual.

Damn, I need to make up my mind


linki: DH, what's his baddie game?

Why the ? How is this like his baddie game?

Turnip Head wrote:Bass you mentioned the 6 outsider votes but I don't see you pursuing that lead any further with specific suspects. That's why it feels like you're just casting a wide net and letting other players do the dirty work.

Do you rally think that's so odd for Day 2?

I am not sure on Bullz, and I don't think BF is bad. I am not seeing the case on Bass, either. Especially the way this lynch is forming up, this feels awful, lol.

Linki ~ last time we lynched Sophie for being too quiet, she was just a busy civ. So maybe that's it.

Linki~ why, LC?
Linki~ Thank DH. At least I can understand that, although I am not sure I agree.

Nice job guys. see you in the next game Bass.

Sweet!!!

I feel like there is a decent chance that Bass is Double Down, cursed himself, and is using it as a shout out to Blacksmith

timmer wrote:

I feel like there is a decent chance that Bass is Double Down, cursed himself, and is using it as a shout out to Blacksmith

Oh so Timmer can brag and take all the credit but I can't I see how it is.

Well played.

DharmaHelper wrote:

timmer wrote:

I feel like there is a decent chance that Bass is Double Down, cursed himself, and is using it as a shout out to Blacksmith

Oh so Timmer can brag and take all the credit but I can't I see how it is.

To be fair, Timmer called the exact situation. That's gotta deserve some shout-outs.

Oh, and Magenta... good call on not saving him. It seems as though you are choosing to save your lynch save for a rainy day, or whatever... just want to remind you that it could mean the difference between Wally West chatting it up with you and Pied Piper... and Wally West killing you.

DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Nah, that would be pointless.

And I thought your vote was vague (and it WAS). Then when you explained it, I said, "Thank You DH" and never brought it up again.

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Nah, that would be pointless.

And I thought your vote was vague (and it WAS). Then when you explained it, I said, "Thank You DH" and never brought it up again.

Your enthusiasm in the matter was noted, and notably suspect, given the results of the lynch.

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Nah, that would be pointless.

And I thought your vote was vague (and it WAS). Then when you explained it, I said, "Thank You DH" and never brought it up again.

Your enthusiasm in the matter was noted, and notably suspect, given the results of the lynch.

What enthusiasm? I thought your vote was vague. I said so. You are making it into something it is not.

That's true, S~V~S, and I don't find your questioning of DH to be suspicious. It's easy to drop "oh, that's his baddie game", but it's more of a test to get some details... I think you approached it the right way.

On the flip side, even though you were satisfied with DH, your vote post is more pro-Bass than any other player.

S~V~S wrote:I am not feeling any of the B-Boy votes.

I am going to vote for Turnip Head. I think his reasons for voting Llama were weak, I think his reasons for voting Bass are weak, too. TH takes voting seriously, and puts lots of thought into his votes when he's a civ, even if he does not post every thought. Todays vote i can get, he is working, he's is playing the Champs game, he's stretched thin. But his Llama vote was weaker than I expect from TH, even for Day 1.

I don't expect him to get lynched, but I want him to know I'm paying attention

It's anti-Turnip Head, which makes sense, because it's a vote post on him. You specifically mention two different things that I read as a Bass-saving attempt: "I'm not feeling any of the B-Boy votes" obviously includes Bass, but in a not-directly-referring-to-Bass kind of way, and then mentioning a short time later that TH's reasons for voting Bass are weak.

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Nah, that would be pointless.

And I thought your vote was vague (and it WAS). Then when you explained it, I said, "Thank You DH" and never brought it up again.

Your enthusiasm in the matter was noted, and notably suspect, given the results of the lynch.

What enthusiasm? I thought your vote was vague. I said so. You are making it into something it is not.

All of those posts of yours I quoted wherein you jump down my throat regarding my Bass vote occur in a very short window of time, thats what I mean when I say you enthusiastically (uh oh LC, Those adwhatevers are back) defended Bass/attacked my vote.

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Nah, that would be pointless.

And I thought your vote was vague (and it WAS). Then when you explained it, I said, "Thank You DH" and never brought it up again.

Your enthusiasm in the matter was noted, and notably suspect, given the results of the lynch.

What enthusiasm? I thought your vote was vague. I said so. You are making it into something it is not.

All of those posts of yours I quoted wherein you jump down my throat regarding my Bass vote occur in a very short window of time, thats what I mean when I say you enthusiastically (uh oh LC, Those adwhatevers are back) defended Bass/attacked my vote.

"Enthusiastically" in this context is appropriate. It maintains a function critical to the understanding of the independent clause. Carry on.

LC, I did not see the case on any of the three, really. So since the votes were so close, I chose not to vote for any of them. I did not feel any of them were bad strongly enough to commit to it in a tight vote. Two, not three, really, since BF was never as serious lynch contender as Bullz or Bass.

I also said that THs reasons for voting Lllama were weak. I thought I was seeing a pattern of weak suspicions, that, for me, characterize bad TH. So 50/50 for me this game, since he was right on Bass, wrong on llama.

Linki, yes, DH, and as soon as you replied, I sais "Thank You" and never mentioned it again. I thought you were being vague. I have no info, so while hindsight is 20/20, at that time, your vagueness caught my eye.

Epignosis wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.

Nah, that would be pointless.

And I thought your vote was vague (and it WAS). Then when you explained it, I said, "Thank You DH" and never brought it up again.

Your enthusiasm in the matter was noted, and notably suspect, given the results of the lynch.

What enthusiasm? I thought your vote was vague. I said so. You are making it into something it is not.

All of those posts of yours I quoted wherein you jump down my throat regarding my Bass vote occur in a very short window of time, thats what I mean when I say you enthusiastically (uh oh LC, Those adwhatevers are back) defended Bass/attacked my vote.

"Enthusiastically" in this context is appropriate. It maintains a function critical to the understanding of the independent clause. Carry on.

Agreed. And if I haven't said it before, I do believe in the adverb theory.

Long Con wrote:That's true, S~V~S, and I don't find your questioning of DH to be suspicious. It's easy to drop "oh, that's his baddie game", but it's more of a test to get some details... I think you approached it the right way.

On the flip side, even though you were satisfied with DH, your vote post is more pro-Bass than any other player.

S~V~S wrote:I am not feeling any of the B-Boy votes.

I am going to vote for Turnip Head. I think his reasons for voting Llama were weak, I think his reasons for voting Bass are weak, too. TH takes voting seriously, and puts lots of thought into his votes when he's a civ, even if he does not post every thought. Todays vote i can get, he is working, he's is playing the Champs game, he's stretched thin. But his Llama vote was weaker than I expect from TH, even for Day 1.

I don't expect him to get lynched, but I want him to know I'm paying attention

It's anti-Turnip Head, which makes sense, because it's a vote post on him. You specifically mention two different things that I read as a Bass-saving attempt: "I'm not feeling any of the B-Boy votes" obviously includes Bass, but in a not-directly-referring-to-Bass kind of way, and then mentioning a short time later that TH's reasons for voting Bass are weak.

I would like the answer to this. He's fighting pretty hard not to be cheated ( ) which feels pretty civvie-ish to me.

Why the ? How is this like his baddie game?

Do you rally think that's so odd for Day 2?

I am not sure on Bullz, and I don't think BF is bad. I am not seeing the case on Bass, either. Especially the way this lynch is forming up, this feels awful, lol.

EBWOP~ just because a person is proven correct about a suspicion, does not make suspicions leading up to that point invalid. Had i known Bass was bad, then I would have lauded your wisdom. I didn't, so I questioned your vagueness.

Yes, DH, then when you FINALLY explained it, I said, "Thank You, DH" and backed off.

S~V~S wrote:EBWOP~ just because a person is proven correct about a suspicion, does not make suspicions leading up to that point invalid. Had i known Bass was bad, then I would have lauded your wisdom. I didn't, so I questioned your vagueness.

Yes, DH, then when you FINALLY explained it, I said, "Thank You, DH" and backed off.

I was pointing out to LC other instances of your being Pro-Bass. Not just in your lynch vote post.

S~V~S wrote:LC, I did not see the case on any of the three, really. So since the votes were so close, I chose not to vote for any of them. I did not feel any of them were bad strongly enough to commit to it in a tight vote. Two, not three, really, since BF was never as serious lynch contender as Bullz or Bass.

I also said that THs reasons for voting Lllama were weak. I thought I was seeing a pattern of weak suspicions, that, for me, characterize bad TH. So 50/50 for me this game, since he was right on Bass, wrong on llama.

Linki, yes, DH, and as soon as you replied, I sais "Thank You" and never mentioned it again. I thought you were being vague. I have no info, so while hindsight is 20/20, at that time, your vagueness caught my eye.

I understand, I realize now that I wasn't really looking for a defense, because it's easy to read as you portray it. It's probably that way, and it has a chance of being less than innocent.

DharmaHelper wrote:

S~V~S wrote:EBWOP~ just because a person is proven correct about a suspicion, does not make suspicions leading up to that point invalid. Had i known Bass was bad, then I would have lauded your wisdom. I didn't, so I questioned your vagueness.

Yes, DH, then when you FINALLY explained it, I said, "Thank You, DH" and backed off.

I was pointing out to LC other instances of your being Pro-Bass. Not just in your lynch vote post.

Yes, there are some undeniably pro-Bass sentiments in those posts, which don't simply pertain to getting a clarification on your Bass suspicion.

What specifically is "pro Bass" as opposed to "not particularly suspicious of Bass" about these posts?

S~V~S wrote:What specifically is "pro Bass" as opposed to "not particularly suspicious of Bass" about these posts?

Calling him a civvie for one thing.

I said his fighting felt civvie-ish to me. It did. That isn't calling him a civvie.

You are stretching here.

Ask me if Bass has fooled me in the past. Ask LC; he saw Bass totally schnocker me in The Island game.

S~V~S wrote:I said his fighting felt civvie-ish to me. It did. That isn't calling him a civvie.

You are stretching here.

Calling the lynch against him and I quote "awful, lol".

Literally defending him against TH.

S~V~S wrote:Ask me if Bass has fooled me in the past. Ask LC; he saw Bass totally schnocker me in The Island game.

There's a big difference between being fooled and actively, aggressively defending someone.

Would S~V~S, FZ, or Rabbit check Bass on Night 1, if they were Blacksmith?

Long Con wrote:Would S~V~S, FZ, or Rabbit check Bass on Night 1, if they were Blacksmith?

I don't even think Rabbit knows Bass.

But its difficult to say with certainty who would pick whom.

Difficult enough to be irrelevant?

Long Con wrote:Difficult enough to be irrelevant?

Dangerously close to the realm of conjecture, to the point where it would take considerable convincing for me to think it was relevant, sure.

I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.

Epignosis wrote:I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.

Anything else?