The Syndicate

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:28 pm**

Woooooaaaah Marmot with the #plays.

I'm no longer suspicious of Boomslang now lol.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:30 pm**

Snow Dog wrote:@Metalmarsh Have you heard of the Finnish band HIM?

No I haven't. Any specific recommendations?

My morning got away from me, and I've got to run. I'm voting Boomslang to put him ahead of zebra (who I have a slight townread on).

I'm not convinced enough to vote for Soneji, and while I trust Epignosis this game, it's too late to lynch nijuu today. Also I don't like ties.

Linki: Hi DrWilgy, I've got that power play, ohbaby!!

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:46 pm**

Is there a case on Boomslang? I'm reading through haven't seen one yet. I don't like either Zerba's or Boom's wagon right now.

Also Quin voted for me and then left a good vote, which avoids all attention and allows him to not get involved in either wagon.

I think Quin is mafia, I could see myself voting there today.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:47 pm**

I haven't paid much attention to Boomslang, I'd rather Soneji be lynched.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:53 pm**

@Sig, I said lynch Boomslang and erryone said with a shrug "Oh, OK."

I think we should lynch Ji-San as well. Zebra would be a good Second. I don't think Niju is possible atm.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:54 pm**

sig wrote:Is there a case on Boomslang? I'm reading through haven't seen one yet. I don't like either Zerba's or Boom's wagon right now.

Also Quin voted for me and then left a good vote, which avoids all attention and allows him to not get involved in either wagon.

I think Quin is mafia, I could see myself voting there today.

I don't care about wagons. I want to lynch you. By your logic I should be suspicious of everyone who's not voting with me.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:55 pm**

Why would I be a good Second? I'm pristine.

linki - ACTUALLY CAN WE LYNCH QUIN PLEASE

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:56 pm**

Quin wrote:
sig wrote:Is there a case on Boomslang? I'm reading through haven't seen one yet. I don't like either Zerba's or Boom's wagon right now.

Also Quin voted for me and then left a good vote, which avoids all attention and allows him to not get involved in either wagon.

I think Quin is mafia, I could see myself voting there today.
I don't care about wagons. I want to lynch you. By your logic I should be suspicious of everyone who's not voting with me.

Aw, and yet again - I voted before any wagons actually formed. da misrep is r34l th0

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:57 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:you probably need to elaborate on why those specific parts are suspicious if you want to get your point across, amigo

linki: i don't do unnecessary.
Are you sure because this post that I'm quoting here is unnecessary.
looks like your ideal world in one where your word is unquestioned and treated as gospel

which doesn't sound so bad, if only you weren't so wrong all the time
Where did I ask people to believe me or agree with me? I could care less. But sure continue to misrepresent me and dig your own grave.
the two or three times you neglected to elaborate on your quin/snow dog suspicion comes to mind
How does neglecting to elaborate in ANY WAY imply that I'm demanding people agree?

'I don't need to elaborate on my thought process because I am right and that's all that matters'

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:58 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Why would I be a good Second? I'm pristine.

linki - ACTUALLY CAN WE LYNCH QUIN PLEASE

nah

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:59 pm**

Quin is taking advantage of the low-hanging fruit that is sig's town play in order to distract from his lack of genuine contribution.

linki - Yup, that's correct. I still don't see where the implication that I'm demanding people agree is. For the nth time, I don't care. Whether or not people agree with me has zero bearing on whether or not I'm right, and whether or not I'm right has zero bearing on whether or not people agree. Stop desperately trying to misrepresent me.

linki - yus

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:59 pm**

next order of business is to ISO Snow Dog, but if I'm correct day ends in a minute so I'll do that once day 4 begins.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:00 pm**

You said that my ideal world is one where my word is unquestioned and treated as gospel. You have no basis for that claim and you're just making yourself look worse and worse by pretending that you have one.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:01 pm**

Boomslang is probably civ IMO.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:01 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Quin is taking advantage of the low-hanging fruit that is sig's town play in order to distract from his lack of genuine contribution.

linki - Yup, that's correct. I still don't see where the implication that I'm demanding people agree is. For the nth time, I don't care. Whether or not people agree with me has zero bearing on whether or not I'm right, and whether or not I'm right has zero bearing on whether or not people agree. Stop desperately trying to misrepresent me.

linki - yus

Quin is voting for a person he's found suspicious since day 1 but ok. Not like you ever addressed my case before this to tell me that you thought he was just low hanging fruit, you just found it convenient to throw shade at me because it seems to fit your narrative

linki: I think I look pretty good tbh zebra

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:02 pm**

Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Quin is taking advantage of the low-hanging fruit that is sig's town play in order to distract from his lack of genuine contribution.

linki - Yup, that's correct. I still don't see where the implication that I'm demanding people agree is. For the nth time, I don't care. Whether or not people agree with me has zero bearing on whether or not I'm right, and whether or not I'm right has zero bearing on whether or not people agree. Stop desperately trying to misrepresent me.

linki - yus
Quin is voting for a person he's found suspicious since day 1 but ok. Not like you ever addressed my case before this to tell me that you thought he was just low hanging fruit, you just found it convenient to throw shade at me because it seems to fit your narrative

linki: I think I look pretty good tbh zebra

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:02 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Why would I be a good Second? I'm pristine.

linki - ACTUALLY CAN WE LYNCH QUIN PLEASE

Because the Boomslang boat became too real outa nuffin.

Ji-San, Niju and Quin are all good alternatives tho.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:03 pm**

I gave my thoughts on sig some time ago.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:03 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Quin is taking advantage of the low-hanging fruit that is sig's town play in order to distract from his lack of genuine contribution.

linki - Yup, that's correct. I still don't see where the implication that I'm demanding people agree is. For the nth time, I don't care. Whether or not people agree with me has zero bearing on whether or not I'm right, and whether or not I'm right has zero bearing on whether or not people agree. Stop desperately trying to misrepresent me.

linki - yus
Quin is voting for a person he's found suspicious since day 1 but ok. Not like you ever addressed my case before this to tell me that you thought he was just low hanging fruit, you just found it convenient to throw shade at me because it seems to fit your narrative

linki: I think I look pretty good tbh zebra

is there a problem, maam?

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:03 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Why would I be a good Second? I'm pristine.

linki - ACTUALLY CAN WE LYNCH QUIN PLEASE
Because the Boomslang boat became too real outa nuffin.

Does it help that I agree?

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:04 pm**

Save me by voting zebra or Quin, everyone. Or, when I flip, use that to inform the trustworthiness of MP's reads. Wilgy and Nacho could be buddying up, as we saw in very early thread.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:04 pm**

Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Quin is taking advantage of the low-hanging fruit that is sig's town play in order to distract from his lack of genuine contribution.

linki - Yup, that's correct. I still don't see where the implication that I'm demanding people agree is. For the nth time, I don't care. Whether or not people agree with me has zero bearing on whether or not I'm right, and whether or not I'm right has zero bearing on whether or not people agree. Stop desperately trying to misrepresent me.

linki - yus
Quin is voting for a person he's found suspicious since day 1 but ok. Not like you ever addressed my case before this to tell me that you thought he was just low hanging fruit, you just found it convenient to throw shade at me because it seems to fit your narrative

linki: I think I look pretty good tbh zebra

No problem, you just have an amusing definition of the word "case" is all.
is there a problem, maam?

linki - WHOA how do you think you can be saved with Quin votes? He's at zero right now.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:05 pm**

Boomslang wrote:Save me by voting zebra or Quin, everyone. Or, when I flip, use that to inform the trustworthiness of MP's reads. Wilgy and Nacho could be buddying up, as we saw in very early thread.

Well that isn't very nice.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:05 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:I gave my thoughts on sig some time ago.

'sig is good because I think he's bad' does not equal legitimate thought process

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:07 pm**

Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:I gave my thoughts on sig some time ago.
'sig is good because I think he's bad' does not equal legitimate thought process

It does. If my ability to read someone has a record of being so bad that I've actually never been right about them, then it only makes sense for me to read them the opposite of how I'm reading them instinctively. Just because I'm thinking outside the box doesn't mean I'm not thinking. Maybe try it?

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:07 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:I gave my thoughts on sig some time ago.
'sig is good because I think he's bad' does not equal legitimate thought process
It does. If my ability to read someone has a record of being so bad that I've actually never been right about them, then it only makes sense for me to read them the opposite of how I'm reading them instinctively. Just because I'm thinking outside the box doesn't mean I'm not thinking. Maybe try it?

my turn

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:08 pm**

Quin wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Save me by voting zebra or Quin, everyone. Or, when I flip, use that to inform the trustworthiness of MP's reads. Wilgy and Nacho could be buddying up, as we saw in very early thread.
Well that isn't very nice.

Yeah, I revoke what I said. Let him buuuurn!

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:08 pm**

Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:I gave my thoughts on sig some time ago.
'sig is good because I think he's bad' does not equal legitimate thought process
It does. If my ability to read someone has a record of being so bad that I've actually never been right about them, then it only makes sense for me to read them the opposite of how I'm reading them instinctively. Just because I'm thinking outside the box doesn't mean I'm not thinking. Maybe try it?
my turn

At least I didn't pretend that my reasoning constitutes a case.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:09 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Save me by voting zebra or Quin, everyone. Or, when I flip, use that to inform the trustworthiness of MP's reads. Wilgy and Nacho could be buddying up, as we saw in very early thread.
Well that isn't very nice.
Yeah, I revoke what I said. Let him buuuurn!

I also revoke my town read of him. That post is baddie as blazes.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:09 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:I gave my thoughts on sig some time ago.
'sig is good because I think he's bad' does not equal legitimate thought process
It does. If my ability to read someone has a record of being so bad that I've actually never been right about them, then it only makes sense for me to read them the opposite of how I'm reading them instinctively. Just because I'm thinking outside the box doesn't mean I'm not thinking. Maybe try it?
my turn

At least I didn't pretend that my reasoning constitutes a case.

ok bud

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:09 pm**

I voted Quin, he is being extremely scummy,

also quin it looks even worse that you voted early since you removed the possibility of voting for anyone else and have been able to be removed from that conversation. In fact your voting record isn't that hot. I want to lynch Quin next phase.

I can't stick around right now since I ahve some school and family stuff to do, but I should be back tomorrow to talk more.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:11 pm**

sig wrote:I voted Quin, he is being extremely scummy,

also quin it looks even worse that you voted early since you removed the possibility of voting for anyone else and have been able to be removed from that conversation. In fact your voting record isn't that hot. I want to lynch Quin next phase.

I can't stick around right now since I ahve some school and family stuff to do, but I should be back tomorrow to talk more.

I didn't vote early. I voted right before I went to sleep fully expecting to sleep through EoD. Time zones, yuh'no?

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:12 pm**

Not comfortable witj this boomslang lynch

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:13 pm**

Quin wrote: I didn't vote early.

Quin wrote:I voted before any wagons actually formed.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:14 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote: I didn't vote early.

Quin wrote:I voted before any wagons actually formed.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.

It's not my fault that people took their sweet time voting. I'm not staying up until 4 in the morning to do it, thx.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:14 pm**

If you voted before any wagons formed, then you voted early. Period. Your reasoning for voting early has nothing to do with it so it's bizarre that you even brought it up.

Somehow voting early to make sure you don't miss EoD means that you DIDN'T vote early? Are you ashamed or something?

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:15 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote: I didn't vote early.

Quin wrote:I voted before any wagons actually formed.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Can... Can I Zebra Senpai?

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:16 pm**

Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote: I didn't vote early.

Quin wrote:I voted before any wagons actually formed.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
It's not my fault that people took their sweet time voting. I'm not staying up until 4 in the morning to do it, thx.

Way to excuse yourself without actually addressing your blatant contradiction.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:16 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote: I didn't vote early.

Quin wrote:I voted before any wagons actually formed.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Can... Can I Zebra Senpai?

nope

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:16 pm**

I got family over now, byeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:17 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:If you voted before any wagons formed, then you voted early. Period. Your reasoning for voting early has nothing to do with it so it's bizarre that you even brought it up.

Somehow voting early to make sure you don't miss EoD means that you DIDN'T vote early? Are you ashamed or something?

I'm not going to argue with you about our definition of 'early'. My reasoning was independent from that, you decided it would be fun to squish them together, so that's on you.

What a pointless post, zebra. I am disappoint.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:17 pm**

Voted Quin.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:18 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote: I didn't vote early.

Quin wrote:I voted before any wagons actually formed.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
It's not my fault that people took their sweet time voting. I'm not staying up until 4 in the morning to do it, thx.
Way to excuse yourself without actually addressing your blatant contradiction.

Don't turn my time zone into a case against me. That's actually disgusting.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:18 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Quin wrote: I didn't vote early.

Quin wrote:I voted before any wagons actually formed.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Can... Can I Zebra Senpai?
nope

I really want to think that if Boomslang is good, Epi must be bad... Unfortunately the existence of 2 teams undermines this thought.

Bye Zeebs, have fun!!

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:21 pm**

Snow Dog wrote:Voted Quin.

Wanna talk about it?

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:21 pm**

Quin wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Voted Quin.
Wanna talk about it?

Sure

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:21 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:I trust Niju less than Zebra... And Niju voted Zebra...

We must save Zebra.

I like the vote spread. It's abit harder to see who's good and who's bad from ith though. Power votes are Niju's, Scotty's, and perhaps me, Epi's and Quin's.

I could see Epi being a cannibal. I could see Boomslang and Niju being Pirates.

Linki - oh shit, whaddup another power vote. Nachomamma are you bad? I'm assuming I'm not on your team if I am.

For the last god damn time yes I am bad and yes you are on my team please for the love of God check your role PM

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:22 pm**

Snow Dog wrote:
Quin wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Voted Quin.
Wanna talk about it?
Sure

Nice chat.

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:23 pm**

Snow Dog wrote:
Quin wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Voted Quin.
Wanna talk about it?
Sure

Can I join?

Linki - No mom I don't wanna

Posted: **Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:25 pm**

Quin wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Quin wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Voted Quin.
Wanna talk about it?
Sure
Nice chat.

I think you are bad. That day 1 self vote is still playing on my mind. BUT.....I was intending to vote Soneji and voted you in error. If we could change votes I'd do it now.

The Syndicate

Monkey Island [ENDGAME]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]

Re: Monkey Island [DAY 3]