The Syndicate

That is fair Niju, but as I didn't even realise that's what he was doing it does make me inclined to think that you may be bad.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Yo Wilgy! Throw some reads at me, bud.

Later. A log in requirement just ate my gth on everyone...

Golden wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm confused.

Scotty wrote:

Golden wrote:What have I become?

This can be managed. From now on, let's form a cypher from the Loren obtuse passages.

If you mean yes, or good, (or agree) post "my sweetest friend"
If you mean no, or bad, (or disagree) post "I will let you down"

My sweetest friend.

What does full of broken thoughts mean?

The Boomerang Said What I Was Waiting to Hear Someone Else Say, Because it Was on My Mind

Full of broken thoughts

nijuukyugou wrote:nonsense

Golden wrote:Full of broken thoughts

nijuukyugou wrote:nonsense

It Isn't Nonsense...I've Seen it So Many Times...

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Full of broken thoughts

nijuukyugou wrote:nonsense

It Isn't Nonsense...I've Seen it So Many Times...

Boomslang wrote:against players who were attracting some heat?

Full of broken thoughts!

DrWilgy wrote:Later. A log in requirement just ate my gth on everyone...

PJNFPHGPLKQINRFITDTK

Boomslang wrote:Linki w/Golden: I don't necessarily think both are fake. But I think odds are high one is, given what we know about the roles.
Linki w/MP: Spinning my wheels here, but I'd say a mafia J could be pretending to help temper his high post count from yesterday. He came out swinging, establishing himself as a strong inquisitive force (see Scotty calling him the Spanish Inquisition, for crying out loud), and playing insanified lets him fade back a bit while retaining that impression.

IBFLGVHJFWVAKYPTQPSRSDXBUFLKXARSTJTBDICXYFCFVEJGHGZIDIMULCBGWOTNKHGZTPBFYTPGUBONRUBLJQBJWZJMVGGFQPMERWCVEPJCAHM

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Full of broken thoughts

nijuukyugou wrote:nonsense

It Isn't Nonsense...I've Seen it So Many Times...

IBFLGQGMOUUYNGJZRUDIYJWWTZWXIKZKJIP

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Linki w/Golden: I don't necessarily think both are fake. But I think odds are high one is, given what we know about the roles.
Linki w/MP: Spinning my wheels here, but I'd say a mafia J could be pretending to help temper his high post count from yesterday. He came out swinging, establishing himself as a strong inquisitive force (see Scotty calling him the Spanish Inquisition, for crying out loud), and playing insanified lets him fade back a bit while retaining that impression.

IBFLGVHJFWVAKYPTQPSRSDXBUFLKXARSTJTBDICXYFCFVEJGHGZIDIMULCBGWOTNKHGZTPBFYTPGUBONRUBLJQBJWZJMVGGFQPMERWCVEPJCAHM

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Full of broken thoughts

nijuukyugou wrote:nonsense

It Isn't Nonsense...I've Seen it So Many Times...

IBFLGQGMOUUYNGJZRUDIYJWWTZWXIKZKJIP

WAH WAH

Scotty wrote:If you mean yes, or good, (or agree)

WBIZ

Scotty wrote:If you mean no, or bad, (or disagree)

WKT

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:If you mean yes, or good, (or agree)

WBIZ

Scotty wrote:If you mean no, or bad, (or disagree)

WKT

That's the Spirit

Epignosis wrote:The Boomerang Said What I Was Waiting to Hear Someone Else Say, Because it Was on My Mind

ZKT

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:The Boomerang Said What I Was Waiting to Hear Someone Else Say, Because it Was on My Mind

ZKT

TBDEGCMSSTCV

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:The Boomerang Said What I Was Waiting to Hear Someone Else Say, Because it Was on My Mind

ZKT

You've Already Lost Me...But That's What My Dead Child Said to Me in a Dream

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:BIZ

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:KT

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:The Boomerang Said What I Was Waiting to Hear Someone Else Say, Because it Was on My Mind

ZKT

TBDEGCMSSTCV

You Are Fun, and I Think That Before This Relationship Gets Serious, I Should Let You Know That I Won't Lynch You if You Can't Speak

Epignosis wrote:The Golden Curse is Specific, While the Jagged Curse Would Require Wording That I Don't Believe Someone With Such a Power Would Use

TKT

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Spoiler: show

Dom wrote:MP PLEASE ANSWER TO THE FOLLOWING

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Scotty wrote:I don't trust several people on this lynch and I don't think Inh will flip bad.

And JJJ: I'm sorry you hate that post.

I still stand by my first post of this game

You're bad.

Alex posted this before Day One ended, but still voted INH even though Rob gave him reason not to.

I find that suspicious.
His last post on me:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sloonei, I'm not too sure how to answer your question with any conviction because I'm really not sure what to think of Dom. A large part of it is definitely gut, but I thought I had a bit more to town read him than I actually do, upon recollection. There's this at least:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Dom wrote:What would be a better answer?

An answer which details a reasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which bears the appearance of being genuine. I don't know what that'd be, but I'd imagine it's plausible for it to exist.

Dom wrote:What would be a worse answer?

An answer which details an unreasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which does not bear the appearance of being genuine. I thought you might be shading me for opportunism re: MP via implication without directly stating it, which would be a dubious assertion given the fuller context of my dialogue with MP.

To your credit, you didn't go there. You didn't provide a "reasonable perspective" either; you left your answer at its most basic: "I thought your accusation was b/s and it was a ping". It's not a thorough explanation, but it's also not one that looks made up. I can on some level appreciate the take-it-or-leave-it frankness.

This is a good point. I can believe that a baddie Dom would have engaged in the latter.

But I do see a lack of townie fire/spark in him and plenty of potential for manufactured content in his posts. I don't know. He could very easily be a mafia read; it was mostly a current gut-based assertion.

So, he gives reason to read me civ, but puts me as a weak mafia read next time he gives a rainbow.
That's strange too. His last post on me:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sloonei, I'm not too sure how to answer your question with any conviction because I'm really not sure what to think of Dom. A large part of it is definitely gut, but I thought I had a bit more to town read him than I actually do, upon recollection. There's this at least:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Dom wrote:What would be a better answer?

An answer which details a reasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which bears the appearance of being genuine. I don't know what that'd be, but I'd imagine it's plausible for it to exist.

Dom wrote:What would be a worse answer?

An answer which details an unreasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which does not bear the appearance of being genuine. I thought you might be shading me for opportunism re: MP via implication without directly stating it, which would be a dubious assertion given the fuller context of my dialogue with MP.

To your credit, you didn't go there. You didn't provide a "reasonable perspective" either; you left your answer at its most basic: "I thought your accusation was b/s and it was a ping". It's not a thorough explanation, but it's also not one that looks made up. I can on some level appreciate the take-it-or-leave-it frankness.

This is a good point. I can believe that a baddie Dom would have engaged in the latter.

But I do see a lack of townie fire/spark in him and plenty of potential for manufactured content in his posts. I don't know. He could very easily be a mafia read; it was mostly a current gut-based assertion.

So, he gives reason to read me civ, but puts me as a weak mafia read next time he gives a rainbow.
That's strange too.

Elaboration and justification for both would be nice.

Hey Dom, here's a response to that stuff you wanted me to respond to.

I think if you'll look in my ISO you'll see it evident that I found both Scotty and INH suspicious, but that I found an INH lynch preferable. I declared "you're bad" in response to that Scotty post because I thought it was a yucky post.

Did you find Rob's reason compelling? If so, why didn't you try to convince me and others to vote otherwise? I'd say it's pretty easy and suspicious to come in after the fact and try to point the blame squarely at me.

Regarding my read of you, my gut keeps shifting back and forth between thinking you're genuine and not, so that's why you've been shuffling between very weak town and very weak mafia. I also started questioning why I was townreading you after Sloonei inquired me and I didn't feel I had that much reason to. I'd have to ISO your content to get a better idea of where I stand on you probably because you're an enigma.

I'm satisfied with the latter answer.

The former reads strangely to me. I wasn't around for the most part-- I worked mroe than I thought I would and ran out of data on my phone. I don't know that I would have voted INH. That's not the point. My point is that you seemed to have had a stronger feeling on Scotty, but voted for INH anyway. Your deflection of this topic onto myself is not a good look.


I am letting you all know that I am ill. I am barely keeping up wtih my games and I will be a bit subdued for a few days. I apologize in advance.

Scotty wrote:A Person

JKT

Scotty wrote:birdwithteeth11

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:Boomslang

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:Dom

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:DrWilgy

ZKT

Scotty wrote:Epignosis

ZKT

Scotty wrote:Golden

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:LoRab

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:Metalmarsh89

ZKT

Scotty wrote:MovingPictures07

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:Nijuukyugou

ZKT

Scotty wrote:Scotty

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:sig

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:Sloonei

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:simmer

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:triceratopzeuhl

JBIZ

I Was Expecting Ws at the Beginning of Each Code, and I am Disappointed

LoRab wrote:Of course, we now have the question of if they are a good insanifier or an evil insanifier. For the sake of balance, if there are 2, I'd venture a guess that there is one of each.

A Person wrote:I don't have the time or energy to read all the nonsense people spew, a few well placed kills would improve the quality of the game.

UKYZZFHIA

I Voted the Founder, as I Implied I Would

The Founder's Need to Run Up the Volume is Fake as Hell

MovingPictures07 wrote:

nijuukyugou wrote:I'm gonna start with ISO'ing Epi votes, since I didn't even know that was a train (shows how much I've been paying attention, lol) and it stands out to me because of that reason (unexpected). It's probably all I'll be able to get through for tonight, but it's a start, I suppose.

I can dig it.

What's new?

Golden wrote:

Boomslang wrote:against players who were attracting some heat?

Full of broken thoughts!

IActual quote from you last night: "Is the theme of this game 'have a self-righteous rant at golden?'"
Why would you post that if you didn't feel like you were taking heat?

Dom wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Spoiler: show

Dom wrote:MP PLEASE ANSWER TO THE FOLLOWING

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Scotty wrote:I don't trust several people on this lynch and I don't think Inh will flip bad.

And JJJ: I'm sorry you hate that post.

I still stand by my first post of this game

You're bad.

Alex posted this before Day One ended, but still voted INH even though Rob gave him reason not to.

I find that suspicious.
His last post on me:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sloonei, I'm not too sure how to answer your question with any conviction because I'm really not sure what to think of Dom. A large part of it is definitely gut, but I thought I had a bit more to town read him than I actually do, upon recollection. There's this at least:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Dom wrote:What would be a better answer?

An answer which details a reasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which bears the appearance of being genuine. I don't know what that'd be, but I'd imagine it's plausible for it to exist.

Dom wrote:What would be a worse answer?

An answer which details an unreasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which does not bear the appearance of being genuine. I thought you might be shading me for opportunism re: MP via implication without directly stating it, which would be a dubious assertion given the fuller context of my dialogue with MP.

To your credit, you didn't go there. You didn't provide a "reasonable perspective" either; you left your answer at its most basic: "I thought your accusation was b/s and it was a ping". It's not a thorough explanation, but it's also not one that looks made up. I can on some level appreciate the take-it-or-leave-it frankness.

This is a good point. I can believe that a baddie Dom would have engaged in the latter.

But I do see a lack of townie fire/spark in him and plenty of potential for manufactured content in his posts. I don't know. He could very easily be a mafia read; it was mostly a current gut-based assertion.

So, he gives reason to read me civ, but puts me as a weak mafia read next time he gives a rainbow.
That's strange too. His last post on me:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sloonei, I'm not too sure how to answer your question with any conviction because I'm really not sure what to think of Dom. A large part of it is definitely gut, but I thought I had a bit more to town read him than I actually do, upon recollection. There's this at least:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Dom wrote:What would be a better answer?

An answer which details a reasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which bears the appearance of being genuine. I don't know what that'd be, but I'd imagine it's plausible for it to exist.

Dom wrote:What would be a worse answer?

An answer which details an unreasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which does not bear the appearance of being genuine. I thought you might be shading me for opportunism re: MP via implication without directly stating it, which would be a dubious assertion given the fuller context of my dialogue with MP.

To your credit, you didn't go there. You didn't provide a "reasonable perspective" either; you left your answer at its most basic: "I thought your accusation was b/s and it was a ping". It's not a thorough explanation, but it's also not one that looks made up. I can on some level appreciate the take-it-or-leave-it frankness.

This is a good point. I can believe that a baddie Dom would have engaged in the latter.

But I do see a lack of townie fire/spark in him and plenty of potential for manufactured content in his posts. I don't know. He could very easily be a mafia read; it was mostly a current gut-based assertion.

So, he gives reason to read me civ, but puts me as a weak mafia read next time he gives a rainbow.
That's strange too.

Elaboration and justification for both would be nice.

Hey Dom, here's a response to that stuff you wanted me to respond to.

I think if you'll look in my ISO you'll see it evident that I found both Scotty and INH suspicious, but that I found an INH lynch preferable. I declared "you're bad" in response to that Scotty post because I thought it was a yucky post.

Did you find Rob's reason compelling? If so, why didn't you try to convince me and others to vote otherwise? I'd say it's pretty easy and suspicious to come in after the fact and try to point the blame squarely at me.

Regarding my read of you, my gut keeps shifting back and forth between thinking you're genuine and not, so that's why you've been shuffling between very weak town and very weak mafia. I also started questioning why I was townreading you after Sloonei inquired me and I didn't feel I had that much reason to. I'd have to ISO your content to get a better idea of where I stand on you probably because you're an enigma.

I'm satisfied with the latter answer.

The former reads strangely to me. I wasn't around for the most part-- I worked mroe than I thought I would and ran out of data on my phone. I don't know that I would have voted INH. That's not the point. My point is that you seemed to have had a stronger feeling on Scotty, but voted for INH anyway. Your deflection of this topic onto myself is not a good look.


I am letting you all know that I am ill. I am barely keeping up wtih my games and I will be a bit subdued for a few days. I apologize in advance.

Well, clearly I didn't indicate how strongly I was feeling about either of them that effectively then, because that's not how I was feeling.

Epignosis wrote:I Voted the Founder, as I Implied I Would

What are you talking about? Why are you voting for me?

Epignosis wrote:The Founder's Need to Run Up the Volume is Fake as Hell

MovingPictures07 wrote:

nijuukyugou wrote:I'm gonna start with ISO'ing Epi votes, since I didn't even know that was a train (shows how much I've been paying attention, lol) and it stands out to me because of that reason (unexpected). It's probably all I'll be able to get through for tonight, but it's a start, I suppose.

I can dig it.

It's not fake. I have my limits. I'm exhausted and I've been busier the last few days than I anticipated. What about my activity or content seems fake to you? Because this is the first I'm hearing about it.

Why are you going down MP?

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Dom wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey Dom, here's a response to that stuff you wanted me to respond to.

I think if you'll look in my ISO you'll see it evident that I found both Scotty and INH suspicious, but that I found an INH lynch preferable. I declared "you're bad" in response to that Scotty post because I thought it was a yucky post.

Did you find Rob's reason compelling? If so, why didn't you try to convince me and others to vote otherwise? I'd say it's pretty easy and suspicious to come in after the fact and try to point the blame squarely at me.

Regarding my read of you, my gut keeps shifting back and forth between thinking you're genuine and not, so that's why you've been shuffling between very weak town and very weak mafia. I also started questioning why I was townreading you after Sloonei inquired me and I didn't feel I had that much reason to. I'd have to ISO your content to get a better idea of where I stand on you probably because you're an enigma.

I'm satisfied with the latter answer.

The former reads strangely to me. I wasn't around for the most part-- I worked mroe than I thought I would and ran out of data on my phone. I don't know that I would have voted INH. That's not the point. My point is that you seemed to have had a stronger feeling on Scotty, but voted for INH anyway. Your deflection of this topic onto myself is not a good look.


I am letting you all know that I am ill. I am barely keeping up wtih my games and I will be a bit subdued for a few days. I apologize in advance.

Well, clearly I didn't indicate how strongly I was feeling about either of them that effectively then, because that's not how I was feeling.

Except that I did, because that's the point of my rainbow list.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why are you going down MP?

What?

I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why are you going down MP?

What?

You took a vote from Epignosis. That's kind of a big deal.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

What? Why? I just got here.

I just want to catch other people online to chat with.

Apperently I'm better at busting up parties than joining them.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Dom wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey Dom, here's a response to that stuff you wanted me to respond to.

I think if you'll look in my ISO you'll see it evident that I found both Scotty and INH suspicious, but that I found an INH lynch preferable. I declared "you're bad" in response to that Scotty post because I thought it was a yucky post.

Did you find Rob's reason compelling? If so, why didn't you try to convince me and others to vote otherwise? I'd say it's pretty easy and suspicious to come in after the fact and try to point the blame squarely at me.

Regarding my read of you, my gut keeps shifting back and forth between thinking you're genuine and not, so that's why you've been shuffling between very weak town and very weak mafia. I also started questioning why I was townreading you after Sloonei inquired me and I didn't feel I had that much reason to. I'd have to ISO your content to get a better idea of where I stand on you probably because you're an enigma.

I'm satisfied with the latter answer.

The former reads strangely to me. I wasn't around for the most part-- I worked mroe than I thought I would and ran out of data on my phone. I don't know that I would have voted INH. That's not the point. My point is that you seemed to have had a stronger feeling on Scotty, but voted for INH anyway. Your deflection of this topic onto myself is not a good look.


I am letting you all know that I am ill. I am barely keeping up wtih my games and I will be a bit subdued for a few days. I apologize in advance.

Well, clearly I didn't indicate how strongly I was feeling about either of them that effectively then, because that's not how I was feeling.

Except that I did, because that's the point of my rainbow list.

I am just saying that seems incongruent with your statement on Scotty.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:A Person

JKT

Scotty wrote:birdwithteeth11

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:Boomslang

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:Dom

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:DrWilgy

ZKT

Scotty wrote:Epignosis

ZKT

Scotty wrote:Golden

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:LoRab

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:Metalmarsh89

ZKT

Scotty wrote:MovingPictures07

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:Nijuukyugou

ZKT

Scotty wrote:Scotty

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:sig

ZBIZ

Scotty wrote:Sloonei

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:simmer

JBIZ

Scotty wrote:triceratopzeuhl

JBIZ

zKT = bad
JBIZ = town?

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

335 Thread Count, Camps on Mount INH, Expects No Scrutiny

Dom wrote:bad

KT

Dom wrote:town

BIZ

JJJKT

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why are you going down MP?

What?

You took a vote from Epignosis. That's kind of a big deal.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

What? Why? I just got here.

What do you mean it's a big deal?

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why are you going down MP?

What?

You took a vote from Epignosis. That's kind of a big deal.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

What? Why? I just got here.

What do you mean it's a big deal?

He's the creme de la crop!

What's your read on him?

Dom wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Dom wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey Dom, here's a response to that stuff you wanted me to respond to.

I think if you'll look in my ISO you'll see it evident that I found both Scotty and INH suspicious, but that I found an INH lynch preferable. I declared "you're bad" in response to that Scotty post because I thought it was a yucky post.

Did you find Rob's reason compelling? If so, why didn't you try to convince me and others to vote otherwise? I'd say it's pretty easy and suspicious to come in after the fact and try to point the blame squarely at me.

Regarding my read of you, my gut keeps shifting back and forth between thinking you're genuine and not, so that's why you've been shuffling between very weak town and very weak mafia. I also started questioning why I was townreading you after Sloonei inquired me and I didn't feel I had that much reason to. I'd have to ISO your content to get a better idea of where I stand on you probably because you're an enigma.

I'm satisfied with the latter answer.

The former reads strangely to me. I wasn't around for the most part-- I worked mroe than I thought I would and ran out of data on my phone. I don't know that I would have voted INH. That's not the point. My point is that you seemed to have had a stronger feeling on Scotty, but voted for INH anyway. Your deflection of this topic onto myself is not a good look.


I am letting you all know that I am ill. I am barely keeping up wtih my games and I will be a bit subdued for a few days. I apologize in advance.

Well, clearly I didn't indicate how strongly I was feeling about either of them that effectively then, because that's not how I was feeling.

Except that I did, because that's the point of my rainbow list.

I am just saying that seems incongruent with your statement on Scotty.

You mean the one where I said 'you're bad'? Okay, I think I follow what you're getting at now.

I didn't have 100% conviction that Scotty was bad, I just thought that post of his looked particularly bad, so I threw down that statement (also wanted to see how he would respond to it).

I expressed my desire to lynch Scotty many times, but I felt stronger even if not much stronger conviction against INH. Not sure what else I can say but that.

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

335 Thread Count, Camps on Mount INH, Expects No Scrutiny

Look, it's not that I expect no scrutiny. That's a misrepresentation of my behavior.

But I'm mentally exhausted this phase. For RL reasons even more than in game, but yeah; I exhausted all that effort and the best we could get is a shitty mislynch, and despite feeling like during d1 I was enervating lots of worthwhile content I find myself constricted by less free time and analysis paralysis, so yeah I'm a bit sour grapes about this game right now.

What the fuck do you expect me to say to you just coming in, plopping a vote on me, and saying my desire to generate content is fake? You've shown no effort to critically evaluate any other INH voter or any other vote except for me today, and you've given me nothing to respond to or work with, just a broad stroke observation that my behavior is fake, and a comment that I could have moved my vote after you made an observation about INH that I considered. What about the other INH voters? Why aren't you and Dom holding them accountable for not changing their votes? Why am I being held to a standard in which you think your one point should have changed my mind when I already spoke extensively and in great detail about my INH thoughts and even expressed that same reservation about his lynch train and others did not? What about all of that specifically strikes you as contrived?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Why are you going down MP?

What?

You took a vote from Epignosis. That's kind of a big deal.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

What? Why? I just got here.

What do you mean it's a big deal?

He's the creme de la crop!

What's your read on him?

I don't know. I would still say Town but I feel like all my reads are uninformed garbage right now and it's disheartening. I have no direction.

I have meetings with fellow professors and students for the next few hours. Be back closer to EoD.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

335 Thread Count, Camps on Mount INH, Expects No Scrutiny

Look, it's not that I expect no scrutiny. That's a misrepresentation of my behavior.

But I'm mentally exhausted this phase. For RL reasons even more than in game, but yeah; I exhausted all that effort and the best we could get is a shitty mislynch, and despite feeling like during d1 I was enervating lots of worthwhile content I find myself constricted by less free time and analysis paralysis, so yeah I'm a bit sour grapes about this game right now.

What the fuck do you expect me to say to you just coming in, plopping a vote on me, and saying my desire to generate content is fake? You've shown no effort to critically evaluate any other INH voter or any other vote except for me today, and you've given me nothing to respond to or work with, just a broad stroke observation that my behavior is fake, and a comment that I could have moved my vote after you made an observation about INH that I considered. What about the other INH voters? Why aren't you and Dom holding them accountable for not changing their votes? Why am I being held to a standard in which you think your one point should have changed my mind when I already spoke extensively and in great detail about my INH thoughts and even expressed that same reservation about his lynch train and others did not? What about all of that specifically strikes you as contrived?

Damn phone

That highlighted bit should be generating.

Now bye.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:You guys call it random chaos marmot.

I'm serious about the timmer/Boomslang thing. Wish I had more time to chat though, but I've only been able to skim a bit.

I didn't say it was chaotic. I just don't find any value in timing accusations; I historically find them to be too inaccurate. When you get a chance, I'd be happy to hear your elaboration and/or what you're talking about re: Russ in Talking Heads.

I never responded to this post. Oops!

In Talking Heads, Russ popped in with his first post saying "Hey guys, sorry I'm late. I'm busy, but I'm just posting because the host warned me to not not post". I accused him of having BTSC, as that's where his potential warning came from. I don't remember if that was the case at all, but he did flip mafia. It's a little different than this one.



If you find this timing thing to be historically inaccurate, can you give me an example or two of someone else using a similar accusation and being wrong?

KBYE

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm done with this game. I don't really care. I'm really not in the mood for this. I'll be back whenever.

335 Thread Count, Camps on Mount INH, Expects No Scrutiny

Look, it's not that I expect no scrutiny. That's a misrepresentation of my behavior.

But I'm mentally exhausted this phase. For RL reasons even more than in game, but yeah; I exhausted all that effort and the best we could get is a shitty mislynch, and despite feeling like during d1 I was enervating lots of worthwhile content I find myself constricted by less free time and analysis paralysis, so yeah I'm a bit sour grapes about this game right now.

Generating Content or White Noise (A Ballad in Three Movements):
a. I Sympathize with a Person, I Really Do
b. By the Time I Read Moby Dick Every Evening, I Lose Interest in Writing Anything Myself
c. The Other Voices are Drowned

MovingPictures07 wrote:What the fuck do you expect me to say to you just coming in, plopping a vote on me, and saying my desire to generate content is fake? You've shown no effort to critically evaluate any other INH voter or any other vote except for me today, and you've given me nothing to respond to or work with, just a broad stroke observation that my behavior is fake, and a comment that I could have moved my vote after you made an observation about INH that I considered. What about the other INH voters? Why aren't you and Dom holding them accountable for not changing their votes? Why am I being held to a standard in which you think your one point should have changed my mind when I already spoke extensively and in great detail about my INH thoughts and even expressed that same reservation about his lynch train and others did not? What about all of that specifically strikes you as contrived?

Of All People, I Would Think Mr. POE (i.e., FIND ALL THE TOWNSFOLK) and Mr. WKT Would Be Most Receptive to a Cogent Point in the Victim's Favor