The Syndicate

Roxy wrote:

Kate wrote:I think haste will make waste today. I think there is only one player who could POSSIBLY be bob.

Who Kate?


No one commenting on my Vomps post?

I think if we cannot agree who Bob is we should deffo take out a recruit.

linky hahah I am not Bob llama

I think what you illustrated makes a lot of sense. As I have said in previous posts, Russ, Vomps, and llama being the three baddies makes a ton of sense to me, and perfectly explains everything that has happened. I'm open to other interpretations, but this is the one that seems most logical to me, so I'm trying to make sure others agree.

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote: I don't see it either. I do think she could have pertinent and/or strong information, but I'm starting to wonder if she's been compromised and/or if she's purposefully spreading incorrect information somewhere.

She claims to know a lot. But how many baddies has she caught with her information so far?

Good question. Seemingly 0 because here we are without a single baddie lynch. I still don't get how the game is even going... but it has to be because we're at 4-4.

Oh wait, I just had a thought. Kate, did you say Rox was eliminated from being Bob?

haha funny llama I will sig bet anyone who doesn't believe me. I am the last person Bob wants to recruit haha I am also NOT Bob another sig bet I am willing to make.

So you have no comment on my Vomps post llama? Not surprising really. I mean I could go back and pull quotes where you were after Vomps for days then suddenly there you two are all chummy and voting together.

linky

No Sockman she did not.

Alex, even if you believe me to be a recruit (which I am not) why take the chance on me when you also believe Russ to be recruit and he comes from a pool of only two possibilities whereas I come from a pool of five? Also, I will help you with Russ. Math indicates that a Russ vote is the way to go. Vote Russ and fabulous prizes await.Vote me, and only sorrow and misery will follow (especially for me )

Roxy wrote: So you have no comment on my Vomps post llama? Not surprising really. I mean I could go back and pull quotes where you were after Vomps for days then suddenly there you two are all chummy and voting together.

I don't really have any comment, no. He suspected me and I suspected him, but as we both got more information, we changed our minds. I went organized a BWT vote because I was afraid of splitting the vote too much and I was able to get agreement from a few people. Vomps just happened to be one.

Why are you the last person Bob would want to recruit? It seems like you would be a logical choice to me.

You would like for people to think that llama wouldn't you? :/

Roxy wrote:You would like for people to think that llama wouldn't you? :/

Yes. Yes I would.

Again, I am not accusing you of anything, Roxy. I just pointed out why you would be a smart choice for a Day 4 recruit. There are other people who would have been a smart choice too. You dispute that, but you won't say why, which I think is odd.

thellama73 wrote:Alex, even if you believe me to be a recruit (which I am not) why take the chance on me when you also believe Russ to be recruit and he comes from a pool of only two possibilities whereas I come from a pool of five? Also, I will help you with Russ. Math indicates that a Russ vote is the way to go. Vote Russ and fabulous prizes await.Vote me, and only sorrow and misery will follow (especially for me )

I'm down with a Russ vote, but we need to cover you as well, because you both have to be bad. We need to cover all recruits so that we lynch a baddie and then stop any NK. That's the only way we have any chance here.

I want to hear what else people have to say.

I have been multitasking studying, but I need to stop multitasking now if I want to get all of this done today. Be back later. Will probably vote tonight.

Whatever happens, I have to admit, this has been a really fun (if at times infuriating) game.

Roxy wrote:

Kate wrote:I think haste will make waste today. I think there is only one player who could POSSIBLY be bob.

Who Kate?


No one commenting on my Vomps post?

I think if we cannot agree who Bob is we should deffo take out a recruit.

linky hahah I am not Bob llama

I dont really think you are.

Do you remember when nev died I posed a theory that he may have been a recruited Catherine? Do think that is at all pissible?

Want to bet me a signature that I am not Bob or a recruit?
I think one of my Beatles siggy's would look fabulous on you llama

Toesocks: I agree I would like to cover:
llama
Vomps
Rusti

But if we cover all the people we think are recruits the baddies can swoop in and all vote for a civ which is something we cannot lose sight of. I think thats why Mati wanted to wait last lynch so baddies have no clue whats going to happen or who is going to get the vote.

No Kate. I find it utterly impossible. tbh.

I think Roxy's idea for voting sounds good, but maybe someone should place 1 vote on MP just to be safe. I didnt like his missing the vote yesterday, when he was here.

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote:
linky hahah I am not Bob llama

Sorry, a typo made my post confusing. I do not think you are Bob, I was trying to say that if I were Bob, you would be an attractive Day 4 recruit. Not necessarily that you are one, but that you would be a logical choice.

Well I did come in here today immediately saying don't lynch llama he's not bob. That doesn't buy me any good faith? Wow. Youre tough.

Matahari wrote:I think Roxy's idea for voting sounds good, but maybe someone should place 1 vote on MP just to be safe. I didnt like his missing the vote yesterday, when he was here.

Do you think mp could be bob? Do You have any role in mind for him?

ffs my posts sound Bea-like I guess b/c we are getting ready to host together

I agree Mati.

Kate wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote:
linky hahah I am not Bob llama

Sorry, a typo made my post confusing. I do not think you are Bob, I was trying to say that if I were Bob, you would be an attractive Day 4 recruit. Not necessarily that you are one, but that you would be a logical choice.

Well I did come in here today immediately saying don't lynch llama he's not bob. That doesn't buy me any good faith? Wow. Youre tough.

What? I was talking to Roxy, not you. I did notice what you said and I'll admit it did make me more favorably inclined towards you, although I still think whatever info you have is likely bad.

Roxy wrote:Want to bet me a signature that I am not Bob or a recruit?
I think one of my Beatles siggy's would look fabulous on you llama

Toesocks: I agree I would like to cover:
llama
Vomps
Rusti

But if we cover all the people we think are recruits the baddies can swoop in and all vote for a civ which is something we cannot lose sight of. I think thats why Mati wanted to wait last lynch so baddies have no clue whats going to happen or who is going to get the vote.

No Kate. I find it utterly impossible. tbh.

Ok good!

Kate wrote: Do you think mp could be bob? Do You have any role in mind for him?

It would not surprise me at all. MP as great at playing those kind of roles.

The only people I see that could possibly be bob are vomp or mp. But I think vomp is a civ role...so...

If we cover all who we think are bad then we leave our selves wide open for baddies to pick one of the civs off.

I think we should wait as late as possible to place our votes.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I want to hear what else people have to say.

I have been multitasking studying, but I need to stop multitasking now if I want to get all of this done today. Be back later. Will probably vote tonight.

Convenient timing?

Wouldn't it make more sense to try and lynch the recruits than Bob, though? If we lynch Bob tonight, we are faced with three potential NKs, whereas if we lynch a recruit we only have to wory about two. Since Bob only recruits every other day, if we can lynch a recruit every day we can reduce the possibility of NKs down to zero and then kill Bob.

Kate wrote:

Matahari wrote:I think Roxy's idea for voting sounds good, but maybe someone should place 1 vote on MP just to be safe. I didnt like his missing the vote yesterday, when he was here.

Do you think mp could be bob? Do You have any role in mind for him?

There is a slight possibility he could be Bob, or the newest recruit. But although one minute it sounds like he is being helpful, the next minute he is being confusing. Playing both sides of the fence, or genuinely seeing the either/ors, I dont know. But I'm still not comfortable with his missing the vote yesterday. He knew what time the vote was. I think he was between a rock and a hard place in relation to his late vote, so I think he thought it safest to pretend like he missed the vote.

Roxy wrote: I think we should wait as late as possible to place our votes.

I still don't see how that makes sense.

Kate - I was thinking Vomps was a certain role as well but now I do believe he was recruited.

I am not sure about MP to be fair. I do feel he missed the last vote on purpose.

Roxy wrote:Kate - I was thinking Vomps was a certain role as well but now I do believe he was recruited.

I am not sure about MP to be fair. I do feel he missed the last vote on purpose.

Ditto on all counts.

There is already 1 vote on Russti, if we put 1 on MP, 1 on Vomps, and all the rest on Llama, I would feel best about it. I'm putting this out there now, because if anyone was to be against it, I want to understand why, or what the objections would be-

Matahari wrote:There is already 1 vote on Russti, if we put 1 on MP, 1 on Vomps, and all the rest on Llama, I would feel best about it. I'm putting this out there now, because if anyone was to be against it, I want to understand why, or what the objections would be-

I drather get rid of vomps. I think hhis role will do us more damage than llamas.

Plus there no point covering mp if we agree he is bob. Remember we only have four civ votes lol...

Matahari wrote:There is already 1 vote on Russti, if we put 1 on MP, 1 on Vomps, and all the rest on Llama, I would feel best about it. I'm putting this out there now, because if anyone was to be against it, I want to understand why, or what the objections would be-

I object to it!

What about my argument that if you have to choose between me and Russ, Russ makes more sense because there is a smaller pool of possibilities in his group and hence less margin for error? From the last NK we know that either Russ or Vomps has to be a recruit and either me, MP, Kate, SVS or Mata has to be a recruit. Why take a one in five shot when you can take a one in two shot?

I agree with your plan Mati <3

whoever does not comply would have to be bad and wanting to lynch a civ

Roxy wrote:whoever does not comply would have to be bad and wanting to lynch a civ

Actually, whoever DOES comply would be wanting to lynch a civ, since I am a civ.

Kate, I dont know whether MP is even bad. I just feel like he is. He could easily be the latest recruit. One vote wouldnt hurt, would it?

Llama, all maths aside (meaning over my head), you are definitely bad. I think you need to go, but I'll wait to see what everyone else has to say.

Matahari wrote:Kate, I dont know whether MP is even bad. I just feel like he is. He could easily be the latest recruit. One vote wouldnt hurt, would it?

I think one vote matters a great deal when there are only four civvies versus four baddies.

thellama73 wrote:

Matahari wrote:Kate, I dont know whether MP is even bad. I just feel like he is. He could easily be the latest recruit. One vote wouldnt hurt, would it?

I think one vote matters a great deal when there are only four civvies versus four baddies.

But one baddie has already voted for 1 baddie, right?

nope.

thellama73 wrote:

Matahari wrote:There is already 1 vote on Russti, if we put 1 on MP, 1 on Vomps, and all the rest on Llama, I would feel best about it. I'm putting this out there now, because if anyone was to be against it, I want to understand why, or what the objections would be-

I object to it!

What about my argument that if you have to choose between me and Russ, Russ makes more sense because there is a smaller pool of possibilities in his group and hence less margin for error? From the last NK we know that either Russ or Vomps has to be a recruit and either me, MP, Kate, SVS or Mata has to be a recruit. Why take a one in five shot when you can take a one in two shot?

So since I'm not a recruit, Russ has to be one? Is this for sure? I'm torn between you and Russ, so if there's proof that Russ is definitely a recruit I'm obivously going with Russ.

Vompatti wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Matahari wrote:There is already 1 vote on Russti, if we put 1 on MP, 1 on Vomps, and all the rest on Llama, I would feel best about it. I'm putting this out there now, because if anyone was to be against it, I want to understand why, or what the objections would be-

I object to it!

What about my argument that if you have to choose between me and Russ, Russ makes more sense because there is a smaller pool of possibilities in his group and hence less margin for error? From the last NK we know that either Russ or Vomps has to be a recruit and either me, MP, Kate, SVS or Mata has to be a recruit. Why take a one in five shot when you can take a one in two shot?

So since I'm not a recruit, Russ has to be one? Is this for sure? I'm torn between you and Russ, so if there's proof that Russ is definitely a recruit I'm obivously going with Russ.

wow, this is making think russ is innocent. putting 2 votes on him helps NO ONE. Are you going to help or not?

Vompatti wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Matahari wrote:There is already 1 vote on Russti, if we put 1 on MP, 1 on Vomps, and all the rest on Llama, I would feel best about it. I'm putting this out there now, because if anyone was to be against it, I want to understand why, or what the objections would be-

I object to it!

What about my argument that if you have to choose between me and Russ, Russ makes more sense because there is a smaller pool of possibilities in his group and hence less margin for error? From the last NK we know that either Russ or Vomps has to be a recruit and either me, MP, Kate, SVS or Mata has to be a recruit. Why take a one in five shot when you can take a one in two shot?

So since I'm not a recruit, Russ has to be one? Is this for sure? I'm torn between you and Russ, so if there's proof that Russ is definitely a recruit I'm obivously going with Russ.

Quite right. If you are innocent, Russ HAS to be guilty. Of course, I don't know for a fact that you are innocent, but I have reason to believe that Russ is the one we should be after.

Matahari wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Matahari wrote:There is already 1 vote on Russti, if we put 1 on MP, 1 on Vomps, and all the rest on Llama, I would feel best about it. I'm putting this out there now, because if anyone was to be against it, I want to understand why, or what the objections would be-

I object to it!

What about my argument that if you have to choose between me and Russ, Russ makes more sense because there is a smaller pool of possibilities in his group and hence less margin for error? From the last NK we know that either Russ or Vomps has to be a recruit and either me, MP, Kate, SVS or Mata has to be a recruit. Why take a one in five shot when you can take a one in two shot?

So since I'm not a recruit, Russ has to be one? Is this for sure? I'm torn between you and Russ, so if there's proof that Russ is definitely a recruit I'm obivously going with Russ.

wow, this is making think russ is innocent. putting 2 votes on him helps NO ONE. Are you going to help or not?

If Russ is innocent, how do you explain the fact that he was one of only two people covered during a no night kill night?

seems like a bandwagon is starting here to help the baddies out. Trying to save Llama?

Llama, russ only needs one vote if he's a recruit. if we dont agree on which recruit to torpedo, its going to look even worse for you and vomps. get it?

If it's certain that Russ is a recruit I'm not going to vote for anyone but him.

Matahari wrote:seems like a bandwagon is starting here to help the baddies out. Trying to save Llama?

Llama, russ only needs one vote if he's a recruit. if we dont agree on which recruit to torpedo, its going to look even worse for you and vomps. get it?

So why not just lynch Russ, then? If you feel you must cover me, go ahead, but it looks like Russ is getting two votes, so why not go all in on him rather than splitting the vote further?

Vompatti wrote:If it's certain that Russ is a recruit I'm not going to vote for anyone but him.

its equally as certain that Llama is a recruit. Are you against forming a voting plan with the rest of us?

Matahari wrote:

Vompatti wrote:If it's certain that Russ is a recruit I'm not going to vote for anyone but him.

its equally as certain that Llama is a recruit. Are you against forming a voting plan with the rest of us?

How is it equally as certain?

Matahari wrote:

Vompatti wrote:If it's certain that Russ is a recruit I'm not going to vote for anyone but him.

its equally as certain that Llama is a recruit. Are you against forming a voting plan with the rest of us?

That's not true from Vomps' perspective. The only one he can be truly sure about is Russ. Why are you so insistent that I be lynched over Russ if you think we are both recruits?