The Syndicate

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:24 am**

Kate wrote:Based on this alone, FH, I would say CBK is the most deserving of a reread.

Sorry, that was way linki'd to FH's last post.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:26 am**

Hmmmm, I wonder why the red and blue secrets were revealed but not the purple...

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:29 am**

Kate wrote:Based on this alone, FH, I would say CBK is the most deserving of a reread.

Yes--Captain Bunny Killer is definitely a priority on my list of people to read through again.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:31 am**

Kate wrote:Based on this alone, FH, I would say CBK is the most deserving of a reread.

I agree.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:42 am**

CBK was a Rabbit voter right?

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:44 am**

Yes. One of the last to vote and voted either when the vote was tied 6-6 or when Bea was ahead by one.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:46 am**

Also, Chaindeath voted 4th for Rabbit when Bea was at 4. So, he tied it up.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:50 am**

Kate wrote:Yes. One of the last to vote and voted either when the vote was tied 6-6 or when Bea was ahead by one.

Kate wrote:Also, Chaindeath voted 4th for Rabbit when Bea was at 4. So, he tied it up.

Very interesting. Thank you, Kate. Some of this blends in when you're catching up.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:53 am**

Dom!! Nice to have you here!

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:54 am**

Dom wrote:CBK was a Rabbit voter right?

Yes. Check out FH's post above. CBK was the 6th rabbit voter which makes it look like she was trying to save bea, a baddie that they voted out that day. (I say they because I'm also a replacement and wasn't in the game then.)

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:05 pm**

I just read back through CBK's posts again (there aren't very many so it took hardly any time). I am going to quote some of the posts.

Day 2:

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Ugh Torn again. I was suspicious of SVS at first too, but not becuase it looked like she was upset about a killed teammate (I think someone said that). It just seemed odd how surprised she was over the strange NK, like it was a little for show. But since I don't know hardly anyone here, I thought I would see what others thought of it. I don't know.

But DH made some interesting observations about rabbit. Of course, that would be going off of what someone else claims is normal for rabbit.

She starts off by mentioning her suspicion of SVS. This is also the first post where she mentions rabbit and it is to say that she finds DH's observations interesting (at the time of this post, bea had received 2 votes, rabbit had 3).

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Hmm. I don't know if I should feel more suspicious of Vomp or rabbit from these personal reasons. I'm not trying to drag out a response from you on this, but anyone else think that sounds like inside information?

Points against rabbit increase.

When she made this post, bea was up to 6 votes and rabbit had 5.

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Well, rabbit it is. I'm heading out to a friend's house, aka the land of no internet, so I can't wait to watch more.

Then 10 minutes later she votes for rabbit giving him his 6th vote (Bea had 7 by this point).

Day 3:
Her next post starts off with a quick defense of her rabbit vote (DH's case), then quickly switches to why she's suspicious of SVS(viewtopic.php?p=2221#p2221). Then her next 2 posts are solely about SVS (viewtopic.php?p=2241#p2241 and viewtopic.php?p=2246#p2246).

But then her last vote in the thread when she voted in the Day 3 lynch was this:

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Well, friends, I'm in a bit of pickle. I'm going to bed and getting up at 5am to ride in a car for 11ish hours. I believe the vote will have passed, and I still have two pages of posts I was unable to catch up on (I was packing and playing with my niece today). I'm afraid this will look really bad for me, but I will not be able to respond to anything and I have to vote early.

As I already explained, I was suspicious of both SVS and rabbit. You can see in my posts today that I was still trying to feel out SVS. I was definitely side-tracked by rabbit yesterday, because I was torn between the two (something I posted long before the lynch came down). I am still torn honestly, but some people were pretty convincing that she was acting normally. So, I will just stick with my rabbit vote.

Despite focusing much more on SVS in her suspicions, she votes for rabbit again. And my theory on that is that she didn't want it to look like she only voted rabbit to save bea on Day 2, so she had to "stick with [her] rabbit vote." She also says she was torn between the two, but the first time she mentioned SVS was also the first time she mentioned rabbit. Then only mentions rabbit again during the actual Day 2 lynch phase.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:08 pm**

After this last lynch and the comments immediately afterward, I'm getting a little suspicious of a few people....

I'm getting more and more suspicious of DH because of what Dom pointed out and the fact that he's been acting so sure of himself about these "bandwagons".

DharmaHelper wrote:Another shitty bandwagon ended in a civvie lynch?

Boomslang wrote:Just wanted to say: nailed it. Maybe a bit more independent thought next lynch?

These two posts do not seem like they are coming from a civvie tbh. The "I told you so" seems more like something a baddie would say to gain some civvie credit. The comments also seem more like that are intended to divide us even further....not constructive IMO.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:13 pm**

Interesting thoughts on CBK as well.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:23 pm**

FH, your case was very good and I see those same issues when looking at her posts. The fact that she only talks about SVS and then votes for rabbit is really odd but i can see someone doing that to "stick" to a vote they made before that was a save vote.

Reywas, I have to think a little more on DH. DH is making me feel a little weird but I think it's because of his tone, the kind of know-it-all tone, than anything else. That tone though is how DH posts in games where he's civv and games where he's bad so I can't say that I find him suspicious without something else. I re-read his posts yesterday but in the context of his INH suspicion so I'll look again at his posts today (game day) to see if anything hits me.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:34 pm**

I think it'll be interesting to see how DH reacts, yes.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:16 pm**

reywaS wrote:After this last lynch and the comments immediately afterward, I'm getting a little suspicious of a few people....

I'm getting more and more suspicious of DH because of what Dom pointed out and the fact that he's been acting so sure of himself about these "bandwagons".

DharmaHelper wrote:Another shitty bandwagon ended in a civvie lynch?

Boomslang wrote:Just wanted to say: nailed it. Maybe a bit more independent thought next lynch?
These two posts do not seem like they are coming from a civvie tbh. The "I told you so" seems more like something a baddie would say to gain some civvie credit. The comments also seem more like that are intended to divide us even further....not constructive IMO.

You do realize I can't be two different people right?

Dom wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Hey rabbit, I heard your "bank" might need a bailout.
Just wanted to say this as I catch up:

Excuse me, DH? For someone so suspicious of all aggressive people, you are pretty freaking aggressive. This post just struck me as od. Not only is it pretty aggressive, but it's kind of the type of thing a baddie might do to try and get everyone to trust them; say I told you so!

I was ribbing rabbit, I wasn't being aggressive towards anyone else. I always rib rabbit. I love rabbit rib.. What were we talking about?

I wouldn't say I told you so if I didn't tell you so, and I did tell you so, so I'll remind you that I told you so. Not "you" specifically, but "everyone that has been voting like sheepy sheeps".

Of course I'm not going to make any friends by not drinking the Kool Aid, and of course eventually when we all run out of Civvie Bandwagons to jump on the one guy that has been consistently pursuing his own thought pattern is going to look like the next in line for the boot, but I'm not going to apologize for not lynching civvies, and I'm definitely not going to stop trying to remind people that all this Kool Aid voting is doing more harm than good, if that's what you're after

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:27 pm**

Out of curiosity, who have you really gone after in this game besides rabbit. And don't say INH, unless you enjoy the pot calling the kettle black.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:28 pm**

besides rabbit?*

The Grammar Nazi has failed you all.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:31 pm**

INH.

Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:37 pm**

Poll Vote Order can now be seen in the Prosilver style.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:39 pm**

Knowledge! :o

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:41 pm**

I mean, what else have you accused him of besides just being overly aggressive? I'm referring to this bit specifically:

insertnamehere wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

Dunno, as I said I'm not quite willing to buy into the impending Droopwagon, probably exclusively because you seem so determined to get people on board.
DH, Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

And then you make light of the situation here:

insertnamehere wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Lol INH :P
Wow, what a jokey aloof post.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:42 pm**

I'm really getting tired of the "Start reading my posts" schtick everybody, I promise. I'm not doing it on purpose. It's just as frustrating for me to type as it is for you to read.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:44 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Any reason other than the fact that he wanted to avoid a penalty?

Don;t make other people do all the work, man~

You know, sometimes I wonder if people read my posts at all :P

As I said

1. Rabbit defended his contest behavior while bringing up Epig as suspect for posting and not voting. (Even if it was just a joke, Rabbit's on my list and him helping out INH only deepens my suspicions.)
2. His vote for bea seems to me to be more of a "go with the flow, don't ruffle any feathers" vote than anything else.

Adding
3. His defense thusfar has been a very snarky "No U" marathon

As for the posts you quoted, I found it funny that INH's defense to my case was essentially "no u lol"

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:46 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Any reason other than the fact that he wanted to avoid a penalty?

Don;t make other people do all the work, man~

You know, sometimes I wonder if people read my posts at all :P

As I said

1. Rabbit defended his contest behavior while bringing up Epig as suspect for posting and not voting. (Even if it was just a joke, Rabbit's on my list and him helping out INH only deepens my suspicions.)
2. His vote for bea seems to me to be more of a "go with the flow, don't ruffle any feathers" vote than anything else.

Adding
3. His defense thusfar has been a very snarky "No U" marathon
As for the posts you quoted, I found it funny that INH's defense to my case was essentially "no u lol"

Adding

4) Apart from his responses to my case, when I read back to his earlier posts alot of them are surface-only posts as I said a while back, not really adding one thing or another.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:47 pm**

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I mean, what else have you accused him of besides just being overly aggressive? I'm referring to this bit specifically:

insertnamehere wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

Dunno, as I said I'm not quite willing to buy into the impending Droopwagon, probably exclusively because you seem so determined to get people on board.
DH, Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.
And then you make light of the situation here:

insertnamehere wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Lol INH :P
Wow, what a jokey aloof post.

I wasn't even talking to INH in that "aggressive" post, I was talking to Kate!

I need a "start reading my posts" smiley. Get on it, LT.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:48 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote:INH.

Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though.

I'm sure you didn't mean for this to be as condescending as it came out. Just because someone is wrong does not mean they did not think nor does it make them a sheep. I have seen you be wrong on more than one occasion and did not see anyone make fun of you for it.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:50 pm**

Kate wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:INH.

Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though.
I'm sure you didn't mean for this to be as condescending as it came out. Just because someone is wrong does not mean they did not think nor does it make them a sheep. I have seen you be wrong on more than one occasion and did not see anyone make fun of you for it.

I tend to use terminology like "sheep voting" "Kool aid voting" "Droopwagon" etc. very surgically. I'm not making fun of anybody. :bass:

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:09 pm**

Kate wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:INH.

Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though.
I'm sure you didn't mean for this to be as condescending as it came out. Just because someone is wrong does not mean they did not think nor does it make them a sheep. I have seen you be wrong on more than one occasion and did not see anyone make fun of you for it.

This.

DH, while I saw that the Droopy case was thin and thus didn't vote for him, there was legitimate evidence IMO to point to Vomp being a baddie. Are you saying that before all the votes started rolling in on Vomp that he just wasn't at all suspicious? You make me nervous with how aggressive you are being toward anyone that doesn't vote the way you are. Like Kate said above, just because someone is wrong doesn't make them sheep. I was convinced Vomp was bad...that's why I voted for him 2 days in a row. In hindsight it's easy to say that it was an "easy bandwagon" because he came back a civvie. With the number of baddies in this game, it's going to be very, very easy for all the baddies to jump on a case when it comes down to vote time.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:11 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote:
Kate wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:INH.

Pursuing legitimate thought and sheep voting are two different things, not sure how that's the pot calling the kettle black. I'm sure you'll elaborate though.
I'm sure you didn't mean for this to be as condescending as it came out. Just because someone is wrong does not mean they did not think nor does it make them a sheep. I have seen you be wrong on more than one occasion and did not see anyone make fun of you for it.

I tend to use terminology like "sheep voting" "Kool aid voting" "Droopwagon" etc. very surgically. I'm not making fun of anybody.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:12 pm**

Having said that, I would like to cross reference everyone that voted for both Droopy and Vomp and look at the timing of their votes. Specifically those that didn't put much thought into their votes. I think that would be a good place to look.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:14 pm**

Does anyone have the day 3 vote saved? I'm sure it's in the thread somewhere, so I can find it on my own if I have to of course.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:31 pm**

I'm sure someone has a spreadsheet with the voting order. I don't.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:39 pm**

Day 3 Voting Order:
1. Mr. Droopy (rabbit) 1
2. Captain Bunny Killer (rabbit) 2
3. insertnamehere (Mr. Droopy) 1
4. Vompatti (rabbit) 3
5. The Truth (Mr. Droopy) 2
6. birdwithteeth (Mr. Droopy) 3
7. triceratops (Mr. Droopy) 4
8. rabbit (Mr. Droopy) 5
9. DharmaHelper (insertnamehere) 1
10. Flyin' High (Mr. Droopy) 6
11. Littletiger (Mr. Droopy) 7
12. AceofSpaces (Mr. Droopy) 8
13. BoatsBoatsBoats (Mr. Droopy) 9
14. Boomslang (Mr. Droopy) 10
15. reywaS (Vompatti) 1
16. Kate (Mr. Droopy) 11
17. SVS (Vompatti) 2
18. chaindeath (Mr. Droopy) 12
19. DisgruntledPorcupine (Vompatti) 3
20. Epignosis (Vompatti) 4
Didn't vote: Roxy, jokreher, Benthayer (note: Roxy and Benthayer have been replaced since then)

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:43 pm**

Day 4 Voting Order:
1. Epignosis (Vompatti) 1
2. LittleTiger (Vompatti) 2
3. BoatsBoatsBoats (Vompatti) 3
4. AceofSpaces (Vompatti) 4
5. SVS (Vompatti) 5
6. Kate (Vompatti) 6
7. Juliet (Vompatti) 7
8. Vompatti (Boats) 1
9. DisgruntledPorcupine (Vompatti) 8
10. DharmaHelper (insertnamehere) 1
11. reywaS (Vompatti) 9
12. The Truth (Vompatti) 10
13. rabbit (Vompatti) 11
14. Boomslange (insertnamehere) 2
15. triceratops (Vompatti) 12
16. Flyin' High (Vompatti) 13
17. birdwithteeth (Vompatti) 14
18. chaindeath (Vompatti) 15
19. Mr. Droopy (rabbit) 1
20. insertnamehere (DharmaHelper) 1
Didn't vote: Captain Bunny Killer, jokreher, Roxy (note: Roxy hadn't been replaced yet)

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:13 pm**

Big ass post incoming.

5. The Truth (Mr. Droopy) 2
12. The Truth (Vompatti) 10

6. birdwithteeth (Mr. Droopy) 3
17. birdwithteeth (Vompatti) 14

7. triceratops (Mr. Droopy) 4
15. triceratops (Vompatti) 12

8. rabbit (Mr. Droopy) 5
13. rabbit (Vompatti) 11

10. Flyin' High (Mr. Droopy) 6
16. Flyin' High (Vompatti) 13

11. Littletiger (Mr. Droopy) 7
2. LittleTiger (Vompatti) 2

12. AceofSpaces (Mr. Droopy) 8
4. AceofSpaces (Vompatti) 4

13. BoatsBoatsBoats (Mr. Droopy) 9
3. BoatsBoatsBoats (Vompatti) 3

16. Kate (Mr. Droopy) 11
6. Kate (Vompatti) 6

18. chaindeath (Mr. Droopy) 12
18. chaindeath (Vompatti) 15

Droopy Votes In Order:

5. The Truth (2nd Vote for Droopy)
6. BWT (3rd Vote for Droopy)
7. Trice (4th Vote For Droopy)
8. Rabbit (5th Vote For Droopy)
10. FH (6th Vote For Droopy)
11. LT (7th Vote For Droopy)
12. Aces (8th Vote For Droopy)
13. Boats (9th Vote for Droopy)
16. Kate (11th Vote For Droopy)
18. Chaindeath (12th Vote for Droopy)

Vomp Votes In Order:

2. LittleTiger (2nd Vote for Vomp)
3. Boats (3rd Vote for Vomp)
4. Aces (4th Vote for Vomp)
6. Kate (6th Vote for Vomp)
12. The Truth (10th Vote for Vomp)
13. Rabbit (11th Vote for Vomp)
15. Trice (12th Vote for Vomp)
16. FH (13th Vote for Vomp)
17. BWT (14th Vote for Vomp)
18. Chaindeath (15th Vote for Vomp

Analysis:

Groupings (within 1 Vote of each other each vote)
LT, Aces Boats.
The Truth, Trice, Rabbit
Trice, FH, Rabbit
Aces, Kate
Kate, Boats

Order:
Chaindeath is last on each list.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:33 pm**

I dont understand you Analysis section and what it is supposed to imply.

Wait, didn't we say earlier today that CBK and chaindeath voted Rabbit? What am I mixing up?

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:34 pm**

Kate wrote:I dont understand you Analysis section and what it is supposed to imply.

Wait, didn't we say earlier today that CBK and chaindeath voted Rabbit? What am I mixing up?

that was day 2, nevermind.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:39 pm**

I 2nd Kate's question, DH, what is your analysis supposed to imply?

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:59 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote:Big ass post incoming.

5. The Truth (Mr. Droopy) 2
12. The Truth (Vompatti) 10

6. birdwithteeth (Mr. Droopy) 3
17. birdwithteeth (Vompatti) 14

7. triceratops (Mr. Droopy) 4
15. triceratops (Vompatti) 12

8. rabbit (Mr. Droopy) 5
13. rabbit (Vompatti) 11

10. Flyin' High (Mr. Droopy) 6
16. Flyin' High (Vompatti) 13

11. Littletiger (Mr. Droopy) 7
2. LittleTiger (Vompatti) 2

12. AceofSpaces (Mr. Droopy) 8
4. AceofSpaces (Vompatti) 4

13. BoatsBoatsBoats (Mr. Droopy) 9
3. BoatsBoatsBoats (Vompatti) 3

16. Kate (Mr. Droopy) 11
6. Kate (Vompatti) 6

18. chaindeath (Mr. Droopy) 12
18. chaindeath (Vompatti) 15

Droopy Votes In Order:

5. The Truth (2nd Vote for Droopy)
6. BWT (3rd Vote for Droopy)
7. Trice (4th Vote For Droopy)
8. Rabbit (5th Vote For Droopy)
10. FH (6th Vote For Droopy)
11. LT (7th Vote For Droopy)
12. Aces (8th Vote For Droopy)
13. Boats (9th Vote for Droopy)
16. Kate (11th Vote For Droopy)
18. Chaindeath (12th Vote for Droopy)

Vomp Votes In Order:

2. LittleTiger (2nd Vote for Vomp)
3. Boats (3rd Vote for Vomp)
4. Aces (4th Vote for Vomp)
6. Kate (6th Vote for Vomp)
12. The Truth (10th Vote for Vomp)
13. Rabbit (11th Vote for Vomp)
15. Trice (12th Vote for Vomp)
16. FH (13th Vote for Vomp)
17. BWT (14th Vote for Vomp)
18. Chaindeath (15th Vote for Vomp

Analysis:

Groupings (within 1 Vote of each other each vote)
LT, Aces Boats.
The Truth, Trice, Rabbit
Trice, FH, Rabbit
Aces, Kate
Kate, Boats

Order:
Chaindeath is last on each list.

Nice analysis! Thanks for posting that...and thanks to FH for posting the vote orders.

LT: I wanted to see which people voted for both Droopy and Vomp and see the timing of their votes. I'm going to go back and read those people to see which one's, if any, jumped onto both Droopy and Vomp and didn't put a lot of thought into their votes. I think that might be telling and could result in finding some baddies. It's not a fool proof plan, of course, but I think it could be helpful.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:32 pm**

LittleTiger wrote:I 2nd Kate's question, DH, what is your analysis supposed to imply?

Umm...

It implies what it says, those people in the groups voted within one vote of each other both for the Droopy and for the Vomp votes.

I dunno what was confusing about that but there you go.

While I'm talking about it, here is some further analysis.

LT, Aces Boats.
The Truth, Trice, Rabbit
Trice, FH, Rabbit
Aces, Kate
Kate, Boats

LT is in a Group with Aces, and Boats (1 Group Total)
Aces is in a group with Boats, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
Boats is in a Group with Aces, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
The Truth is in a Group with Rabbit and FH (1 Group Total)
Trice is in a group with Rabbit, Truth and FH (2 Groups Total)
FH is in a group with Trice and Rabbit (1 Group Total)
Rabbit is in a group with FH, the Truth, and Trice (2 Groups Total)

Aces and Boats both appear in a group with Kate
Trice and Rabbit appear in 2 groups together (one with FH, one with The Truth)

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:36 pm**

No, it says what it says. It implies something completely different.

Are you suggesting that the people who vote within a few votes of each other are working together?

You know it may help if you actually say what you are trying to get at. People may stop "ignoring" your posts.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:45 pm**

DharmaHelper wrote:
LittleTiger wrote:I 2nd Kate's question, DH, what is your analysis supposed to imply?

Umm...

It implies what it says, those people in the groups voted within one vote of each other both for the Droopy and for the Vomp votes.

I dunno what was confusing about that but there you go.

While I'm talking about it, here is some further analysis.

LT, Aces Boats.
The Truth, Trice, Rabbit
Trice, FH, Rabbit
Aces, Kate
Kate, Boats

LT is in a Group with Aces, and Boats (1 Group Total)
Aces is in a group with Boats, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
Boats is in a Group with Aces, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
The Truth is in a Group with Rabbit and FH (1 Group Total)
Trice is in a group with Rabbit, Truth and FH (2 Groups Total)
FH is in a group with Trice and Rabbit (1 Group Total)
Rabbit is in a group with FH, the Truth, and Trice (2 Groups Total)

Aces and Boats both appear in a group with Kate
Trice and Rabbit appear in 2 groups together (one with FH, one with The Truth)

Can't tell if serious?

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:48 pm**

rabbit8 wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
LittleTiger wrote:I 2nd Kate's question, DH, what is your analysis supposed to imply?

Umm...

It implies what it says, those people in the groups voted within one vote of each other both for the Droopy and for the Vomp votes.

I dunno what was confusing about that but there you go.

While I'm talking about it, here is some further analysis.

LT, Aces Boats.
The Truth, Trice, Rabbit
Trice, FH, Rabbit
Aces, Kate
Kate, Boats

LT is in a Group with Aces, and Boats (1 Group Total)
Aces is in a group with Boats, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
Boats is in a Group with Aces, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
The Truth is in a Group with Rabbit and FH (1 Group Total)
Trice is in a group with Rabbit, Truth and FH (2 Groups Total)
FH is in a group with Trice and Rabbit (1 Group Total)
Rabbit is in a group with FH, the Truth, and Trice (2 Groups Total)

Aces and Boats both appear in a group with Kate
Trice and Rabbit appear in 2 groups together (one with FH, one with The Truth)

Can't tell if serious?

What? You don't instantly know what he is getting at?!?!

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:00 pm**

DH - that is the most "reaching" vote analysis I have ever seen... and I still don't know what you are implying by doing it. It is far too early in such a large game to determine that when people vote after someone else implies some kind of logical grouping. I am really scratching my head at this. You've played far too many games to post ... ummm.... not sure what to call it LOL!

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:08 pm**

I dunno, when I have info, or think I do, and can't find areal case, I flood the thread with data hoping a pattern emeges to someone. This is the kind of bizarre post I make in that situation. DH has been sounding frustratted and reasonably sincere, if snarkish, to me.

He has been screaming "INH!!!!!" For days, I am inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:18 pm**

S~V~S wrote:I dunno, when I have info, or think I do, and can't find areal case, I flood the thread with data hoping a pattern emeges to someone. This is the kind of bizarre post I make in that situation. DH has been sounding frustratted and reasonably sincere, if snarkish, to me.

He has been screaming "INH!!!!!" For days, I am inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt

If he would lose the snark and play nice with the group I'd be much more inclined to listen to him. Like your post, for example, very nice

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:26 pm**

S~V~S wrote:I dunno, when I have info, or think I do, and can't find areal case, I flood the thread with data hoping a pattern emeges to someone. This is the kind of bizarre post I make in that situation. DH has been sounding frustratted and reasonably sincere, if snarkish, to me.

He has been screaming "INH!!!!!" For days, I am inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt

I don't think I have ever seen you post something like what DH just posted though.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:32 pm**

MovingPictures07 wrote:ATTENTION:

The ROLES section has been updated with more information from the Books of Knowledge. No more notifications will be made by me when more information is made public.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:37 pm**

I did in 70s and in Enchanted Forest. I made up statistics, a,ll kkindsa crazy crap, lol. I also did something similar to Tranq & Typh on the first ACTA, making up ratios of post to content, lol.

Maybe not to this extent, but that is what it looks like nevertheless~

I am inclined to trust, and if he's wrong we'll kill him. Civ or bad, I can't see him going to this length unless he's pretty sure.

The Syndicate

[END] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [DAY 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [DAY 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2

Re: [NIGHT 4] Avant-Garde Mafia 2