The Syndicate

Snow Dog wrote:

Quin wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Quin wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:Voted Quin.

Wanna talk about it?

Sure

Nice chat.

I think you are bad. That day 1 self vote is still playing on my mind. BUT.....I was intending to vote Soneji and voted you in error. If we could change votes I'd do it now.

I see how the self-vote could come across as though I was trying to avoid the lynch. I wasn't avoiding discussion at all though, so you should keep that in my mind. It really was just an answer to an important question that I didn't think through the repercussions of.

Day 3

Who is a real man eater?

Poll runs till Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:32:01 pm


a2thezebra
3
MacDougall (6), Soneji (8), nijuukyugou (15) 14%
Boomslang
4
DrWilgy (13), Scotty (16), Nachomamma8 (18), Metalmarsh89 (19) 19%
Dr. Wilgy
1
Boomslang (17) 5%
Epignosis
0
No votes
Long Con
0
No votes
MacDougall
0
No votes
Metalmarsh89
0
No votes
motel room 2.0
0
No votes
Nachomamma8
0
No votes
Nijuukyugou
1
Epignosis (14) 5%
Quin
2
sig (20), Snow Dog (21) 10%
Scotty
0
No votes
Sig
1
Quin (12) 5%
Snow Dog
1
a2thezebra (2) 5%
Soneji
2
Vompatti (10), motel room (11) 10%
Vompatti
0
No votes
Murray the Skull (Host/Mod/Dead/NP)
6
MovingPictures07 (1), thellama73 (3), juliets (4), Perd Hapley (5), Glorfindel (7), Golden (9) 29%
Total votes : 21

Snow Dog wrote:Not comfortable witj this boomslang lynch

Me neither.

DrWilgy wrote:I really want to think that if Boomslang is good, Epi must be bad... Unfortunately the existence of 2 teams undermines this thought.

I'd love to hear the pretzel logical behind what you want to think.

Time to master the sword! On Monkey Island, sword fights are won or lost not based on how fast your feet and hands are, but on how quick your wit is. A properly delivered insult will do more to demoralize your opponent than the sharpest rapier. For example, if you encounter a pirate who boasts "You fight like a dairy farmer" a response along the lines of "How appropriate, you fight like a cow!" will give you a sure victory.

To pass this test, PM me your cleverest comebacks to the following three insults:
1. I once owned a dog that was smarter than you!
2. My handkerchief will mop up your blood!
3. Soon you'll be wearing my sword like a shish kebab!

NOTE: This is not about googling the answers from the game and sending me those. Anybody can do that. This is about trying to be more clever than the game, so good luck.

Meanwhile, Boomslang has been lynched. He was Carla.
You have 24 hours to submit your night actions.

said I didn't like it.

This game is more chaotic than I'm used to.

Epignosis wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:Not comfortable witj this boomslang lynch

Me neither.

DrWilgy wrote:I really want to think that if Boomslang is good, Epi must be bad... Unfortunately the existence of 2 teams undermines this thought.

I'd love to hear the pretzel logical behind what you want to think.

When BR was lynched, I saw both he and you vouch that bussers were amongst the voters. While independently or in majority this may be considered healthy, but in a scenario where it's only 2, it reads as 2 non teammates.

Oh. The thread doesn't get locked. I'll do my Snow Dog ISO today then.

Quin wrote:Oh. The thread doesn't get locked. I'll do my Snow Dog ISO today then.

Cool!!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:@Metalmarsh Have you heard of the Finnish band HIM?

No I haven't. Any specific recommendations?

Nope. I saw two of their albums in a charity shop today and I wondered if you knew anything of them.

Snow Dog wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:@Metalmarsh Have you heard of the Finnish band HIM?

No I haven't. Any specific recommendations?

Nope. I saw two of their albums in a charity shop today and I wondered if you knew anything of them.

I have heard this band, and regard them as one of the worst bands ever, but don't let that discourage you.

All logic is pretzel logic. Vompatti is the only user on this site that fully understands this truth, even I have trouble accepting and implementing it.

All logic isn't pretzel logic, for then all logic would be delicious.

DrWilgy wrote:All logic isn't pretzel logic, for then all logic would be delicious.

Sounds logical.

Sorry I missed the vote, everyone. I took on a job in the house that was bigger than I expected, and it consumed me for the last few hours of the lynch, then I went to work.

Reading into Snow Dog's posts.
A question about game mechanics. I don't lean either way on this; I have a 'would a baddie be more likely to ask this on the game thread or in BTSC' thing going around in my head, but knowing the answer to this specific question wouldn't put baddies at any significant advantage makes this a null read.
I like this. Not every question has to be generated into some sort of read, but Snow Dog seems to be covering his bases to not leave any stone unturned.
I don't like this. Earlier he said he'd 'reluctantly vote for a non-poster'. I think that there's a specific mentality for people who want to vote that way on Day 1 (as well as all other days tbfh), and that it's got a lot to do with the notion of 'they're not here so they're not contributing, and it would be rude to lynch a present player before them, so they're the next best thing to a mislynch'. This goes against that, because zebra was clearly here and contributing in her own way. Reason 2 is just whatever.
'I don't understand why you find a specific thing suspicious but I'll try and defend myself against it anyway'. This doesn't make me feel good.



----


I come out of this with a scum lean on Snow Dog.

I'd like motel room's opinion on this, specifically.

Bye Boomslang we hardly knew ye.

Are we really just gonna not discuss the fact that Wilgy hasn't read his role pm? Wilgy do you think that we should not lynch a player who refuses to become aware of their nature thus removing our ability to analyse theit play genuinely? You are scum hunting apparently but at what point do we have to have a stab in the dark and lynch you just in case? The longer we wait the more of a gamble it is.

a2thezebra wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Save me by voting zebra or Quin, everyone. Or, when I flip, use that to inform the trustworthiness of MP's reads. Wilgy and Nacho could be buddying up, as we saw in very early thread.

Well that isn't very nice.

Yeah, I revoke what I said. Let him buuuurn!

I also revoke my town read of him. That post is baddie as blazes.

It wasn't. Didn't look like it either. You faked this post entirely.

One sec.

quote="MacDougall"]Zebra is Mafia without doubt. 100% absolute bonafide guaranteed lock it down impossible to deny.[/quote]

Dammmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnniiiitttttt

Also I changed my mind sig is bad.

I also think Vompatti is good.

I might post more when I am not in the supermarket on my phone.

Snow Dog wrote:

Quin wrote:Oh. The thread doesn't get locked. I'll do my Snow Dog ISO today then.

Cool!!

Faaaaaake you are bad too.

Epignosis wrote:

What's this rolling at mate? Snow Dog's fake reactions or the result? Or both? Life in general?

thellama73 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:@Metalmarsh Have you heard of the Finnish band HIM?

No I haven't. Any specific recommendations?

Nope. I saw two of their albums in a charity shop today and I wondered if you knew anything of them.

I have heard this band, and regard them as one of the worst bands ever, but don't let that discourage you.

Duly noted! Thanks

MacDougall wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Quin wrote:Oh. The thread doesn't get locked. I'll do my Snow Dog ISO today then.

Cool!!

Faaaaaake you are bad too.

Not fake. Not bad.

MacDougall wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

What's this rolling at mate? Snow Dog's fake reactions or the result? Or both? Life in general?

Again. Not fake reaction. i didn't like the Boomslang train. I haven't lynched a civ yet. Maybe look at someone who has?

Quin wrote:Reading into Snow Dog's posts.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:Is it possible to earn gold?

A question about game mechanics. I don't lean either way on this; I have a 'would a baddie be more likely to ask this on the game thread or in BTSC' thing going around in my head, but knowing the answer to this specific question wouldn't put baddies at any significant advantage makes this a null read.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Nachomamma8 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I wish we had changeable votes.

Hey Snow Dog, what's up buddy? Are you bad?

Bad to the bone!

No, are you?

What do you think about MM's claim to have been sent the wrong role?

Why do you think that MM's claim about being sent the wrong role has anything to do with his alignment?

I'm just pursuing something that struck me as odd. It probably has nothing to do with his alignment.

I like this. Not every question has to be generated into some sort of read, but Snow Dog seems to be covering his bases to not leave any stone unturned.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Scotty wrote:Why is no one talking about me? This is odd for me for a day 1.

I like dog's entrance. (Note that my phone routinely likes to change his name to "dog" or "sog"). I don't like zebra's entrance. And motel room is playing very minimally and I don't mind the case against him, but zebra will be getting my vote if she doesn't check in today.

I was thinking of voting zebra too. Reason 1, he has only posted a bunch of emoticons which in itself is annoying. Reason 2, he is the first name on the list.

I don't like this. Earlier he said he'd 'reluctantly vote for a non-poster'. I think that there's a specific mentality for people who want to vote that way on Day 1 (as well as all other days tbfh), and that it's got a lot to do with the notion of 'they're not here so they're not contributing, and it would be rude to lynch a present player before them, so they're the next best thing to a mislynch'. This goes against that, because zebra was clearly here and contributing in her own way. Reason 2 is just whatever.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't like Snow Dog's vote yesterday. I like it even worse today.

Just my two cents after the lynch. I'll be looking at him.

I'm not a fan of his voting record either, but his content has seemed genuine to me. I'll take a look at his ISO though and maybe I'll come up with a different perspective.

I don't understand. What is wrong with my voting record? I have been consistent. Explain please!

'I don't understand why you find a specific thing suspicious but I'll try and defend myself against it anyway'. This doesn't make me feel good.



----


I come out of this with a scum lean on Snow Dog.

If you call zebra's posts "contributing" then i can hardly reason with you can I?

Snow Dog wrote:

Quin wrote:Reading into Snow Dog's posts.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:Is it possible to earn gold?

A question about game mechanics. I don't lean either way on this; I have a 'would a baddie be more likely to ask this on the game thread or in BTSC' thing going around in my head, but knowing the answer to this specific question wouldn't put baddies at any significant advantage makes this a null read.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Nachomamma8 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I wish we had changeable votes.

Hey Snow Dog, what's up buddy? Are you bad?

Bad to the bone!

No, are you?

What do you think about MM's claim to have been sent the wrong role?

Why do you think that MM's claim about being sent the wrong role has anything to do with his alignment?

I'm just pursuing something that struck me as odd. It probably has nothing to do with his alignment.

I like this. Not every question has to be generated into some sort of read, but Snow Dog seems to be covering his bases to not leave any stone unturned.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Scotty wrote:Why is no one talking about me? This is odd for me for a day 1.

I like dog's entrance. (Note that my phone routinely likes to change his name to "dog" or "sog"). I don't like zebra's entrance. And motel room is playing very minimally and I don't mind the case against him, but zebra will be getting my vote if she doesn't check in today.

I was thinking of voting zebra too. Reason 1, he has only posted a bunch of emoticons which in itself is annoying. Reason 2, he is the first name on the list.

I don't like this. Earlier he said he'd 'reluctantly vote for a non-poster'. I think that there's a specific mentality for people who want to vote that way on Day 1 (as well as all other days tbfh), and that it's got a lot to do with the notion of 'they're not here so they're not contributing, and it would be rude to lynch a present player before them, so they're the next best thing to a mislynch'. This goes against that, because zebra was clearly here and contributing in her own way. Reason 2 is just whatever.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't like Snow Dog's vote yesterday. I like it even worse today.

Just my two cents after the lynch. I'll be looking at him.

I'm not a fan of his voting record either, but his content has seemed genuine to me. I'll take a look at his ISO though and maybe I'll come up with a different perspective.

I don't understand. What is wrong with my voting record? I have been consistent. Explain please!

'I don't understand why you find a specific thing suspicious but I'll try and defend myself against it anyway'. This doesn't make me feel good.



----


I come out of this with a scum lean on Snow Dog.

If you call zebra's posts "contributing" then i can hardly reason with you can I?

My point is that voting for a non-poster infers a specific mindset that contradicts your choice of vote. zebra was not a non-poster.

Shaddappppp

Quin wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Quin wrote:Reading into Snow Dog's posts.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:Is it possible to earn gold?

A question about game mechanics. I don't lean either way on this; I have a 'would a baddie be more likely to ask this on the game thread or in BTSC' thing going around in my head, but knowing the answer to this specific question wouldn't put baddies at any significant advantage makes this a null read.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Nachomamma8 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I wish we had changeable votes.

Hey Snow Dog, what's up buddy? Are you bad?

Bad to the bone!

No, are you?

What do you think about MM's claim to have been sent the wrong role?

Why do you think that MM's claim about being sent the wrong role has anything to do with his alignment?

I'm just pursuing something that struck me as odd. It probably has nothing to do with his alignment.

I like this. Not every question has to be generated into some sort of read, but Snow Dog seems to be covering his bases to not leave any stone unturned.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

Scotty wrote:Why is no one talking about me? This is odd for me for a day 1.

I like dog's entrance. (Note that my phone routinely likes to change his name to "dog" or "sog"). I don't like zebra's entrance. And motel room is playing very minimally and I don't mind the case against him, but zebra will be getting my vote if she doesn't check in today.

I was thinking of voting zebra too. Reason 1, he has only posted a bunch of emoticons which in itself is annoying. Reason 2, he is the first name on the list.

I don't like this. Earlier he said he'd 'reluctantly vote for a non-poster'. I think that there's a specific mentality for people who want to vote that way on Day 1 (as well as all other days tbfh), and that it's got a lot to do with the notion of 'they're not here so they're not contributing, and it would be rude to lynch a present player before them, so they're the next best thing to a mislynch'. This goes against that, because zebra was clearly here and contributing in her own way. Reason 2 is just whatever.

Spoiler: show

Snow Dog wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't like Snow Dog's vote yesterday. I like it even worse today.

Just my two cents after the lynch. I'll be looking at him.

I'm not a fan of his voting record either, but his content has seemed genuine to me. I'll take a look at his ISO though and maybe I'll come up with a different perspective.

I don't understand. What is wrong with my voting record? I have been consistent. Explain please!

'I don't understand why you find a specific thing suspicious but I'll try and defend myself against it anyway'. This doesn't make me feel good.



----


I come out of this with a scum lean on Snow Dog.

If you call zebra's posts "contributing" then i can hardly reason with you can I?

My point is that voting for a non-poster infers a specific mindset that contradicts your choice of vote. zebra was not a non-poster.

Did i not say that I'd vote for a non poster or a low poster?

^Ok seems I didn't. But nevertheless, non poster/low poster who post garbage, it's the same to me.

MacDougall wrote:Bye Boomslang we hardly knew ye.

Are we really just gonna not discuss the fact that Wilgy hasn't read his role pm?

Does anyone actually still believe that's true? I never really thought he was being serious.

a2thezebra wrote:All logic is pretzel logic. Vompatti is the only user on this site that fully understands this truth, even I have trouble accepting and implementing it.

I couldn't agree more!

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Bye Boomslang we hardly knew ye.

Are we really just gonna not discuss the fact that Wilgy hasn't read his role pm?

Does anyone actually still believe that's true? I never really thought he was being serious.

How is it relevant whether he has read it or not? Would knowing your role affect the way you play? Because it shouldn't.

Vompatti wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Bye Boomslang we hardly knew ye.

Are we really just gonna not discuss the fact that Wilgy hasn't read his role pm?

Does anyone actually still believe that's true? I never really thought he was being serious.

How is it relevant whether he has read it or not? Would knowing your role affect the way you play? Because it shouldn't.

Not in the way that you are seeing it. But the knowledge of one's teammates, if they exist, should inform one's play to some degree.

Vompatti wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Bye Boomslang we hardly knew ye.

Are we really just gonna not discuss the fact that Wilgy hasn't read his role pm?

Does anyone actually still believe that's true? I never really thought he was being serious.

How is it relevant whether he has read it or not? Would knowing your role affect the way you play? Because it shouldn't.

what

Aw crap.

Sorry Boomslang! You were the best of us.

MacDougall wrote:Bye Boomslang we hardly knew ye.

Are we really just gonna not discuss the fact that Wilgy hasn't read his role pm? Wilgy do you think that we should not lynch a player who refuses to become aware of their nature thus removing our ability to analyse theit play genuinely? You are scum hunting apparently but at what point do we have to have a stab in the dark and lynch you just in case? The longer we wait the more of a gamble it is.

By all means lynch me if you feel that that is the best means of winning. I'm a constant unknown and I acknowledge this. I do note however, If I am bad, the other baddie team must kill me for victory. It's only a matter of time before the baddies are itching to remove the unknown as well.

Also what makes you think it hasn't been discussed? That was Ji-San's spiel day 1.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Aw crap.

Sorry Boomslang! You were the best of us.

Hey!

Long Con wrote:Sorry to see you go, MP - you were the best of us!

Long Con wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Aw crap.

Sorry Boomslang! You were the best of us.

Hey!

Long Con wrote:Sorry to see you go, MP - you were the best of us!

Needless plagiarism.

Oh man I'm sorry boom. And sorry for missing the night poll, llama. It's been a busy day- haven't been around at all.

Who would ever suggest doing a matinee on a Friday? Who would go see that anyway? No one. That's who.

Congratulations! You have mastered the sword. Only two more trials to complete before you're a real pirate!
Here are the winning comebacks:

1. I once owned a dog that was smarter than you!
"Indeed! It was his idea that I shit in your loafers."
2. My handkerchief will mop up your blood!
"Well, first you should clean our your loafers."
3. Soon you'll be wearing my sword like a shish kebab!
"Soon you'll be wearing smelly loafers."

It's a joyous occasion indeed, but sadly, not everyone will live to enjoy it.

Epignosis has been killed.
Quin has been killed.
You have 48 hours to lynch a baddie.

Q.Q

People I wanted to talk to today are dead now...

Figures Epi died. RIP! Surprised at Quins death, seeing as he was getting lots of pressure from people yesterday. I think he was good, for the record.

DrWilgy wrote:Q.Q

People I wanted to talk to today are dead now...

What would you have talked about that you couldn't do so yesterday?

Wilgy, have you checked your Role PM yet?

MacDougall wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Zebra is Mafia without doubt. 100% absolute bonafide guaranteed lock it down impossible to deny.

Mac, are you going to vote zebra today?

Zebra, what about you?