Page 26 of 36
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:50 pm
I’m actually reasonably sure there’s mafia in the people that jumped on the check. Jay looks best out of those imo, Michelle will go over without me, Nutella is best TK today I think
Why so sure? Why does a baddie need to do anything when a town lynch is underway?
Not 100%, but would be surprised if at least one didn’t jump.
Otherwise the team is what, Epi and jack exactly?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
by nutella
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
The one thing complicating this is that I’m not sure if Epi was around to see the check and actively ignored it or if he just wasn’t on to see it
Same problem with Jack though.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
I can't speak for everyone, but when I ask myself how I would handle that if I was a mafioso in this setup -- dive on the peek gung-ho without a worry isn't the answer I come up with. I'm speaking mostly about nutella here -- Michelle joined the wagon a bit later in a more awkward fashion. LC mentioned it before with that gif. Instead of "okay cool red peek *vote*", she posted a joke about a gif. That feels less natural.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:54 pm
by Epignosis
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
The one thing complicating this is that I’m not sure if Epi was around to see the check and actively ignored it or if he just wasn’t on to see it
Which check? You made three or four of them, didn't you?
I wasn't logged in, but I followed along in sips, so I'm not behind.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:54 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
nutella wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
The one thing complicating this is that I’m not sure if Epi was around to see the check and actively ignored it or if he just wasn’t on to see it
Same problem with Jack though.
Jack was in thread in the meantime
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:55 pm
by Long Con
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:50 pm
I’m actually reasonably sure there’s mafia in the people that jumped on the check. Jay looks best out of those imo, Michelle will go over without me, Nutella is best TK today I think
Why so sure? Why does a baddie need to do anything when a town lynch is underway?
Not 100%, but would be surprised if at least one didn’t jump.
Otherwise the team is what, Epi and jack exactly?
Yes... IF no baddie jumped on. I could see a baddie doing either though.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:55 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:54 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
The one thing complicating this is that I’m not sure if Epi was around to see the check and actively ignored it or if he just wasn’t on to see it
Which check? You made three or four of them, didn't you?
I wasn't logged in, but I followed along in sips, so I'm not behind.
Red check on long con Is what I’m referring to
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:55 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
For a civilian when a red peek arrives, there is a collective sigh of relief -- not only because it's a positive development, but because it relieves them of much of the day's workload. I felt more kinship with nutella in that way than with Michelle.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:55 pm
by nutella
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:54 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
The one thing complicating this is that I’m not sure if Epi was around to see the check and actively ignored it or if he just wasn’t on to see it
Same problem with Jack though.
Jack was in thread in the meantime
Yeah but he was responding to old stuff, and his MO is to do so without paying attention to new posts. Quite possible he didn't read it.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:56 pm
by Epignosis
I figured the Day was in hand and I could fuck off and start my taxes and fill out other governmental forms.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:56 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
I mean I’m pretty sure there’s one baddie on minimum if LC is town, if there isn’t then idk how to play I guess
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:56 pm
by Long Con
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
I can't speak for everyone, but when I ask myself how I would handle that if I was a mafioso in this setup -- dive on the peek gung-ho without a worry isn't the answer I come up with. I'm speaking mostly about nutella here -- Michelle joined the wagon a bit later in a more awkward fashion. LC mentioned it before with that gif. Instead of "okay cool red peek *vote*", she posted a joke about a gif. That feels less natural.
So you think nutella/Michelle are the baddies.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:56 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
I could be moved on a Jack lynch I think.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:57 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
nutella wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:55 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:54 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:52 pm
The one thing complicating this is that I’m not sure if Epi was around to see the check and actively ignored it or if he just wasn’t on to see it
Same problem with Jack though.
Jack was in thread in the meantime
Yeah but he was responding to old stuff, and his MO is to do so without paying attention to new posts. Quite possible he didn't read it.
I count that as active ignoring for this purpose, presumably a teammate would’ve let him know “hey there’s a red on LC” or some such.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:57 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:56 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:53 pm
I can't speak for everyone, but when I ask myself how I would handle that if I was a mafioso in this setup -- dive on the peek gung-ho without a worry isn't the answer I come up with. I'm speaking mostly about nutella here -- Michelle joined the wagon a bit later in a more awkward fashion. LC mentioned it before with that gif. Instead of "okay cool red peek *vote*", she posted a joke about a gif. That feels less natural.
So you think nutella/Michelle are the baddies.
No, I think Michelle is a good candidate to be bad. I don't feel that way about nutella. I don't really see a case on her emerging from this peek stuff.
Jack and Michelle are my top suspects at the moment. They both also fit the bill for that lame ass MP kill.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:58 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
I think jack/Nutella more likely than Nutella/Michelle tbh. In part because of michelle and Nutella interactions, in part because jack is TRing nutes.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:58 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:56 pm
I mean I’m pretty sure there’s one baddie on minimum if LC is town, if there isn’t then idk how to play I guess
I think there's a lot to gain from your maneuver here; I just don't think "who jumped on my bullshit?" is necessarily the right question to ask.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:59 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Jack/Michelle is my best guess at present.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:59 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
I need [mention]nutella[/mention] to speak for her own damned self. I've made that mistake before. If you're good, tell us who isn't.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:00 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:58 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:56 pm
I mean I’m pretty sure there’s one baddie on minimum if LC is town, if there isn’t then idk how to play I guess
I think there's a lot to gain from your maneuver here; I just don't think "who jumped on my bullshit?" is necessarily the right question to ask.
I’m uh
Pretty sure there is though
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:01 pm
by nutella
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:59 pm
I need @nutella to speak for her own damned self. I've made that mistake before. If you're good, tell us who isn't.
Michelle and Jack seems likely to me. Or like I said before Michelle and LC though LC's response to all this looks genuinely solvey. Unless he and Nanook are pulling a huge one over on us but that's significant tinfoil.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:02 pm
by nutella
..........Or Jay and Jack if we're going into foil land
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:02 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
Ok, I’ve gotta take off unfortunately. I really pretty strongly think nutella is a better kill today than Michelle but do what you want I guess
Assuming LC is town I’d guess teams that make most sense are like Nutella/jack, jack/Michelle, Epi/jay, something like that.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:02 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
There seems to be consistent overlap at [VOTE:
Jackofhearts2005] aubergine
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:03 pm
by nutella
I really want to hear [mention]Jackofhearts2005[/mention] respond to all this nonsense before we just go and lynch him but he's not online uggghhhhhhhhhhh
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:03 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:02 pm
Ok, I’ve gotta take off unfortunately. I really pretty strongly think nutella is a better kill today than Michelle but do what you want I guess
Assuming LC is town I’d guess teams that make most sense are like Nutella/jack, jack/Michelle, Epi/jay, something like that.
Would you lynch Jack then? We all seem to agree on that one.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:05 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
/note
everyone eager to vote Michelle
recommend Jack vote and *crickets*
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:05 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
I think Nutella is strictly better tbh
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:05 pm
by Epignosis
One hour remaining, correct?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:06 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
I’d probably do jack over Michelle tho
Idk it’s on you guys now I’ve gotta go for realsies.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:06 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Is it purely the things stemming from your peek that lead you here?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:06 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:05 pm
One hour remaining, correct?
yes
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:06 pm
by NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:06 pm
Is it purely the things stemming from your peek that lead you here?
Largely yes
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:06 pm
by Long Con
I like Jack/Michelle. [VOTE:
Jack] aubergine
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:06 pm
by Epignosis
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:05 pm
/note
everyone eager to vote Michelle
recommend Jack vote and *crickets*
If my initial take of Michelle and S~V~S ends up being correct I'm going to be needlessly smug for some time.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:07 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
If there's someone out there that should be countering Nanook and isn't, I'm going to be really mad.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:08 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
In a Jack/Michelle world, we'll have to contend with their argument earlier this phase. Off-hand I wouldn't call it a clear dissociation, but it's still a fight. A closer look is needed.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:09 pm
by nutella
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:07 pm
If there's someone out there that should be countering Nanook and isn't, I'm going to be really mad.
I'm hesitant to lynch Jack for this very reason. Like I said I don't think he saw all the claiming stuff and he's the last one who might have a counterclaim so I really want to be able to wait for him to show up. But if his response doesn't change much I'm happy to lynch him.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:09 pm
by nutella
He has less than an hour.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:10 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:19 am
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:34 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:36 am
Town
Jack
Nutella
Dys/Jay
.....
Nanook
Epi
.....
Michelle
LC
.....
.....
Scum
Unless both power roles are in Nutella and Jay, we can pretty well guarantee a wolf lynch today since there's very likely 2 wolves in a 4 player POE and two innocent children.
I've already claimed a PR, so
Move me up daddy
Yeah, my stupid reason for townreading you was that I thought you were hinting a power role ("I'm not getting lynched today") but I didn't want to say that out loud and get you killed if it wasn't known. Haven't gotten to the part where you outright claimed yet.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:11 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
[mention]Long Con[/mention] why did you just drop me
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:13 pm
by nutella
Maybe the secret to lynching Jack is just when he's not around

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:14 pm
by Long Con
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:11 pm
@Long Con why did you just drop me
1. I'm the only one who's remotely interested in lynching you
2. You're wearing me down with your convincingness today
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:14 pm
by nutella
Ooo and also it's not his name on the poll. That's definitely a faerie loophole
[VOTE:
jack] aubergine
still wish he would show up though
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:15 pm
by Epignosis
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:07 pm
If there's someone out there that should be countering Nanook and isn't, I'm going to be really mad.
At the risk of incurring your wrath for my potential ignorance, if Nanook isn't the cop, wouldn't it be prudent to say whom he did check and what the result was? Or did I miss it?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:15 pm
by Long Con
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:40 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:33 pm
You really don't wanna believe JJJ could be the one, huh?
I'm town dude, and if you are too then give it a rest and help me figure the game out
This post was real.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:16 pm
by Long Con
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:15 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:07 pm
If there's someone out there that should be countering Nanook and isn't, I'm going to be really mad.
At the risk of incurring your wrath for my potential ignorance, if Nanook isn't the cop, wouldn't it be prudent to say whom he did check and what the result was? Or did I miss it?
If Nanook isn't the cop, then there's no real check to share the result of...?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:18 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:15 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:07 pm
If there's someone out there that should be countering Nanook and isn't, I'm going to be really mad.
At the risk of incurring your wrath for my potential ignorance, if Nanook
isn't the cop, wouldn't it be prudent to say whom he did check and what the result was? Or did I miss it?
I don't entirely follow your question. It makes sense if I convert "isn't" to "is". If so, then it would be prudent of him to say that. He claimed a Night 0 civilian check on MP and has not claimed otherwise conclusively.
If you did mean "isn't", I'd ask that you try to rephrase.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:20 pm
by Epignosis
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:18 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:15 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:07 pm
If there's someone out there that should be countering Nanook and isn't, I'm going to be really mad.
At the risk of incurring your wrath for my potential ignorance, if Nanook
isn't the cop, wouldn't it be prudent to say whom he did check and what the result was? Or did I miss it?
I don't entirely follow your question. It makes sense if I convert "isn't" to "is". If so, then it would be prudent of him to say that. He claimed a Night 0 civilian check on MP and has not claimed otherwise conclusively.
If you did mean "isn't", I'd ask that you try to rephrase.
"is"
I'm sorry.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:21 pm
by Epignosis
So if the civilians lose because the person he checked and got a good result on gets lynched Day 2, we can yell at him?