Re: [Day 9] The Shawshank Redemption Mafia
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:49 pm
Didn't see that one coming at all. :/
RIPIYWG Sorsha.
I'm still looking at JJ.
RIPIYWG Sorsha.
I'm still looking at JJ.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
S~V~S wrote:Now THAT is not what I expected.
rip Sorsha, iywg
Is that not who you guys targeted or something?Dom wrote:Didn't see that one coming at all. :/
RIPIYWG Sorsha.
I'm still looking at JJ.
wat? lol, i am not a killer, and i don't know who is. It surprises me becasue there was some suspicion on Sorsha, i kinda suspected Sorsha. Suspicious folks are odd targets.Mister Rearranger wrote:S~V~S wrote:Now THAT is not what I expected.
rip Sorsha, iywgIs that not who you guys targeted or something?Dom wrote:Didn't see that one coming at all. :/
RIPIYWG Sorsha.
I'm still looking at JJ.![]()
Orly? I had her as the 3rd member of the Shawshank personnel, so killing her would mean that the sisters have monopoly over the baddie NK's.S~V~S wrote:Now THAT is not what I expected.
rip Sorsha, iywg
You said the SK was civ-friendly, I disagreed. What's wrong with that? Calling SK's civ-friendly is like calling cigarettes lung-friendly. Also I kinda think the SK might be dead (or a non-traditional SK, I could see Epi labelling someone as a Serial Killer and not making them a typical LMS role) anyway since we've never seen them actually kill anybody.Lizzy wrote:Search me...![]()
One other person I was eyeing, but felt like carp about it because I've done the same in the other game, is Bullz. :\ It's his comments on my take on the SK and then his very dubious vote for me that made me see him as Boo's equivalent in the sisters.
I am unsure.Dom wrote:Do you really think SVS and I are bad, MR?
It was your phrasing and the reasoning here...Bullzeye wrote:You said the SK was civ-friendly, I disagreed. What's wrong with that? Calling SK's civ-friendly is like calling cigarettes lung-friendly. Also I kinda think the SK might be dead (or a non-traditional SK, I could see Epi labelling someone as a Serial Killer and not making them a typical LMS role) anyway since we've never seen them actually kill anybody.Lizzy wrote:Search me...![]()
One other person I was eyeing, but felt like carp about it because I've done the same in the other game, is Bullz. :\ It's his comments on my take on the SK and then his very dubious vote for me that made me see him as Boo's equivalent in the sisters.
... that bugged the hell out me.Just in case I forget, I'm throwing my vote on Lizzy. Her comments about SK's really caught my eye, it seemed like she was almost trying to encourage people to leave the SK alive. I see no reason why a civ would suggest such a thing.
In all fairness your comment bugged the hell out of me too, hence the voteLizzy wrote:It was your phrasing and the reasoning here...Bullzeye wrote:You said the SK was civ-friendly, I disagreed. What's wrong with that? Calling SK's civ-friendly is like calling cigarettes lung-friendly. Also I kinda think the SK might be dead (or a non-traditional SK, I could see Epi labelling someone as a Serial Killer and not making them a typical LMS role) anyway since we've never seen them actually kill anybody.Lizzy wrote:Search me...![]()
One other person I was eyeing, but felt like carp about it because I've done the same in the other game, is Bullz. :\ It's his comments on my take on the SK and then his very dubious vote for me that made me see him as Boo's equivalent in the sisters.
... that bugged the hell out me.Just in case I forget, I'm throwing my vote on Lizzy. Her comments about SK's really caught my eye, it seemed like she was almost trying to encourage people to leave the SK alive. I see no reason why a civ would suggest such a thing.
Because I knew no one else would vote for you and I needed to try and stay alive. I really don't know who to vote for at this point because we have had too many ties and I am tired of them quite frankly. I may change my vote late but I felt you where a good placeholder.birdwithteeth11 wrote:So John, did you have a reason for voting me, or did you prefer to do it as a fly-by?
I think the sk is dead or was a replacement due to inactivityBullzeye wrote:In all fairness your comment bugged the hell out of me too, hence the voteLizzy wrote:It was your phrasing and the reasoning here...Bullzeye wrote:You said the SK was civ-friendly, I disagreed. What's wrong with that? Calling SK's civ-friendly is like calling cigarettes lung-friendly. Also I kinda think the SK might be dead (or a non-traditional SK, I could see Epi labelling someone as a Serial Killer and not making them a typical LMS role) anyway since we've never seen them actually kill anybody.Lizzy wrote:Search me...![]()
One other person I was eyeing, but felt like carp about it because I've done the same in the other game, is Bullz. :\ It's his comments on my take on the SK and then his very dubious vote for me that made me see him as Boo's equivalent in the sisters.
Just in case I forget, I'm throwing my vote on Lizzy. Her comments about SK's really caught my eye, it seemed like she was almost trying to encourage people to leave the SK alive. I see no reason why a civ would suggest such a thing.
... that bugged the hell out me.I haven't seen anything else from you that's caught my eye though tbh, for that little while I thought you could be a sneaky SK but now I doubt it. I don't see you, or anyone really, holding off a kill for 8 nights.
Dude you got like 10 votes, nearly everyone helped kill the first you.Mister Rearranger wrote:I might be down for lynching Bullz.
He helped kill the first me.
I did too, as well as many others. Sorries.Mister Rearranger wrote:I might be down for lynching Bullz.
He helped kill the first me.
Well, I suggest you change it unless you want my vote as well; and we haven't had a tie in a while.johns2jj wrote:Because I knew no one else would vote for you and I needed to try and stay alive. I really don't know who to vote for at this point because we have had too many ties and I am tired of them quite frankly. I may change my vote late but I felt you where a good placeholder.birdwithteeth11 wrote:So John, did you have a reason for voting me, or did you prefer to do it as a fly-by?
johns2jj wrote:Because I knew no one else would vote for you and I needed to try and stay alive. I really don't know who to vote for at this point because we have had too many ties and I am tired of them quite frankly. I may change my vote late but I felt you where a good placeholder.birdwithteeth11 wrote:So John, did you have a reason for voting me, or did you prefer to do it as a fly-by?
What can I say? I had my reasons for thinking you were bad, I outlined them when I voted for you. Obviously I was wrong.Mister Rearranger wrote:Linki @bullz: Yeah, but few of that group were part of both days' pushes (remember, I wasn't lynched on day 1, only because I saved myself). One of them was muy bad.
Erm, Boggs is a Sister...Russtifinko wrote:Well I'm all in a kerfuffle. It looks to me as if JJ is probably going down today, but I'd be interested in looking elsewhere if anyone seems inclined to. Even if Elo was right, taking down the Sisters isn't nearly as important as getting rid of Boggs.
Going on a shopping trip, then I'll be back and think about who to vote for.
I agree about getting Boggs, it's just that looking for a specific individual is a bit difficult at the moment. A teammate would do just as well.Russtifinko wrote:Well I'm all in a kerfuffle. It looks to me as if JJ is probably going down today, but I'd be interested in looking elsewhere if anyone seems inclined to. Even if Elo was right, taking down the Sisters isn't nearly as important as getting rid of Boggs.
Going on a shopping trip, then I'll be back and think about who to vote for.
What are you not understanding?Mister Rearranger wrote:Am I missing something or just stupid? >.>
Why priority is being given to lynching Sisters when they don't kill tonight?Bullzeye wrote:What are you not understanding?Mister Rearranger wrote:Am I missing something or just stupid? >.>
I do think you had a point about eliminating the other team but have we had confirmation that the Sisters won't just pick up that kill? If they don't then I definitely think you're right that we should take out the last of the other baddies.Mister Rearranger wrote:Why priority is being given to lynching Sisters when they don't kill tonight?Bullzeye wrote:What are you not understanding?Mister Rearranger wrote:Am I missing something or just stupid? >.>
Then again, my question to Epi still stands. That hasn't been asked by anyone else yet, has it?
You may.Russtifinko wrote:So MR, if I may ask, does anything make you think Bullz is bad besides that he helped get you lynched the first time? I always enjoy a good revenge vote, but I'd like to understand if there's a case the translates to the rest of us.
Epignosis wrote:Lizzy wrote:Mister Robignosis Host Sir, if Hadley is dead, what happens to the odd NK's? Does HB Haig get them if still alive, or does Bogs get monopoly over the baddie NK's?
I said Boo's idea was interesting and that's literally the only time I mentioned him until the second night of the game.Mister Rearranger wrote:You may.Russtifinko wrote:So MR, if I may ask, does anything make you think Bullz is bad besides that he helped get you lynched the first time? I always enjoy a good revenge vote, but I'd like to understand if there's a case the translates to the rest of us.
Prologue mentioning of boo (in agreement) and Mongoose ("randomization" = excuse for distancing?). Continues to downplay the Llama v. Mongoose situation on Day 1. Pushes a theory that I was "saved" by a team (even though in reality, I saved myself with 1 vote), then backpedals, saying that his theory was something he said only to gauge the reactions of other players. The "Kinda shocked at how the votes piled up on you but you really haven't helped yourself." is very boo-esque. He becomes subtly defensive of boo on a couple occasions prior to his lynch, but eventually throws the final vote on him. And then there's obviously his voting record aside from that. In fact, the only hesitation I have about calling him the last Shawshanker right now is his vote in the Mongoose lynch. Then again, none of how that vote went makes sense to me.
linki: ohai der *waves*
Why?S~V~S wrote:I am in the middle of a rousing D & D session, so i am gonna vote now so i don;t forget.
I still think John is bad.
That I didLizzy wrote:The hosts never announced when a baddie team had been exterminated in any of the games I've played here.
Also, I think you might have missed this:
Epignosis wrote:Lizzy wrote:Mister Robignosis Host Sir, if Hadley is dead, what happens to the odd NK's? Does HB Haig get them if still alive, or does Bogs get monopoly over the baddie NK's?
SVS, I was a bit confused when I read that. Do you think A Person is baddie? I'm not sure what you're getting at.S~V~S wrote:Why do you think A Person specifically asked the SK to kill me, but not the baddies?
This is probably one of the most cogent cases I've seen you put together.Mister Rearranger wrote:You may.Russtifinko wrote:So MR, if I may ask, does anything make you think Bullz is bad besides that he helped get you lynched the first time? I always enjoy a good revenge vote, but I'd like to understand if there's a case the translates to the rest of us.
Prologue mentioning of boo (in agreement) and Mongoose ("randomization" = excuse for distancing?). Continues to downplay the Llama v. Mongoose situation on Day 1. Pushes a theory that I was "saved" by a team (even though in reality, I saved myself with 1 vote), then backpedals, saying that his theory was something he said only to gauge the reactions of other players. The "Kinda shocked at how the votes piled up on you but you really haven't helped yourself." is very boo-esque. He becomes subtly defensive of boo on a couple occasions prior to his lynch, but eventually throws the final vote on him. And then there's obviously his voting record aside from that. In fact, the only hesitation I have about calling him the last Shawshanker right now is his vote in the Mongoose lynch. Then again, none of how that vote went makes sense to me.
linki: ohai der *waves*
Yes, but when SVS cast her vote, if you and Boo hadn't voted then you and Lizzy would still have been tied. Therefore it could be said that the two people who voted Lizzy and not you (FZ and SVS) after I put you ahead may have tried to save you. That's what my theory was and is part of why I voted for you when you got lynched.Mister Rearranger wrote:@Bullz: I thought SVS voted to tie Lizzy and I, then boo voted to put me back ahead of her, then I voted for Lizzy in hopes I'd live?