The Syndicate

I'm totally down with this TSP lynch, and I'm currently out eating Mexican food and drinking Dos Equis. So I'll add my vote to the train and hope it goes to the right destination.

LoRab wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:45 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:36 pm I'm thinking that Rico has something on INH and can't share it because rules if there is anything. Or maybe he has something on Golden and is pairing the two. I haven't been town reading INH, but I think he is right about the curse, it looks like a frame.

This reads like a teammate sort of but not really defending a teammate. You're basically saying that Rico might have info, INH hasn't seemed civvie, but really, this means INH is right and not bad.

Neither you nor INH looks all that good based on this post.

I think it's very possible inh and tony are teammates.

Rico has nothing on me but it's interesting to see who picked up on my earlier implication that rico might have some info. I tend to think people who know something is true are more likely to embrace it.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:05 pm RAAAAAAAINBOW LIST

INH
Boomslang
JOH
Dom
Sprityo
Timmer
Neverwhere
Wilgy
Lorab
Golden
Speedchuck
TonyStarkPrime
Epignosis
Ricochet
Elochin

WHY AM I POOP-COLORED!?

(And could you explain your read on me, thanks)

OK, keep dozing off, so going to fall asleep so I don't miss the vote.

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:07 pm Reading TSP, he doesnt look the best, but at least when he answered Epi or things, it sounded right.

I WOULDNT have an issue lynching TSP, HOWEVER

Based off his interactions, we dont gain much information from it.

So if he flips town, we essentially gain nothing outside of a few singular posts and then whoever decided to lynch him

I think a Tony flip will show us Epi's alignment as well.

I think I'm dead.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:08 pm Sprityo, what's your stance on Elochin?

she looks lazy and very follow the lead of whatever sounds good. doesnt mean has to be good.

Not in the best stance IMO

linki: ive got my doubts over this TSP lynch.... but Golden, LoRab, and Speedchuck are generally good looking to me, even though i dont want to put all of my chips on LoRab and Speedchuck yet since i havent looked carefully at them, not to mention LoRab has some disagreements with INH from what ive recently read someone post.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:16 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:07 pm Reading TSP, he doesnt look the best, but at least when he answered Epi or things, it sounded right.

I WOULDNT have an issue lynching TSP, HOWEVER

Based off his interactions, we dont gain much information from it.

So if he flips town, we essentially gain nothing outside of a few singular posts and then whoever decided to lynch him

I think a Tony flip will show us Epi's alignment as well.

that's probably like the ONE thing we'll get if he flips town

Im going to be Voting Eloh

people im not against lynching also include:

timmer
DrWilgy
Epi
Neverwhere

i see no way of us coming back from five votes on TSP.

If he's town, mafia can sit back and relax. If he's mafia, i expect more votes to either pile on or just as likely stay off. Gut is telling me bad lynch

@jack what do you see as epis alignment for each potential tony alignment?

@Epi if youre right and TSP is mafia, ill have to redouble my efforts and reconsider some things

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:13 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:05 pm RAAAAAAAINBOW LIST

INH
Boomslang
JOH
Dom
Sprityo
Timmer
Neverwhere
Wilgy
Lorab
Golden
Speedchuck
TonyStarkPrime
Epignosis
Ricochet
Elochin

WHY AM I POOP-COLORED!?

(And could you explain your read on me, thanks)

Nothing you've really said has made me especially inspired or captivated by your civilian-ness. Feels a little under the radar, which is usually the type of player I tend to really suspect. Also I don't think you've properly explained your "bad feels" about me.

If I had to pick the most middle-of-the-road player, who is going with the proverbial "flow," it'd be Elochin. But you'd be second. Hence both of your low placements.

TBH, you're above the dividing line between players I'm pretty suspicious of, and players I'd be okay with being lynched. The folks below you are the people I'd really like to put in the hotseat.

As for the coloring, apologies are necessary. I'm not great at picking the colors on these things, which is why I miss the [rainbow] function.

I wouldn't mind in the least seeing rainbow lists from you and anyone else who'd care to give them. This is the part of the game when people need to be forced to speak up.

Golden wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:21 pm @jack what do you see as epis alignment for each potential tony alignment?

A Potential Answer:
Tony - Town
Epi- SMaf or PMaf or Town

The others
Tony - SMaf
Epi - Town or PMaf

Tony - PMaf
Epi- SMaf or town

I'm also tossing a vote in Elochin's direction.

TSP is the path of least resistance, and despite him doing some shady-ass stuff, all the other players I suspect are also all throwing votes his way [except for Rico,] making his lynch seem uncomfortable inevitable.

I'm okay with him going, but I can't help but agree with Sprit that it wouldn't be very informative.

Elochin

Did we ever get an answer as to whether votes after vote 4 count? TBH, I totally forgot about that when I voted.

LoRab wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:27 pm Did we ever get an answer as to whether votes after vote 4 count? TBH, I totally forgot about that when I voted.

oh i just remembered that too

Tony, you could save yourself yet!

LoRab wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:27 pm Did we ever get an answer as to whether votes after vote 4 count? TBH, I totally forgot about that when I voted.

I don't see why they wouldn't. Only the votes placed fourth would be affected.

So TSP currently has four votes, counting the fifth one placed.

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:18 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:08 pm Sprityo, what's your stance on Elochin?

she looks lazy and very follow the lead of whatever sounds good. doesnt mean has to be good.

Not in the best stance IMO

linki: ive got my doubts over this TSP lynch.... but Golden, LoRab, and Speedchuck are generally good looking to me, even though i dont want to put all of my chips on LoRab and Speedchuck yet since i havent looked carefully at them, not to mention LoRab has some disagreements with INH from what ive recently read someone post.

Lazy and follow the lead? I was the first to give the idea to look at those in both BV and ROTTK. Also, yesterday i was fussed at by two people for voting too soon. Now that I wait, I'm lazy. Whatever. We just finished tv as a family and I got the kids to bes. I'm going to finish reading real quick and vote.

Or maybe it was just looking at thise in BV at the time... because this was before Dom's curse. Sorry, its my bedtime....just give me a aec to catch up

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:57 pm So having read Epi's ISO there was one thing abundantly clear

no large, collective posts regarding searching for information for a case on something

Day 1 is an entire shenanigan fest of jokes and a tunnel filled with TSP

this falls off as day 2 rolls around as he starts talking with Golden more, dropping shade on INH and Speedchuck as well

mostly everything ive read from Epi though reeks of defensive dismissive words. Maybe that's how he plays? but it looks unnatural to me. However, i dont think it warrants him a vote.... yet. were he to vote INH today it would definitely prompt me to vote for Epi, but in general he hasnt been playing optimally IMO

I am probably going to vote for INH. Too bad you already voted.

Elo, you're the person who has pushed the curse narrative that I feel the Politician team would want to push the most, and you haven't responded in any real way to criticism of the "curses reference BV and Rot3K, so FOW must have been in both" rationale. Instead, you ignore contrary opinions while blending into the proverbial pack.

That's why you're at the bottom of my rainbow list, and you're the person I'd be most comfortable seeing go today.

Speedchuck

Golden
Lorab

Ricochet
Sprityo
JOH

Boomslang
Timmer
Wilgy
Neverwhere


INH
Dom
Elochin
Epignosis
TonyStarkPrime

I don't really have anyone that stands out and screams HAAAAAAAAI'M SCUUUUUM But that's how it goes. Eloh has dropped after impressing me on D1, Dom has risen from last place, TSP has dropped thanks to possible coalignments, vote placement, and gut feels after his defenses today, Sprit's points about Epi are things I believe in (Epi is more shade-throwy than usual, but hasn't followed up), Lorab's been great today, Wilgy is a wild card.

I think that covers my stream-of-consciousness stuff. As for you INH, you are only low because I feel like Rico might know something, and because your reads have basically been opposite mine the whole game. Not great reasons, I must admit. But they were giving me the willies.

Moved you up accordingly.

Oh, and linki: Apparently we finally agree on something, INH

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:34 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:57 pm So having read Epi's ISO there was one thing abundantly clear

no large, collective posts regarding searching for information for a case on something

Day 1 is an entire shenanigan fest of jokes and a tunnel filled with TSP

this falls off as day 2 rolls around as he starts talking with Golden more, dropping shade on INH and Speedchuck as well

mostly everything ive read from Epi though reeks of defensive dismissive words. Maybe that's how he plays? but it looks unnatural to me. However, i dont think it warrants him a vote.... yet. were he to vote INH today it would definitely prompt me to vote for Epi, but in general he hasnt been playing optimally IMO

I am probably going to vote for INH. Too bad you already voted.

"shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:34 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:57 pm So having read Epi's ISO there was one thing abundantly clear

no large, collective posts regarding searching for information for a case on something

Day 1 is an entire shenanigan fest of jokes and a tunnel filled with TSP

this falls off as day 2 rolls around as he starts talking with Golden more, dropping shade on INH and Speedchuck as well

mostly everything ive read from Epi though reeks of defensive dismissive words. Maybe that's how he plays? but it looks unnatural to me. However, i dont think it warrants him a vote.... yet. were he to vote INH today it would definitely prompt me to vote for Epi, but in general he hasnt been playing optimally IMO

I am probably going to vote for INH. Too bad you already voted.

I've said why. I'm not going to keep repeating myself.

Apparently I'm supposed to save Tony though because we're bad together. I can't do that though. Too bad.

Someone says I'm a follower and votes for me. Someone says I'm a leader and not backing off my theory and votes for me.

I'm going to bed. Y'all are a confused crew. I'm voting tony too in case y'all try to pile on me at the last second.

tony

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:42 pm I've said why. I'm not going to keep repeating myself.

Apparently I'm supposed to save Tony though because we're bad together. I can't do that though. Too bad.

Oh that lovable contrarian epigonsis

what a card

But seriously, you still think I'm the Faceless Old Woman?

Do you want me to repost my rebuttals so you can read and maybe respond to them?

Or would you just like to continue to ignore every point I make in favor of sitting in silence instead of engaging people about your suspicions?

You suspect me. Great, whoop-de-doo. Would you like to talk about it, and maybe be constructive?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm "shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

Perhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.

Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?

Elohcin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:45 pm Someone says I'm a follower and votes for me. Someone says I'm a leader and not backing off my theory and votes for me.

I'm going to bed. Y'all are a confused crew. I'm voting tony too in case y'all try to pile on me at the last second.

tony

I didn't say you were a leader, and it's not really your theory, either.

You weren't the first to come up with the idea that the Faceless Old Woman must have been in both Blue Velvet and Rot3K, but you're the only one who has steadfastly pursued it while ignoring and not engaging with any criticism.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:46 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:42 pm I've said why. I'm not going to keep repeating myself.

Apparently I'm supposed to save Tony though because we're bad together. I can't do that though. Too bad.

Oh that lovable contrarian epigonsis

what a card

But seriously, you still think I'm the Faceless Old Woman?

Do you want me to repost my rebuttals so you can read and maybe respond to them?

Or would you just like to continue to ignore every point I make in favor of sitting in silence instead of engaging people about your suspicions?

You suspect me. Great, whoop-de-doo. Would you like to talk about it, and maybe be constructive?

I will admit the evidence against you is circumstantial.

I find it easy to lynch you because you are blatant in your schemes.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:50 pm I will admit the evidence against you is circumstantial.

I find it easy to lynch you because you are blatant in your schemes.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:47 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm "shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

Perhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.

Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?

You aren't bad. You voted early both times. One was Made but the other netted Long Con. If you are on the other team, you are being bold, and you have never struck me as bold. On top of that, your response to me about your switching opinions didn't have the aroma of agenda. If you are bad, I would be surprised.

Can we at least talk about what you perceive to be "insertnamehere gameplay?" Because it seems fairly alien to me, insertnamehere.

If your suspicion of me is based on a foundation of a meta-read, let's talk about your meta-read of me.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:53 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:47 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm "shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

Perhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.

Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?

You aren't bad. You voted early both times. One was Made but the other netted Long Con. If you are on the other team, you are being bold, and you have never struck me as bold. On top of that, your response to me about your switching opinions didn't have the aroma of agenda. If you are bad, I would be surprised.

Huh. I thought you thought I was bad, and were just not pursuing it for some reason. That would have been atypical play for you, I think.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:56 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:53 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:47 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:40 pm "shade-throwy but hasn't followed up?"

I think you need to research what throwing shade really means, speedchuck.

Perhaps. I've not heard/used the term often.

Let me be blunt. What is your current opinion of me?

You aren't bad. You voted early both times. One was Made but the other netted Long Con. If you are on the other team, you are being bold, and you have never struck me as bold. On top of that, your response to me about your switching opinions didn't have the aroma of agenda. If you are bad, I would be surprised.

Huh. I thought you thought I was bad, and were just not pursuing it for some reason. That would have been atypical play for you, I think.

Why? Because I asked you about your changes of opinion?

Poll ends soon. Voting INH to piss of spirtyo.

I am displeased that timmer has not voted. If he does not vote, I will likely be voting him next.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:57 pm Why? Because I asked you about your changes of opinion?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:49 pm I am also not enthusiastic about speedchuck's vote for Long Con, followed up by someone he apparently suspects. I am hoping to hear more from speedchuck before I vote.

This bit.

Granted, that was before he flipped. But it was never really followed up on.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:01 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:57 pm Why? Because I asked you about your changes of opinion?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:49 pm I am also not enthusiastic about speedchuck's vote for Long Con, followed up by someone he apparently suspects. I am hoping to hear more from speedchuck before I vote.

This bit.

Granted, that was before he flipped. But it was never really followed up on.

I thought your vote on Made sucked, so your vote on Long Con looked like more of the same- voting first out of the blue to escape accountability.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:02 pm I thought your vote on Made sucked, so your vote on Long Con looked like more of the same- voting first out of the blue to escape accountability.

Huh. Thought it was the opposite.

Who killed DFaraday with dactyls?

Poll ended at Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:00 pm
Please note that if you vote, your vote will be visible.


Boomslang
0
No votes
Voters: None
Dom
0
No votes
Voters: None
Dr Wilgy
0
No votes
Voters: None
Elohcin
2
17%
Voters: sprityo, insertnamehere
Epignosis
0
No votes
Voters: None
Golden
0
No votes
Voters: None
insertnamehere
2
17%
Voters: Ricochet, Epignosis
Jackofhearts2005
0
No votes
Voters: None
Lorab
0
No votes
Voters: None
Neverwhere
0
No votes
Voters: None
Ricochet
0
No votes
Voters: None
speedchuck
0
No votes
Voters: None
sprityo
0
No votes
Voters: None
timmer
0
No votes
Voters: None
TonyStarkPrime
6
50%
Voters: Golden, Boomslang, speedchuck, LoRab, Jackofhearts2005, Elohcin
William Carlos Williams (host, non, mod, dead)
2
17%
Voters: nijuukyugou, JaggedJimmyJay
Total votes: 12

Feeling better about you, Epi, with your most recent posts.

well motherfucker

OMG. You fucking lynched Cecil?

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:02 pm Interns, today no intern may place a 4th vote on any player. Any votes placed 4th will not count.

I took this to mean that only the person who was the fourth to vote for a person had their vote invalidated, and that people who voted after them would have legit votes.

@Niju, was I wrong?

This displeases me.

That sucks on multiple levels. I didn't miss something did I? Tony was definitely leading on the poll?