Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:21 pm
So if the civilians lose because the person he checked and got a good result on gets lynched Day 2, we can yell at him?
Yes, though I think he has left enough information to avoid that. He hasn't given an indication that at least the three names fielded lately were civilian peeks -- Michelle, Jack, nutella. Or Long Con.
My concern is that there doesn't seem to be a second peek at all. Still, if he isn't a/the cop then some other civilian has screwed the pooch today.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:24 pm
by Long Con
I feel like he would not let us Lynch a green check.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:38 am
This is why Down With Ketchup is the one true way.
You can have both though!! I regularly post as Jack does, responding to things as I read while missing current thread information, but I still make every effort to read every post in the game so I don't miss anything.
Anyway [VOTE:
lc] aubergine since it looks like nanook means it. Still think Michelle is extremely likely the other one.
I'm trying to see why Nanook was so bothered by nutella's handling of his fake peeking. I return to this post in which she threw herself in on the LC wagon, and I just feel like it rings genuinely. She was all-hands on deck going after Michelle before, but when confronted with [what looked like a real] red peek, she shrugged and did her duty. That's pretty much what I did.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:41 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
Combining PeekGate and the MP kill, and I feel like this is the emergent POE:
Jack~V~S
Michelle
nutella
Nanook should have been somehow countered, criticized, or skewered if he was lying about his role claim. It didn't happen, so I just hope folks understand the matrix.
Epignosis and Long Con were the two I felt were least likely to kill MP first, and that holds. I wouldn't either.
If I'm right about all of the above, then I next consider the combinations among those three.
~ Jack~V~S/nutella sounds reasonably plausible. I can't off-hand think of any reason why not.
~ Jack~V~S/Michelle sounds reasonably plausible. S~V~S was a known busser, and she went after Michelle early and often. Jack held up that banner though, so it's not super clear.
~ nutella/Michelle sounds less plausible. nutella was ready to murder Michelle pre-PeekGate, and it didn't strike me as a distancing sort of business. If nutella is mafia, Michelle was a scapegoat.
The common denominator is Jack~V~S.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:45 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
If I'm right then the game is already won anyway, but that's why I would love some of that sweet, delicious feedback.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:47 pm
by Epignosis
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:45 pm
If I'm right then the game is already won anyway, but that's why I would love some of that sweet, delicious feedback.
I agree with your triumvirate.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:48 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:45 pm
If I'm right then the game is already won anyway, but that's why I would love some of that sweet, delicious feedback.
To be clear:
With 7 alive, 2 as mafia, we're in a 5 vs. 2 scenario. That means 1 mislynch is still allowed before the game is lost (barring doctor protections which at present appear impossible).
1 mislynch available + 2 mafia alive = correct POE pool of 3 to win the game.
So if it's not 2 out of Jack/Michelle/nutella, start screaming immediately.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:53 pm
by nutella
Well I know it's not me and I think Jack/Michelle is most likely but like I'm not sure. I guess I have to pick either you, LC, or Epi to replace my name in the poe, and my gut still says LC I guess.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:58 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
If it is Jack/Michelle, be aware that Jack currently leads by 2 votes with neither of those players on a viable counterwagon (at present it would be nutella). This leaves room for shenanigans that would be best avoided -- one more vote on Jack please. Or quick closing arguments about alternative(s).
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:02 pm
by Long Con
I wish that Jack and Michelle had shown up today.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:04 pm
by Epignosis
Voted.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:05 pm
by nutella
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:02 pm
I wish that Jack and Michelle had shown up today.
How much do we believe that the scum were entirely absent for the last couple hours of the day?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:06 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
EOD is slightly earlier than usual. Who knows.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:14 pm
by Sloonei
Day 2
Bartolo Colon is not here to swing the bat. If ever there was an argument in favor of the Designated Hitter, one would think it exists in the unfathomable hitting mechanics of Bartolo. But he has an arm blessed by the baseball gods, so he's stuck around forever. The only price he has to pay is that once every few innings he is required to step into the batter's box and face a Major League pitcher.
But on this glorious day, against all odds, Bartolo swung the bat and it connected with the ball at just the right angle. As the world held its breath to watch it sail over the fence, we knew we'd witnessed... well, not greatness. But something adjacent to it. This was a sight to behold. But upon rounding the bases, the home plate umpire had decided he'd seen enough. A home run by Bartolo Colon was an absolutely ridiculous prospect. So as Bartolo thumped down onto homeplate, grinning ear to ear, the umpire softly motion an ejection, and informed the pitcher-turned-slugger that he must leave. For a minute there, Bartolo Colon had learned how to fly but, alas, he flew too close to the sun.
Jackofhearts2005 has been ejected. He was Bartolo Colon, civilian 1-shot tracker.
It is Night 2. You have 24 hours to submit your night actions.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:15 pm
by nutella
.......oh
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:16 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
gut punch
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:16 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
back to the drawing board
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:20 pm
by Long Con
Boo. Maybe there's some Tracking info hidden in his posts?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:21 pm
by Michelle
What a game.
So LC wasn't for real the red check of Nanook.
And Jack playing like that as villager... I did n't expect that.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:21 pm
by JaggedJimmyJay
This should effectively confirm Nanook. 1-shot tracker is compatible with the cop. It's also compatible with the doctor, but Jack was the only one left who was still in a position to claim doctor. So it isolates us to setup 1.
I don't feel I can rely on the MP kill as a guide now. It still could be Michelle/nutella, but I haven't felt that. I'll review again. If it isn't, then either LC or Epignosis was a fucking coward.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:23 pm
by Michelle
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:02 pm
I wish that Jack and Michelle had shown up today.
I expalined I will not be. But if I would, it would be one more vote from me on Jack.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:25 pm
by Michelle
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:21 pm
This should effectively confirm Nanook. 1-shot tracker is compatible with the cop. It's also compatible with the doctor, but Jack was the only one left who was still in a position to claim doctor. So it isolates us to setup 1.
I don't feel I can rely on the MP kill as a guide now. It still could be Michelle/nutella, but I haven't felt that. I'll review again. If it isn't, then either LC or Epignosis was a fucking coward.
Did Epi amswered at any from your or Nanook tests ?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:25 pm
by Long Con
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:21 pm
This should effectively confirm Nanook. 1-shot tracker is compatible with the cop. It's also compatible with the doctor, but Jack was the only one left who was still in a position to claim doctor. So it isolates us to setup 1.
I don't feel I can rely on the MP kill as a guide now. It still could be Michelle/nutella, but I haven't felt that. I'll review again. If it isn't, then either LC or Epignosis was a fucking coward.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:21 pm
This should effectively confirm Nanook. 1-shot tracker is compatible with the cop. It's also compatible with the doctor, but Jack was the only one left who was still in a position to claim doctor. So it isolates us to setup 1.
I don't feel I can rely on the MP kill as a guide now. It still could be Michelle/nutella, but I haven't felt that. I'll review again. If it isn't, then either LC or Epignosis was a fucking coward.
Did Epi amswered at any from your or Nanook tests ?
I wouldn't say I have administered any tests. Epi didn't have much to say about Nanook's claim.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:21 pm
This should effectively confirm Nanook. 1-shot tracker is compatible with the cop. It's also compatible with the doctor, but Jack was the only one left who was still in a position to claim doctor. So it isolates us to setup 1.
I don't feel I can rely on the MP kill as a guide now. It still could be Michelle/nutella, but I haven't felt that. I'll review again. If it isn't, then either LC or Epignosis was a fucking coward.
Did Epi amswered at any from your or Nanook tests ?
I wouldn't say I have administered any tests. Epi didn't have much to say about Nanook's claim.
oh come on, your 'who would kill M7' test. I don't remember a reaction from him.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:34 pm
by Epignosis
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:21 pm I don't feel I can rely on the MP kill as a guide now. It still could be Michelle/nutella, but I haven't felt that. I'll review again. If it isn't, then either LC or Epignosis was a fucking coward.
That's a shitty thing to say.
If something has value, it has value regardless. You walking this back smells.
what made you change the vote from your scum read since the get go, me, to Jack?
Following the herd.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:38 pm
by Epignosis
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:58 pm
If it is Jack/Michelle, be aware that Jack currently leads by 2 votes with neither of those players on a viable counterwagon (at present it would be nutella). This leaves room for shenanigans that would be best avoided -- one more vote on Jack please. Or quick closing arguments about alternative(s).
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:58 pm
If it is Jack/Michelle, be aware that Jack currently leads by 2 votes with neither of those players on a viable counterwagon (at present it would be nutella). This leaves room for shenanigans that would be best avoided -- one more vote on Jack please. Or quick closing arguments about alternative(s).
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:58 pm
If it is Jack/Michelle, be aware that Jack currently leads by 2 votes with neither of those players on a viable counterwagon (at present it would be nutella). This leaves room for shenanigans that would be best avoided -- one more vote on Jack please. Or quick closing arguments about alternative(s).
This gem.
What's so precious?
That was sarcasm. JJJ asked someone to move to Jack. So I did.
what made you change the vote from your scum read since the get go, me, to Jack?
Following the herd.
Why did you give up to your read?
Because I do what I like.
are you scum?
I wouldn't kill MP Night 1 and everybody knows it. I have standards.
what can proove this?
Endgame.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:45 pm
by Michelle
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:43 pm
Hey Michelle, what time is where you are?
Where was this righteous indignation from you an hour ago?
it's 1:45 am now
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:46 pm
by Michelle
don't expect big brain from me at this hour.
I woke up a lil bit too late. But i would vote Jack so the result would be the same.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:48 pm
by Epignosis
Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:46 pm
don't expect big brain from me at this hour.
I woke up a lil bit too late. But i would vote Jack so the result would be the same.
Then why are you asking me why I took my vote off of you (and put it on Jack)?
Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:46 pm
don't expect big brain from me at this hour.
I woke up a lil bit too late. But i would vote Jack so the result would be the same.
Then why are you asking me why I took my vote off of you (and put it on Jack)?
because i was already scum reading Jack while your scum read was me. So you changed reads or what happened?
Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:46 pm
don't expect big brain from me at this hour.
I woke up a lil bit too late. But i would vote Jack so the result would be the same.
Then why are you asking me why I took my vote off of you (and put it on Jack)?
because i was already scum reading Jack while your scum read was me. So you changed reads or what happened?
Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:46 pm
don't expect big brain from me at this hour.
I woke up a lil bit too late. But i would vote Jack so the result would be the same.
Then why are you asking me why I took my vote off of you (and put it on Jack)?
because i was already scum reading Jack while your scum read was me. So you changed reads or what happened?
Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:46 pm
don't expect big brain from me at this hour.
I woke up a lil bit too late. But i would vote Jack so the result would be the same.
Then why are you asking me why I took my vote off of you (and put it on Jack)?
because i was already scum reading Jack while your scum read was me. So you changed reads or what happened?
I was playing follow the cop.
No. You were playing follow Jay from what I saw.
I moved one vote in response to one thing JJJ said. That isn't "follow JJJ."
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:54 pm
by Michelle
[mention]nutella[/mention] come tell me about your recent reads please
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:55 pm
by Epignosis
Pause.
What kind of fuckery is this?
Incoming.
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:56 pm
by nutella
Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:54 pm
@nutella come tell me about your recent reads please
Jack's flip threw me off but I still think you are scum out of the remaining candidates, along with probably LC?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:58 pm
If it is Jack/Michelle, be aware that Jack currently leads by 2 votes with neither of those players on a viable counterwagon (at present it would be nutella). This leaves room for shenanigans that would be best avoided -- one more vote on Jack please. Or quick closing arguments about alternative(s).
This gem.
What's so precious?
That was sarcasm. JJJ asked someone to move to Jack. So I did.
the post quoted here was the reason you voted Jack?
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 7:01 pm
by Epignosis
I'm about to flip shit on its head. Stop interrogating me for a minute.
