The Syndicate

Posted: **Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:00 pm**

Well, that may not be as important, because I think it possible that we may have an un supported civ. So lynching someone for no vouce is not going to work.

And yeah, I was bad. I was very bad

But I put that all behind me

Posted: **Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:13 pm**

Snowman wrote: The only danger involving Snowman...is the danger of falling in love with him.

You were bad?! Wait, I thought they said that if you started out bad you stayed bad. I know SVS didn't start out bad, you were good, then bad, then good again? I thought when people started to die off this crazy game would begin to make sense. If the baddies are converting, then I honestly have no idea who's legit. I've been sticking up for former BTSC chums,

Great, I'll probably go bad on the last round, sounds about right.

Really don't have a good idea of who I should vote for. Open to suggestions. If Ty has support, and Bass is off limits, who's the prime suspect?

If you turn bad on the last round, you'll win.

Posted: **Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:21 pm**

This is not easy, not enough winking & nudging going on today.

Posted: **Tue Feb 17, 2015 10:53 pm**

I was also bad for one day and one night, but I am good again. For realz. Maybe we are all taking turns being bad. So, who is bad now? Someone who was cool with killing FZ, so not SVS or Llama I would think. No me (obviously) or Bass, or Ty, so we're left with BR, LC, and Snowman. Snowman's post was particularly long and jovial today. That makes me think that he's trying to hide something. I'm fine lunching him. But that's not really fair since BR and LC aren't really saying anything at all.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:25 am**

The only people I have not had BTS with, alive, are Bass, LC & Ty. As such I have no read on them, and no clue if they have changed positions at any time. Bass is off the table for me due to his family situation.

Re LC & Ty, anyone have any insights as to possible alignment shifts for them, and how that affected their behavior?

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:30 am**

thellama73 wrote:
Snowman wrote: The only danger involving Snowman...is the danger of falling in love with him.

You were bad?! Wait, I thought they said that if you started out bad you stayed bad. I know SVS didn't start out bad, you were good, then bad, then good again? I thought when people started to die off this crazy game would begin to make sense. If the baddies are converting, then I honestly have no idea who's legit. I've been sticking up for former BTSC chums,

Great, I'll probably go bad on the last round, sounds about right.

Really don't have a good idea of who I should vote for. Open to suggestions. If Ty has support, and Bass is off limits, who's the prime suspect?
If you turn bad on the last round, you'll win.

Oh.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:52 am**

I haven't had btsc with LC either. I think based on what SVS and Zombrella have said, combined with what I know about my past teammates, we have a good chance of getting a baddie with him through process of elimination. Voting Long Con now.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:22 am**

Hey I have a minute so I'm going to go ahead and post. I was bad the day splits got lunched instead of blooper. I then was made civ again. I am still civ but I won't get support being that there is no one left but me.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:24 am**

Hey I have a minute so I'm going to go ahead and post. I was bad the day splits got lunched instead of blooper. I then was made civ again. I am still civ but I won't get support being that there is no one left but me.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:35 am**

Thanks Bass. That makes me feel better about my vote.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:53 am**

thellama73 wrote:Thanks Bass. That makes me feel better about my vote.

Glad I could help.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:02 am**

Snowman wrote: The only danger involving Snowman...is the danger of falling in love with him.

You were bad?! Wait, I thought they said that if you started out bad you stayed bad. I know SVS didn't start out bad, you were good, then bad, then good again? I thought when people started to die off this crazy game would begin to make sense. If the baddies are converting, then I honestly have no idea who's legit. I've been sticking up for former BTSC chums,

Great, I'll probably go bad on the last round, sounds about right.

Really don't have a good idea of who I should vote for. Open to suggestions. If Ty has support, and Bass is off limits, who's the prime suspect?

That is not how it is working at all.

I am civ now and I could get a vouch from a trusted if need be.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:18 am**

Bass_the_Clever wrote:Hey I have a minute so I'm going to go ahead and post. I was bad the day splits got lunched instead of blooper. I then was made civ again. I am still civ but I won't get support being that there is no one left but me.

I have reason to believe you are being honest here.

And BR is one of the people I small actively not worried about.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:41 pm**

I see what Bass is trying to do as well, and that earns my vote. If you don't want to lynch him because of his Real Life issues, then that's totally understandable. But he's the one.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:45 pm**

I think there is a civ alone, and Bass' post makes me think it is him.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:03 pm**

S~V~S wrote:I think there is a civ alone, and Bass' post makes me think it is him.

I know.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:04 pm**

S~V~S wrote:And BR is one of the people I small actively not worried about.

Say this sentence again, if you don't mind. It's got a hitch in it.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:39 pm**

Lol I know. Spell check FTL ha ha.

Not sure what I was trying to say, but the point is I am not worried about BR

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:40 pm**

Also, Zomberella, when I came after you last round with a 'weak' case, it was because my BTSC partner said that he and some old teammates had a Roxy-approved secret code going on, and I think he said that you and S~V~S were baddies according to it. I mad eup some stuff about my own deductions based on letters, etc... but then Russ got lynched. I really expected the code-people to follow along with what I said and come after you then, so I don't know what happened with that. You were bad then, right?

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:10 pm**

Long Con wrote:Also, Zomberella, when I came after you last round with a 'weak' case, it was because my BTSC partner said that he and some old teammates had a Roxy-approved secret code going on, and I think he said that you and S~V~S were baddies according to it. I mad eup some stuff about my own deductions based on letters, etc... but then Russ got lynched. I really expected the code-people to follow along with what I said and come after you then, so I don't know what happened with that. You were bad then, right?

I don't totally trust you so I'm going to plead the fifth. However, I was part of a pact that now isn't really going to work because there's only two of us left.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:30 pm**

My team had a secret code, but since it came via PM and not chat I was not sure if it was Roxy approved, soi deleted the PM and did not use it. So how someone knew this based on a code baffles me since I did not use a code.

I was bad one day, though.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:34 pm**

I think I'm starting to see how this game is different than normal mafia. The BTSC is usually only a mafia power so people are hesitant to "defend" each other.

So this round I do have BTSC but the other member of my civ group is functionally non existent, so I'm not gonna get any endorsements this round. I did want to lunch Ty, but now I'm leaning more toward Snowman. He just posts so little and I can never get a read on him. LC, all your posts sound suspicious to me so I doubt know if you ate bad or if I'm biased.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:36 pm**

EBWOP: don't know if you are good

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:36 pm**

Zomberella12 wrote:I think I'm starting to see how this game is different than normal mafia. The BTSC is usually only a mafia power so people are hesitant to "defend" each other.

So this round I do have BTSC but the other member of my civ group is functionally non existent, so I'm not gonna get any endorsements this round. I did want to lunch Ty, but now I'm leaning more toward Snowman. He just posts so little and I can never get a read on him. LC, all your posts sound suspicious to me so I doubt know if you ate bad or if I'm biased.

Personally, I think it would be smarter of you to lunch Long Con. Unless of course you are bad this round.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:40 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I think I'm starting to see how this game is different than normal mafia. The BTSC is usually only a mafia power so people are hesitant to "defend" each other.

So this round I do have BTSC but the other member of my civ group is functionally non existent, so I'm not gonna get any endorsements this round. I did want to lunch Ty, but now I'm leaning more toward Snowman. He just posts so little and I can never get a read on him. LC, all your posts sound suspicious to me so I doubt know if you ate bad or if I'm biased.
Personally, I think it would be smarter of you to lunch Long Con. Unless of course you are bad this round.

I REALLY want to lunch Long Con but I'm worried after my mistake with Russ.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:41 pm**

Whatever. Voting Long Con. Llama, you better not be messing with me.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:48 pm**

Zomberella12 wrote:Whatever. Voting Long Con. Llama, you better not be messing with me.

I assure you, I'm not.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:31 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:Whatever. Voting Long Con. Llama, you better not be messing with me.
I assure you, I'm not.

SVS, Snowman, does this sound real to you?

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:44 pm**

Zomberella12 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:Whatever. Voting Long Con. Llama, you better not be messing with me.
I assure you, I'm not.
SVS, Snowman, does this sound real to you?

Why are you relying on Snowman's opinion after stating you might vote him?

I have to vote now and I am going to with TySlayer this time. Sorry, I didn't have a lot of time to think about this game today I got caught up in the other one.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:46 pm**

Black Rock wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:Whatever. Voting Long Con. Llama, you better not be messing with me.
I assure you, I'm not.
SVS, Snowman, does this sound real to you?
Why are you relying on Snowman's opinion after stating you might vote him?

I have to vote now and I am going to with TySlayer this time. Sorry, I didn't have a lot of time to think about this game today I got caught up in the other one.

I just want his opinion. I won't necessarily rely on it.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:49 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I think I'm starting to see how this game is different than normal mafia. The BTSC is usually only a mafia power so people are hesitant to "defend" each other.

So this round I do have BTSC but the other member of my civ group is functionally non existent, so I'm not gonna get any endorsements this round. I did want to lunch Ty, but now I'm leaning more toward Snowman. He just posts so little and I can never get a read on him. LC, all your posts sound suspicious to me so I doubt know if you ate bad or if I'm biased.
Personally, I think it would be smarter of you to lunch Long Con. Unless of course you are bad this round.

Unless YOU are bad this round, your vote should be going to Bass. I don't believe what he says about being alone on a Civvie team.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:51 pm**

Long Con wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I think I'm starting to see how this game is different than normal mafia. The BTSC is usually only a mafia power so people are hesitant to "defend" each other.

So this round I do have BTSC but the other member of my civ group is functionally non existent, so I'm not gonna get any endorsements this round. I did want to lunch Ty, but now I'm leaning more toward Snowman. He just posts so little and I can never get a read on him. LC, all your posts sound suspicious to me so I doubt know if you ate bad or if I'm biased.
Personally, I think it would be smarter of you to lunch Long Con. Unless of course you are bad this round.
Unless YOU are bad this round, your vote should be going to Bass. I don't believe what he says about being alone on a Civvie team.

I've always been open to a Bass vote, but too many others are not willing to let it happen due to his RL circumstances. By process of elimination, I feel pretty good about my vote for you.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:23 pm**

Where's the rest of the votes? SVS? Snowman? Ty?

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:48 pm**

I voted Ty~ I don't want to lynch Bass, and I am waffling on LCs sincerity. I figures force a tie and let the Gods of Random sort it out

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:05 pm**

Rezz please.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:24 pm**

Hungry eyes

No one was starving the way Hunger had tried. He was just making plans to starve another when he was banished from the camps with a firm final kick from Jacob.

Long Con has been eaten for Lunch.

It is now Night 5.

A mini rotation has occurred.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:27 pm**

Nailed it. BIH Long Con.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:27 pm**

He was bad?

Yay LC voters

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:46 pm**

I'm so glad that worked out so well!

I am voting pie because I like it better than cake.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:50 pm**

Zomberella12 wrote:I did want to lunch Ty, but now I'm leaning more toward Snowman. He just posts so little and I can never get a read on him.

Cue eye-roll...

I don't know how I could post more. I posted immediately before work, and again as soon as I got home. Maybe if you posted less, the dishes would be clean and dinner would be ready.

I might pay for that...

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:24 pm**

Zomberella12 wrote:I'm so glad that worked out so well!

I am voting pie because I like it better than cake.

Wrong again, cake is better.

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 9:57 am**

I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:43 am**

I really thought LC was hinting at the civvie role I know is by itself, he was the baddie role that was by itself.

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:45 am**

Long Con wrote:I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?

I do.

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:45 am**

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:49 am**

S~V~S wrote:

This

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:55 am**

Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?[/dead]

I do.

Can I see them please?

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:56 am**

Long Con wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?[/dead]

I do.
Can I see them please?

Rezz first.

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:56 am**

Well, I fucked that up nicely.

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:56 am**

Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?
I do.
Can I see them please?

Rezz first.[/quote]
No, seriously, do you have them or not?

The Syndicate

The Donner Party - Day 7

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Day 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5

Re: The Donner Party - Night 5