I just made a note in my A World Asunder development to include an Indy with a "you alone win if..." condition. Savage!
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:31 am
by Sloonei
Stupid babies need the most attention!
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:32 am
by Kylemii
so spooky
can you imagine how fucked that would have been if 112 had been around for longer? all the unexplained vote blocks? i mean i'm sure we'd figure it out eventually but wow
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:34 am
by tutuu
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:31 am
Stupid babies need the most attention!
Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:28 pm
Yeah...well it has to be pointed out that from the time Nutella "took the lead" straight through to now there is no indication that the leaders and the rest of sheep town have even been in sniffing range of a wolf.
@tutuu
I said that...which is nothing but factually accurate...and you, Radishes, and JPIC all have acted like I stole your lunch money ever since. And no doubt Nutella is mad at me too. Which is fine...I can be the bad guy.
what does that have anything to do with "people are claiming wolf pets they havent earned"? i see literally 0 connection, can u elaborate more on that?
as for this specific thing - our town win con is to kill the people who are opposed to us. 112 wasn't a neutral 3p role, she was an evil role. she wins by herself and makes everyone else lose. killing her was part of our win con, we couldn't have won the game without killing 112. your protest for killing 112 is misplaced
if you didn't like the direction where the game is going i think the appropriate thing to do is share your reads and ask people to listen to you
i perceived you as indirectly antagonizing me, hence my reaction to your posts
apart from day 3 this game has been a sweep
perhaps another part of the reason why i reacted in such a way to you is because you're convinced i'm mafia, right? well imagine if im town for 1 second. from my pov you are also nowhere near in range of sniffing a wolf yourself. so from my pov you are mocking me for something you are guilty of yourself
if you wanna keep scumreading me - fine, im not going to lose sleep over that, we are still going to win pretty easily. but ... im not sure if i can hold back my reactions if u attack people's performance again? above all because its simply inaccurate to attack it fmpov
My 'protest' isn't about the killing of 112. Dangerous 3P dead, yay!!!
But...you realize I am sure that any wolves roaming around treated the 112 wagon as a victory, right? I mean, until the flip from a wolf POV 112 was most likely a town mischop. And the read that chop was based on was just factually wrong...the kind of case wolves cheerfully follow along with when the whole town is just (from the wolf POV) running hard in the wrong direction.
So, yeah, the whole "sheep me for the glory, oh, missed, well glory anyway sheep me again" thing...missed me with that.
And when I said so the defensiveness against the facts was pretty hilarious to me. And wolfy, but hilarious.
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:25 am
oh shit 112 was actually dangerous
My thoughts exactly. That one word, "alone", in the role description... changes everything.
The only really interesting 3Ps are the ones who can just flat win the game.
Speaking of which...does this change anyone's perspective on Alison's claim that she can and will be happy to win with town?
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:47 am
by tutuu
Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:36 am
My 'protest' isn't about the killing of 112. Dangerous 3P dead, yay!!!
But...you realize I am sure that any wolves roaming around treated the 112 wagon as a victory, right? I mean, until the flip from a wolf POV 112 was most likely a town mischop. And the read that chop was based on was just factually wrong...the kind of case wolves cheerfully follow along with when the whole town is just (from the wolf POV) running hard in the wrong direction.
So, yeah, the whole "sheep me for the glory, oh, missed, well glory anyway sheep me again" thing...missed me with that.
And when I said so the defensiveness against the facts was pretty hilarious to me. And wolfy, but hilarious.
yes, from the wolves pov killing 112 was a victory
the case for why she was mafia and aligned with people ended up being wrong, sure
some people might have scumreead her for her posting independently, i think she dropped off and lost motivation to scumhunt compared to everyone else. but thats not the most relevant
i do believe that we could have used the fact that the wolves thought 112 was town as a tool to scumhunt, if the wolves didnt aleady all get mechanically outed, sure
"sheep me for the glory, oh, missed, well glory anyway sheep me again" - about this thing:
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:13 pm
She said "oh michelle too. my main poe is something like sloonei/michelle/hollowkatt/wilgy. been on and off on a couple others like ted"
So more or less in alignment with us. Hurray.
Yeah...well it has to be pointed out that from the time Nutella "took the lead" straight through to now there is no indication that the leaders and the rest of sheep town have even been in sniffing range of a wolf.
these 2 posts of yours
in between epi's posts and your two posts, not a single person did anything remotely close to "sheep me for the glory, oh, missed, well glory anyway sheep me again"
people celebrated 112's flip and were making some silly and fun post, long con shared nutella's reads which were shared respectfully, martin outed his ted peek, thats about it
@Timsup2nothin please quote me the post that sounds like "sheep me for the glory, oh, missed, well glory anyway sheep me again" that was made during day 5, and before you made those 2 posts of yours. if you can show me it i will concede the argument. can you please quote it to me
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:13 pm
She said "oh michelle too. my main poe is something like sloonei/michelle/hollowkatt/wilgy. been on and off on a couple others like ted"
in fact look at nutella's reads. she suspected sloonei before jack revealed the peek. i also see tedxtr's name. seems to me like she respectfully provided a reasonable PoE that included 5 names, 2 of which wolves.
this is the post where epi announces d5 start, wrong link
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:00 am
by tutuu
Syn wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:28 pmDyslexicon - claims to have protected nutella during n3 and to know that his action was successful. backs up that martin's claim is real, and that dizzy stopped the negative part of martins role, but the positive one succeeded (dizzy was alerted of this).
^^ don't see how this really works with Martin's results
as for this, dizzy appears to be my juliets' role from radiohead mafia - he seems to choose a target and protect from all negative utility except night kills (if the role is copy pasted)
martin is a jailkeeper, so it makes sense why they sort of found each other when they both landed on nutella n3 and they both received feedback (i woudlnt give them feedback thats rly townsided. but the entire game appears to be rly townsided so that's not even the biggest balancing issue)
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:00 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:28 am
I just made a note in my A World Asunder development to include an Indy with a "you alone win if..." condition. Savage!
Yeh survivors are boring.
Even 3P that can share a win with the town should usually want to knock out specific townies or have a power that hinders the town at the very least.
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:00 am
by Timsup2nothin
Tutuu, I walked in planning to make that post. I expected a little bit of poutiness at the reminder. I really didn't expect Radishes, and you, and JPIC to react like I was stealing from you and flip out. If you are all town it's fine, but it's wolfy in my opinion.
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:25 am
oh shit 112 was actually dangerous
My thoughts exactly. That one word, "alone", in the role description... changes everything.
The only really interesting 3Ps are the ones who can just flat win the game.
Speaking of which...does this change anyone's perspective on Alison's claim that she can and will be happy to win with town?
It's more likely, to me, that Epi would put in one deadly Indy and one independent one, that two deadly ones. I think Alison is no threat to any faction.
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:02 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:13 pm
She said "oh michelle too. my main poe is something like sloonei/michelle/hollowkatt/wilgy. been on and off on a couple others like ted"
Tell her I said hi!
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:03 am
by Long Con
*than
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:03 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Why are Tim and Tutuu fighting? Don’t fight.
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:04 am
by tutuu
i think that if alison wins by herself and makes everyone lose that can be uncomfortable from a design pov
they seem to have very similar conditions: 112 needs to have ppl hypnotized + herself > rest
alison needs people whom accepted her deal > those who dont, and i think living people 8 or less?
so, there is a situation where 112 and alison both achieve their win conditions at the exact same time
in that case, and if alison also wins by herself and makes everyone else lose - how do u resolve that? it seems annoying
alison winning with everyone makes more sense. although from 112's wording it would still imply alison has to lose, but that seems more like a design role PM writing wrinkle imprefection, i would bet that alison could still win with 112 assuming im correct here
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:13 pm
She said "oh michelle too. my main poe is something like sloonei/michelle/hollowkatt/wilgy. been on and off on a couple others like ted"
Tell her I said hi!
I did tell her, even as I also laughingly commented that she's still reading the thread.
My time is not well-spent delivering messages from here to nutella.
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:12 am
by tutuu
if we yeet sloonei before we yeet ted we are forfeiting the credibility of any n5 results
once again, because ted will gain the ability to be a self-targetting bus driver
any track results from long con on n5 cant be trusted
any roleblock result from MR cant be trusted
jailkeep result from martin cant be trusted
etc
yeeting ted before sloonei reduces the mechanical complexity of the game. we only have 1 more wolf to find. yeeting ted first will make our lives easier.
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:12 am
by tutuu
and jack's cop above all
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:17 am
by Jackofhearts2005
tutuu wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:04 am
i think that if alison wins by herself and makes everyone lose that can be uncomfortable from a design pov
they seem to have very similar conditions: 112 needs to have ppl hypnotized + herself > rest
alison needs people whom accepted her deal > those who dont, and i think living people 8 or less?
so, there is a situation where 112 and alison both achieve their win conditions at the exact same time
in that case, and if alison also wins by herself and makes everyone else lose - how do u resolve that? it seems annoying
alison winning with everyone makes more sense. although from 112's wording it would still imply alison has to lose, but that seems more like a design role PM writing wrinkle imprefection, i would bet that alison could still win with 112 assuming im correct here
Protip: don’t give me this much credit if I’m hosting.
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:45 am
I really want to do this galaxy brain play but I think it's maybe a little too galaxy brain
no such thing as too galaxy brain
go read the end of ziggy stardust mafia
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:51 am
by TonyStarkPrime
ziggy stardust mafia: the game where I developed a foolproof 100% win plan and then deviated from it myself and then confused everyone so much that they killed me
Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:34 am
also made is immortal and i have a nuke
Wait did you define this nuke?
joke; i was gonna like go into a whole thing like "epi sent me 20lbs of uranium in a suitcase and stole my drivers license and cell phone" but like for real i'm all out of mana
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:55 am
by Michelle
[VOTE:
Sloonei] aubergine
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:59 am
by Kylemii
once i completed my tasks dunya mailed me a paper bag filled with stop watches all counting down from 144 hours and a note that just says "run"
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 2:20 am
by Michelle
Caught up, but i will go to work.
If Jack moves his vote from Sloonei I will follow him.
Until the end of this day @Jackofhearts2005 has my vote, please @ me if/when you switch
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 2:46 am
by Sloonei
Re: Game of Champions 2020 [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 2:52 am
by Justplayingitcool
This must be how Tom Brady feels when he loses a superbowl