The Syndicate

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:17 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:58 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:49 pm

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:36 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:21 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:38 pm I just read through INH and I don't see any reason to call him a civ. There wasn't a lot there and he seems to be missing after saying he would try to be here more on day 2. Low performing INH in my experience = bad INH. I could see a vote there unless I'm missing some good reason not to.

alrighty now catching up, but literally popped into the most recent page to post about how I'm townreading Kara the most and wishing that JJJ was in one of his moody self-loathing moods instead of his SUUUUUUUUUPATOWN (PAY ATTENTION TO THE WORDS I SPEAK) moods. Not sure if/how that impacts his alignment, but he's certainly TALKING VERY LOUD, and making GRAND SWEEPING DECLARATIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT THE PROPER WAY TO PLAY MAFIA. It's like he tried posting differently on D1, got a negative response, then reverted back to his standard shtick.

Then, I see this stupid post by Juliets. Juliets, you're a lovely person, and a wonderful fixture in this community, but this is like the second game that you've pushed this weird forced "low-posting INH = bad INH" thing. It's dumb. I'm at a point in my life where my mafia time is limited. I have just finished another game, and started the sign up process for a game that I'm hosting. Yesterday was a holiday. This thread is, in standard Full Job fashion, too damn long. There's no way that I could be whatever the fuck you'd call a "high performing INH" right now. My level of activity is dependent on the length/density of the thread, the amount of games I'm concurrently playing/hosting, and the things happening in my life. Not what alignment I am. So, please kindly stop pushing this idea. It irks me.

Still have like 6 pages to get through. Will continually update with more commentary.

PS: Day 1's are, have been, and always will be random garbage-y crapshoots barring major fuckery.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:25 pm Okay, inh is town

Nutella is too quick to buy INH's response. I get that he's busy and has limited time for mafia. But when he does have time to post, his content still pings me as not fully genuine. Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but giving commentary on what's happening in the game, giving out fluffy/non reads, defending your own meta, and using the "busy" excuse, however true it may be, just makes me more inclined to suspect that you are scum.
So far INH's reads are Kara is town, JJJ looks a "tad suspicious," and Owner should be lynched.
I currently think Kara looks suspicious, and see no reason to town read him. Sort of agree with the JJJ thing, and disagree that Owner should be lynched.

well gee wilikers, I'm sorry that my opinions aren't enough for you Luna. Not sure where the hell you got the "fluffy non-reads" from. Scumreading JJJ, Owner, and Juliets currently. Townreading Kara, because her responses to folks attacking her sound hella genuine to me. Apologies that my ""busy" excuse" just makes you more inclined to scumread me. You're certainly entitled to your own opinion.

If you want to unduly dismiss everything I've said in this game and view it in the most negative possible light for no other substantive reason other than "I'm a skeptic," then, well, you can certainly choose to do that.

Okay, but how do you feel about nutella's quick acceptance that you must be town based on your response?

Not great in the context of her quick condemnation of me earlier. Then again, you were the one who started the whole condemnation conga, based on my dastardly practice of providing commentary on the thread.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:17 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:05 pm LC = scrotum ... I am not entirely sure what that means.

I've been called out as scum before but I gotta say, I've never been called out as scrotum before.

Must mean I'm a better mafia player than @Long Con

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:24 pm For real though Lunalee is hecka scum

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:30 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:24 pm For real though Lunalee is hecka scum

And I was feeling quite proud of my scum-hunting today.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:29 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:17 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:58 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:49 pm

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:36 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:21 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:38 pm I just read through INH and I don't see any reason to call him a civ. There wasn't a lot there and he seems to be missing after saying he would try to be here more on day 2. Low performing INH in my experience = bad INH. I could see a vote there unless I'm missing some good reason not to.

alrighty now catching up, but literally popped into the most recent page to post about how I'm townreading Kara the most and wishing that JJJ was in one of his moody self-loathing moods instead of his SUUUUUUUUUPATOWN (PAY ATTENTION TO THE WORDS I SPEAK) moods. Not sure if/how that impacts his alignment, but he's certainly TALKING VERY LOUD, and making GRAND SWEEPING DECLARATIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT THE PROPER WAY TO PLAY MAFIA. It's like he tried posting differently on D1, got a negative response, then reverted back to his standard shtick.

Then, I see this stupid post by Juliets. Juliets, you're a lovely person, and a wonderful fixture in this community, but this is like the second game that you've pushed this weird forced "low-posting INH = bad INH" thing. It's dumb. I'm at a point in my life where my mafia time is limited. I have just finished another game, and started the sign up process for a game that I'm hosting. Yesterday was a holiday. This thread is, in standard Full Job fashion, too damn long. There's no way that I could be whatever the fuck you'd call a "high performing INH" right now. My level of activity is dependent on the length/density of the thread, the amount of games I'm concurrently playing/hosting, and the things happening in my life. Not what alignment I am. So, please kindly stop pushing this idea. It irks me.

Still have like 6 pages to get through. Will continually update with more commentary.

PS: Day 1's are, have been, and always will be random garbage-y crapshoots barring major fuckery.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:25 pm Okay, inh is town

Nutella is too quick to buy INH's response. I get that he's busy and has limited time for mafia. But when he does have time to post, his content still pings me as not fully genuine. Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but giving commentary on what's happening in the game, giving out fluffy/non reads, defending your own meta, and using the "busy" excuse, however true it may be, just makes me more inclined to suspect that you are scum.
So far INH's reads are Kara is town, JJJ looks a "tad suspicious," and Owner should be lynched.
I currently think Kara looks suspicious, and see no reason to town read him. Sort of agree with the JJJ thing, and disagree that Owner should be lynched.

well gee wilikers, I'm sorry that my opinions aren't enough for you Luna. Not sure where the hell you got the "fluffy non-reads" from. Scumreading JJJ, Owner, and Juliets currently. Townreading Kara, because her responses to folks attacking her sound hella genuine to me. Apologies that my ""busy" excuse" just makes you more inclined to scumread me. You're certainly entitled to your own opinion.

If you want to unduly dismiss everything I've said in this game and view it in the most negative possible light for no other substantive reason other than "I'm a skeptic," then, well, you can certainly choose to do that.

Okay, but how do you feel about nutella's quick acceptance that you must be town based on your response?

Not great in the context of her quick condemnation of me earlier. Then again, you were the one who started the whole condemnation conga, based on my dastardly practice of providing commentary on the thread.

Hey, I've noticed scum make long but meaningless posts by providing commentary on the thread before, so when I saw a hint of that in your posts, it set off alarm bells. But lol, you don't feel great about nutella for her quick flop on you, but "I started it" by expressing my suspicions?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:35 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:30 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:24 pm For real though Lunalee is hecka scum

And I was feeling quite proud of my scum-hunting today.

Who do you suspect again?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:24 pm I'm also pretty damn sure that I already confronted Juliets about this in the last game we played together when she brought it up.

Bit scummy to be using it once again as an excuse to hop onto a bandwagon, with more or less the same wording/justification. Was she hoping I forgot I already debunked this?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:36 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:29 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:17 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:58 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:49 pm

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:36 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:21 pm

alrighty now catching up, but literally popped into the most recent page to post about how I'm townreading Kara the most and wishing that JJJ was in one of his moody self-loathing moods instead of his SUUUUUUUUUPATOWN (PAY ATTENTION TO THE WORDS I SPEAK) moods. Not sure if/how that impacts his alignment, but he's certainly TALKING VERY LOUD, and making GRAND SWEEPING DECLARATIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT THE PROPER WAY TO PLAY MAFIA. It's like he tried posting differently on D1, got a negative response, then reverted back to his standard shtick.

Then, I see this stupid post by Juliets. Juliets, you're a lovely person, and a wonderful fixture in this community, but this is like the second game that you've pushed this weird forced "low-posting INH = bad INH" thing. It's dumb. I'm at a point in my life where my mafia time is limited. I have just finished another game, and started the sign up process for a game that I'm hosting. Yesterday was a holiday. This thread is, in standard Full Job fashion, too damn long. There's no way that I could be whatever the fuck you'd call a "high performing INH" right now. My level of activity is dependent on the length/density of the thread, the amount of games I'm concurrently playing/hosting, and the things happening in my life. Not what alignment I am. So, please kindly stop pushing this idea. It irks me.

Still have like 6 pages to get through. Will continually update with more commentary.

PS: Day 1's are, have been, and always will be random garbage-y crapshoots barring major fuckery.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:25 pm Okay, inh is town

Nutella is too quick to buy INH's response. I get that he's busy and has limited time for mafia. But when he does have time to post, his content still pings me as not fully genuine. Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but giving commentary on what's happening in the game, giving out fluffy/non reads, defending your own meta, and using the "busy" excuse, however true it may be, just makes me more inclined to suspect that you are scum.
So far INH's reads are Kara is town, JJJ looks a "tad suspicious," and Owner should be lynched.
I currently think Kara looks suspicious, and see no reason to town read him. Sort of agree with the JJJ thing, and disagree that Owner should be lynched.

well gee wilikers, I'm sorry that my opinions aren't enough for you Luna. Not sure where the hell you got the "fluffy non-reads" from. Scumreading JJJ, Owner, and Juliets currently. Townreading Kara, because her responses to folks attacking her sound hella genuine to me. Apologies that my ""busy" excuse" just makes you more inclined to scumread me. You're certainly entitled to your own opinion.

If you want to unduly dismiss everything I've said in this game and view it in the most negative possible light for no other substantive reason other than "I'm a skeptic," then, well, you can certainly choose to do that.

Okay, but how do you feel about nutella's quick acceptance that you must be town based on your response?

Not great in the context of her quick condemnation of me earlier. Then again, you were the one who started the whole condemnation conga, based on my dastardly practice of providing commentary on the thread.

Hey, I've noticed scum make long but meaningless posts by providing commentary on the thread before, so when I saw a hint of that in your posts, it set off alarm bells. But lol, you don't feel great about nutella for her quick flop on you, but "I started it" by expressing my suspicions?

But that's not what I did, Luna.

Let me explain: you started the "condemnation conga" by jumping on JJJ's weak case against me with vague-ass reasoning. Then, Nutella jumps on board, then off board. Y'all both don't look great.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:36 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:35 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:30 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:24 pm For real though Lunalee is hecka scum

And I was feeling quite proud of my scum-hunting today.

Who do you suspect again?

INH. have you read any of my posts?

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:37 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:24 pm I'm also pretty damn sure that I already confronted Juliets about this in the last game we played together when she brought it up.

Bit scummy to be using it once again as an excuse to hop onto a bandwagon, with more or less the same wording/justification. Was she hoping I forgot I already debunked this?

I don't recall you debunking it but I do recall you were MIA for a good chunk of GOC where you were bad and also the game after that, I can't remember the game, where you were bad. So I'm wary of the behavior.I have no recollection of your telling me what you told me here. I meant no offense.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:38 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:36 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:29 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:17 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:58 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:49 pm

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:36 pm


Nutella is too quick to buy INH's response. I get that he's busy and has limited time for mafia. But when he does have time to post, his content still pings me as not fully genuine. Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but giving commentary on what's happening in the game, giving out fluffy/non reads, defending your own meta, and using the "busy" excuse, however true it may be, just makes me more inclined to suspect that you are scum.
So far INH's reads are Kara is town, JJJ looks a "tad suspicious," and Owner should be lynched.
I currently think Kara looks suspicious, and see no reason to town read him. Sort of agree with the JJJ thing, and disagree that Owner should be lynched.

well gee wilikers, I'm sorry that my opinions aren't enough for you Luna. Not sure where the hell you got the "fluffy non-reads" from. Scumreading JJJ, Owner, and Juliets currently. Townreading Kara, because her responses to folks attacking her sound hella genuine to me. Apologies that my ""busy" excuse" just makes you more inclined to scumread me. You're certainly entitled to your own opinion.

If you want to unduly dismiss everything I've said in this game and view it in the most negative possible light for no other substantive reason other than "I'm a skeptic," then, well, you can certainly choose to do that.

Okay, but how do you feel about nutella's quick acceptance that you must be town based on your response?

Not great in the context of her quick condemnation of me earlier. Then again, you were the one who started the whole condemnation conga, based on my dastardly practice of providing commentary on the thread.

Hey, I've noticed scum make long but meaningless posts by providing commentary on the thread before, so when I saw a hint of that in your posts, it set off alarm bells. But lol, you don't feel great about nutella for her quick flop on you, but "I started it" by expressing my suspicions?

But that's not what I did, Luna.

Let me explain: you started the "condemnation conga" by jumping on JJJ's weak case against me with vague-ass reasoning. Then, Nutella jumps on board, then off board. Y'all both don't look great.

Good thing I don't care too much about how I look. I added on to JJJ's case on you because I saw scummy behavior. I didn't just copy it and go, "yeah, I buy it."

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:37 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:24 pm I'm also pretty damn sure that I already confronted Juliets about this in the last game we played together when she brought it up.

Bit scummy to be using it once again as an excuse to hop onto a bandwagon, with more or less the same wording/justification. Was she hoping I forgot I already debunked this?

I don't recall you debunking it but I do recall you were MIA for a good chunk of GOC where you were bad and also the game after that, I can't remember the game, where you were bad. So I'm wary of the behavior.I have no recollection of your telling me what you told me here. I meant no offense.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:41 pm I think I'm going to use INH's strategy of just suspecting people who suspect me. That sounds like a really easy way to play this game.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:41 pm I think I'm going to use INH's strategy of just suspecting people who suspect me. That sounds like a really easy way to play this game.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:41 pm I like his Milo Garret avatar, though.

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:29 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:17 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:05 pm LC = scrotum ... I am not entirely sure what that means.

I've been called out as scum before but I gotta say, I've never been called out as scrotum before.

Must mean I'm a better mafia player than @Long Con

I'm just a big ol' ballsack, yup. But I'm a Civ ballsack.

sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:51 pm too many balls, i propose more triangles

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:42 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:37 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:24 pm I'm also pretty damn sure that I already confronted Juliets about this in the last game we played together when she brought it up.

Bit scummy to be using it once again as an excuse to hop onto a bandwagon, with more or less the same wording/justification. Was she hoping I forgot I already debunked this?

I don't recall you debunking it but I do recall you were MIA for a good chunk of GOC where you were bad and also the game after that, I can't remember the game, where you were bad. So I'm wary of the behavior.I have no recollection of your telling me what you told me here. I meant no offense.

Activity level is just an OT idea to me, so the idea that someone's bringing it into the game and attempting to use it against me kinda pisses me off. Do you want me to find games where I was a low poster and civilian just to get this idea solidified in your mind?

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:46 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:41 pm I think I'm going to use INH's strategy of just suspecting people who suspect me. That sounds like a really easy way to play this game.

Then why are you voting me?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:06 pm The Jack and Mac attack is back. Leggoooo.

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:03 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:54 am

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:28 amKylemii Nice to be playing with you again! We’ve never quite connected in any game we’ve played previously so this might be the first. Tell me, what do you think of Quin?

hello!

quin is taking a more active approach to this game than I'm used to seeing him take, in the sort of jabby punch way that he does, which on the surface level looks good to me.

wbu?

I’d say that is a remarkably accurate assessment of his contributions so far. I’d be more cautious than you however in jumping to any conclusion about that suggesting that he is ‘good’. Having said that, I’m not sure that my meta/tonal reads even apply here anymore - as I alluded to this morning, things seem very different here now than they were when I used to play. Take Epi for example - I don’t remember him ever being so low key as he appears this game. I was thinking that looked a little out of the ordinary but maybe he’s changed his approach?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:58 pm Who is bad Juliets?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:54 am Testing out new secret code.

Bogarts Only Obliviate Basilisks Slytherin

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:14 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:58 pm Who is bad Juliets?

I am striking out on finding people that are bad. It seems like if I suspect someone they just turn around and say I'm bad - that used to be unacceptable (Bullz did not do that to his credit). I am about to read Luna, timmer, and Soneji because I haven't paid much attention to two of them (timmer and Sonji , and I can't remember all the positions Luna has taken. I'll let you know when I find someone.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:28 pm I find it funny when people say things like "Bullzeye is getting set up for a lazy lynch" or "this wagon feels too easy" more than 24 hours out from the actual lynch. Heaps scrote behaviours.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:09 pm

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:03 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:54 am

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:28 amKylemii Nice to be playing with you again! We’ve never quite connected in any game we’ve played previously so this might be the first. Tell me, what do you think of Quin?

hello!

quin is taking a more active approach to this game than I'm used to seeing him take, in the sort of jabby punch way that he does, which on the surface level looks good to me.

wbu?

I’d say that is a remarkably accurate assessment of his contributions so far. I’d be more cautious than you however in jumping to any conclusion about that suggesting that he is ‘good’. Having said that, I’m not sure that my meta/tonal reads even apply here anymore - as I alluded to this morning, things seem very different here now than they were when I used to play. Take Epi for example - I don’t remember him ever being so low key as he appears this game. I was thinking that looked a little out of the ordinary but maybe he’s changed his approach?

It's called "work is a cluster." Over 25 teachers out for the second day in a row.

While the police and principal were investigating a freshman who apparently had weed on him, a group of seniors tried to hijack and race their golf carts.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:40 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:37 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:24 pm I'm also pretty damn sure that I already confronted Juliets about this in the last game we played together when she brought it up.

Bit scummy to be using it once again as an excuse to hop onto a bandwagon, with more or less the same wording/justification. Was she hoping I forgot I already debunked this?

I don't recall you debunking it but I do recall you were MIA for a good chunk of GOC where you were bad and also the game after that, I can't remember the game, where you were bad. So I'm wary of the behavior.I have no recollection of your telling me what you told me here. I meant no offense.

Outpost 31?

Chickachicka 123?

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:35 pm MacDougall

Spoiler: show

is mafia. Discuss.

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:34 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:14 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:58 pm Who is bad Juliets?

I am striking out on finding people that are bad. It seems like if I suspect someone they just turn around and say I'm bad - that used to be unacceptable (Bullz did not do that to his credit). I am about to read Luna, timmer, and Soneji because I haven't paid much attention to two of them (timmer and Sonji , and I can't remember all the positions Luna has taken. I'll let you know when I find someone.

Hey Jules, I had a look at Lunas posts last night, only some of them are in my iso, the ones I thought were relevant, but if you're looking at Luna, feel free to browse then.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:15 pm I was just waiting for reassurance so I could [VOTE: Glor] aubergine

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 8:00 pm I am become the Sauciest Boi. Gaze upon my visage and beware.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 7:32 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:15 pm I was just waiting for reassurance so I could [VOTE: Glor] aubergine

Any specific reason other than he hasn't done anything a scum wouldn't do?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 8:29 pm I’m torn on INH. The tone of his defenses is decent, but the content is meh.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 8:31 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 8:29 pm I’m torn on INH. The tone of his defenses is decent, but the content is meh.

You're the GTH man. Take a side.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 8:30 pm How am I supposed to play Mafia when there’s an incredibly exciting 49ers/Raiders matchup on prime time?

karavalenge wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 12:53 am

Spoiler: show

Who is ready to learn?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:03 pm I apologize if this has been litigated and I missed it (if so please point it out) but:

1. In Firefly Mafia, Owner scum read me in part based on a "Picture Tell" in which she said I subconciously associated with Negan and Thanos, two bad characters. Therefore I must be bad.

2. In this game, Owner scum read Kara based on a picture tell of Kara posting a Hagrid-themed comic strip. Hagrid is a good guy.



My point being, if in Firefly Owner (civ) Genuinely suspected me (civ) for being Negan/Thanos (bad dudes) that's fine because as wrong as it was, it tracks and makes sense if you accept the "Picture Tell" premise. If you accept that same premise and apply it to her Kara suspicion, its fake. She fabricated a reason to suspect Kara and the only reason to do that is if you're bad and need people to suspect.

Slam. Dunk.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:43 pm Y'all keep talking about Owner and this picture tell thing, and referencing Firefly without directly speaking to whatever connection may exist. So I allowed myself to be myself at least long enough to do your homework for you.

Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:06 pm I didn't say mafia; I said scum. And for those wondering usually, I count 3p as scum. But do you guys ever get friendly 3p over here?

Tell 1: The Picture/Gif Tell (can also sometimes be called the music tell, as I use it on both pictures and music. Yes, I have in fact caught scum this way before.

DharmaHelper has used multiple Negan pictures. Subconsciously, I feel like people post pictures of villains see themselves as being the bad guys themselves. I actually did not finish watching The Walking Dead. I didn't really like Negan. Maybe if I gave him another shot he would turn out to be an alright guy, but my first impression of him made me stop watching the show. So at first, I didn't really think all too much about the Negan pictures as is it really right for me to judge Negan as I didn't take time to get to know him? But then DharmaHelper also posted a picture of Thanos. So either personally, DharmaHelper can easily relate himself to those 2 characters or subconsciously he's bad so he posts pictures of villains.

This post comes from Firefly. Do not interpret it as being a post from Hogwarts, because it is from Firefly. K.

The two highlighted portions are of interest. The picture tell is stated in somewhat general terms first, and then Owner expands to discuss the nature of DH's villanous pictures as being a potential indicator of trouble. It is unclear from this whether the picture tell as Owner knows it requires villanous content to work or if this example simply featured villanous images which fed into the story Owner developed in her read of DH.

@Owner of a Lonely Heart, does the picture tell require villains to function? You said in Firefly that you've caught scum this way before -- can you remember an example game, and on what site[mention]Owner of a[mention]Owner of a Lonely Heart[/mention]

It does not require villains to function. Kara's picture tell is based off of Hagrid's actions or portrayal of betrayal. My 2nd forum game ever a guy posted batman and joker gifs as much as DH posts Negan. I was cop and checked him; he happened to be scum. I might have gotten lucky that time. In the Angels of Ulennia game that I mentioned earlier that both myself and Soneji played in, I caught someone as scum based off of them posting the Kill la Kill Ragyo Kiryuin theme. Soneji died early that game, so probably won't remember it as it wasn't directly related to him as we were both indies that game.

Unfortunately, I have a family emergency. I ask for a replacement. @Dragon D Luffy @duyna

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 8:06 pm My thoughts on Bullz - I already didn't feel great about his D1 activity and his explanation of it makes me feel worse about it (The game starts D1 fam so play starts D1) that being said The zeroing in on him RE: Nova strikes me as false. I feel like there is an element within that mob that isn't genuine. I'll have to dig into that tomorrow.