The Syndicate

Boogs wrote:I mentioned the danger, and you guys cared less. Now, like I suggested, if one player lands they pay them a ton of cash which they have power to buy any card for bid and powers. Great job listening to my suggestion since "I am so insane with my ideas " in mafia.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Long Con wrote:my eye is definitely back on TH, and I haven't forgotten my early theory about him trusting Epig.

^^^This one in particular. For someone who once suspected Epi and now trusts him, why does he continue to push the coin on someone who did trust Epi?

S~V~S wrote:EBWoP~ and you are not the only person, or even the first, to warn of this danger. Either we all agreed to not search (which would be like herding cats, getting all of us to agree on ANYTHING) or this would become an issue eventually. But we still have to get rid of the baddies even if teams ARE forming.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

juliets wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:We need a highly trained accountant to go through LC and Epi's books and see if they could even afford to purchase that many houses.





MovingPictures07.... I summon thee!!!!!

Yes, as an unhighly trained non-accountant I'm having a hard time seeing how Epi could purchase three houses, even if he has a high rent total. I haven't looked at LC yet.

It looks like there are two groups that have formed, so I guess Epi and LC could be in the house-less group, meaning there is another richer group somewhere.

Linki: I'll return the penny to hear your thoughts.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:EBWoP~ and you are not the only person, or even the first, to warn of this danger. Either we all agreed to not search (which would be like herding cats, getting all of us to agree on ANYTHING) or this would become an issue eventually. But we still have to get rid of the baddies even if teams ARE forming.

Sooo, since we pretty much agreed to search, and groups have formed and houses are cropping up, we should just let them have our money?

We are on a new day now, and we have multiple leads. Whichever direction people decide to go will be very telling.

Linki: So how do you justify your trust in him now, LC?

Epignosis wrote:First, I am not in BTSC with Long Con. He implied that he searched me Night 1, and I called him out on that.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:First, I am not in BTSC with Long Con. He implied that he searched me Night 1, and I called him out on that.

When did all this happen? I don't remember implying that, or being called out on it.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:EBWoP~ and you are not the only person, or even the first, to warn of this danger. Either we all agreed to not search (which would be like herding cats, getting all of us to agree on ANYTHING) or this would become an issue eventually. But we still have to get rid of the baddies even if teams ARE forming.

Sooo, since we pretty much agreed to search, and groups have formed and houses are cropping up, we should just let them have our money?

We are on a new day now, and we have multiple leads. Whichever direction people decide to go will be very telling.

Linki: So how do you justify your trust in him now, LC?

Long Con wrote:How is that an implication that I searched you on Night 1?

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:RIP S~V~S. I would have probably checked you next, hope you weren't in my colour-group.

Boo, are people allowed to publicize who they checked at night? Like, could I say "Yo Epig, I checked you last night and we didn't sync up, too bad!", for example?

For example indeed!

Long Con wrote:Blooper said no one can be thought of as trustworthy that early in the game, and so I brought up the two people who expressed trust in you as a point of interest. Maybe you can explain from your point of view how that translates into "I searched Epig night 1", but I don't get your angle here.

You responded by saying even Railroads can't vouch for each other due to lack of BTSC, but again, how is that "calling me out for implying I searched you"?

What I read in those posts and what you are saying happened in them are not even remotely the same thing.

thellama73 wrote:Fingersplints, you sly-boots. I'm going to use my rob to rob you.
$75 for the rob

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:What's happened to MP?

And where's keys? He seems to have disappeared after the Day 1 union discussion. I miss him.

Is keys a she?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:boo, when do the small random powers go out to players?

I bet I didn't get one...

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Or, there's this.

boo wrote:Night 1 Event: I have a list of 24 powers currently (there are some more that are locked up because I'm RNGing everything and don't want them to be able to get listed yet). You may PM a power description you think is one of the 24 that is not 1 of the three already confirmed (or protect/roleblock), and if you're right, you will get 1 extra vote you may send in during any lynch. If you submit one that is not on the list but I like enough to put onto the list, you get 2 any time votes.

And...he's been auctioning them off. Publicly. Lets clarify this point.

@boo~ Are these 24 powers just being given out behind the scenes, or are they the ones being auctioned?

S~V~S wrote:@boo~ Was this a one use protection, or is it a nightly/daily power? It reads like a one time use to me, but better safe than sorry, because it really could be read either way I guess.

3rd) Protect (Can be used to protect a person of your choice at night if you pick during a day, and remove a person of your choice from being on the lynch poll if used at night) - $50 start

If it is a one time use, then I doubt TH would have used it at this point.

Turnip Head wrote:It's also possible that BWT gave his auction win item to his partner, and THAT person has the Electric Company.

@boo: If you have the highest bid on a power, but you're lynched the same Day that the auction ends, do you still win the auction?

juliets wrote:boo: if you have found your partners can one of your partners build a house(s) on your property OR give you the money to build a house(s) on your property?

Boogs wrote:I would love to vote TH after the argument Llama showed, however with me not having time to keep up today, I will vote Hedge for a chance on her card.

Long Con wrote:I took llama's comment to bea to mean "Bea gets points for posting 11 times in a row" whereas I think bea took it to mean "I'm pointing at bea, pointing out a flagrant undecuple-poster!" At least, I think that's what happened, looks like it was taken the wrong way?

I also believe I recall one of the rules in bidding is that you have to beat the last person's bid by what you bid, possible $200 bonus notwithstanding. So Turnip Head would have had to bid $11 in order to beat Lorab's $205.

Turnip Head may be bad, but I don't believe he won the auction for Electric Company and lied about it... so it's not really valid to suspect him for that. Llama's case feels solid and doesn't include the auction result - my eye is definitely back on TH, and I haven't forgotten my early theory about him trusting Epig.

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

bea wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Points to bea for posting 11 times in a row.

$10 on rob.

what - I'm just trying to catsup as fast as I can - and this vote ends sat?? fuck's sake. I'll keep doing my best to keep reading

Not sure why you had to shut her down

I see that I was misunderstood. The word "points" in my post was meant to convey the concept of awarding points for an achievement. "You win! Point to you!"

I did not mean "indicating with the index finger in an accusatory manner."

I apologize for the miscommunication.

Turnip Head wrote:No... lol

Mongoose got replaced. I think it was Bea.

keys56000000000 wrote:$400 on the rob

Boogs wrote:Wr are in Disney for Bf's birthday! Yay! So checking in while we wait in line.
I would love to vote TH after the argument Llama showed, however with me not having time to keep up today, I will vote Hedge for a chance on her card.

keys56000000000 wrote:What are the odds that one of them is Long Con?