Re: Monkey Island [DAY 4]
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 1:57 am
I have patience.
Yes, let's.DrWilgy wrote:If Niju flips bad, let's lynch Snow Dog.
Policy self-lynch out of fatigue or admission of guilt?Snow Dog wrote:Yes, let's.DrWilgy wrote:If Niju flips bad, let's lynch Snow Dog.
Pretty much *twiddles thumbs*Snow Dog wrote:
I see the point being made here, don't really buy into it as a slip.motel room wrote:Speaking ofHow do you know MP was town?Soneji wrote:Zebra has had a very narrow focus this game, without giving anything to backup these reads and trolling/harassing people. His aim seems to be to distract, which as LC noted he wasn't doing d1 when the two main suspects were MP and motel room, both town.
Liked this post though.motel room wrote:fwiw, there is a reasonable reason I'd accept there but soneji was in the thread for a little while after I posted that and has now gone. For posterity.
Pretty quick to pull that trigger. Also, what?Vompatti wrote:I voted for Soneji for making false claims and for voting for a confirmed civilian.
I've generally found that people who believe that there is only one possible thing that can happen in any given situation are not right often.a2thezebra wrote:MP gave me a soft baddie read. If he was civ, he would have given me a hard baddie read at the time. He was disingenuous and bad.Scotty wrote:To both of you: why.a2thezebra wrote:I do too.DrWilgy wrote:Y'know what...
I still think mp was bad.
And how does that help you sort things out right now?
Anything is possible, but I focus my convictions on what's plausible.Nachomamma8 wrote:I've generally found that people who believe that there is only one possible thing that can happen in any given situation are not right often.a2thezebra wrote:MP gave me a soft baddie read. If he was civ, he would have given me a hard baddie read at the time. He was disingenuous and bad.Scotty wrote:To both of you: why.a2thezebra wrote:I do too.DrWilgy wrote:Y'know what...
I still think mp was bad.
And how does that help you sort things out right now?
Why did you decide to vote for Boomslang here? I don't remember him being one of the targets that you liked to talk about the most, and I'd expect me pushing his lynch to dampen your enthusiasm a bit.Scotty wrote:Ok folks's, I've got a lot to do in prep for thanksgiving (happy turkey day, US of A!) including prepping my first tofurkey (wtf). I'm sated for now with soneji's response to the "MP is civ" thing. I think I'd rather vote Boom today, so I'll go ahead and do that. Godspeed, brave adventurers!
boom
I could still vote for sig.sig wrote:Is there a case on Boomslang? I'm reading through haven't seen one yet. I don't like either Zerba's or Boom's wagon right now.
Also Quin voted for me and then left a good vote, which avoids all attention and allows him to not get involved in either wagon.
I think Quin is mafia, I could see myself voting there today.
I don't really understand your case on MM; him voting Black Rock for not doing anything while saying that he wasn't doing anything was the crux of your case against him, correct? Don't you think there was a considerable difference between MM's play and Black Rock's?Scotty wrote:i feel like zebras are far less quarrelsome in the savannah. Zebras wrestling with dogs and...whatever the hell Mac's avatar is...unheard of!MacDougall wrote:I would like to point out that I am not also Snow Dog.
Also, GTH who would you vote for right now?
mac, what is your avatar?
I want to vote MM. Anyone want to join me?
yeah I don't think *twiddles thumbs* comes from town who has just been lynched.DrWilgy wrote:Niju's post poll ending post fills me with confidence.
Why is me falling off in activity suspicious? Do you generally find it pretty common that people who have the ability to post a lot as mafia post a lot Day 1 and then are completely unable to post later in the game? Why would I struggle posting when I could scumhunt legitimately?Soneji wrote:Seems they have gone more the route of letting the activity slow down to a crawl rather than try to take the lead now that most of the top level/most active players are dead. The players I was watching this phase were Long Con and Nacho. As I pointed out in my ISO of Long Con, he backed off of Wilgy due to Nacho's insistence that Wilgy's role PM antics weren't scum indicative. This was odd to me considering LC going after MP for supposed buddying but then allowing someone he has no reason to trust to sway his view on another player, rather than suspecting them of buddying/defending a scummate. That Nacho has fallen off the face of the earth in activity after d1 is a big red flag.
My vote will be on LC or Nacho today.
And THESE are your top two suspects?Soneji wrote:Seems they have gone more the route of letting the activity slow down to a crawl rather than try to take the lead now that most of the top level/most active players are dead. The players I was watching this phase were Long Con and Nacho. As I pointed out in my ISO of Long Con, he backed off of Wilgy due to Nacho's insistence that Wilgy's role PM antics weren't scum indicative. This was odd to me considering LC going after MP for supposed buddying but then allowing someone he has no reason to trust to sway his view on another player, rather than suspecting them of buddying/defending a scummate. That Nacho has fallen off the face of the earth in activity after d1 is a big red flag.
My vote will be on LC or Nacho today.
sig being on the "DO NOT LYNCH" list despite you scumreading him is a sad sad thinga2thezebra wrote:I fully support the lynch of anyone that isn't DrWilgy, Metalmarsh89, motel room 2.0, sig, Vompatti, and myself.
You judge harshly. I twiddle my thumbs in Monday-after-Thanksgiving deadness. Shall I scream in pain and agony instead for your amusement?Nachomamma8 wrote:yeah I don't think *twiddles thumbs* comes from town who has just been lynched.DrWilgy wrote:Niju's post poll ending post fills me with confidence.
I'm putting my money on you being civ.nijuukyugou wrote:You judge harshly. I twiddle my thumbs in Monday-after-Thanksgiving deadness. Shall I scream in pain and agony instead for your amusement?Nachomamma8 wrote:yeah I don't think *twiddles thumbs* comes from town who has just been lynched.DrWilgy wrote:Niju's post poll ending post fills me with confidence.
I made it clear that I have had and continue to have a town read of sig. You can say my reasoning is weak but I have not once read him as scum.Nachomamma8 wrote:sig being on the "DO NOT LYNCH" list despite you scumreading him is a sad sad thinga2thezebra wrote:I fully support the lynch of anyone that isn't DrWilgy, Metalmarsh89, motel room 2.0, sig, Vompatti, and myself.
You could, for it would amuse me.nijuukyugou wrote:You judge harshly. I twiddle my thumbs in Monday-after-Thanksgiving deadness. Shall I scream in pain and agony instead for your amusement?Nachomamma8 wrote:yeah I don't think *twiddles thumbs* comes from town who has just been lynched.DrWilgy wrote:Niju's post poll ending post fills me with confidence.
I might be missing out on your reasoning; from my memory, it was that you were scumreading him but you're usually wrong on him and thus you think he is town.a2thezebra wrote:I made it clear that I have had and continue to have a town read of sig. You can say my reasoning is weak but I have not once read him as scum.Nachomamma8 wrote:sig being on the "DO NOT LYNCH" list despite you scumreading him is a sad sad thinga2thezebra wrote:I fully support the lynch of anyone that isn't DrWilgy, Metalmarsh89, motel room 2.0, sig, Vompatti, and myself.
I'm sorry. I don't know why you were lynched either, as I missed yet another day.nijuukyugou wrote:![]()
![]()
I have four votes for no good reason that I saw. I said my defense. It did nothing. I'm rather annoyed that it happened this way, actually. However, I see no reason to react ridiculously, as it changes nothing.
If I am right and you are civ, I fear that the mafia has a good grip on this game. I wanted to say something els and completely forgotten it.nijuukyugou wrote:![]()
![]()
I have four votes for no good reason that I saw. I said my defense. It did nothing. I'm rather annoyed that it happened this way, actually. However, I see no reason to react ridiculously, as it changes nothing.
Correct, so I'm not scumreading him. I'm going against my gut because the empirical evidence is overwhelmingly against it in sig's case.Nachomamma8 wrote:I might be missing out on your reasoning; from my memory, it was that you were scumreading him but you're usually wrong on him and thus you think he is town.a2thezebra wrote:I made it clear that I have had and continue to have a town read of sig. You can say my reasoning is weak but I have not once read him as scum.Nachomamma8 wrote:sig being on the "DO NOT LYNCH" list despite you scumreading him is a sad sad thinga2thezebra wrote:I fully support the lynch of anyone that isn't DrWilgy, Metalmarsh89, motel room 2.0, sig, Vompatti, and myself.
It may have been Epignosis' ISO that started the ball rolling.Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm sorry. I don't know why you were lynched either, as I missed yet another day.nijuukyugou wrote:![]()
![]()
I have four votes for no good reason that I saw. I said my defense. It did nothing. I'm rather annoyed that it happened this way, actually. However, I see no reason to react ridiculously, as it changes nothing.
Who are your suspects? Who do you want us to kill in your name?
And the reason why I'm asking for guidance from you is because, if you are town, town's next top suspect seems to be Zebra which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence. This means that any words you have as a soon to be confirmed town could be the difference between getting town back on track versus eating ourselves alive.nijuukyugou wrote:![]()
![]()
I have four votes for no good reason that I saw. I said my defense. It did nothing. I'm rather annoyed that it happened this way, actually. However, I see no reason to react ridiculously, as it changes nothing.
If nijuu is town, this is what she would be doing right now.Nachomamma8 wrote:You could, for it would amuse me.nijuukyugou wrote:You judge harshly. I twiddle my thumbs in Monday-after-Thanksgiving deadness. Shall I scream in pain and agony instead for your amusement?Nachomamma8 wrote:yeah I don't think *twiddles thumbs* comes from town who has just been lynched.DrWilgy wrote:Niju's post poll ending post fills me with confidence.
Or, you could give me a recap of your last significant suspects before you die so that we have something to pursue in order to avenge you if you flip town. What do you think of sig and Sonejii?
And hence why I said that it made me sad that you were scumreading him and still townreading him.a2thezebra wrote:Correct, so I'm not scumreading him. I'm going against my gut because the empirical evidence is overwhelmingly against it in sig's case.Nachomamma8 wrote:I might be missing out on your reasoning; from my memory, it was that you were scumreading him but you're usually wrong on him and thus you think he is town.a2thezebra wrote:I made it clear that I have had and continue to have a town read of sig. You can say my reasoning is weak but I have not once read him as scum.Nachomamma8 wrote:sig being on the "DO NOT LYNCH" list despite you scumreading him is a sad sad thinga2thezebra wrote:I fully support the lynch of anyone that isn't DrWilgy, Metalmarsh89, motel room 2.0, sig, Vompatti, and myself.
I agree. Who are your other suspects? What are we going to do to absolutely ruin their position?Snow Dog wrote:If I am right and you are civ, I fear that the mafia has a good grip on this game. I wanted to say something els and completely forgotten it.nijuukyugou wrote:![]()
![]()
I have four votes for no good reason that I saw. I said my defense. It did nothing. I'm rather annoyed that it happened this way, actually. However, I see no reason to react ridiculously, as it changes nothing.
No, it's not. Because both my heart's reasons and your head's reasons for reading sig as bad are adjacent to his civ behavior.Nachomamma8 wrote:And hence why I said that it made me sad that you were scumreading him and still townreading him.a2thezebra wrote:Correct, so I'm not scumreading him. I'm going against my gut because the empirical evidence is overwhelmingly against it in sig's case.Nachomamma8 wrote:I might be missing out on your reasoning; from my memory, it was that you were scumreading him but you're usually wrong on him and thus you think he is town.a2thezebra wrote:I made it clear that I have had and continue to have a town read of sig. You can say my reasoning is weak but I have not once read him as scum.Nachomamma8 wrote:sig being on the "DO NOT LYNCH" list despite you scumreading him is a sad sad thinga2thezebra wrote:I fully support the lynch of anyone that isn't DrWilgy, Metalmarsh89, motel room 2.0, sig, Vompatti, and myself.
Your correct that your conclusion is that sig is town, but that doesn't change the fact that your heart is in the right place; that's why I am sad.
I don't know. Lynches are strange. From nowhere it seems a lynch train appears and previous suspects are forgotten. Maybe we need to go back to the beginning. It is possible that one civ (threepwood) already knows for certain who some civs are. Unless of course Threepwood is a low poster.Nachomamma8 wrote:I agree. Who are your other suspects? What are we going to do to absolutely ruin their position?Snow Dog wrote:If I am right and you are civ, I fear that the mafia has a good grip on this game. I wanted to say something els and completely forgotten it.nijuukyugou wrote:![]()
![]()
I have four votes for no good reason that I saw. I said my defense. It did nothing. I'm rather annoyed that it happened this way, actually. However, I see no reason to react ridiculously, as it changes nothing.
I'm confused; what are you saying "no it's not" in reference to?a2thezebra wrote:No, it's not. Because both my heart's reasons and your head's reasons for reading sig as bad are adjacent to his civ behavior.Nachomamma8 wrote:And hence why I said that it made me sad that you were scumreading him and still townreading him.a2thezebra wrote:Correct, so I'm not scumreading him. I'm going against my gut because the empirical evidence is overwhelmingly against it in sig's case.Nachomamma8 wrote:I might be missing out on your reasoning; from my memory, it was that you were scumreading him but you're usually wrong on him and thus you think he is town.a2thezebra wrote:I made it clear that I have had and continue to have a town read of sig. You can say my reasoning is weak but I have not once read him as scum.Nachomamma8 wrote:sig being on the "DO NOT LYNCH" list despite you scumreading him is a sad sad thinga2thezebra wrote:I fully support the lynch of anyone that isn't DrWilgy, Metalmarsh89, motel room 2.0, sig, Vompatti, and myself.
Your correct that your conclusion is that sig is town, but that doesn't change the fact that your heart is in the right place; that's why I am sad.
Yes, I've been giving Scotty a pass because he seems helpful and has a very civ demeanour. I have been caught out that way before though.Nachomamma8 wrote:And as a point against the ever-lurking Soneji, I find that he's putting down a vote that obviously isn't going anywhere today (unless he honestly believes that "Nacho is lurking now and wasn't always lurking!" is gonna fly, which I doubt) is a move coming from mafia that's confident in their overall position; Scotty's EoD bothers me for a similar reason, but he at least seems earnest in his scumhunting (although the "oops I should look for Cannibals" bothers the shit out of me).
Depends. If the person is known to generally make well-reasoned votes, they can't really get away with using "gut" as a reason often. If they are not, then yes, but that also means that said player is also likely to make gut votes as town. In this game, the people I'm expecting to rely on "gut" often are probably: Wilgy, Vompatti, Zebra, MM; Golden and MP, when talking about them, use words like "random" or "WIFOM-laden" and other people agree, which means that they aren't as likely to scumhunt in the way that you're expecting them to.Snow Dog wrote:Isn't gut just an easy way for mafia to vote someone?
I like you. Your views are nuanced and you're willing and able to dismantle generalizations.Nachomamma8 wrote:Depends. If the person is known to generally make well-reasoned votes, they can't really get away with using "gut" as a reason often. If they are not, then yes, but that also means that said player is also likely to make gut votes as town. In this game, the people I'm expecting to rely on "gut" often are probably: Wilgy, Vompatti, Zebra, MM; Golden and MP, when talking about them, use words like "random" or "WIFOM-laden" and other people agree, which means that they aren't as likely to scumhunt in the way that you're expecting them to.Snow Dog wrote:Isn't gut just an easy way for mafia to vote someone?