Page 29 of 76
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
by Golden
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:04 pm
Also epi - provide an example of what you claim (mafia claim independent in situations like this). It would never have even occurred to me, but I also disagree, because if anything inh didn't 'claim' indy but 'slip' indy.
I'm not providing a thing. I have no interest. I've seen it. You don't believe me? Fine.
A moment ago you decided I
knew INH was doing this. Now you seem comfortable that I 'don't believe you'.
There's not a whole lot of integrity to your current thought processes.
On the other hand, I have to admit that I don't understand why you'd raise inh's apparent 'claim' at all if you were bad. You'd have been better off just letting things play out.
But I don't understand at all why you'd lynch both one after the other on the basis that sig would be scum if you think INH is covering for being scum.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
by Epignosis
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:10 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm
To those of you not named Epignosis or Golden.
If one of them is bad, who is it?
Golden.
If I'm bad Quin is bad.
You can lie detect that motherfucker to the bank.
No you can't.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
by ColinIsCool
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm
To those of you not named Epignosis or Golden.
If one of them is bad, who is it?
Epignosis.
Usually I am suspicious of him from the get-go and he’s always town. I feel at ease with him right now so I’m a little concerned.
I still haven’t seen him play as scum yet either so I can’t make a super informed call here but I feel better calling Golden town than I do scum.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
by Kylemii
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pmIf I'm bad Quin is bad.
tell me why
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
by Epignosis
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:16 pm
Epignosis are you actually a doctor or were you talking shit? Because there's a bit of an elephant in the room here given Scotty seems to be counter claiming.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
by MacDougall
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:04 pm
Also epi - provide an example of what you claim (mafia claim independent in situations like this). It would never have even occurred to me, but I also disagree, because if anything inh didn't 'claim' indy but 'slip' indy.
I'm not providing a thing. I have no interest. I've seen it. You don't believe me? Fine.
A moment ago you decided I
knew INH was doing this. Now you seem comfortable that I 'don't believe you'.
There's not a whole lot of integrity to your current thought processes.
On the other hand, I have to admit that I don't understand why you'd raise inh's apparent 'claim' at all if you were bad. You'd have been better off just letting things play out.
But I don't understand at all why you'd lynch both one after the other on the basis that sig would be scum if you think INH is covering for being scum.
You are Jaying on Epi pretty hard right now.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
by ColinIsCool
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:15 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Am I wrong to think INH is not claiming or slipping indie in that post? I interpreted it as “I could tell you my role but then I’d be a goner” but I can’t figure out what exactly he meant.
He specifically said "I'm not a threat to the townies".
When has a civilian ever said that?
I took that to mean “because I am one.” I dunno.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
by MacDougall
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:15 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Am I wrong to think INH is not claiming or slipping indie in that post? I interpreted it as “I could tell you my role but then I’d be a goner” but I can’t figure out what exactly he meant.
He specifically said "I'm not a threat to the townies".
When has a civilian ever said that?
I took that to mean “because I am one.” I dunno.
Did you really? Would he not have just said "I am one" as opposed to "I am not a threat to them".
Nah dog. Nah.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
by Golden
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pmIf I'm bad Quin is bad.
tell me why
Well I'm not bad so it would be illogical to have an explanation for this other than it's the fact it would come back as true.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
by Epignosis
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:04 pm
Also epi - provide an example of what you claim (mafia claim independent in situations like this). It would never have even occurred to me, but I also disagree, because if anything inh didn't 'claim' indy but 'slip' indy.
I'm not providing a thing. I have no interest. I've seen it. You don't believe me? Fine.
A moment ago you decided I
knew INH was doing this. Now you seem comfortable that I 'don't believe you'.
There's not a whole lot of integrity to your current thought processes.
On the other hand, I have to admit that I don't understand why you'd raise inh's apparent 'claim' at all if you were bad. You'd have been better off just letting things play out.
But I don't understand at all why you'd lynch both one after the other on the basis that sig would be scum if you think INH is covering for being scum.
You don't need to understand me.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:20 pm
by Golden
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:04 pm
Also epi - provide an example of what you claim (mafia claim independent in situations like this). It would never have even occurred to me, but I also disagree, because if anything inh didn't 'claim' indy but 'slip' indy.
I'm not providing a thing. I have no interest. I've seen it. You don't believe me? Fine.
A moment ago you decided I
knew INH was doing this. Now you seem comfortable that I 'don't believe you'.
There's not a whole lot of integrity to your current thought processes.
On the other hand, I have to admit that I don't understand why you'd raise inh's apparent 'claim' at all if you were bad. You'd have been better off just letting things play out.
But I don't understand at all why you'd lynch both one after the other on the basis that sig would be scum if you think INH is covering for being scum.
You are Jaying on Epi pretty hard right now.
Explain.
PS why you outing scotty like that
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
by Epignosis
Scotty isn't a doctor.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
by Kylemii
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pmIf I'm bad Quin is bad.
tell me why
Well I'm not bad so it would be illogical to have an explanation for this other than it's the fact it would come back as true.
why would quin's badness be a function of yours
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
by ColinIsCool
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:15 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Am I wrong to think INH is not claiming or slipping indie in that post? I interpreted it as “I could tell you my role but then I’d be a goner” but I can’t figure out what exactly he meant.
He specifically said "I'm not a threat to the townies".
When has a civilian ever said that?
I took that to mean “because I am one.” I dunno.
Did you really? Would he not have just said "I am one" as opposed to "I am not a threat to them".
Nah dog. Nah.
I mean, I guess. That’s a pretty blatant slip though when he can just pretend to be town you know?
Everything about this just got 10 times more complicated and I don’t like it
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
by Quin
More fuel for the INH is indy fire:
He didn't realise mafia get fake claims because he isn't mafia.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
by MacDougall
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:20 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:04 pm
Also epi - provide an example of what you claim (mafia claim independent in situations like this). It would never have even occurred to me, but I also disagree, because if anything inh didn't 'claim' indy but 'slip' indy.
I'm not providing a thing. I have no interest. I've seen it. You don't believe me? Fine.
A moment ago you decided I
knew INH was doing this. Now you seem comfortable that I 'don't believe you'.
There's not a whole lot of integrity to your current thought processes.
On the other hand, I have to admit that I don't understand why you'd raise inh's apparent 'claim' at all if you were bad. You'd have been better off just letting things play out.
But I don't understand at all why you'd lynch both one after the other on the basis that sig would be scum if you think INH is covering for being scum.
You are Jaying on Epi pretty hard right now.
Explain.
PS why you outing scotty like that
Dude, Scotty put it out there. I am sure there are civilians that didn't see it but you can bet your ass all the scum know so it's better to just inform everyone point blank at this point.
Also, Jay and Epi do this every time they play when they are civ/civ. You are just playing the role of Jay right now.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
by Golden
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Scotty isn't a doctor.
Yeah, I'm happy with my vote.
This is absolutely 100% a false statement.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
by Golden
Scotty is both town and doctor.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:23 pm
by Epignosis
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
More fuel for the INH is indy fire:
He didn't realise mafia get fake claims because he isn't mafia.
I don't buy that shit for a minute.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:23 pm
by Quin
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pmIf I'm bad Quin is bad.
tell me why
Well I'm not bad so it would be illogical to have an explanation for this other than it's the fact it would come back as true.
Posts written as hypotheticals might not be checkable. So I'll help out.
I am bad and Golden is my teammate.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:23 pm
by MacDougall
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
More fuel for the INH is indy fire:
He didn't realise mafia get fake claims because he isn't mafia.
So how does that work for sig given ...
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
OH WAIT
Did Speed ever say mafia would get fake flavor?
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
OH WAIT
Did Speed ever say mafia would get fake flavor?
Nevermind he did I just didn't read the rules.
Does this mean sig is confirmed not scum?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:23 pm
by ColinIsCool
I thought Scotty was claiming but he didn’t take action against Epignosis either.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:24 pm
by Epignosis
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Scotty isn't a doctor.
Yeah, I'm happy with my vote.
This is absolutely 100% a false statement.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:24 pm
by Golden
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Also, Jay and Epi do this every time they play when they are civ/civ. You are just playing the role of Jay right now.
I do it every time epi and I are both civ too lol.
But not every time I do it is epi civ.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:25 pm
by Quin
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:23 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
More fuel for the INH is indy fire:
He didn't realise mafia get fake claims because he isn't mafia.
So how does that work for sig given ...
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
OH WAIT
Did Speed ever say mafia would get fake flavor?
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
OH WAIT
Did Speed ever say mafia would get fake flavor?
Nevermind he did I just didn't read the rules.
Does this mean sig is confirmed not scum?
Maybe they're both unaffiliated independents.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pm
by Golden
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pmIf I'm bad Quin is bad.
tell me why
Well I'm not bad so it would be illogical to have an explanation for this other than it's the fact it would come back as true.
why would quin's badness be a function of yours
It isn't a function of mine because I'm not bad and I'm pretty sure Quin isn't either.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pm
by MacDougall
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Scotty isn't a doctor.
Yeah, I'm happy with my vote.
This is absolutely 100% a false statement.
I do question the statement. Why do you think he's not a doctor?
I also now suspicious of how Epi has gradually backtracked from his "claim" when Scotty counter claimed to his most recent *shrug* when I asked if he is a doctor and whether we should let him get away with what seems most likely to be a fake claim that has backfired?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:27 pm
by Epignosis
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Scotty isn't a doctor.
Yeah, I'm happy with my vote.
This is absolutely 100% a false statement.
I do question the statement. Why do you think he's not a doctor?
I also now suspicious of how Epi has gradually backtracked from his "claim" when Scotty counter claimed to his most recent *shrug* when I asked if he is a doctor and whether we should let him get away with what seems most likely to be a fake claim that has backfired?
What was my motive for claiming as I did and when I did?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:28 pm
by Golden
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:27 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Scotty isn't a doctor.
Yeah, I'm happy with my vote.
This is absolutely 100% a false statement.
I do question the statement. Why do you think he's not a doctor?
I also now suspicious of how Epi has gradually backtracked from his "claim" when Scotty counter claimed to his most recent *shrug* when I asked if he is a doctor and whether we should let him get away with what seems most likely to be a fake claim that has backfired?
What was my motive for claiming as I did and when I did?
Diluting the target on other players backs.
Seemed pretty sound to me in the moment.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:28 pm
by Golden
Other than the fact that target painting is bullshit in the first place.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:28 pm
by MacDougall
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:27 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Scotty isn't a doctor.
Yeah, I'm happy with my vote.
This is absolutely 100% a false statement.
I do question the statement. Why do you think he's not a doctor?
I also now suspicious of how Epi has gradually backtracked from his "claim" when Scotty counter claimed to his most recent *shrug* when I asked if he is a doctor and whether we should let him get away with what seems most likely to be a fake claim that has backfired?
What was my motive for claiming as I did and when I did?
1. You need not have a motive for random behaviour in the early game. You're epi.
2. If you need one, it could be as simple as luring out a counter claim
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:28 pm
by Turnip Head
I'm on a bender right now gang and let me tell you it is fucking glorious
I've given in to the inevitability of our defeat in a world where someone other than myself is in charge of the laws of time, on like a personal level we should all feel this to be true
And so I sit here shitfaced waiting for this existence to be wiped clean by the oppressors
Tell me I am wrong to do this
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:29 pm
by Turnip Head
I just linkid everyone
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:29 pm
by Golden
There's no reason to presume epi's claim is false for certain. Juliets was the 'backup doctor' in Phenon after all.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:29 pm
by Kylemii
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pmIf I'm bad Quin is bad.
tell me why
Well I'm not bad so it would be illogical to have an explanation for this other than it's the fact it would come back as true.
why would quin's badness be a function of yours
It isn't a function of mine because I'm not bad and I'm pretty sure Quin isn't either.
but why would you being bad mean that quin is also necessarily bad? what's the link?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm
by MacDougall
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:28 pm
I'm on a bender right now gang and let me tell you it is fucking glorious
I've given in to the inevitability of our defeat in a world where someone other than myself is in charge of the laws of time, on like a personal level we should all feel this to be true
And so I sit here shitfaced waiting for this existence to be wiped clean by the oppressors
Tell me I am wrong to do this
You are wrong to do this because we are all just different variations of each other in separate timelines
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm
by Lunalee
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Scotty is both town and doctor.
How are you so sure of that?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:31 pm
by MacDougall
Epi are you a doctor, or The Doctor?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:32 pm
by Epignosis
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:31 pm
Epi are you a doctor, or The Doctor?
Bend over and reach me that box of gloves honey and I'll show you.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:33 pm
by MacDougall
I'm going to just say it because it'll make for more fun.
I'm also a doctor.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:33 pm
by Golden
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:29 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:11 pmIf I'm bad Quin is bad.
tell me why
Well I'm not bad so it would be illogical to have an explanation for this other than it's the fact it would come back as true.
why would quin's badness be a function of yours
It isn't a function of mine because I'm not bad and I'm pretty sure Quin isn't either.
but why would you being bad mean that quin is also necessarily bad? what's the link?
Kyle, stop trying to read rational meaning into something that I intended to be patently incorrect.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm
by MacDougall
Hands up if you're a doctor?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm
by Quin
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm
Hands up if you're a doctor?
I'm a stump.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm
by Golden
Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Scotty is both town and doctor.
How are you so sure of that?
My entire role was literally 'find scotty', I just didn't know it was scotty, until I did.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm
by Golden
I am definitely not a doctor.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm
by Epignosis
Let's do something more fun.
sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.
Who gets your vote and why?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm
by MacDougall
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm
Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Scotty is both town and doctor.
How are you so sure of that?
My entire role was literally 'find scotty', I just didn't know it was scotty, until I did.
Scotty is literally Scotty from Star Trek?
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm
by MacDougall
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm
Let's do something more fun.
sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.
Who gets your vote and why?
Turnip Head for aforementioned reasons.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:37 pm
by Golden
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm
Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm
Scotty is both town and doctor.
How are you so sure of that?
My entire role was literally 'find scotty', I just didn't know it was scotty, until I did.
Scotty is literally Scotty from Star Trek?
The engines cannae take that kind o' pressure, capt'n.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:39 pm
by Golden
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm
Let's do something more fun.
sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.
Who gets your vote and why?
Epignosis
Choutas
Lapluie
Kylemii
Lunalee
or maybe Colin because I keep tinfoiling him.