So going to do a quick read of Scotty see if anything pops up, go over Sprit's and a few other players.
Scotty wrote:Oh look! Sprityo's back!
Let's lynch him again!
Surely lightning won't strike twice..
Civ points for scotty oh wait it doesn't matter.
I tried to do a NKA (night kill analysis) but I don't see anything there that would explain a kill, minus the Sprityo thing. Which doesn't matter at this point.
With 15 posts Dom is well within the realm of a low poster. Within these 15 posts I found several troubling things that I'll be linking, even though Jack seems to have beaten me to the punch.
Dom wrote:Uhhh
ishmael, given those recent revelations is a huge threat.
This is mechanic talk which is okay, but a good portion of Dom's posts are like this or fluff.
Dom wrote:LoRab, why are the VFD a bigger thread than Ishmael?
Dom wrote:LoRab wrote:Dom wrote:LoRab, why are the VFD a bigger thread than Ishmael?
Because of my natural distrust of purely neutral roles, especially when it's a 2 person neutral team that just has to survive to win. You've known me long enough to know how I feel about this (
and to know that it's because of how may have once played such a role to win the game for the mafia). Also, they have a block and a protect to use every night.
Ishmael's team has a 50% chance of recruiting each night, and at least early on, it's kind of a crap shoot what roles they get. At the start, it's 13 civs to recruit v 8 baddies v 3 neutral (he can't recruit himself). So, almost even odds of getting a non-civ than a civ. It, in part, depends on who the first successful recruit is.
In all, it may likely have more to do with my innate prejudicial suspicion towards neutral roles than anything else.
I know about this natural distrust.
I thought you'd attribute some level of distrust to Ishamel for this reason as well.
Two mechanic based conversation.
Dom wrote:Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Let me throw this out there and see what people think.
Mathematically, the cult is not much of a threat. Using one of Klaus's auto scum catches on Ishmael would most benefit.....the mafia.
So players expressing extreme unwarranted concern about the cult are somewhat suspicious to me at this point.
I do agree that Klaus might not want to use his check on Ishmael.
This is interesting, seeing how Dom thought the cult was a major threat why wouldn't he want Klaus to search them? However, I don't think this plays into his role, unless he is Ishmael.
Dom wrote:Scotty wrote:I'm making a blanket statement that I trust none of you and will be voting a no-show or low poster. That there are 12/25 people not being civs, a coin flip isn't the worst thing in the world atm
How does one of these statements follow the other?
Well I missed this in my ISO of scotty, but I did notice it here. Dom was agaisnt this idea without coming out 100% agaisnt it, he is also a low poster like Glorf/Sprit who flipped mafia. This could be a reason for Scotty's death and if Dom is mafia I'd bet at least one other member of their team is a low poster.
Dom wrote:Hi guys--
I've fallen ill again. I'm hoping to be better by the holidays, but I am very fatigued right now. Forgive me, O Mafia players.
Spacedaisy wrote:Having just been on a baddie team with Sorsha in Lost Again, I'm not seeing the same thing from her here. I am leaning civ on her at the moment.
Do we think this logic holds?
I don't.
Go read Sorsha in Lost Again and tell me if you really think that matters in comparison to this game.
Four options:
-SD and Sorsha are baddies together
-SD and Sorsha are civvies together.
-SD and Sorsha are on opposing sides.
-indys involved
Glorfindel wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:I voted sprityo to break the tie between him and DDL. I didn't get a chance to look at sprityo, nor DDL for that matter. But y'all left me to break a tie, so
Here's a list of players who missed the vote (including sprityo).
- Dom
DrWilgy
Elohcin
Epignosis
Glorfindel
LoRab
Marco
Nachomamma8
soup
sprityo
I would like to point out (for the record) my friend that I did not 'miss' the vote. I deliberately withheld mine. I was faced with a choice between two players of which I was unwilling to support either.
...this is not true. You had plenty of other options.
Glorfindel wrote:And there you go... vindicated again!
Smug doesn't fit you.
Which baddie team are you on?
So the first part isn't super interesting, but the last portion of this post is. If Dom suspected Glorf of being on a mafia team for one behavioral based post, why did he then attack and vote for me when I made the same type of case with more information attached? I think this is an attempt at distancing.
Also hope you feel better.
Dom wrote:I don't see the merit in the discussion.
This is probably one of the most eyebrow raising posts of Dom's.
He doesn't see the merit in discussing Glorf's behavior surrounding refusing to claim good or bad. This is an attempt to shift the conversation and defend Glorf from being lynched based on meta reasoning, even though he suspected Glorf?
Dom wrote:sig wrote:Nachomamma8 wrote:sig wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:sig wrote:hm Glorf replaced out, that is interesting.
What do you make of it?
:
I think it could mean Sprityo is mafia, in fact I'd be willing to lynch on it. Glorf was alreayd a suspect of mine, for not giving reads not talking much and a general gut read. Two things to know about Glorf is he hates lying, even in a game he won't do it and he hates being mafia. His refusal to answer the good/bad question was a tip off, he wouldn't lie about it, he'd just not say it either way. I'm thinking his BTSC mates told him that. He went with it, but hated it and asked to be replaced. Since even if he was bad, he wouldn't want to let his team down. So he replaced out since he couldn't be a mafia member and he did this soon enough that most people wouldn't consider it.
He attempted to do the same thing in Star wars mafia when he was bad as well.
So I'm voting there and I'll be voting there now, since I am 80% sure Sprityo 2.0/Glorf are mafia and that is why Glorf acted the way he did day 1 and was replaced.
I'm feeling good about the SDs and Golden. I won't be lynching Jack today since he is a civ lean, or Epi/LC since I need time to read them.
I never saw the case on MM so he won't get my vote either.
So Glorf replacing out is closely correlated with him being a baddie?
I would say yes there is a correlation.
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... ?f=2&t=769
Take a look at Star Wars mafia, Glorfs first game here, he subbed out after awhile as mafia there as well. Though I will admit that was in part due to being mafia and being completely overwhelmed, while I don't think i've ever seen a civ Glorf sub out, not even when he is being harassed and bothered.
Finally I'd say im being replaced just assured me of my read, I'd say I can gut read some players rather well, Glorf being one of them and he was pinging me from his first post.
Furthermore when he wouldn't give me reads, something he does often regardless of alignment, but much more as mafia.
Voting sig for this contradiction despite me suspecting glorf.
Hedging.
Not making assertive claims.
Now this post is why I think he's a teammate of Glorf. He votes for me because I was hedging and not making assertive claims? Based all around one sentence in one of my post. At this time it tied me with Sprityo, so not only did he tie the vote, but he also attempted to make me and my case seem disingenuous. I'd also say keep in mind if Dom was mafia he might have thought sprityo would vote for me, which would have pushed me ahead of him by two votes, due to his power. This claim also doesn't make much sense since I came into the thread guns ablazing agaisnt Glorf and was one of the first votes.
He also says he is suspicious of Glorf, yet votes for the player pushing Glorf and doesn't mention if there's any merits in my case
This as well as Dom not wanting to discuses Glorf's meta/refusal to claim and saying he was suspecting Glorf yet not taking my case into consideration looks bad. I'd GTH Dom as bad and put him as likely scum.