Re: The Theme is Literally a Burglary (Mafia game, Night 1)
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:20 pm
twice in a row...
burglarys don't agree with me
burglarys don't agree with me
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
EBYWOPinsertnamehere wrote:twice in a row...
burglaries don't agree with me
I'm just having fun.MovingPictures07 wrote:I wouldn't say you all wasted Day 1 or anything; these Burglaries are tough to get rolling before any lynch with such a limited time constraint, especially with others not posting. What could have made it more illuminating I suppose was more poo flinging (as Jay calls it). It's practically impossible to differentiate the motives between players who voted a no-poster lynch, whereas at least if the votes were spread around with some pretty baseless observations we could get somewhere.Long Con wrote:What would have made it more illuminating? What would you like to see in Day 2?MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, that catchup wasn't particularly illuminating.
EBYOP x2insertnamehere wrote:EBWOPinsertnamehere wrote:twice in a row...
burglaries don't agree with me
fuckinsertnamehere wrote:EBWOP x2insertnamehere wrote:EBWOPinsertnamehere wrote:twice in a row...
burglaries don't agree with me
Could just be a civvie power role?Metalmarsh89 wrote:insertnamehere! You will be avenged!
VOTE SIG
He was rather quiet this night phase. That smells... fishy.
1. Quin participating in WIFOM openly. I don't think this is alignment indicative or even meaningful, but it caught my eye.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Name the top two things that caught your eye.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, that catchup wasn't particularly illuminating.
For example, I don't know what inspired juliets to cast this vote on sig as opposed to Bass or even me.juliets wrote:I don't want to vote anyone who is participating at the moment so I will
VOTE SIG
OK, Rico. We get it already. Do you have anything else to say for yourself?Ricochet wrote:Hi I'm Poppy.
As for 1, I enjoy the fast paced nature of burglaries. I like to play these a lot more casually than I do for the long-term ones. Just fool around a bit.MovingPictures07 wrote:1. Quin participating in WIFOM openly. I don't think this is alignment indicative or even meaningful, but it caught my eye.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Name the top two things that caught your eye.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, that catchup wasn't particularly illuminating.
2. It appears that there was a natural inclination for voters to cast their votes towards sig when both sig and Bass were missing, but once the argument was floated that Bass is less likely to be active, the votes flooded away. I'd like to know how everyone came to the determination of their initial votes.
Well, she sure wasn't defending Bass.MovingPictures07 wrote:For example, I don't know what inspired juliets to cast this vote on sig as opposed to Bass or even me.juliets wrote:I don't want to vote anyone who is participating at the moment so I will
VOTE SIG
I noticed sig wasn't here and voted for him. I knew bass had posted just before the game started and I forgot you even existed.MovingPictures07 wrote:1. Quin participating in WIFOM openly. I don't think this is alignment indicative or even meaningful, but it caught my eye.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Name the top two things that caught your eye.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, that catchup wasn't particularly illuminating.
2. It appears that there was a natural inclination for voters to cast their votes towards sig when both sig and Bass were missing, but once the argument was floated that Bass is less likely to be active, the votes flooded away. I'd like to know how everyone came to the determination of their initial votes.
I think it's turned off on purpose because you could potentially get linki for 5 straight minutes, which would be rather unfortunate in a 20 minute day phase.Made wrote:Yo, Linki aren't showing up for me? Halp
Hi I'm PoppyGlorfindel wrote:OK, Rico. We get it already. Do you have anything else to say for yourself?Ricochet wrote:Hi I'm Poppy.
Likewise bud!Made wrote:Nothing strong yet, will keep you posted.MovingPictures07 wrote:How's it feel to be back playing mafia again, Made?
Got any leads?
Also nice seeing you as always
I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.Long Con wrote:RIP INH
Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.
This is correct; we turned them off in Burglaries after we realized quickly during the first one that they were a real pain in the ass.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I think it's turned off on purpose because you could potentially get linki for 5 straight minutes, which would be rather unfortunate in a 20 minute day phase.Made wrote:Yo, Linki aren't showing up for me? Halp
What are your thoughts?Glorfindel wrote:OK, Rico. We get it already. Do you have anything else to say for yourself?Ricochet wrote:Hi I'm Poppy.
I was getting some conversation going, see how you reacted.Quin wrote:I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.Long Con wrote:RIP INH
Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.
@3J - VOTE LONG CON
Note that there's likely two baddies out there and for a burglary, there's not gonna be a lot of deliberation going on.Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP is a civread for me. He spent his catchup reading the thread as opposed to plotting a kill. I won't be voting for him today.
@Made. I suppose that's possible, I find a baddie-sorta alignment to be more believable.
Sure, but there are motives for manufactured suspicions regardless of Bass's flip. I don't know that I get that vibe from juliets; I'm just trying to do some digging.Long Con wrote:Well, she sure wasn't defending Bass.MovingPictures07 wrote:For example, I don't know what inspired juliets to cast this vote on sig as opposed to Bass or even me.juliets wrote:I don't want to vote anyone who is participating at the moment so I will
VOTE SIG
What's your conclusion?Long Con wrote:I was getting some conversation going, see how you reacted.Quin wrote:I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.Long Con wrote:RIP INH
Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.
@3J - VOTE LONG CON
LolwutMetalmarsh89 wrote:MP is a civread for me. He spent his catchup reading the thread as opposed to plotting a kill. I won't be voting for him today.
@Made. I suppose that's possible, I find a baddie-sorta alignment to be more believable.
Seems to me Rico always ends up doing weird stuff like this. I doubt Jay had either the time or the inclination to come up with some kind of curse for his role so I doubt it's legitimate.MovingPictures07 wrote:What are your thoughts?Glorfindel wrote:OK, Rico. We get it already. Do you have anything else to say for yourself?Ricochet wrote:Hi I'm Poppy.
I agree, but if two mafioso have BTSC, they will likely spend at least a little time in there discussing.Quin wrote:Note that there's likely two baddies out there and for a burglary, there's not gonna be a lot of deliberation going on.Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP is a civread for me. He spent his catchup reading the thread as opposed to plotting a kill. I won't be voting for him today.
@Made. I suppose that's possible, I find a baddie-sorta alignment to be more believable.
Can you elaborate at all? What specifically bugged you about her posts there that isn't ringing the same here?Glorfindel wrote:I'm not getting the baddie vibe from Juliets that I did in Election Night Mafia...
Your reaction was to come after me before I could come after you.Quin wrote:What's your conclusion?Long Con wrote:I was getting some conversation going, see how you reacted.Quin wrote:I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.Long Con wrote:RIP INH
Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.
@3J - VOTE LONG CON
Rico isn't playing (hence the non-player blue). I was asking in general.Glorfindel wrote:Seems to me Rico always ends up doing weird stuff like this. I doubt Jay had either the time or the inclination to come up with some kind of curse for his role so I doubt it's legitimate.MovingPictures07 wrote:What are your thoughts?Glorfindel wrote:OK, Rico. We get it already. Do you have anything else to say for yourself?Ricochet wrote:Hi I'm Poppy.
I don't think he's playing. His posts were in blue I think.Glorfindel wrote:Seems to me Rico always ends up doing weird stuff like this. I doubt Jay had either the time or the inclination to come up with some kind of curse for his role so I doubt it's legitimate.MovingPictures07 wrote:What are your thoughts?Glorfindel wrote:OK, Rico. We get it already. Do you have anything else to say for yourself?Ricochet wrote:Hi I'm Poppy.
Why do you feel I'm probably civ?juliets wrote:I agree that MP is probably civ but I don't have any good vibes about anyone else. I need to hurry and get some.
The conversation could very well be something like:Metalmarsh89 wrote:I agree, but if two mafioso have BTSC, they will likely spend at least a little time in there discussing.Quin wrote:Note that there's likely two baddies out there and for a burglary, there's not gonna be a lot of deliberation going on.Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP is a civread for me. He spent his catchup reading the thread as opposed to plotting a kill. I won't be voting for him today.
@Made. I suppose that's possible, I find a baddie-sorta alignment to be more believable.
Sig was making deep fried oreos.juliets wrote:sig is too quiet I am getting suspicious.
What motivation would a mafia sig have to be quiet?juliets wrote:sig is too quiet I am getting suspicious.
Thank god for that. Now you can't suspect me or I'll just dismiss it as an OMGUSLong Con wrote:Your reaction was to come after me before I could come after you.Quin wrote:What's your conclusion?Long Con wrote:I was getting some conversation going, see how you reacted.Quin wrote:I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.Long Con wrote:RIP INH
Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.
@3J - VOTE LONG CON