Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day Zero]
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:37 pm
Are votes changeable?thellama73 wrote:Vote Sorsha. Locked In. Final Answer.
No, which I rather wish I had remembered before casting mine.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Are votes changeable?thellama73 wrote:Vote Sorsha. Locked In. Final Answer.
I 'member.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Remember that time we played a Mafia game about jeans and space bears?
I know that NOW!Mongoose wrote:In this game, you can change your answers in non-lynch polls but not in lynch polls.
Good catch! He says hi. I made him come read my Day 1 post. (He loves space and bears).Epignosis wrote:I sense a spectator in our midst.
Hello Brian.
Because I gave my honest opinion on Sorsha?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:People I have felt good about for at least one second:
Quin
Scotty
thellama73
DDL
People I have felt bad about for at least one second:
Sorsha
Long Con
Metalmarsh89
Epignosis
I didn't say anything about why.Epignosis wrote:Because I gave my honest opinion on Sorsha?
Funny enough, when I included those two words, I was thinking, "These two will probably get me in hot water with somebody."JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I didn't say anything about why.Epignosis wrote:Because I gave my honest opinion on Sorsha?
I recall in the earliest stage of GY!BE, Sloonei ripped me up for a few "hesitant" bits he found in my posts, one of which was "I guess". I think he identified a real tell in my posts. You said "I guess" in your discussion of Sorsha in a context that reminds me of that scenario.
I notice that there's no overlap. You should talk about that.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:People I have felt good about for at least one second:
Quin
Scotty
thellama73
DDL
People I have felt bad about for at least one second:
Sorsha
Long Con
Metalmarsh89
Epignosis
Tell him I said "Stop being a bitch and come sign up and play. Also, the football team you like sucks. Also, I won FF this year bitch."Mongoose wrote:Good catch! He says hi. I made him come read my Day 1 post. (He loves space and bears).Epignosis wrote:I sense a spectator in our midst.
Hello Brian.
Feelings are fleeting so early. Most posts are absent of content that can be readily judged. The beginnings of the Mafia thread are often a pile of null posts with a sprinkled mix of non-null posts, and this thread is no different. For those players listed I see a collection of null and at least one isolated moment of something other than null, and that's reflected in my categories.Quin wrote:I notice that there's no overlap. You should talk about that.
Can I change my vote to Epignosis?Epignosis wrote:In addition, I want everybody to look at my signature. You will see one that says "FELT HEDGEHOG RABBIT SQUIRREL WINNER." That's because I won Felt Mafia 1.
I intend on keeping tradition alive and winning Felt Mafia 2.
I just think it's worth noting that of the eight people (about half the roster) you got something from, none of them gave you anything but a one-way read.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Feelings are fleeting so early. Most posts are absent of content that can be readily judged. The beginnings of the Mafia thread are often a pile of null posts with a sprinkled mix of non-null posts, and this thread is no different. For those players listed I see a collection of null and at least one isolated moment of something other than null, and that's reflected in my categories.Quin wrote:I notice that there's no overlap. You should talk about that.
A qualifier I should acknowledge is that Sloonei's catches in that game were, while in his eyes a general suspicion, accurate because of my independent role. I wasn't rocking the boat precisely because my task in that game was solo (which was what Sloonei correctly observed), but my uncertain language reflected the truth of my uncertain reads. In that regard it may reflect similarly on you in this example -- and in this game there is no independent unless it's the extra role/seventh star or something.Epignosis wrote:Funny enough, when I included those two words, I was thinking, "These two will probably get me in hot water with somebody."
I used to those two words instead of the sentence, "I'm not the best person to judge Sorsha, because I'm almost never right." I opted for "I guess," because I am not interested in making excuses for why I may have a hard time forming a clear opinion on someone.
Okay.Quin wrote:I just think it's worth noting that of the eight people (about half the roster) you got something from, none of them gave you anything but a one-way read.
No. That's about it.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Okay.Quin wrote:I just think it's worth noting that of the eight people (about half the roster) you got something from, none of them gave you anything but a one-way read.
Do you have any new feelings of your own to state?
It's the same thing I would do if I had gotten one.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Quin's immediate response to being given an early positive read was to poke me about it. I like.
Thanks, MattMatt!A Person wrote:goosegoose - I loved your day 1 post!
The fact that I was one of the eight names doesn't matter at all actually. I'm curious because I think there should be some instance of overlap with that many people.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Quin's immediate response to being given an early positive read was to poke me about it. I like.
Between a full time job, masters program and boyfriendly duties I barely sleep. my brain is usually a slushy as well when free time rolls around.Epignosis wrote:Tell him I said "Stop being a bitch and come sign up and play. Also, the football team you like sucks. Also, I won FF this year bitch."Mongoose wrote:Good catch! He says hi. I made him come read my Day 1 post. (He loves space and bears).Epignosis wrote:I sense a spectator in our midst.
Hello Brian.
He'll know what you mean.
Are there any players in your own reads that would represent that sort of overlap for you?Quin wrote:The fact that I was one of the eight names doesn't matter at all actually. I'm curious because I think there should be some instance of overlap with that many people.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Quin's immediate response to being given an early positive read was to poke me about it. I like.
Damn son.JJLehto wrote:and boyfriendly duties I barely sleep.
Not me. I know how to take a compliment.Epignosis wrote:It's the same thing I would do if I had gotten one.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Quin's immediate response to being given an early positive read was to poke me about it. I like.
I've seen both civ and scum moments from Scotty and llama. Although, Scotty's is more of a 'I find this suspicious, but he seems genuine in his justification' thing.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Are there any players in your own reads that would represent that sort of overlap for you?Quin wrote:The fact that I was one of the eight names doesn't matter at all actually. I'm curious because I think there should be some instance of overlap with that many people.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Quin's immediate response to being given an early positive read was to poke me about it. I like.
That's just the way I like it. Keeps me from getting NKed too early.Quin wrote: I've seen both civ and scum moments from Scotty and llama.
nekk minutethellama73 wrote:That's just the way I like it. Keeps me from getting NKed too early.Quin wrote: I've seen both civ and scum moments from Scotty and llama.
You are very insistent on that point. I disagree.Quin wrote:The fact that I was one of the eight names doesn't matter at all actually. I'm curious because I think there should be some instance of overlap with that many people.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Quin's immediate response to being given an early positive read was to poke me about it. I like.
Your senses have not served you well.Epignosis wrote:I would lynch Long Con. I sense that he has received a bad role this time.
'Insistent' is painting the conversation in the wrong light. I take it your reads are currently pretty cut and dry? What are they?Long Con wrote:You are very insistent on that point. I disagree.Quin wrote:The fact that I was one of the eight names doesn't matter at all actually. I'm curious because I think there should be some instance of overlap with that many people.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Quin's immediate response to being given an early positive read was to poke me about it. I like.
I dig all of this. I won't even put my tinfoil hat on.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What I like about llama is that he has drawn attention to himself deliberately and doesn't seem to give a damn. He made the game's first accusation, he assumed a confident posture in that read, and then he placed the game's first vote. At face value I like that kind of behavior.
Llama jumped on my check in post literally two minutes after I posted it. My initial gut reaction was that it was a joke because I don't see how anything I said in that post could be found to be suspicious. So I responded with a joke. In hind sight, sure I should have made sure that he was actually serious about it but being jumped on like that right out of the gate isn't something I'm accustomed to.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Here, have some thoughts. I thought these thoughts up.
thellama73 wrote:You're bad.Sorsha wrote:Space station sounds like the best place to me!I don't know how serious llama was about his initial accusation, but I do think Sorsha's response to it is suspicious. In the earliest stages of a game, it can be genuinely difficult for a baddie to respond to an assertive accusation, even when the baddie knows the accusation can't possibly be informed by anything substantial. There's still the matter of forcing out a response of some kind and trying to look legitimate in the process. Sometimes when I have found myself in that position, my response has been to offer a jokey retort to my accuser rather like Sorsha's here. The purpose is that it alleviates the pressure of the accusation by adding levity and humor to the exchange, and generally other players aren't going to be pinged by that. The problem is that it evidences a desire to respond without an accompanying desire to explore. Sorsha does not seem interested in why llama threw poop at her. I just typed a whole paragraph about that post you guys!Sorsha wrote:I didn't hear you call dibs on the space station llama
All for one line and an emoticon? Seriously? How am I supposed to respond to that? If anything would actually make me overly enthusiastic it would be finally getting a civ role since it seems like all I've been s bad lately. Take that for all the WIFOM it worth. Until he actually voted for me today I still wasn't entirely sure he was serious and not just trying to get a reaction out of players.thellama73 wrote: It's not about your vote. It's about your phony, trying-too-hard enthusiasm and emoticon use. I don't buy it.
Yes, well, there was sort of a gambit named after him once upon a time.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What I like about llama is that he has drawn attention to himself deliberately and doesn't seem to give a damn. He made the game's first accusation, he assumed a confident posture in that read, and then he placed the game's first vote. At face value I like that kind of behavior.