Re: 2018 Socky Awards Mafia (DAY 1)
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:26 pm
I don't think anyone's really worth trusting on page 3.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
My understanding is similar. I always assume there’s at least one baddie that tries to skate by on minimal content, though. Whether they’re just busy IRL or they want to make themselves harder to find by offering fewer posts to analyze. Sometimes it’s just someone who doesn’t post as much in general.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:48 pmDoesn't it though? (inactive in my eyes being someone inactive in the past 24 hours, btw. Everyone's posted at least once, I think.)
But at the same time, mafia folks are more likely to post just a little to get by IMO. Gives them a way to control the vote if we start going after inactives.
I don't really want to lynch the more active people or the inactives, but how do I choose between people who have only made a few non-game-related posts?
Thanks alot
Why not? Nutella lols quite a bit, why do you think it is alignment indicative? If you had to vote now, who would you vote for?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:15 pmI too, don't feel comfortable trusting nutella.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
Come on you have played with me in the last year.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
Because she was scum last time I thought she might me town. So I now cannot trust her.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:45 pmSpoiler: showWhy not? Nutella lols quite a bit, why do you think it is alignment indicative? If you had to vote now, who would you vote for?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:15 pmI too, don't feel comfortable trusting nutella.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
I have to finish my Socky thing, if I had to vote now it would be G Man, but as Luna says, we should be tightening up rather than spreading out more.
But in fact, DDL could be bad and also looking for an opportunistic lynch, and is therefore hyper-aware of other people acting opportunistic.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:27 am Bob's posts don't make me feel anything in special but then LC latching on him gives me opportunistic vibes.
ummm....hi there....ummm, excuse for ummm being perhaps a tad pedantic, but you use "recency bias" and "but it's based on actual content" here. That seems redundant to me. Your recency bias is actual content from the previous game, no? So your recency bias is content, yes. That seems like a wasted bullshitty sentence to me. Perhaps I'm missing something?nutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 3:37 pmOf course not. It's the perspective I gained from being scum with him recently that is drawing my attention to some of his behavior here. Maybe there is some element of recency bias, I should admit, but it is based in actual content. Like look at how he deflected the "reading the rules" accusation back onto speed.
Nutella I can't help it, it's an involuntary reaction. You say scummy things and it triggers my scumdar. I have to use all my willpower just to keep it down.nutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:47 pmCome on you have played with me in the last year.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
That doesn't make sense. if I'm town I'm also looking for people acting opportunistic. I don't have to be scum to detect that.Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:07 pmBecause she was scum last time I thought she might me town. So I now cannot trust her.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:45 pmSpoiler: showWhy not? Nutella lols quite a bit, why do you think it is alignment indicative? If you had to vote now, who would you vote for?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:15 pmI too, don't feel comfortable trusting nutella.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
I have to finish my Socky thing, if I had to vote now it would be G Man, but as Luna says, we should be tightening up rather than spreading out more.
And If I had to vote now, I would [VOTE: Dragon D Luffy] aubergine because he is voting Long Con because Long Con is voting colonialbob for posting in pictures. DDL says the reason this makes LC look sketchy is :But in fact, DDL could be bad and also looking for an opportunistic lynch, and is therefore hyper-aware of other people acting opportunistic.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:27 am Bob's posts don't make me feel anything in special but then LC latching on him gives me opportunistic vibes.
My Spider-Sense or my S~V~S Auto Sus- which one is tingling right now?S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:45 pmThanks alotI would return the favor, but it looks like you already have a vote (becasue you do/do not like socks?) and I would rather not place a second joke vote on someone with such a spread.
I see that Nova didn't really explain his LC vote. I saw DDL did but I don't see what was opportunistic about LC's vote, although I think Bob is more likely trying to relive the fun he had with Presidential quotes (unless he does this self imposed posting gimmick all the time?) than anything.
Still not loving G Mans vote, plus I see he is making feints at no shows when I seem to recall that we have a few replacements.
Why not? Nutella lols quite a bit, why do you think it is alignment indicative? If you had to vote now, who would you vote for?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:15 pmI too, don't feel comfortable trusting nutella.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
I have to finish my Socky thing, if I had to vote now it would be G Man, but as Luna says, we should be tightening up rather than spreading out more.
Auto sus or a No U? You pretty much ignored my post this AM. You basically made a vote to call out MP, but you did not actually call him out. Weak sauce, not sure I buy it.G-Man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:39 pmMy Spider-Sense or my S~V~S Auto Sus- which one is tingling right now?S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:45 pmThanks alotI would return the favor, but it looks like you already have a vote (becasue you do/do not like socks?) and I would rather not place a second joke vote on someone with such a spread.
I see that Nova didn't really explain his LC vote. I saw DDL did but I don't see what was opportunistic about LC's vote, although I think Bob is more likely trying to relive the fun he had with Presidential quotes (unless he does this self imposed posting gimmick all the time?) than anything.
Still not loving G Mans vote, plus I see he is making feints at no shows when I seem to recall that we have a few replacements.
Why not? Nutella lols quite a bit, why do you think it is alignment indicative? If you had to vote now, who would you vote for?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:15 pmI too, don't feel comfortable trusting nutella.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
I have to finish my Socky thing, if I had to vote now it would be G Man, but as Luna says, we should be tightening up rather than spreading out more.
![]()
"Wrecking your shenanigans"?G-Man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:47 pm Mention tags start with the @ symbol, which would have wrecked my shenanigans. I also tend to ignore a lot of people’s questions. I’m also getting pretty good at spotting baddie bullsuit early-game accusations against me (like Nutella in Vanilla). Your supposed expectations of my play don’t smell right. Prove me wrong.
My shenanigans and my vote are mutually exclusive events. Maybe you’ll spot it in time.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:54 pm"Wrecking your shenanigans"?G-Man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:47 pm Mention tags start with the @ symbol, which would have wrecked my shenanigans. I also tend to ignore a lot of people’s questions. I’m also getting pretty good at spotting baddie bullsuit early-game accusations against me (like Nutella in Vanilla). Your supposed expectations of my play don’t smell right. Prove me wrong.
That vote would have caught my eye regardless of who made it. Whatever baddie BS you think you are spotting it isnt from me becasue I am not bad. And "proof", lol, cute.
I'm also in a crazy polar vortex and not going anywhere. Blahh. Anyway did you explain your vote? Also you seemed to defend low posting early game and then say eh whatever get rid of one of them and get the game moving along.
I did not spot it. But if you really wanted to call him out, then, why not quote his one post? Your shenanigans seem to allow for that. Like I said, that post seemed like a call out, but then you did not call him out. I have not voted for you, and likely will not since no one is feeling it but me, and it is already spread too far. But I am not a huge fan of this No U thing you got going on here.G-Man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:01 pmMy shenanigans and my vote are mutually exclusive events. Maybe you’ll spot it in time.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:54 pm"Wrecking your shenanigans"?G-Man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:47 pm Mention tags start with the @ symbol, which would have wrecked my shenanigans. I also tend to ignore a lot of people’s questions. I’m also getting pretty good at spotting baddie bullsuit early-game accusations against me (like Nutella in Vanilla). Your supposed expectations of my play don’t smell right. Prove me wrong.
That vote would have caught my eye regardless of who made it. Whatever baddie BS you think you are spotting it isnt from me becasue I am not bad. And "proof", lol, cute.
He always could, but is he bad? You took this same approach with me in the Vanilla game. What are your thoughts on LC's vote, and his take on cbob?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:07 pmBecause she was scum last time I thought she might me town. So I now cannot trust her.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:45 pmSpoiler: showWhy not? Nutella lols quite a bit, why do you think it is alignment indicative? If you had to vote now, who would you vote for?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:15 pmI too, don't feel comfortable trusting nutella.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
I have to finish my Socky thing, if I had to vote now it would be G Man, but as Luna says, we should be tightening up rather than spreading out more.
And If I had to vote now, I would [VOTE: Dragon D Luffy] aubergine because he is voting Long Con because Long Con is voting colonialbob for posting in pictures. DDL says the reason this makes LC look sketchy is :But in fact, DDL could be bad and also looking for an opportunistic lynch, and is therefore hyper-aware of other people acting opportunistic.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:27 am Bob's posts don't make me feel anything in special but then LC latching on him gives me opportunistic vibes.
Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:07 pmBecause she was scum last time I thought she might me town. So I now cannot trust her.S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:45 pmSpoiler: showWhy not? Nutella lols quite a bit, why do you think it is alignment indicative? If you had to vote now, who would you vote for?Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:15 pmI too, don't feel comfortable trusting nutella.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:01 pmThe way you start the sentence with "lol" before throwing shade at someone then saying you won't "necessarily" vote for them triggered mynutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:29 pmLol last time someone called Luna out for not practicing what she was preaching she was bad
I don't necessarily suspect her for it here though. Only so much one can do![]()
But we only have 4.5 hours so yeah who should we start grouping votes onto? I'd love to hear thoughts other than my ownsenses.
I have to finish my Socky thing, if I had to vote now it would be G Man, but as Luna says, we should be tightening up rather than spreading out more.
And If I had to vote now, I would [VOTE: Dragon D Luffy] aubergine because he is voting Long Con because Long Con is voting colonialbob for posting in pictures. DDL says the reason this makes LC look sketchy is :But in fact, DDL could be bad and also looking for an opportunistic lynch, and is therefore hyper-aware of other people acting opportunistic.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:27 am Bob's posts don't make me feel anything in special but then LC latching on him gives me opportunistic vibes.
M = Magnificent