The Syndicate

I just want to give a big thank you to my defenders, DFaraday, Vomps, and Bullz. You guys get me, and you are the best.

Bullzeye wrote:
It's early to be throwing out that kind of thing isn't it? Missing a day zero vote isn't exactly a sign of being a baddie.

Bullz, did you think Llama was civvie when you said this?

Just wondering.

thellama73 wrote:I'm voting for Keterman too. Last one to check in and an opportunistic vote for me piggybacking on Boogs. Especially when I am obviously civ.

Does Keterman checking in late make him bad or his opportunistic vote? I don't see his checking in late as bad. His vote-- yes.

I'm voting Keterman.

Dom wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:
It's early to be throwing out that kind of thing isn't it? Missing a day zero vote isn't exactly a sign of being a baddie.

Bullz, did you think Llama was civvie when you said this?

Just wondering.

I wasn't saying Llama was bad in that quote was I? I was just saying he was coming off a bit too keen.

Dom wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I'm voting for Keterman too. Last one to check in and an opportunistic vote for me piggybacking on Boogs. Especially when I am obviously civ.

Does Keterman checking in late make him bad or his opportunistic vote? I don't see his checking in late as bad. His vote-- yes.

Neither of those things "make" him bad. The role he was assigned is the only thing that can make him good or bad. I famously like to vote for people who miss votes and don't participate, because it makes the game more fun, so that is one. Two is his vote for me, and three is the fact that I had a better chance to save myself by voting for him, since he already had a vote. Four is a hunch.

I am doing school with the kiddos, finishing up laundry from our camping trip, and the kids have gymnastics at 11am. I don't have time to catch up and I won't be here to vote later so I have to do it now. I am randomizing :/. *votes keterman*

oh wow....I had no idea I was the 5th to vote him.....weird that is who came out randomly for me when so many others already voted him. May I add, I know some of you watch the thread and probably have seen me signed in for a while, but truth is, I signed in to try and catch up but have not sat down to look at the thread til now....so even though I have been signed in, I haven't had a chance to read anything.

Elohcin wrote:I am doing school with the kiddos, finishing up laundry from our camping trip, and the kids have gymnastics at 11am. I don't have time to catch up and I won't be here to vote later so I have to do it now. I am randomizing :/. *votes keterman*

That is the best randomization I have ever seen.

Dom wrote:I'm voting Keterman.

Dom, you forgot to actually vote. Please come back and do that, please.

Breakfast? At 3pm? Even I'm not that lazy! :P

Boogs wrote:

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.

No one has ever successfully defined "civ-like behavior." That's because there is no definition. If pressed, I would argue that stirring the pot is a much more civilian tactic than a Mafia trait.

I also fail to see why voting for a non-participant if you are a civilian is always a bad idea. That's a rather naive position. I have seen my share of Mafia coast right on through and even miss votes on purpose to know that it isn't necessarily a bad idea at all.

In your estimation, then, not participating (including not voting, which is how civilians get rid of Mafia) is more civ-like behavior than gauging reactions.

Boogs wrote:

bea wrote:so boogsy - you are cranky at the llama because he didn't give enough time for low poster to check in before he started to suspect them?

Is that right? Or am I misunderstanding your point?

I'm not cranky, I'm saying it's very suspicious to me to make such a bold statement and assumption THAT early and be acting so cocky that he is sure he is awesome etc. He's really rubbing me the wrong way and Dfaraday trying to vouch for him that he's Civ isn't setting right with me either. I think he's acting very off compared to the games I have played with him recently. Either he's being weird on purpose, or he's confident you his teammates can assure he isn't going anywhere for a while for the behavior he has been showing in the thread, but in no way has he been contributing as a proactive civ as DFar stated.

I would be far more suspicious of llama if he was not arrogant. Your post here also includes an either-or fallacy: "Either he's being weird on purpose, or he's confident his teammates can assure he isn't going anywhere for a while for the behavior he has been showing the thread..." I can come up with several alternatives to this statement, such as llama being decidedly ordinary. As for the notion that llama is confident that his teammates can assure he isn't going anywhere for a while, look at the votes and tell me if that's working out for him.

As for your claim that "in no way has he been contributing as a proactive civ," would you mind sharing who here HAS been contributing as a proactive civilian?

Don't like the votes for llama.
Don't like the votes for Keterman.

I don't like the way some have had their suspicions whored out to others to use as a reason to vote.

Don't like early lynches.
Don't like Mondays.

[quote="Roxy"]Don't like the votes for llama.
Don't like the votes for Keterman.

I don't like the way some have had their suspicions whored out to others to use as a reason to vote.

Don't like early lynches.
Don't like Mondays.[/quote

How do you feel about Tuesdays? :P

Roxy wrote: Don't like Mondays.

Tell me why.

Boogs wrote:

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.

This post makes me suspect boogs. Voting him. Llama doesn't seem off enough, and ketterman's suspicion seems kinda silly.

Boogs talk of what and what wouldn't a civvie do seems to be attempting to box llama into a very small definition is allowed to be civvie, and it doesn't seem right to me.

Elohcin wrote:I am doing school with the kiddos, finishing up laundry from our camping trip, and the kids have gymnastics at 11am. I don't have time to catch up and I won't be here to vote later so I have to do it now. I am randomizing :/. *votes keterman*

Elohcin wrote:oh wow....I had no idea I was the 5th to vote him.....weird that is who came out randomly for me when so many others already voted him. May I add, I know some of you watch the thread and probably have seen me signed in for a while, but truth is, I signed in to try and catch up but have not sat down to look at the thread til now....so even though I have been signed in, I haven't had a chance to read anything.

If I didn't know better, this would sound suspicious and fidgety.

And I voted Boogs.

Ugh, it's a good thing I woke up before missing the lynch! 12-8 shifts, man. I don't know if I love this Keterman voters block at all. :/

However, I'm not exactly beyond suspicion of him or Llama. Keterman, while his reason for suspecting Llama rings genuine to me (I too wonder if Llama started the game waaay too eager and on the offensive), his defense to being called out on low-posting doesn't ring very true, imo. But that's all I have to go on with either, which is frustrating.

I feel like a tie is a dangerous thing here, but I can't shake the sense that something with the vote pattern reeks of a save attempt after not much discussion. I'm going to vote Llama. I've gone back and forth on this several times here, but I need to get back to bed so those who have not voted yet can make the final call.

It pains me to do so when you were pretty much the only other voice in this thread, but *votes thellama*

keter's vote seems glommy. I don't think this is bad llama at this point in time.

voting keter.

omg you guys - my hangover hates me.

And after I trusted you, MR. Tsk tsk.

Ebwop: "only other voice on Day 0", rather.

And ok then, 4 votes left.

Linki: 3

Double linki:

Linki (German: Linken) is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Mikołajki Pomorskie, within Sztum County, Pomeranian Voivodeship, in northern Poland.

I was stuck in a meeting - fuckity fuck! Had to fire a girl who was caught taking money out of the registar sucky day all around.

Don't like firing people.
Don't like thieves.
Would have voted Elo for her vote and weird post after. Like she was trying to take back her reasoning of her vote right after she made it. Like it was the other voters fault they had voted the same.

Well crap. I'm sorry keter.

Sorry Keterman. Self-preservation and all that, old sport.

I am now more inclined to think Boogs might be Keterman's partner in (lack of) crime.

Bullzeye wrote:

Roxy wrote:Don't like the votes for llama.
Don't like the votes for Keterman.

I don't like the way some have had their suspicions whored out to others to use as a reason to vote.

Don't like early lynches.
Don't like Mondays.

How do you feel about Tuesdays? :P

I don't like Tuesdays either LOL The holiday threw my week off.

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote: Don't like Mondays.

Tell me why.

I want to shoot the whole day down!

thellama73 wrote:Sorry Keterman. Self-preservation and all that, old sport.

I am now more inclined to think Boogs might be Keterman's partner in (lack of) crime.

Good grief!!! Why paint such a HUGE neon sign on Boogs right as night begins????

I tried to vote for all the options except "rainbow" (because rainbow isn't a color just like the NFL is not a player). However, I get an error message saying I tried to pick too many options.

I voted Rainbow bc I could. What a great color
Wish Tye-Dye would have been a choice just so Epi could have made some sort of joke about it

Oh and this was so f'n adorable Mongoose!!!!

I'm voting all the colours of the rainbow. As well as rainbow itself. Just to be cool.

Roxy wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Sorry Keterman. Self-preservation and all that, old sport.

I am now more inclined to think Boogs might be Keterman's partner in (lack of) crime.

Good grief!!! Why paint such a HUGE neon sign on Boogs right as night begins????

the baddies are going to kill someone. They might as well kill someone who's trying to lynch me. Anyway, I have never bought into the whole "if we don't point out that someone is likely civ, the baddies will be too dumb to notice" idea.

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Sorry Keterman. Self-preservation and all that, old sport.

I am now more inclined to think Boogs might be Keterman's partner in (lack of) crime.

Good grief!!! Why paint such a HUGE neon sign on Boogs right as night begins????

the baddies are going to kill someone. They might as well kill someone who's trying to lynch me. Anyway, I have never bought into the whole "if we don't point out that someone is likely civ, the baddies will be too dumb to notice" idea.

But funny thing some are too dumb to notice.

Epignosis wrote:I tried to vote for all the options except "rainbow" (because rainbow isn't a color just like the NFL is not a player). However, I get an error message saying I tried to pick too many options.

You are limited to half the number of players, so when we get down to 7, the total Night Poll options will be 14 in number, allowing you to choose 7.

I voted for all the colors mentioned in this song.

Roxy wrote:Oh and this was so f'n adorable Mongoose!!!!

So glad you enjoyed, Roxy! I named them the way I did after my favorite two sweater-wearing cowpokes.

Mongoose wrote:

Roxy wrote:Oh and this was so f'n adorable Mongoose!!!!

So glad you enjoyed, Roxy! I named them the way I did after my favorite two sweater-wearing cowpokes.

i lloove noanm chiomsky in anreroticway

Well if anything good came out of this, the pool table/housey thingy don't have to be worried about accidentally getting themselves killed now. Hopefully that can give civvie some type of advantage.

Voted Brown white red and yellow because racism sucks.

I didn't mean to entirely miss the poll

i picked some colors, pink needs more luvin

RIP Ket, sorry.

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I am doing school with the kiddos, finishing up laundry from our camping trip, and the kids have gymnastics at 11am. I don't have time to catch up and I won't be here to vote later so I have to do it now. I am randomizing :/. *votes keterman*

Elohcin wrote:oh wow....I had no idea I was the 5th to vote him.....weird that is who came out randomly for me when so many others already voted him. May I add, I know some of you watch the thread and probably have seen me signed in for a while, but truth is, I signed in to try and catch up but have not sat down to look at the thread til now....so even though I have been signed in, I haven't had a chance to read anything.

If I didn't know better, this would sound suspicious and fidgety.

I didn't click on "view results" or whatever it says before voting....I didn't even think to I was in a hurry.

Interesting...big felt rolls had btsc with felt samples. I will go back and read to see if anyone was trying to defend Keterman.

Elohcin wrote:Interesting...big felt rolls had btsc with felt samples. I will go back and read to see if anyone was trying to defend Keterman.

Hmm, no defense that I saw. So, as some of you have been talking about low-posters already, I would guess Felt Samples is among them. If I were Felt Samples, I would try to speak up on behalf of my BTSC partner as much as I could without info-dumping.

Rip Keterman :/ I think it's lame he got killed when he didn't even do anything. And Llama you aren't making me feel any better about you trying to accuse me of a role and say you don't care if I die since I suspect you instead of trying to change my opinion on your behavior.

Boogs wrote:Rip Keterman :/ I think it's lame he got killed when he didn't even do anything. And Llama you aren't making me feel any better about you trying to accuse me of a role and say you don't care if I die since I suspect you instead of trying to change my opinion on your behavior.

Of course I care if you die. But if someone has to die, I would rather it be someone who's trying to kill me, all things being equal.