Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
you should answer to DDLuffy's comments about you.Sloonei wrote:I have not played an open setup game in years and I usually ask The Thread what it thinks the possible setup could be at a certain point early in the game. I can't do that here
Not much, considering we don't know anyone's previous role. Like I said, I was mostly throwing a theory on the wall to see how people would react.sanmateo wrote:is there anything that a possible alignment change would say about jay right now tho? ftr i dont think he didnt become more proactive. he did say he was going to post some reads as day 0 ended but nothing happened afaictDragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm curious too. This Day 0 has been fun, but it's hard to make reads on anyone when almost none of the posts are about the game. It's easier when everyone is accusing each other. I suppose that's what Day 1s are for.
Btw, I think it's very interesting how Jay started talking about making cases right after the second role was handed out. Which is interesting since the game was pretty much a blank state at that point. Though to be fair, he did say he had nothing at that point.
That could indicate an alignment change. If a player who has done nothing gets a new role and suddenly starts being proactive, it might mean a townie who became mafia, or vice-versa. Just a theory.
for reference, here's the last time he was scum: https://rateyourmusic.com/board_message ... msg5765318 (jay, if you are scum this time please dont murk me on night 1. thx)
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:c'mon all y'all. make some posts, and feed this Day 1 with delicious new content. every new player making an appearance allows responses from the rest, and it's exponential growth of content. that's like an economics thing or something right?
That's fair and logical. Thanks!Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I think it's very likely that it's true, and that it could just be a different way of thinking. I've been wrong about players because I didn't agree with their way of hinking so I framed them as scum, when the truth was that they were just different from me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What implications does "weird" have for you? Are you reading civilian, mafia, or neutral on Sloonei? Do you believe his explanation?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: I do think it's weird that you tried to start a conversation by saying something you don't actually believe in.
But I also see the possibility of a scum slip. For example, he might have tried to start a conversation just to make it look like he's talking, and when someone (me) tried to question what he said, he backed down because he isn't really interested in discussing.
i'm going to build an embassy for my people in the coordinate center of your capital cityEpignosis wrote:Listen, foreigner. Your ways are strange here.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:until one of the hosts has responded to the queries regarding vote changes in the poll, i will refrain from making any vote in the poll. however, i would like to represent a "vote" in the thread in some manner before that declaration is made. votes are highly important to my Day 1 methods. just like before, if i italicize your username, know that i am voting for you in spirit if not necessarily the poll. i'll underline it too for good measure.
if the hosts declare that the poll vote may be changed then this will no longer be necessary.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:i'm going to build an embassy for my people in the coordinate center of your capital cityEpignosis wrote:Listen, foreigner. Your ways are strange here.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:until one of the hosts has responded to the queries regarding vote changes in the poll, i will refrain from making any vote in the poll. however, i would like to represent a "vote" in the thread in some manner before that declaration is made. votes are highly important to my Day 1 methods. just like before, if i italicize your username, know that i am voting for you in spirit if not necessarily the poll. i'll underline it too for good measure.
if the hosts declare that the poll vote may be changed then this will no longer be necessary.
What Jay's singing? How did I miss that?MovingPictures07 wrote:Also listening to Skylarking thanks to Jay's 'singing'. :P
Just kidding, it's way better than my singing.
Anyway, it's an amazing album that I haven't listened to in WAY too long.
I had stated my "disinterest" in the idea in the initial post where I brought it up, to be fair. You don't seem committed to either side of the argument in this post. If you had to choose at this moment, which would you say is more likely? That I am just a townie with a different strategy, or a slippin' scummy?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I think it's very likely that it's true, and that it could just be a different way of thinking. I've been wrong about players because I didn't agree with their way of hinking so I framed them as scum, when the truth was that they were just different from me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What implications does "weird" have for you? Are you reading civilian, mafia, or neutral on Sloonei? Do you believe his explanation?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: I do think it's weird that you tried to start a conversation by saying something you don't actually believe in.
But I also see the possibility of a scum slip. For example, he might have tried to start a conversation just to make it look like he's talking, and when someone (me) tried to question what he said, he backed down because he isn't really interested in discussing.
yo sanmateo, do you note any similarities between Me Now and Me Then?sanmateo wrote:is there anything that a possible alignment change would say about jay right now tho? ftr i dont think he didnt become more proactive. he did say he was going to post some reads as day 0 ended but nothing happened afaictDragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm curious too. This Day 0 has been fun, but it's hard to make reads on anyone when almost none of the posts are about the game. It's easier when everyone is accusing each other. I suppose that's what Day 1s are for.
Btw, I think it's very interesting how Jay started talking about making cases right after the second role was handed out. Which is interesting since the game was pretty much a blank state at that point. Though to be fair, he did say he had nothing at that point.
That could indicate an alignment change. If a player who has done nothing gets a new role and suddenly starts being proactive, it might mean a townie who became mafia, or vice-versa. Just a theory.
for reference, here's the last time he was scum: https://rateyourmusic.com/board_message ... msg5765318 (jay, if you are scum this time please dont murk me on night 1. thx)
sloonei's phrasing did caught my eye but it seems odd that you are going ahead and calling that a possible* scumslip when you just agreed with his method of "want[ing] to make people talk to see if can get someone knocked out of their confort zone"Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
I think it's very likely that it's true, and that it could just be a different way of thinking. I've been wrong about players because I didn't agree with their way of hinking so I framed them as scum, when the truth was that they were just different from me.
But I also see the possibility of a scum slip. For example, he might have tried to start a conversation just to make it look like he's talking, and when someone (me) tried to question what he said, he backed down because he isn't really interested in discussing.
good thinking, can we post our previous roles or would that be game-breaking? do we even know if there was any alignment changes?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Not much, considering we don't know anyone's previous role. Like I said, I was mostly throwing a theory on the wall to see how people would react.
I just found the timing interesting. The host sent the new roles, and suddenly Jay was like "can I start playing seriously on day 0"?
Does the fact that DDL seems committed to neither side give you any feel for his alignment?Sloonei wrote:I had stated my "disinterest" in the idea in the initial post where I brought it up, to be fair. You don't seem committed to either side of the argument in this post. If you had to choose at this moment, which would you say is more likely? That I am just a townie with a different strategy, or a slippin' scummy?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I think it's very likely that it's true, and that it could just be a different way of thinking. I've been wrong about players because I didn't agree with their way of hinking so I framed them as scum, when the truth was that they were just different from me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What implications does "weird" have for you? Are you reading civilian, mafia, or neutral on Sloonei? Do you believe his explanation?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: I do think it's weird that you tried to start a conversation by saying something you don't actually believe in.
But I also see the possibility of a scum slip. For example, he might have tried to start a conversation just to make it look like he's talking, and when someone (me) tried to question what he said, he backed down because he isn't really interested in discussing.
if i am using this forum correctly, this here's a hyperlink to The SpotDragon D. Luffy wrote:What Jay's singing? How did I miss that?MovingPictures07 wrote:Also listening to Skylarking thanks to Jay's 'singing'. :P
Just kidding, it's way better than my singing.
Anyway, it's an amazing album that I haven't listened to in WAY too long.
I am not the hosts, but I think this would be considered rule breaking; if not, it would be bad form, since the game is open setup, and role claiming is a huge no no around here. Just an FYI.sanmateo wrote:good thinking, can we post our previous roles or would that be game-breaking? do we even know if there was any alignment changes?
not that i remember but i was doing the pm thing back then and i wasnt that involved with anything else happening.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:yo sanmateo, do you note any similarities between Me Now and Me Then?sanmateo wrote:is there anything that a possible alignment change would say about jay right now tho? ftr i dont think he didnt become more proactive. he did say he was going to post some reads as day 0 ended but nothing happened afaictDragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm curious too. This Day 0 has been fun, but it's hard to make reads on anyone when almost none of the posts are about the game. It's easier when everyone is accusing each other. I suppose that's what Day 1s are for.
Btw, I think it's very interesting how Jay started talking about making cases right after the second role was handed out. Which is interesting since the game was pretty much a blank state at that point. Though to be fair, he did say he had nothing at that point.
That could indicate an alignment change. If a player who has done nothing gets a new role and suddenly starts being proactive, it might mean a townie who became mafia, or vice-versa. Just a theory.
for reference, here's the last time he was scum: https://rateyourmusic.com/board_message ... msg5765318 (jay, if you are scum this time please dont murk me on night 1. thx)
A townie with a different strategy. Scum usually doesn't slip that easily unless they're pretty bad.Sloonei wrote:I had stated my "disinterest" in the idea in the initial post where I brought it up, to be fair. You don't seem committed to either side of the argument in this post. If you had to choose at this moment, which would you say is more likely? That I am just a townie with a different strategy, or a slippin' scummy?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I think it's very likely that it's true, and that it could just be a different way of thinking. I've been wrong about players because I didn't agree with their way of hinking so I framed them as scum, when the truth was that they were just different from me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What implications does "weird" have for you? Are you reading civilian, mafia, or neutral on Sloonei? Do you believe his explanation?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: I do think it's weird that you tried to start a conversation by saying something you don't actually believe in.
But I also see the possibility of a scum slip. For example, he might have tried to start a conversation just to make it look like he's talking, and when someone (me) tried to question what he said, he backed down because he isn't really interested in discussing.
oh i forgot for a second u dont do roleclaiming here, sorryMovingPictures07 wrote:I am not the hosts, but I think this would be considered rule breaking; if not, it would be bad form, since the game is open setup, and role claiming is a huge no no around here. Just an FYI.sanmateo wrote:good thinking, can we post our previous roles or would that be game-breaking? do we even know if there was any alignment changes?
I will definitely not be posting anything regarding my previous role PM and I think it would be a waste of time to even discuss them.
Not yet. I am committed to neither side of this observation. I see it as equally possible for this to be the behavior of a townie still gathering his thoughts or a scum who's unwilling to make any open commitments this early in the thread.MovingPictures07 wrote:Does the fact that DDL seems committed to neither side give you any feel for his alignment?Sloonei wrote:I had stated my "disinterest" in the idea in the initial post where I brought it up, to be fair. You don't seem committed to either side of the argument in this post. If you had to choose at this moment, which would you say is more likely? That I am just a townie with a different strategy, or a slippin' scummy?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I think it's very likely that it's true, and that it could just be a different way of thinking. I've been wrong about players because I didn't agree with their way of hinking so I framed them as scum, when the truth was that they were just different from me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What implications does "weird" have for you? Are you reading civilian, mafia, or neutral on Sloonei? Do you believe his explanation?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: I do think it's weird that you tried to start a conversation by saying something you don't actually believe in.
But I also see the possibility of a scum slip. For example, he might have tried to start a conversation just to make it look like he's talking, and when someone (me) tried to question what he said, he backed down because he isn't really interested in discussing.
Don't sweat it!sanmateo wrote:oh i forgot for a second u dont do roleclaiming here, sorryMovingPictures07 wrote:I am not the hosts, but I think this would be considered rule breaking; if not, it would be bad form, since the game is open setup, and role claiming is a huge no no around here. Just an FYI.sanmateo wrote:good thinking, can we post our previous roles or would that be game-breaking? do we even know if there was any alignment changes?
I will definitely not be posting anything regarding my previous role PM and I think it would be a waste of time to even discuss them.
Sometimes. Epi can be active as hell, but during Day 1, I've seen him sit back and watch for a bit before pouncing on someone with an observation.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Anyone in the know:
Is it typical for Epignosis to be aware of and introduced to a game (as seen in his initial new-role post) but distinctly quiet while others carry on discussion?
you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
You willing to back this assertion up with a vote?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
i think townies (except for new-ish players) are most likely to assert whatever their thoughts may be more directly while scum tries to gauge the reactions of others before going after a player. and you have been very tentative in your posts, thats what i was referring to.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:A townie with a different strategy. Scum usually doesn't slip that easily unless they're pretty bad.Sloonei wrote:I had stated my "disinterest" in the idea in the initial post where I brought it up, to be fair. You don't seem committed to either side of the argument in this post. If you had to choose at this moment, which would you say is more likely? That I am just a townie with a different strategy, or a slippin' scummy?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I think it's very likely that it's true, and that it could just be a different way of thinking. I've been wrong about players because I didn't agree with their way of hinking so I framed them as scum, when the truth was that they were just different from me.MovingPictures07 wrote:What implications does "weird" have for you? Are you reading civilian, mafia, or neutral on Sloonei? Do you believe his explanation?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: I do think it's weird that you tried to start a conversation by saying something you don't actually believe in.
But I also see the possibility of a scum slip. For example, he might have tried to start a conversation just to make it look like he's talking, and when someone (me) tried to question what he said, he backed down because he isn't really interested in discussing.
@sanmateo: It's one thing to want to make people talk, but scum also wants to join conversations to avoid looking like they're hiding. The two things are equally possible.
And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
This usually gets me in danger of being lynched on D1, though.
i can certainly offer a spiritual vote. Dragon D. LuffyMovingPictures07 wrote:You willing to back this assertion up with a vote?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
Stop being a coward!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:is it possible to see the poll results before having submitted a vote? i see the "view results" button, but i don't wanna click it if it cancels my ability to vote -- it would on an RYM poll.
It does not cancel your ability to vote; you can click it as many times as you want.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:is it possible to see the poll results before having submitted a vote? i see the "view results" button, but i don't wanna click it if it cancels my ability to vote -- it would on an RYM poll.
You have cast exactly zero votes in the poll yourself.Epignosis wrote:Stop being a coward!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:is it possible to see the poll results before having submitted a vote? i see the "view results" button, but i don't wanna click it if it cancels my ability to vote -- it would on an RYM poll.
please share any thought whatsoever that has passed through your mind as you've read the posts in this game since Russ declared the start of Day 1. ideally the thought you share should be ABOUT these posts though -- i understand the mind wanders.Epignosis wrote:Stop being a coward!JaggedJimmyJay wrote:is it possible to see the poll results before having submitted a vote? i see the "view results" button, but i don't wanna click it if it cancels my ability to vote -- it would on an RYM poll.
good to know, thanks.MovingPictures07 wrote:It does not cancel your ability to vote; you can click it as many times as you want.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:is it possible to see the poll results before having submitted a vote? i see the "view results" button, but i don't wanna click it if it cancels my ability to vote -- it would on an RYM poll.
Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
Would you feel better about voting for a player who's not posted yet than you would voting for one of us who's been active in the early going? Why/why not?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
i can sympathize at least. and i think one of the most effective means of playing Day 1 is to get town reads more than scum reads. but since we're currently stuck with a small core of players doing all the talking, i am going to challenge you with a question:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
why tho?MovingPictures07 wrote:Committing to slight civilian read on DDL. I believe him.
can you describe what is motivating your slight trust? i don't necessarily disagree. but for you to make this post requires that some point he made or emotion he conveyed resonated with you in a meaningful way. please point to it if you can.MovingPictures07 wrote:Committing to slight civilian read on DDL. I believe him.
Reads genuine to me. It's something I've felt many times before as well as faked, and the wording here does not seem fabricated. I could very well be wrong. But I'm throwing it out there.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.
ergo, you're scum.
Who is more suspicious to you at the moment, Epi or DDL?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:i have to take note that Epignosis is active lurking right now. he is aware of the game, seemingly following the game, and contributing nothing to it. at face value and independent of meta (which i cannot know beyond MP's descriptions), i find that suspicious.
Epi. i don't really find DDL especially suspicious. he has made himself available to be pressured and responded to it in a neutral or better way. i don't take immediate issue with his commentary.MovingPictures07 wrote:Who is more suspicious to you at the moment, Epi or DDL?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:i have to take note that Epignosis is active lurking right now. he is aware of the game, seemingly following the game, and contributing nothing to it. at face value and independent of meta (which i cannot know beyond MP's descriptions), i find that suspicious.
I think you all (you, MP, and Jay and some other guy whose name I forgot) look like town. In other words, I also have no scumreads.Sloonei wrote:Would you feel better about voting for a player who's not posted yet than you would voting for one of us who's been active in the early going? Why/why not?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
And when you say you "don't think any of the active players are scum right now", does that mean you have no scum reads yet, or that you are reading us all as town?
why are you willing to go out on a limb and say everyone here so far is town? because you did mention you thought sloonei could've scum-slipped. so you did point something out but now you're not gonna do that anymore because people mentioned it was suss.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
I think you all (you, MP, and Jay and some other guy whose name I forgot) look like town. In other words, I also have no scumreads.Sloonei wrote:Would you feel better about voting for a player who's not posted yet than you would voting for one of us who's been active in the early going? Why/why not?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
And when you say you "don't think any of the active players are scum right now", does that mean you have no scum reads yet, or that you are reading us all as town?
Why do you feel comfortable enough to say that we're all town reads?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I think you all (you, MP, and Jay and some other guy whose name I forgot) look like town. In other words, I also have no scumreads.Sloonei wrote:Would you feel better about voting for a player who's not posted yet than you would voting for one of us who's been active in the early going? Why/why not?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Thing is, I don't think any of the active players are scum right now. If I had to vote right now, I'd vote for one of the inactive ones. I only see small possibilities. So I explore them since I don't have anything better. But I don't want to directly call people scum on something that is only a small possibility, at the risk of saying something stupid. When I see someone that looks more scummy than not to me, i'll point it out.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:you've not called anyone scum. in fact, you've made assertions of scumminess but in each case offered a caveat to relieve the pressure inherent to those assertions.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sloonei wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:And I like to call people scum. Defenses are a great way to get reactions.
ergo, you're scum.
And when you say you "don't think any of the active players are scum right now", does that mean you have no scum reads yet, or that you are reading us all as town?
Thus, if I had to vote now, I'd vote for some of the others, despite the fact I have nearly zero data on any of them. It's a matter of probability, really.
Thank god I don't have to vote now, so I hope the others come and talk so I get more vote candidates.
Fair enough. I have no opinion on Epi at the moment.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Epi. i don't really find DDL especially suspicious. he has made himself available to be pressured and responded to it in a neutral or better way. i don't take immediate issue with his commentary.MovingPictures07 wrote:Who is more suspicious to you at the moment, Epi or DDL?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:i have to take note that Epignosis is active lurking right now. he is aware of the game, seemingly following the game, and contributing nothing to it. at face value and independent of meta (which i cannot know beyond MP's descriptions), i find that suspicious.
Since when does "look like town" equate to a town read?Sloonei wrote:Why do you feel comfortable enough to say that we're all town reads?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
I think you all (you, MP, and Jay and some other guy whose name I forgot) look like town. In other words, I also have no scumreads.
Thus, if I had to vote now, I'd vote for some of the others, despite the fact I have nearly zero data on any of them. It's a matter of probability, really.
Thank god I don't have to vote now, so I hope the others come and talk so I get more vote candidates.