The Syndicate

sig wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:RIP DrWilgobels.

I think you're right sig. Question: why did you think DrWilgy assumed he wasn't going to be lynched?

I was thinking he was Joseph Moseley or maybe the doctor.

Though I was leaning more on Moseley.

linki: Epi why are you talking about this at night when we don't have a protector? It seems like a bad strategy.

Having said this I think he targeted Scotty from his post.

Absolutely I'm talking about this at Night.

Elohcin wrote:4) All players on the side of the winning faction will win, whether they are dead-or-alive.

Absolutely I'm talking about this at Night.

You're painting a target on us, unless your mafia then your just painting it on everyone else.

linki: Ah okay never mind I forgot about that rule.

BTSC could also be civ, right?

Though even so, painting a target on people who we can clear as solid civs isn't very smart.

@Nero yes, however I think you just slipped that you aren't a civ with BTSC. :P

Nerolunar wrote:BTSC could also be civ, right?

Oops.

Sigh.....

Now can we lynch daisy or dog or someone that I want tommorw?

ika wrote:Sigh.....

Now can we lynch daisy or dog or someone that I want tommorw?

dog

Epignosis wrote:

ika wrote:Sigh.....

Now can we lynch daisy or dog or someone that I want tommorw?

dog

Welcome to mobile posting world...

You know I mean sig

ika wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

ika wrote:Sigh.....

Now can we lynch daisy or dog or someone that I want tommorw?

dog

Welcome to mobile posting world...

You know I mean sig

I'm not a dog.

Fun Fact I'm in the top five posters.


@ika why do you want to lynch me you have yet to explain your case on me.

Also why Daisy?

sig wrote:Fun Fact I'm in the top five posters.


@ika why do you want to lynch me you have yet to explain your case on me.

And how many fucking times to I have to repeat myself

I DONT DO CASES CUS I SUCK AT THEM AND THEY ARE WEAK AS SHIT!!!!

sig wrote:Also why Daisy?

She has no natural paranoia of me and is buddying super hard

ika wrote:

sig wrote:Also why Daisy?

She has no natural paranoia of me and is buddying super hard

ika, I watched your baddie game very closely in Turf Wars. Up close and personal. Frankly you almost always tunnel hard on your own team. I am not on a baddie team so I am very confident that you are civ, plus you were hard after DF who we know was civ. Additionally, your play at the start clearly looked like someone who was trying to solve the game, although that has been severely lacking of late which I assume has been on the decline because you don't have Silver in the game with you right now. But your behavior when she was in the thread lacked the mindless sheeping of her opinions that you displayed in Turf Wars. Also, if you had killed Silver N1, you and I both know that you have an emotional response to betraying Silver which is difficult for you to hide, I have seen no such emotional response in this game. I have no paranoia of you not because I am buddying but because I feel extremely confident that you are civ. And I think I have decent reason to believe so. A thread based case for your civ alignment, if you will. But you know, according to you that's weak as shit. So if you are civ and I am correct in my read of you (which I didn't plan on revealing why I felt that about you because why build a case for someone's civ alignment just to make them a target for the baddies, but clearly you misread why I trust you) then maybe you should take a second to re-evaulate your suspicion of me.

So Epi what are you feeling about sig then?

Spacedaisy wrote:So Epi what are you feeling about sig then?

Feeling? I'm not feeling anything about sig. I don't think its my feelings about sig that matter all too much anyway.

Epignosis wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:So Epi what are you feeling about sig then?

Feeling? I'm not feeling anything about sig. I don't think its my feelings about sig that matter all too much anyway.

but, but,
I was planning our honeymoon.


Are you saying you're going to leave me at the alter! I bought myself a dress and converted to Mormonism for nothing!




:P


Though seriously, do you think I'm good, bad, leaning good, leaning bad, ect.

sig wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:So Epi what are you feeling about sig then?

Feeling? I'm not feeling anything about sig. I don't think its my feelings about sig that matter all too much anyway.

but, but,
I was planning our honeymoon.


Are you saying you're going to leave me at the alter! I bought myself a dress and converted to Mormonism for nothing!




:P


Though seriously, do you think I'm good, bad, leaning good, leaning bad, ect.

I don't think that's appropriate to say right now.

I wouldn't want to...you know...paint a target on your or anything like that.

I guess with it being election year, I shouldn't talk about Mormons your right.

Well I'm mad again. Way to go, household.

Also, hi.

Why?

Thanks for not lynching me today while I was holed up in the basement. I will respond in the morning to what I'm sure are rivoting reasons why I was the lead lynch for a while.

Also brief thoughts off the top of my head:

Llama seems bad to me. Nero seems bad as well. I'd be down with a Nero lynch tomorrow.
I trust Epi right now.
I am willing to leave LoRab alone, as well as Daisy.
I trust ika.
MM is still a ??? to me.
Matt...is about as hopeless this game as Bernie is to win the nomination.
More tomorrow.

sig wrote:Why?

One: don't silence me. I'm inclined to think you did it sig, if only to pass me in posts.
Two: another important civ was lynched.
Three: I have anger management problems.

Scotty wrote:

sig wrote:Why?

One: don't silence me. I'm inclined to think you did it sig, if only to pass me in posts.
Two: another important civ was lynched.
Three: I have anger management problems.

Me never though it would be tempting.
Ah okay
You should take care of those problems by doing something relaxing liking making sure MM gets silenced so I can pass him in posts. or screaming into a pillow.

Scotty wrote:Thanks for not lynching me today while I was holed up in the basement. I will respond in the morning to what I'm sure are rivoting reasons why I was the lead lynch for a while.

Also brief thoughts off the top of my head:

Llama seems bad to me. Nero seems bad as well. I'd be down with a Nero lynch tomorrow.
I trust Epi right now.
I am willing to leave LoRab alone, as well as Daisy.
I trust ika.
MM is still a ??? to me.
Matt...is about as hopeless this game as Bernie is to win the nomination.
More tomorrow.

Why does llama feel bad?

I don't know, why does Llama feel bad?

This is a why did the chicken road scenario, isn't it?

Is Nerolunar the lynch tomorrow?

Epignosis wrote:Is Nerolunar the lynch tomorrow?

You make it sounds so simple.

Epignosis wrote:Is Nerolunar the lynch tomorrow?

Nope. I didn´t slip before. You guys made it seem like Wilgys reads were only on mafia, which is odd since he checks both civ and baddie BTSC apparently. I got confused for a moment

My scum reads are: Scotty, Sig, Lorab

My civ reads are: Ika, Epignosis

Sig probably only started the wagon on Wilgy to save himself Im cursing myself for following through with it at his suggestion. I don´t trust you anymore Sig.

Let's looksie why I got votes yesterday:

Nerolunar has a pretty straightforward day 4. He throws out names to suspect:

Nerolunar wrote:Yeah I dont think we should rule out Lorab either.

Nerolunar wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Nerolunar wrote:I could see Sig being bad tbh. Im not that used to his meta, but so far he seems more calculated than usual. Scotty too has this manipulative/calculated vibe. They are not acting the way they did in Turf Wars at least - what do you guys think of this?

I wouldn´t lynch Ika. He is a solid townread for me, as is Epignosis.

He doesn't seem calculated at all to me. Long Con is someone who I would call calculated and that isn't unique to this game.

How would you describe their behavior in Turf Wars? What were their alignments and that game?

Scotty was way more laid back and Sig was being very messy, although he did receive heat by everyone. They were both civs.

But he isn't the first to vote on anyone. He's fishing.
He was the first to suggest that I am not laid back in this game. I'm still pretty laid back, but while I was getting votes from y'all I was anything but. Again, thanks for not lynching me while I had glue in my mouth.

thellama73 wrote:I'm putting my vote on Scotty for now. The more I think about him, the more I suspect he's been flying under the radar this whole time.

Then llama immediately follows with this post, which was completely out of the blue, considering he hasn't shown this kind of suspicion of me this whole game. I also find it VERY hard to believe that I've been flying under the radar with the second most posts in the game at this point.

Nerolunar wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I'm putting my vote on Scotty for now. The more I think about him, the more I suspect he's been flying under the radar this whole time.

I feel you.

Scotty

Well lookie! Someone bought your weak ass suspicion so now you're on it like donkey kong. I amend what I said before- YOU look more suspicious than llama because of this vote.

Nerolunar wrote:Im more inclined to lynch Scotty this phase as I find him to be the most suspicious right now. I won´t oppose Lorab either.

Epi gets in on the fun:

Epignosis wrote:At present, I would be willing to vote sig or Scotty, but my willingness needs reason.

Even though:

I don't do, "Hey help me lynch this guy" and "join me and vote that guy!"

Following with:

Epignosis wrote:I voted silenced Scotty. I gather he is silenced because only he and Illyria have not posted, but he has votes but has said nothing.

So what is the reasoning you just described you needed? That I was silenced by a civ? Wtf is this vote. Would you let me put my hands down your pants if I said I was your doctor? No?

Nerolunar wrote:Scotty is silenced? didn´t realize that before someone pointed it out. I think its kinda shitty to vote for a silenced person so I will move my vote.

Lorab

Suspicion still lingers from yesterday. I feel like she is currently trying to clean it up but so far Im not convinced.

How noble of you switch now that you saw the moral dilemma.

Llama kept his vote on me all day phase. He never added anything more of note, besides eating the bait from Nero.

I grade Llama's vote at a D+ . I grade Nero's at a D- . I grade Epi's at a C- .


Like what actual suspicions can I even respond to here? Someone enlighten me.

Nerolunar wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Is Nerolunar the lynch tomorrow?

Nope. I didn´t slip before. You guys made it seem like Wilgys reads were only on mafia, which is odd since he checks both civ and baddie BTSC apparently. I got confused for a moment

My scum reads are: Scotty, Sig, Lorab

My civ reads are: Ika, Epignosis

Sig probably only started the wagon on Wilgy to save himself Im cursing myself for following through with it at his suggestion. I don´t trust you anymore Sig.

I don't understand. Sig didn't start the wagon. Epi did, and you even voted for Wilgy BEFORE sig.

I think your memory is failing you, Nero.

You didn't end up with my vote, and that's what counts.

Epignosis wrote:You didn't end up with my vote, and that's what counts.

#truth

sig wrote:

Nerolunar wrote:Wilgy gunning out reads the moment he comes under suspicion.

Yes agreed one of which is me, who is an easy person to say is mafia and not big deal when I flip civ. Wanna vote for me with him?

This is what Im referring to.

Wait... I have misinterpreted that. Sig is asking me to vote for him along with Wilgy, not the opposite.

Yeah nero you're making no sense. Wilgy is suscpious for trying to lynch me, (your words.) Yet you think I'm mafia. Also I didn't start tge Wilgy wagon i wanted to lynch ika. So your argument makes no sense what so ever.

Ugh mobile sucks, but sig doesn't auto correct to dog on mine hmmmm

Well, I was only moderately suspicious of you before Wilgy got lynched. You are a scum read for me now

I fully believed that Wilgy was scum before he was lynched

Nerolunar wrote:I fully believed that Wilgy was scum before he was lynched

Hey Cora!

I wouldn't be surprised if Epignosis is Cora, and he's not even using her night abilities.

I would. That's not very Epi-like.

Nerolunar wrote:Well, I was only moderately suspicious of you before Wilgy got lynched. You are a scum read for me now

I fully believed that Wilgy was scum before he was lynched

Why where you suspicious of me at all though? And more importantly why are you trying to blame me for your Rilgy vote.

I blamed you a little but I was wrong, since I had misinterpreted your statement. See above, I explained it earlier.

Im still suspicious of you on a tone level. You seem too calculated.

Nerolunar wrote:I blamed you a little but I was wrong, since I had misinterpreted your statement. See above, I explained it earlier.

Im still suspicious of you on a tone level. You seem too calculated.

I can't defend myself from a tone read that I'm to calculated.

sig wrote:

Nerolunar wrote:Well, I was only moderately suspicious of you before Wilgy got lynched. You are a scum read for me now

I fully believed that Wilgy was scum before he was lynched

Why where you suspicious of me at all though? And more importantly why are you trying to blame me for your Rilgy vote.

Doctow Rilgy at your service.

Scotty wrote:Let's looksie why I got votes yesterday:

Nerolunar has a pretty straightforward day 4. He throws out names to suspect:

Nerolunar wrote:Yeah I dont think we should rule out Lorab either.

Nerolunar wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Nerolunar wrote:I could see Sig being bad tbh. Im not that used to his meta, but so far he seems more calculated than usual. Scotty too has this manipulative/calculated vibe. They are not acting the way they did in Turf Wars at least - what do you guys think of this?

I wouldn´t lynch Ika. He is a solid townread for me, as is Epignosis.

He doesn't seem calculated at all to me. Long Con is someone who I would call calculated and that isn't unique to this game.

How would you describe their behavior in Turf Wars? What were their alignments and that game?

Scotty was way more laid back and Sig was being very messy, although he did receive heat by everyone. They were both civs.

But he isn't the first to vote on anyone. He's fishing.
He was the first to suggest that I am not laid back in this game. I'm still pretty laid back, but while I was getting votes from y'all I was anything but. Again, thanks for not lynching me while I had glue in my mouth.

thellama73 wrote:I'm putting my vote on Scotty for now. The more I think about him, the more I suspect he's been flying under the radar this whole time.

Then llama immediately follows with this post, which was completely out of the blue, considering he hasn't shown this kind of suspicion of me this whole game. I also find it VERY hard to believe that I've been flying under the radar with the second most posts in the game at this point.

Nerolunar wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I'm putting my vote on Scotty for now. The more I think about him, the more I suspect he's been flying under the radar this whole time.

I feel you.

Scotty

Well lookie! Someone bought your weak ass suspicion so now you're on it like donkey kong. I amend what I said before- YOU look more suspicious than llama because of this vote.

Nerolunar wrote:Im more inclined to lynch Scotty this phase as I find him to be the most suspicious right now. I won´t oppose Lorab either.

Epi gets in on the fun:

Epignosis wrote:At present, I would be willing to vote sig or Scotty, but my willingness needs reason.

Even though:

I don't do, "Hey help me lynch this guy" and "join me and vote that guy!"

Following with:

Epignosis wrote:I voted silenced Scotty. I gather he is silenced because only he and Illyria have not posted, but he has votes but has said nothing.

So what is the reasoning you just described you needed? That I was silenced by a civ? Wtf is this vote. Would you let me put my hands down your pants if I said I was your doctor? No?

Nerolunar wrote:Scotty is silenced? didn´t realize that before someone pointed it out. I think its kinda shitty to vote for a silenced person so I will move my vote.

Lorab

Suspicion still lingers from yesterday. I feel like she is currently trying to clean it up but so far Im not convinced.

How noble of you switch now that you saw the moral dilemma.

Llama kept his vote on me all day phase. He never added anything more of note, besides eating the bait from Nero.

I grade Llama's vote at a D+ . I grade Nero's at a D- . I grade Epi's at a C- .


Like what actual suspicions can I even respond to here? Someone enlighten me.

@Nero why did your view of me change so quickly.

DrWilgy wrote:

sig wrote:

Nerolunar wrote:Well, I was only moderately suspicious of you before Wilgy got lynched. You are a scum read for me now

I fully believed that Wilgy was scum before he was lynched

Why where you suspicious of me at all though? And more importantly why are you trying to blame me for your Rilgy vote.

Doctow Rilgy at your service.

Rigly sounds like a much better doctors name.

Spacedaisy wrote:I would. That's not very Epi-like.

I know he would use his abilities, but I get the impression he doesn't like lie detectors. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:I would. That's not very Epi-like.

I know he would use his abilities, but I get the impression he doesn't like lie detectors. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Epignosis wrote:But I had a hand in designing the game.

Epignosis wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:I would. That's not very Epi-like.

I know he would use his abilities, but I get the impression he doesn't like lie detectors. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Epignosis wrote:But I had a hand in designing the game.

I already lie detected that statement, and it came back as false.