Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:10 pm
What Epi is saying though is that sig mentioned him so many times it is doubtful he actually forgot about him.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
What Epi is saying though is that sig mentioned him so many times it is doubtful he actually forgot about him.
Meanwhile in this role madness setup with only a smidgeon of info disclosed, you’re here with your back against the wall picking your teeth and making some vague rationale that you need to be lynched D3. To benefit the town? For shits? Literally the only reason at this point in your life I can imagine you’re withholding your power is that it loses its power if you disclose it. Otherwise you should disclose, we go “oh, cool, yeah let’s help you do that”, the doc saves you tonight and we lynch you tomorrow.
I don't really want to lynch sig today. I didn't know quite what to think of his claims earlier, but now I feel like he's being genuine.sig wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:33 am1. Everything resets and I leave you all for a better land BUT I wouldn't have been lynched.Spoiler: show
2. No my role is relevant until I use it
3. I told you I can't be lynched that's my role power.![]()
IF you try you fail and the timeline will be disrupted resulting in chaos. Or that's the theory anyway.
Also just to be clear if you tried to lynhc me day 3 it would also fail, but it would've been the optimal time for me to active my power. Or that's what I thought at first.
Asking the important question- why has sig completely avoided the possibility that he could be wrong and not pinning it on INH, who would obviously be the option here
Yes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.
Why is that?
Yeah, I would probably put the pitchforks down because I don’t know how his role works in accordance with mine.
Why would scum Quin feel the need to gambit this hard D2? Who is “his team”?Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:22 pmYes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.
I literally forgot you were my teammate for a day in Easter.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:10 pmWhat Epi is saying though is that sig mentioned him so many times it is doubtful he actually forgot about him.
I don't know. But I thought I'd go back and look for any clues, and found this objection to lynching both sig and INH. So now I'm back to thinking Quin actually received a pm, whether legit or not, and is trying to be helpful. I don't know who to vote for now, and I'm running out of time.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:33 pmWhy would scum Quin feel the need to gambit this hard D2? Who is “his team”?Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:22 pmYes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.
If he’s bad, why would he have made that clear?ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:18 pm I still don’t understand why Day 3 is any better than Day 2, or Day 4 or 5.
ty
It's denial and fear-mongering with no real potential results IMO. I realize I'm not exactly unbiased, but I'd feel more comfortable if the town lynched people because of legitimate in-thread reasons when we have no flips to go off of, instead of contested info-dropping hearsay which won't truly be proven one way or the other until dead peoples' roles are revealed. The former is productive and can generate conversations, while the second won't actually give us any information while serving as a major distraction.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:09 pm I don’t agree with the recurring idea that we’ll just get rid of both signand inh to be safe. Quin’s posts should have been the catalyst for a decision, not a non-decision.
Golden, you're not making much sense here. You don't agree with INH's analysis of my posts, but you think I'm bad because I defended sig?