The Syndicate

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:10 pm**

NANANANANANA_BANANA

nijuukyugou

Sorsha

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:10 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:NANANANANANA_BANANA

nijuukyugou

Sorsha

GOOD

BAD

GOOD

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:11 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:NANANANANANA_BANANA

nijuukyugou

Sorsha

Good

Bad

Good

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:11 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:NANANANANANA_BANANA

nijuukyugou

Sorsha

GOOD

UMMMMM GOOD

SUPA GOOD

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:11 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:NANANANANANA_BANANA- Don't care

nijuukyugou-bad

Sorsha- good

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:11 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:NANANANANANA_BANANA

nijuukyugou

Sorsha

Bad
Good
Me

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:12 pm**

S~V~S

TheFloyd73

Turnip Head

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:12 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:S~V~S

TheFloyd73

Turnip Head

GOOD

GOOD

BAD

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:12 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:S~V~S

TheFloyd73

Turnip Head

Bad
Good
Bad

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:13 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:S~V~S

TheFloyd73

Turnip Head

Good

Bad

Fail

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:13 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:S~V~S

TheFloyd73

Turnip Head

GOOD BUT WRONG

GOOD

BAD

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:13 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:S~V~S

TheFloyd73

Turnip Head

civ
civ
indi

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:14 pm**

Well, that's that. Compiling the results...

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:15 pm**

Haha, I wrote Mac as bad. That was a surprise. That's what gun to head will do to you.

Basically, I think Mac is being quite careful this game.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:16 pm**

So what do we do now?

Sorsha - Was surprised you listed SVS as bad. Just a feeling or anything else to go with that?

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:17 pm**

FZ. wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Turnip Head
indi

You broke the rules

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:18 pm**

Matt F wrote:So what do we do now?

I'm currently ranking who got the most to least "bad" votes and whatnot.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:18 pm**

Matt F wrote:So what do we do now?

Sorsha - Was surprised you listed SVS as bad. Just a feeling or anything else to go with that?

We wait for zebra to give us a list. What you do with it later is up to you.

linki: what she said

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:18 pm**

Turnip Head wrote:
FZ. wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Turnip Head
indi
You broke the rules

She couldn't bring herself to name her partner bad.

Linki Zeebs - Sweet.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:19 pm**

Turnip Head wrote:
FZ. wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Turnip Head
indi
You broke the rules

But am I wrong? :P

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:19 pm**

Matt F wrote:So what do we do now?

Sorsha - Was surprised you listed SVS as bad. Just a feeling or anything else to go with that?

I just erred on the side of bad. I'm kinda middle of the road with her. She implied that she was poisoned and that team hark did it, which points to her not being mafia but I'm pinged by the defense of bea and her suspicion of you.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:22 pm**

By the way, so did you, TH. You wrote fail

linki: I'm still trying to figure out whether SVS' suspicions are just tunnelling and bad or is she bad herself. For some reason, I tend to look at people suspecting me as civvies. It's stupid, but I'm biased that way.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:23 pm**

FZ. wrote:By the way, so did you, TH. You wrote fail

linki: I'm still trying to figure out whether SVS' suspicions are just tunnelling and bad or is she bad herself. For some reason, I tend to look at people suspecting me as civvies. It's stupid, but I'm biased that way.

When I'm a civvie, I tend to think everyone suspecting me as baddie. One of my flaws.

I'm giving SVS the BOTD because I have been asking some weird shit.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:26 pm**

There is more of a consensus than I expected.

Turnip Head - III and a Half (thanks to FZ saying "Indy"...)
Luke11646 - III
nijuukyugou - III
bea - II
a2thezebra - I
FZ - I
Golden - I
MacDougall - I
Matt F - I
NANANANANANA_BANANA - I (as well as a "Don't care" from FZ...)
S~V~S - I
TheFloyd73 - I
Elohcin - 0
Sorsha - 0

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:27 pm**

Zebra!! I just realized you listed me as bad.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:28 pm**

Matt F wrote:Zebra!! I just realized you listed me as bad.

Really? I thought you knew.

Matt F wrote:When I'm a civvie, I tend to think everyone suspecting me as baddie. One of my flaws.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:29 pm**

Lol

Why do you think I'm bad? Cuz I keep twirling my mustache?

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:30 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:There is more of a consensus than I expected.

Turnip Head - III and a Half (thanks to FZ saying "Indy"...)
Luke11646 - III
nijuukyugou - III
bea - II
a2thezebra - I
FZ - I
Golden - I
MacDougall - I
Matt F - I
NANANANANANA_BANANA - I (as well as a "Don't care" from FZ...)
S~V~S - I
TheFloyd73 - I
Elohcin - 0
Sorsha - 0

I don't think Nana banana should have been on the list. Someone who isn't playing does nothing to the game. If baddies win because no one lynched the absent player, that's not a win in my opinion. If he's civ, then there's not point talking about him. Either way, it's a waste of time.

But who said Banana is bad?

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:32 pm**

It was me

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:32 pm**

Turnip Head:

a2thezebra - TOWN
bea - TOWN
Elohcin - TOWN
FZ - TOWN
Golden - SCUM
Luke11646 - SCUM
MacDougall - TOWN
Matt F - TOWN
NANANANANANA_BANANA - TOWN
nijuukyugou - SCUM
Sorsha - TOWN
S~V~S - TOWN
TheFloyd73 - SCUM
Turnip Head - FAIL

9 TOWN / 4 SCUM

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:33 pm**

How many people played?

linki: Really? I'd eye you, but it's you. Why?

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:35 pm**

I had to pick something.

He hasn't done anything town, you make a point about ignoring him though

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:36 pm**

Matt F:

a2thezebra - SCUM
bea - SCUM
Elohcin - TOWN
FZ - SCUM
Golden - TOWN
Luke11646 - TOWN
MacDougall - TOWN
Matt F - BEST THEORIST EVER
NANANANANANA_BANANA - TOWN
nijuukyugou - TOWN
Sorsha - TOWN
S~V~S - TOWN (but wrong)
TheFloyd73 - TOWN
Turnip Head - SCUM

9 TOWN / 4 SCUM

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:38 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:Matt F:

a2thezebra - SCUM
bea - SCUM
Elohcin - TOWN
FZ - SCUM
Golden - TOWN
Luke11646 - TOWN
MacDougall - TOWN
Matt F - BEST THEORIST EVER
NANANANANANA_BANANA - TOWN
nijuukyugou - TOWN
Sorsha - TOWN
S~V~S - TOWN (but wrong)
TheFloyd73 - TOWN
Turnip Head - SCUM

9 TOWN / 4 SCUM

Wow, I don't agree with any of Matt's baddie reads

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:39 pm**

Sorsha:

a2thezebra - TOWN
bea - SCUM
Elohcin - TOWN
FZ - TOWN
Golden - TOWN
Luke11646 - TOWN
MacDougall - TOWN
Matt F - TOWN
NANANANANANA_BANANA - SCUM
nijuukyugou - TOWN
Sorsha - HER
S~V~S - SCUM
TheFloyd73 - TOWN
Turnip Head - SCUM

9 TOWN / 4 SCUM

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:40 pm**

FZ - Well duh you're on there

You think bea, Turnip, and Zeebs are on the up and up?

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:44 pm**

FZ.:

a2thezebra - TOWN
bea - TOWN
Elohcin - TOWN
FZ - TOWN (won't count in final ratio)
Golden - TOWN
Luke11646 - SCUM
MacDougall - SCUM
Matt F - TOWN
NANANANANANA_BANANA - DON'T CARE (????)
nijuukyugou - SCUM
Sorsha - TOWN
S~V~S - TOWN
TheFloyd73 - TOWN
Turnip Head - INDEPENDENT

8 TOWN / 3 SCUM / 1 INDY / 1 DGAF

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:45 pm**

Matt F wrote:FZ - Well duh you're on there

You think bea, Turnip, and Zeebs are on the up and up?

I don't know about Bea. If SVS is good, I want to trust her on Bea, even though she's wrong about me.
I think TH is a better player than just saving all his baddie team so obviously.
Zebra, I started out thinking she was okay, then went to bad, and back to good lately. I don't really know why I've gone back and forth with her, but at the moment, that's how I'm feeling.

Ask me again in two hours

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:47 pm**

a2thezebra - ME
bea - TOWN
Elohcin - TOWN
FZ - TOWN
Golden - TOWN
Luke11646 - SCUM
MacDougall - TOWN
Matt F - SCUM
NANANANANANA_BANANA - TOWN
nijuukyugou - SCUM
Sorsha - TOWN
S~V~S - TOWN
TheFloyd73 - TOWN
Turnip Head - SCUM

9 TOWN / 4 SCUM

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:47 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:FZ.:

a2thezebra - TOWN
bea - TOWN
Elohcin - TOWN
FZ - TOWN (won't count in final ratio)
Golden - TOWN
Luke11646 - SCUM
MacDougall - SCUM
Matt F - TOWN
NANANANANANA_BANANA - DON'T CARE (????)
nijuukyugou - SCUM
Sorsha - TOWN
S~V~S - TOWN
TheFloyd73 - TOWN
Turnip Head - INDEPENDENT

8 TOWN / 3 SCUM / 1 INDY / 1 DGAF

\
What's up with the "?????"?
I explained why I DGAF. I can't be bothered by players who sign up but don't play.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:49 pm**

Matt F wrote:Lol

Why do you think I'm bad? Cuz I keep twirling my mustache?

To me it seems that you're trying to imitate what you normally do, and you don't even seem convinced by your own arguments half the time. I sense you is a bad'n.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:52 pm**

FZ. wrote: I don't think Nana banana should have been on the list. Someone who isn't playing does nothing to the game. If baddies win because no one lynched the absent player, that's not a win in my opinion. If he's civ, then there's not point talking about him. Either way, it's a waste of time.

But who said Banana is bad?

I could not disagree more. Hearing what people have to say about Banana could effect how they are perceived, in addition to Banana himself. See this isn't just to tally the general consensus, it's also to gauge reactions. Your refusal to say "good" or "bad" with Banana may be telling later on, as well as the rest of us who gave our read of him. Besides, even if I was to agree that inactive players should be left out, where would I draw the line? Luke has come dangerously close to that label until recently.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:53 pm**

FZ. wrote:
Matt F wrote:FZ - Well duh you're on there

You think bea, Turnip, and Zeebs are on the up and up?
I don't know about Bea. If SVS is good, I want to trust her on Bea, even though she's wrong about me.
I think TH is a better player than just saving all his baddie team so obviously.
Zebra, I started out thinking she was okay, then went to bad, and back to good lately. I don't really know why I've gone back and forth with her, but at the moment, that's how I'm feeling.

Ask me again in two hours

Per the underline. In the recent games I've been playing, players always say stuff like "Why would they so blatantly defend so and so?" My feeling on the matter, is that blatantly defending your teammates is the new smart move to make, because nobody will think you did.

But that isn't just it. Turnip's recent comments like "Maybe it'll just be best for the game if I die" and such does not say civvie to me.

Linki - I can see what you're saying, Zeebs. I've tried to keep an open mind after my play in TH. Trying not to tunnel so much.

Back in the day, I guarantee you I would've been all over SVS simply for refusing to listen to reason regarding me, but again, trying to play a little differently.

I swear I'm a good egg, though! Swearsies!

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:54 pm**

FZ. wrote: Turnip Head - SCUM

9 TOWN / 4 SCUM

Wow, I don't agree with any of Matt's baddie reads[/quote]
Then despite seeing Turnip Head as indy, you see him as town-aligned then?

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:56 pm**

FZ. wrote: What's up with the "?????"?
I explained why I DGAF. I can't be bothered by players who sign up but don't play.

Another reason why "?????" is because it messes with your ratio. All four of the other players including myself had a 9 TOWN / 4 SCUM ratio, so it's interesting to see that you are an exception for breaking the rules twice. I don't mind/care that you did, it's just interesting to observe that anomaly.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:58 pm**

Matt F wrote:
FZ. wrote:
Matt F wrote:FZ - Well duh you're on there

You think bea, Turnip, and Zeebs are on the up and up?
I don't know about Bea. If SVS is good, I want to trust her on Bea, even though she's wrong about me.
I think TH is a better player than just saving all his baddie team so obviously.
Zebra, I started out thinking she was okay, then went to bad, and back to good lately. I don't really know why I've gone back and forth with her, but at the moment, that's how I'm feeling.

Ask me again in two hours
Per the underline. In the recent games I've been playing, players always say stuff like "Why would they so blatantly defend so and so?" My feeling on the matter, is that blatantly defending your teammates is the new smart move to make, because nobody will think you did.

But that isn't just it. Turnip's recent comments like "Maybe it'll just be best for the game if I die" and such does not say civvie to me.

Agreed. I'm voting Turnip Head.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:59 pm**

And I'm a tunneler too so it's all good, Matt.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:02 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
FZ. wrote: I don't think Nana banana should have been on the list. Someone who isn't playing does nothing to the game. If baddies win because no one lynched the absent player, that's not a win in my opinion. If he's civ, then there's not point talking about him. Either way, it's a waste of time.

But who said Banana is bad?
I could not disagree more. Hearing what people have to say about Banana could effect how they are perceived, in addition to Banana himself. See this isn't just to tally the general consensus, it's also to gauge reactions. Your refusal to say "good" or "bad" with Banana may be telling later on, as well as the rest of us who gave our read of him. Besides, even if I was to agree that inactive players should be left out, where would I draw the line? Luke has come dangerously close to that label until recently.

I think there's a big difference between Luke and Banana. All I can remember Banana saying is something like "hi, I realized I haven't said anything today'. Has he said anything after that? If so, I guess I need to read back. Luke has made several posts every day. They just seem so insignificant that they are both treated the same. For what it's worth, I'd say Banana is a civ, because if the his BTSC friends told him to play like this, and keep it low just to survive, I'd feel embarrassed for them.

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:06 pm**

Matt F wrote:
FZ. wrote:
Matt F wrote:FZ - Well duh you're on there

You think bea, Turnip, and Zeebs are on the up and up?
I don't know about Bea. If SVS is good, I want to trust her on Bea, even though she's wrong about me.
I think TH is a better player than just saving all his baddie team so obviously.
Zebra, I started out thinking she was okay, then went to bad, and back to good lately. I don't really know why I've gone back and forth with her, but at the moment, that's how I'm feeling.

Ask me again in two hours
Per the underline. In the recent games I've been playing, players always say stuff like "Why would they so blatantly defend so and so?" My feeling on the matter, is that blatantly defending your teammates is the new smart move to make, because nobody will think you did.

But that isn't just it. Turnip's recent comments like "Maybe it'll just be best for the game if I die" and such does not say civvie to me.

Linki - I can see what you're saying, Zeebs. I've tried to keep an open mind after my play in TH. Trying not to tunnel so much.

Back in the day, I guarantee you I would've been all over SVS simply for refusing to listen to reason regarding me, but again, trying to play a little differently.

I swear I'm a good egg, though! Swearsies!

I disagree. You know why? Because one in all the games I've ever played as a baddie, I tried what you're suggesting. I got lynched just for that. No matter how many times you tell people that defending baddies does not automatically indicate fellow scum, those are the people that always get suspected.

I don't know about TH. I said I think he's an indi, but it's just me. Maybe he's doing exactly that, but if he is, look how it's working out for him. Once again those voting late to "save" the baddies, are those getting the votes. I think it proves my point

Posted: **Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:10 pm**

a2thezebra wrote:
FZ. wrote: What's up with the "?????"?
I explained why I DGAF. I can't be bothered by players who sign up but don't play.
Another reason why "?????" is because it messes with your ratio. All four of the other players including myself had a 9 TOWN / 4 SCUM ratio, so it's interesting to see that you are an exception for breaking the rules twice. I don't mind/care that you did, it's just interesting to observe that anomaly.

Since 2 baddies are dead, and Harkonnen only have 4 people, I'm not sure we're looking for 4 more baddies. I don't care what others did.

As for TH, if he's an indi, I don't know if he's bad or good, but if he can win with either, no strings attached, I think he'd take the civvie side. Again, just my opinion

The Syndicate

Dune [ENDGAME]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]

Re: Dune [Day 4]