Arkham Mafia [ENDGAME]

#1501

People get it. We're just not super invested in it.

#1502

a2thezebra wrote:
Matt wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Matt wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Dom wrote:Matt, it's not like the post didn't exist hours ago. You could have found it.
Man I wish I were you right now, or anyone else. Catching a glimpse of the bullshit that I've been dealing with and being blissfully unaware of just how much of it Matt has thrown at me non-stop. You guys are really better off as human beings by skimming or outright skipping our back-and-forths. It's just amazing, flat-out impressive how one can completely ignore and dismiss one person and simultaneously think that that person owes them content and a nicer attitude at the same time. I don't think I could write a character as disrespectful as Matt has been to me this game.
You've been the one to call me fake and my suss of you pathetic, and I've been disrespectful of you? K.

You seriously think getting called "fake" in a game that literally revolves around deceit is disrespectful but everything that I've said that you have done isn't?

I think we should contact Llama Zeebs because I've had about enough of your trash talk.

Linki - Nah and I doubt I "broke" Zebra either. Gotta be an act.
Either it's "trash talk" or it's an act, I would never stoop to doing both at once. Make up your mind.

@ Dom - I'm not trying to manipulate you against him, I'm just losing my shit.
We've reached a point where you are needlessly talking crap about me (acting as if I think you're my mafia housewife I mean wtf??), so if that's where we're at, please contact Llama and stop bringing it to the game.
People didn't think I had a good reason for refusing to give you that link and I had to explain that I had a reason. I'm sorry if you take issue with that reason but I'm only expressing how I felt I've been treated by you in these games, so it is not "needlessly talking crap." I think you're a great person and a great player but I would be lying if I said that I don't think you're capable of stooping to some pretty low levels to justify whatever your thought process is. I don't think you mean any harm in doing it but it has hurt me, so it's all the more infuriating to see you get mad at me just for saying that I think you're disingenuous a lot of times. I mean come the fuck on.

Zebra, I like you I really do but I've honestly felt that you've been a bit rude to me in this game. I have chalked that up to you being bad, because if you're not bad while saying some of the things you've said, I'll be a bit disappointed (no joke).

Anywho, my burger king has arrived and then I'm gettin' down on some old school x files for about 2 hours. I SWEAR, before I go to sleep, though, I will answer your post in full.

Also, does anyone think Robin stopped the lynch? Peace

#1503

Enrique wrote:People get it. We're just not super invested in it.

Obviously they didn't because some were suspecting me for not co-operating, or saying that I could've brought it up a hundred times during the back-and-forth. Again, I'm sorry it got carried away.

#1504

Epignosis wrote:
THERE'S A TIE?

Ooooooooooooo. It always brings a smile to my face.

I think this guy did. I like to think Robin is less of a dick.

#1505

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Meanwhile 8 people besides me missed the vote, but whether I voted for someone I suspected or someone everyone else suspected but I did not is the biggest issue.

Fuck this.
This is what I saw in A World Reborn.
Seriously, show me where I did this in a world reborn.

linki, lol NO!!!

I think you sort of did, at the very end when it was us or you and we were fighting for hearts in minds in the thread, though.

I see this on day one as different.

#1506

Turnip Head wrote:I'm frustrated at the lack of lynch and I'm about to watch The 100 so we can hash this out when we're both less frustrated SVS. I'm not a bully out to get you, I swear it.

I have two diametrically opposed reasons my non vote was suspect, plus the non vote itself (although I was trying to mediate between two other people inthe last minutes that led to losing track of time).

No matter what I say or do I am fucked, right? So why do i give a shit?

#1507

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Meanwhile 8 people besides me missed the vote, but whether I voted for someone I suspected or someone everyone else suspected but I did not is the biggest issue.

Fuck this.
This is what I saw in A World Reborn.
No it isn't.

Give me a link.

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 66#p207566
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 33#p206233
These two are kind of what I'm talking about. Though, I was very frustrated with some players in that game, so I think my judgement in how trite you were is clouded. However, I will say you were vindictive in that game.
Lots of emotional pleas to avoid lynches.

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Meanwhile 8 people besides me missed the vote, but whether I voted for someone I suspected or someone everyone else suspected but I did not is the biggest issue.

Fuck this.
This is what I saw in A World Reborn.
Seriously, show me where I did this in a world reborn.

linki, lol NO!!!

...I was looking.

Righteous, much?

Anyway, you're missing the point. I am not suspicious you voted Glorf. I'm suspicious of the fact that you missed a vote you were clearly here to vote on.

#1508

Welcome Sabie

I don't think we've met.

#1509

S~V~S wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I'm frustrated at the lack of lynch and I'm about to watch The 100 so we can hash this out when we're both less frustrated SVS. I'm not a bully out to get you, I swear it.
I have two diametrically opposed reasons my non vote was suspect, plus the non vote itself (although I was trying to mediate between two other people inthe last minutes that led to losing track of time).

No matter what I say or do I am fucked, right? So why do i give a shit?

Why is my suspicion subject to your feelings on other people's suspicions of you?

#1510

Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I'm frustrated at the lack of lynch and I'm about to watch The 100 so we can hash this out when we're both less frustrated SVS. I'm not a bully out to get you, I swear it.
I have two diametrically opposed reasons my non vote was suspect, plus the non vote itself (although I was trying to mediate between two other people inthe last minutes that led to losing track of time).

No matter what I say or do I am fucked, right? So why do i give a shit?
Why is my suspicion subject to your feelings on other people's suspicions of you?

What? This had nothing to do with your feelings, it was based on TH & DH suspecting me for totally different reasons. Nothing to do with you. You should feel free to suspect me for your own reasons.

#1511

Turnip Head wrote:I'm frustrated at the lack of lynch and I'm about to watch The 100 so we can hash this out when we're both less frustrated SVS. I'm not a bully out to get you, I swear it.

I believe you, for what it's worth.

Want to visit Wayne Manor with me?

#1512

Would anyone be willing to follow Matt's formula here? Three players per location to keep the others in check? I spoke against it before but the numbers actually kinda work out.

#1513

Especially useful now before the Mafias have bought their cops and can coordinate with them.

#1514

S~V~S wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I'm frustrated at the lack of lynch and I'm about to watch The 100 so we can hash this out when we're both less frustrated SVS. I'm not a bully out to get you, I swear it.
I have two diametrically opposed reasons my non vote was suspect, plus the non vote itself (although I was trying to mediate between two other people inthe last minutes that led to losing track of time).

No matter what I say or do I am fucked, right? So why do i give a shit?

I want to understand your POV just as much as I want you to understand mine. If you don't care about any of that that's your prerogative.

#1515

Sorry I didn't vote. Like I said, I'm behind and thought I had at least a little bit of time to catch up but I was wrong. I'll have to catch up later after work.

Linki- I'm not opposed to it Enrique but it really comes down to I'm going to go where I want to go, so... I guess that means I should vote early in the night polls so I don't have to be "forced" to somewhere I don't want to go to.

Linki again- did anyone ask or have the hosts told us if it's going to be made public if the cop recruit was successful or not?

#1516

Harumph

#1517

MacDougall wrote:Harumph

Want to go to Wayne Manor with me?

#1518

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I'm frustrated at the lack of lynch and I'm about to watch The 100 so we can hash this out when we're both less frustrated SVS. I'm not a bully out to get you, I swear it.
I believe you, for what it's worth.

Want to visit Wayne Manor with me?

Sure, I hear it's a great place to party

#1519

Never mind about that cop recruit question... I just saw that they pick a # not a player. So I guess for night 1 at least there will for sure be a recruit. But after that if the Mafia family chooses a # and that player happens to have been lynched or night killed it would fail.

So Hosts: will we be told if the recruit is successful?

#1520

What makes Park Row so popular today?

#1521

Enrique wrote:What makes Park Row so popular today?

Nobody went there the first time.

#1522

Enrique wrote:Would anyone be willing to follow Matt's formula here? Three players per location to keep the others in check? I spoke against it before but the numbers actually kinda work out.

Still catching up, but are you serious like seriously? You voted for me, BECAUSE I wanted to share info and know you are advocating for not only sharing info but coordinating every player to go to certain locations? like seriously?

#1523

Oh I am caught up nevermind.

#1524

Except I'm not advocating for info sharing? Hold your horses, all this does is make sure nobody pulls any info out of their ass.

#1525

Unless you have a good reason to go where you want to go, this looks like a perfectly fine idea to me.

#1526

Wayne Enterprises.

#1527

a2thezebra wrote: If you're wondering why I think you're more likely to be genuine than sig is, it's because I've seen you do this as rogue (Star Wars, again, ironic, because you keep bringing it up to describe me when it's not even remotely a valid comparison) before and I think you can do it to an extent as town as well. I don't want to take that risk when I just see no possible way that sig was genuine with his advocating map discussions. With you I can see that because you weren't as demanding about it as he was, and you haven't expressed suspicion of anyone simply for not agreeing with you (with that at least anyway).

You are using a WIFOM argument on me basically and the things you seem to be getting mad at people for (ignoring/tunnling) you seem to be doing to me?

Also I believe Enrique or you said, when I defended myself I used WIFOM tell me how am I supposed to defend myself when neither of you actually build a case, you discount what I say to defend myself, and just generally refuse to consider my point of view?

Dom wrote:
sig wrote:Voted enrquie will explain when I get home battery almost dead.
DH, you caught another fish!

I can't tell if this is joking or not, if not I was like four pages behind, less then two minutes before the deadline, and unsure of the top two, I voted for the player who I was more suspicious of. How did you "catch" anything?

Matt wrote: Anywho, my burger king has arrived /quote]

You can get burger king delivered?

#1528

Enrique wrote:Except I'm not advocating for info sharing? Hold your horses, all this does is make sure nobody pulls any info out of their ass.

Even if info isn't given this will help the mafia hide among voters and gather more intel with no explanation, and either way info sharing or no, this is still a complete 180 from your previous view?

#1529

? The Mafia doesn't need this plan to vote. lol. They're not getting anything they wouldn't otherwise, why is that an argument?

sig I said "you did a bad thing" and you said "why would I do that if I were bad?" That's... that's exactly what a WIFOM is.

#1530

Any pattern we could see from voting will be gone. First it is a genuine question you never actually seemed to answer? I gave good points for why I believed we should share info it and you ignored them. This was also the most suspicious thing you found for the entire day that you voted on it?

#1531

Gonna go to the prison and standover some crims for info.

#1532

I voted for Wayne Manor.

#1533

Sorsha wrote:So Hosts: will we be told if the recruit is successful?

No.

#1534

What is the question, sig?

Don't forget I gave my reasons for not wanting to as well.

#1535

Don't forget to vote in Sockys 2015!

#1536

I just don't see how it is bad to suggest sharing info? I can see your argument that it is a bad idea, but saying I'm scum for saying it doesn't make much sense to me.

Also welcome sabie.

#1537

checking in at intermission.

Also welcome Sable!! Looking forward to hearing from you.

Do we think a tie lynch is always a no-lynch or is Enrique on to something with the Joker having some power over a tie lynch?

@Hosts are tie lynches always a no-lynch?

#1538

I forgot to welcome you sabie so welcome!

#1539

The no lynch could have been a result on the party who lost the tie coinflip having a survival ability. Happened in GoC.

#1540

Scotty wrote:@Hosts are tie lynches always a no-lynch?

Ties do not function as lynch stops.

#1541

S~V~S wrote:Meanwhile 8 people besides me missed the vote, but whether I voted for someone I suspected or someone everyone else suspected but I did not is the biggest issue.

Fuck this.

???

Why are you so upset?

I need to catch up I think.

#1542

Curses time zones, I thought I might have another 10 minutes but nope I'm just 50 minutes late

#1543

I don't even know who was lynched, hold on

#1544

Okay, so it was between Scotty and Wilgy and you ended up not being able to lynch either?

1. Why Wilgy?

2. Why Scotty?

I actually am having a zero understanding of either of these.

Okay, not zero, but I don't understand the logic of why you guys voted for Scotty aside from his wanting to lynch a low poster

#1545

sprityo wrote:Okay, so it was between Scotty and Wilgy and you ended up not being able to lynch either?

1. Why Wilgy?

2. Why Scotty?

I actually am having a zero understanding of either of these.

Okay, not zero, but I don't understand the logic of why you guys voted for Scotty aside from his wanting to lynch a low poster

I guess we fucked up because you weren't here to guide us. Who would you have voted for?

#1546

Guys. Why the hell do you always try to D1 lynch me only when I'm not here. It's like Home Alone Mafia all over again. I guess I'm lucky I survived.

I have 1000 posts to catch up on. I'll hopefully get it done by D2.

#1547

So I am officially starting from the beginning and I can't promise that some of the shit I'll bring up is so three days ago.

All the way to the end of page three and I am surprised Golden wasn't a top contender for this lynch.

Turnip Head wrote:You're cool in my book Enrique, I just think you're on the wrong track about Golden at the present time. In the interest of discussing other matters...

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
sig wrote:It wouldn't be a new record so no thank you, if you can lynch my day 0 then go ahead otherwise I'd prefer not to get lynched until mid game.
Why mid game and not the end? Perhaps it because you are bad...
Sig, can you explain why you didn't respond to this post? It did seem like a weird thing for you to say, and to not respond to Bass about it feels like you're trying to sweep it under the rug.

You sound confidant about that statement and I can't imagine why. Can you explain your thoughts. Because so far (pg 3) Golden is a little off. I'm surprised you would shrug it off so easily.

#1548

I believe I explain my thoughts on Golden either before or after that post. I have no information about his role. Why does he sound off to you?

#1549

sprityo wrote:Okay, so it was between Scotty and Wilgy and you ended up not being able to lynch either?

1. Why Wilgy?

2. Why Scotty?

I actually am having a zero understanding of either of these.

Okay, not zero, but I don't understand the logic of why you guys voted for Scotty aside from his wanting to lynch a low poster

I'll summarize, but to get a good understanding, I recommend reading all my posts about him (Mac also is suspicious of him).

Scotty says he likes to vote low posters day 1. He selects two low posters. One has shown up and posted at absolute minimum, the other just got replaced at the end of the day because they hadn't shown up. He excuses the one who had shown up because that player was new to the site. He did not offer the same privilege to lovedesic who is also new to the site. This picqued my interest.

He then claimed he only votes people he has "concrete evidence" on-- that's why he won't vote for his one suspect, MP. But get this-- people with no posts can have that exact logic applied to them. So... why the person who hasn't posted at all over MP?

Overall, Scotty has been inconsistent at best and absolutely unable to come up with any rationale at worst.

#1550

Skimmin to figure out how I nearly ended up on the receiving end of a lynch.

Turnip Head wrote:Let's lynch Wilgy who history tells us posts less as a baddie and is putting in the bare minimum of effort right now.

Linki: Well done Typh

1st of all, why use Meta on the player that goes out of his way to negate Meta?

2nd History? History tells crap! My mafia play time compared to civ is like 90:20! What good references did you use to come to this conclusion? Pikmin? (which I barely played?) Home alone? (Where I was NK'd day 1 as cop) Tree? Where the first two days of the game I go "hey someone else lead me") or maybe realm reborn, where I, as a civ, got lynched because of how little I was playing while having, guess what, an option to remove myself from the poll.

I guess I'm just skimming amd I haven't seen the full picture, but I had to stop there and say something regardin these shenanigans.

(I'm also noting that the two people that had my eye voted me...)

Also, riddle me this, what does a player feigning intrest look like compared to a player disinterested?

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

Who killed no one?