The Syndicate

Quin wrote:I actually kind of want to vote Dizzy again.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Spoiler: show

Dyslexicon wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Can Dyslexicon please answer this question?

I can, though I personally don't think it's very relevant. As a matter of fact the only player even commenting on it in that game turned out to be scum. She commented, then forgot about it, and when I reminded her next game day she tried to twist it to an argument for suspicion. I had had a tunnel-vision scum read on her regardless of this (that I struggled to articulate, cause it was very gut-based), so I'm not sure the fakeslip in itself really did that much (also, the site meta makes that situation different - it's more interesting here).

This rant is only half relevant:
However, I believe JJJ and Golden's take that I "just like to do stuff like that" is more relevant. Have you ever done something just because you felt like it? Obviously, that is not the whole story, but I generally like to experiment and try to expand possibilities. I'm also think I'm generally better at creating waves than forming solid reads, especially D1 (though me reads haven't been bad lately actually). In short, I'm trying to make my own style, personality and game philosophy work for me and for town. Sometimes I may go overboard, sometimes I think the style works for me (both as in I feel good about my play and I'm having fun). Some players may find it perplexing or even "not good play". Personally, I don't believe there's any one way to play mafia as long as you try your best to play to your wincon. Different players do it in different ways, which makes the game even harder and more exciting.

What is regretful is that I may have taken up too much time and attention. And while I'm an attention whore, it may not have been the best situation. But what's done is done and I have beer in my fridge.

That... is actually a pretty accurate description of how I like to play. I will do GTH reads, cases, and other thread analysis if I have the time, but that doesn't suit my abilities. I prefer to be unpredictable (which has eventually grown to mean predictable) and chaotic. Sometimes I'll hunker down and focus, usually as the game goes on, but I prefer a lighter playstyle.

That being said, your slip, it looked like an accident. You assert that it was not an accident, but a fakeslip. You then introduced some reads after the fact. Nacho made a good point that you didn't factor the 'fakeslip' into your reads. I think (without looking at your link to your other game) it was an accident.

Need to read into Nacho's posts to see if this is actually what was happening, but there's motive to kill here.

Dyslexicon wrote:INH, In other words. Your whole post is formed as a conclusion that I'm scum. You won't be able to convince me that I'm scum, so it's not very easy or productive to answer that (haveing a "yes"/"no" argument), but I can try to clarify what I think you've mis-understood/construed (depending on your alignment).

insertnamehere wrote:I'm assuming MM is in the lead, right?

speedchuck wrote:insertnamehere - posted a huge thing against Dys, and I only agreed with one point on it. The rest looked like a scum filter over earnest attempts to help the town and one blunder. wasn't a huge fan beforehand, either.

The one point I did agree with on it is that Dizzy seems to go after people that considered him neutral. I don't really consider that scummy, but...

Dizzy has said like five times that they are suspicious of me, and haven't sent a vote or an explanation my way. Calling you out, Dizzybro. Put er up.

Might be voting INH in another few posts, or I might keep scotty or marmot. The culture here says not to throw your vote around every other post, so I won't.

Scotty wrote:Sloonei, while you're busy advocating do my lynch because "why not?" I ask, why not Elo?

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Sloonei, while you're busy advocating do my lynch because "why not?" I ask, why not Elo?

I never dropped any such "why not" on you, and I'm not voicing any confidence that Elohcin is *bad*. I just think I've found more evidence to suggest you are town.

Sloonei wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Sloonei, while you're busy advocating do my lynch because "why not?" I ask, why not Elo?

I never dropped any such "why not" on you, and I'm not voicing any confidence that Elohcin is *bad*. I just think I've found more evidence to suggest you are town.

EBWOP: *good

Sloonei wrote:

Quin wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Who's got a tally?

One thing to note is that, while I suspect Scotty a bit for the way he stated his suspicion against Elohcin, I would not rule out the possibility that that was a bus attempt (assuming Scotty is bad). Elohcin would be a prime bus candidate right now.

I don't, but I think that marmot is in soft lynch territory at the moment.

I am compelled to yell and scream and tell everyone to get their votes away from there.

I'm gonna start advocating for a Scotty lynch. Hey everyone, why aren't you voting for Scotty?

Scotty wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Sloonei, while you're busy advocating do my lynch because "why not?" I ask, why not Elo?

I never dropped any such "why not" on you, and I'm not voicing any confidence that Elohcin is *bad*. I just think I've found more evidence to suggest you are town.

EBWOP: *good

Oh no?

Sloonei wrote:

Quin wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Who's got a tally?

One thing to note is that, while I suspect Scotty a bit for the way he stated his suspicion against Elohcin, I would not rule out the possibility that that was a bus attempt (assuming Scotty is bad). Elohcin would be a prime bus candidate right now.

I don't, but I think that marmot is in soft lynch territory at the moment.

I am compelled to yell and scream and tell everyone to get their votes away from there.

I'm gonna start advocating for a Scotty lynch. Hey everyone, why aren't you voting for Scotty?

Sloonei wrote:One thing that I did not like, though, was his loyalty to Metalmarsh in the whole map business, which seems like it may be spreading out into the game in general. He can correct me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe INH had any serious reason to trust the Marmot on Day 0 when he voted to give him the map, but he seems to have continued to trust him with some reliance on this premise deeper into the game (and I don't just mean with regards to the map claims. I believe there was some soft Marmot defense in INH's Dizzy ISO). I'd like to hear more about that.

While I do not agree with all of his case against Dyslexicon, I also think it looks believable and I like the contribution INH has made with that case. I've never seen a scum INH, but this looks like his usual town self so far. I would, however, like to hear some expanded thoughts from him. We know where he stands on Dizzy. What about Metalmarsh? What about Jay? What about Golden? He was an early suspect; what has become of that now?

Sloonei wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:I'm assuming MM is in the lead, right?

How does this make you feel?

insertnamehere wrote:

Sloonei wrote:One thing that I did not like, though, was his loyalty to Metalmarsh in the whole map business, which seems like it may be spreading out into the game in general. He can correct me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe INH had any serious reason to trust the Marmot on Day 0 when he voted to give him the map, but he seems to have continued to trust him with some reliance on this premise deeper into the game (and I don't just mean with regards to the map claims. I believe there was some soft Marmot defense in INH's Dizzy ISO). I'd like to hear more about that.

While I do not agree with all of his case against Dyslexicon, I also think it looks believable and I like the contribution INH has made with that case. I've never seen a scum INH, but this looks like his usual town self so far. I would, however, like to hear some expanded thoughts from him. We know where he stands on Dizzy. What about Metalmarsh? What about Jay? What about Golden? He was an early suspect; what has become of that now?

I'll be up front. I don't get the case against MM. The parts of it that I do get remind me of the case against Sig, and the one against myself, both of which I know to be BS.

I can't help but think if I hadn't shown up with my big ol' ISO, I'd be the one people were pressuring others about. If MM were here right now, responding to people, defending himself, I doubt he'd be in the lead with the votes.

There seems to be a trend of voting out "controversial" players when they aren't around to defend themselves. It took sig, and I'm worried it's gonna take MM too. That's a big reason why I wish sprityo was as active in posting the vote tallies as he was D1. I'd be very interested in the overlap between the Sig and MM voters.

It feels like the path of least resistance to me.

Jay and Golden I'm indifferent towards currently. I feel better about Jay than I do Golden, but I'm not about to scum read either of them.

Quin wrote:Something that's pretty obvious that has occurred to me that I thought I'd share anyway is that people should be asking two questions before they vote on which direction to go.

1) Do I think this person has the map? Less important question, because some people just might not want to put any stock in the map business.
2) Do I trust the person who has the map? There's no guarantee that the destination the map holder is trying to get us to go is of benefit to the civilians.

Based on that, I'm going south west. I think that this direction takes us back to the start, but if that's the case, we might be able to get another map holder out of the deal.

insertnamehere wrote:

speedchuck wrote:insertnamehere - posted a huge thing against Dys, and I only agreed with one point on it. The rest looked like a scum filter over earnest attempts to help the town and one blunder. wasn't a huge fan beforehand, either.

The one point I did agree with on it is that Dizzy seems to go after people that considered him neutral. I don't really consider that scummy, but...

Dizzy has said like five times that they are suspicious of me, and haven't sent a vote or an explanation my way. Calling you out, Dizzybro. Put er up.

Might be voting INH in another few posts, or I might keep scotty or marmot. The culture here says not to throw your vote around every other post, so I won't.

What makes me bad, speedchunk? I'd appreciate a straight answer.

Also, what's the "one blunder" in my ISO you reference?

Scotty wrote:Stop voting me. I'd rather not be lynched at the same time as I was lynched in GoC while being incapacitatwd by no cell plAn

I see speedchuck still hasn't let go of my case, thAts ok fine.

Sloon, that post you were referencing has no contradiction. I prefer to vote no posters or no shows on Day 1, but it really looked like he slipped. I'm gonna reference a similar case in GoC because I'm dead there but a similar thing caught my attention when Wilgy dropped "info" on Golden in that game. I took it as a fact. This looked similar, in the sense that it looked plain as day.

I'm sorry you don't like friendly Scotty. I've been in a pretty happy place recently so whatevs.

Just lynch me. That's fine.

If I am more suspicious for doing little drop ins that you people don't call helpful, that's fine. Let Elo, who it's admitted her head isn't in the game, continue to play. That's perfectly fine.

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Sloonei, while you're busy advocating do my lynch because "why not?" I ask, why not Elo?

I never dropped any such "why not" on you, and I'm not voicing any confidence that Elohcin is bad. I just think I've found more evidence to suggest you are town.

Sloonei wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Sloonei wrote:One thing that I did not like, though, was his loyalty to Metalmarsh in the whole map business, which seems like it may be spreading out into the game in general. He can correct me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe INH had any serious reason to trust the Marmot on Day 0 when he voted to give him the map, but he seems to have continued to trust him with some reliance on this premise deeper into the game (and I don't just mean with regards to the map claims. I believe there was some soft Marmot defense in INH's Dizzy ISO). I'd like to hear more about that.

While I do not agree with all of his case against Dyslexicon, I also think it looks believable and I like the contribution INH has made with that case. I've never seen a scum INH, but this looks like his usual town self so far. I would, however, like to hear some expanded thoughts from him. We know where he stands on Dizzy. What about Metalmarsh? What about Jay? What about Golden? He was an early suspect; what has become of that now?

I'll be up front. I don't get the case against MM. The parts of it that I do get remind me of the case against Sig, and the one against myself, both of which I know to be BS.

I can't help but think if I hadn't shown up with my big ol' ISO, I'd be the one people were pressuring others about. If MM were here right now, responding to people, defending himself, I doubt he'd be in the lead with the votes.

There seems to be a trend of voting out "controversial" players when they aren't around to defend themselves. It took sig, and I'm worried it's gonna take MM too. That's a big reason why I wish sprityo was as active in posting the vote tallies as he was D1. I'd be very interested in the overlap between the Sig and MM voters.

It feels like the path of least resistance to me.

Jay and Golden I'm indifferent towards currently. I feel better about Jay than I do Golden, but I'm not about to scum read either of them.

Having ISO'd metalmarsh after ISOing you, I fully agree with your stance on him. The little snippets of case I've seen against him don't strike me as anything I'd base a vote off of.

What do you think of Scotty and Elohcin? They are the two players I am most likely to vote for right now.

speedchuck wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Sloonei, while you're busy advocating do my lynch because "why not?" I ask, why not Elo?

I never dropped any such "why not" on you, and I'm not voicing any confidence that Elohcin is bad. I just think I've found more evidence to suggest you are town.

?????????? I have no idea what this post says. Last several are actually confusing to me.

Long Con wrote:

Dyslexicon wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Dyslexicon wrote:

Long Con wrote:Dyslexicon: Is it over? Your fakeslip plan? Should we keep discussing it, or drop it and move on?

I mean, everything in the thread is information. I guess you should focus on what seems interesting and important to you, and thenI will judge you hard and see if you're scum for it things develop from there.

Your overall tactic with the fakeslip, then, is to send it out into the world and let it develop on its own through the eyes of others?

Sure, that too. Everything in the game belongs to the game. Do I look like someone with a grand plan?



Finally fully caught up. Still can't make my head deal with the map thing, but I don't know if it makes any real difference anyway and is certainly less important than finding scum.

I don't like your answer, friend. I was hoping I'd see something from you that tries to use the "data" you generated. I gave you a couple of chances to come forward with something like that, but it looks to me like it was actually very hollow. If you were honestly using a ploy to generate reads, then you... should be doing that. I think you are false, Slex, and it's time to update my vote.

Unvote insertnamehere

Vote Lynch Dyslexicon

insertnamehere wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Sloonei wrote:One thing that I did not like, though, was his loyalty to Metalmarsh in the whole map business, which seems like it may be spreading out into the game in general. He can correct me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe INH had any serious reason to trust the Marmot on Day 0 when he voted to give him the map, but he seems to have continued to trust him with some reliance on this premise deeper into the game (and I don't just mean with regards to the map claims. I believe there was some soft Marmot defense in INH's Dizzy ISO). I'd like to hear more about that.

While I do not agree with all of his case against Dyslexicon, I also think it looks believable and I like the contribution INH has made with that case. I've never seen a scum INH, but this looks like his usual town self so far. I would, however, like to hear some expanded thoughts from him. We know where he stands on Dizzy. What about Metalmarsh? What about Jay? What about Golden? He was an early suspect; what has become of that now?

I'll be up front. I don't get the case against MM. The parts of it that I do get remind me of the case against Sig, and the one against myself, both of which I know to be BS.

I can't help but think if I hadn't shown up with my big ol' ISO, I'd be the one people were pressuring others about. If MM were here right now, responding to people, defending himself, I doubt he'd be in the lead with the votes.

There seems to be a trend of voting out "controversial" players when they aren't around to defend themselves. It took sig, and I'm worried it's gonna take MM too. That's a big reason why I wish sprityo was as active in posting the vote tallies as he was D1. I'd be very interested in the overlap between the Sig and MM voters.

It feels like the path of least resistance to me.

Jay and Golden I'm indifferent towards currently. I feel better about Jay than I do Golden, but I'm not about to scum read either of them.

Having ISO'd metalmarsh after ISOing you, I fully agree with your stance on him. The little snippets of case I've seen against him don't strike me as anything I'd base a vote off of.

What do you think of Scotty and Elohcin? They are the two players I am most likely to vote for right now.

Let me put it this way: There has to be some serious dirt for me to want to lynch Scotty or Elohcin Day 2.

And there ain't any dirt.

speedchuck wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

speedchuck wrote:insertnamehere - posted a huge thing against Dys, and I only agreed with one point on it. The rest looked like a scum filter over earnest attempts to help the town and one blunder. wasn't a huge fan beforehand, either.

The one point I did agree with on it is that Dizzy seems to go after people that considered him neutral. I don't really consider that scummy, but...

Dizzy has said like five times that they are suspicious of me, and haven't sent a vote or an explanation my way. Calling you out, Dizzybro. Put er up.

Might be voting INH in another few posts, or I might keep scotty or marmot. The culture here says not to throw your vote around every other post, so I won't.

What makes me bad, speedchunk? I'd appreciate a straight answer.

Also, what's the "one blunder" in my ISO you reference?

The blunder was the thing about Dizzy attacking certain people. His blunder, not yours.

It was the rest I disagreed with. And, I'll admit, I haven't done an ISO on you, nor built a case. I just can't remember any reasons to put you as town, and I'm on Dizzy's side regarding the ISO. It seems more like you were taking a player who had a shaky spot in this game earlier, assuming he's scum, and coming up with evidence to push that viewpoint.

Edit before posting: Your post about the case on mM is quite good, though. I like it.

Sloonei wrote:Do you have anything specific to say against my case on Scotty?

Sloonei wrote:Also @ INH, do you have any strong suspects besides Dyslexicon?

Quin wrote:I'm still mixing up he's and she's. Problem is I don't actually know so Sorry.

insertnamehere wrote:

Quin wrote:I'm still mixing up he's and she's. Problem is I don't actually know so Sorry.

If it makes you feel better, gender is just something made up by clothing companies to sell different types of underwear.

insertnamehere wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Do you have anything specific to say against my case on Scotty?

I think the "contradiction" you pointed out is meaningless semantics, and the other "weird stuff" Scotty has allegedly done isn't weird enough to break through the fact that Scotty is mislynched for doing stuff people deem "weird" a whole bunch.

Do you think Dyslexicon's responses to my case are valid? How do you currently feel about him, in relation to Scotty and Elo?

Quin wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Quin wrote:I'm still mixing up he's and she's. Problem is I don't actually know so Sorry.

If it makes you feel better, gender is just something made up by clothing companies to sell different types of underwear.

The weirdest thing is socks. Why are there men's socks and women's socks? Are our ankles that different?

insertnamehere wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Also @ INH, do you have any strong suspects besides Dyslexicon?

How would you feel if I didn't?

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Curious of people's opinions of the kills. Did anyone feel Wigly was acting particularly scummy?

This caught my attention during the metalmarsh ISO. This came earlier in Day 2. Silver Lantern later tells us that he killed Wilgy, but here he is asking why Wilgy was killed. I can think of plenty of reasons why he would be asking this question, but I'd like to ask why anyway.

Scotty wrote:Stop voting me. I'd rather not be lynched at the same time as I was lynched in GoC while being incapacitatwd by no cell plAn

I see speedchuck still hasn't let go of my case, thAts ok fine.

Sloon, that post you were referencing has no contradiction. I prefer to vote no posters or no shows on Day 1, but it really looked like he slipped. I'm gonna reference a similar case in GoC because I'm dead there but a similar thing caught my attention when Wilgy dropped "info" on Golden in that game. I took it as a fact. This looked similar, in the sense that it looked plain as day.

I'm sorry you don't like friendly Scotty. I've been in a pretty happy place recently so whatevs.

Just lynch me. That's fine.

If I am more suspicious for doing little drop ins that you people don't call helpful, that's fine. Let Elo, who it's admitted her head isn't in the game, continue to play. That's perfectly fine.

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Curious of people's opinions of the kills. Did anyone feel Wigly was acting particularly scummy?

This caught my attention during the metalmarsh ISO. This came earlier in Day 2. Silver Lantern later tells us that he killed Wilgy, but here he is asking why Wilgy was killed. I can think of plenty of reasons why he would be asking this question, but I'd like to ask why anyway.

I'm no sure why you'd ask such an obvious question. It's borderline dumb/intentionally obtuse.

Clearly I was fishing to get others to commit on their view of Wigly before his alignment was revealed. How is that not obvious to a player of your alleged caliber?

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Stop voting me. I'd rather not be lynched at the same time as I was lynched in GoC while being incapacitatwd by no cell plAn

I see speedchuck still hasn't let go of my case, thAts ok fine.

Sloon, that post you were referencing has no contradiction. I prefer to vote no posters or no shows on Day 1, but it really looked like he slipped. I'm gonna reference a similar case in GoC because I'm dead there but a similar thing caught my attention when Wilgy dropped "info" on Golden in that game. I took it as a fact. This looked similar, in the sense that it looked plain as day.

I'm sorry you don't like friendly Scotty. I've been in a pretty happy place recently so whatevs.

Just lynch me. That's fine.

If I am more suspicious for doing little drop ins that you people don't call helpful, that's fine. Let Elo, who it's admitted her head isn't in the game, continue to play. That's perfectly fine.

The tone of this post resonated vaguely for me back to Rocky and Bullwinkle, in which Scotty was bad almost exactly 1 year ago to the day. He was caught early by a certain valiant townie and responded with a similar tone when he was going down. Here's a comparable post. Tells us not to vote for him and such without doing much to actually respond to the cases being made.

Granted, this might just be how he responds to things. I'll go look for townie Scotty lynches. They're not hard to find.

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Curious of people's opinions of the kills. Did anyone feel Wigly was acting particularly scummy?

This caught my attention during the metalmarsh ISO. This came earlier in Day 2. Silver Lantern later tells us that he killed Wilgy, but here he is asking why Wilgy was killed. I can think of plenty of reasons why he would be asking this question, but I'd like to ask why anyway.

I'm no sure why you'd ask such an obvious question. It's borderline dumb/intentionally obtuse.

Clearly I was fishing to get others to commit on their view of Wigly before his alignment was revealed. How is that not obvious to a player of your alleged caliber?

I ask questions so that people will say things, not because I can't figure out the answers on my own
Got any results you want to share?

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Curious of people's opinions of the kills. Did anyone feel Wigly was acting particularly scummy?

This caught my attention during the metalmarsh ISO. This came earlier in Day 2. Silver Lantern later tells us that he killed Wilgy, but here he is asking why Wilgy was killed. I can think of plenty of reasons why he would be asking this question, but I'd like to ask why anyway.

I'm no sure why you'd ask such an obvious question. It's borderline dumb/intentionally obtuse.

Clearly I was fishing to get others to commit on their view of Wigly before his alignment was revealed. How is that not obvious to a player of your alleged caliber?

I ask questions so that people will say things, not because I can't figure out the answers on my own
Got any results you want to share?

Yeah I'm not in the habit of being questioned when I'm clearly town. It's quite irritating, not that you care.

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Curious of people's opinions of the kills. Did anyone feel Wigly was acting particularly scummy?

This caught my attention during the metalmarsh ISO. This came earlier in Day 2. Silver Lantern later tells us that he killed Wilgy, but here he is asking why Wilgy was killed. I can think of plenty of reasons why he would be asking this question, but I'd like to ask why anyway.

I'm no sure why you'd ask such an obvious question. It's borderline dumb/intentionally obtuse.

Clearly I was fishing to get others to commit on their view of Wigly before his alignment was revealed. How is that not obvious to a player of your alleged caliber?

I ask questions so that people will say things, not because I can't figure out the answers on my own
Got any results you want to share?

Yeah I'm not in the habit of being questioned when I'm clearly town. It's quite irritating, not that you care.

Dyslexicon wrote:I'm just watching. Don't mind me. :3

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Curious of people's opinions of the kills. Did anyone feel Wigly was acting particularly scummy?

This caught my attention during the metalmarsh ISO. This came earlier in Day 2. Silver Lantern later tells us that he killed Wilgy, but here he is asking why Wilgy was killed. I can think of plenty of reasons why he would be asking this question, but I'd like to ask why anyway.

I'm no sure why you'd ask such an obvious question. It's borderline dumb/intentionally obtuse.

Clearly I was fishing to get others to commit on their view of Wigly before his alignment was revealed. How is that not obvious to a player of your alleged caliber?

I ask questions so that people will say things, not because I can't figure out the answers on my own
Got any results you want to share?

Yeah I'm not in the habit of being questioned when I'm clearly town. It's quite irritating, not that you care.

I can't not ask questions. I don't apologize.

Just treat me like either a 3 year old or a psychiatrist rather than an interrogator.

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Silver Lantern wrote:Curious of people's opinions of the kills. Did anyone feel Wigly was acting particularly scummy?

This caught my attention during the metalmarsh ISO. This came earlier in Day 2. Silver Lantern later tells us that he killed Wilgy, but here he is asking why Wilgy was killed. I can think of plenty of reasons why he would be asking this question, but I'd like to ask why anyway.

I'm no sure why you'd ask such an obvious question. It's borderline dumb/intentionally obtuse.

Clearly I was fishing to get others to commit on their view of Wigly before his alignment was revealed. How is that not obvious to a player of your alleged caliber?

I ask questions so that people will say things, not because I can't figure out the answers on my own
Got any results you want to share?

Yeah I'm not in the habit of being questioned when I'm clearly town. It's quite irritating, not that you care.

I can't not ask questions. I don't apologize.

Just treat me like either a 3 year old or a psychiatrist rather than an interrogator.

It's cool man I get it's your playstyle. I don't want to playstyle police you. I'm sure eventually I'll just start ignoring your questions if they're too annoying. It's just that on our site constantly fishing for info is a little scummy so it raises a red flag every time you question me.