The Syndicate

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:46 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:16 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:07 pm Golden thinks sig is bad and resigns to interactively analyse.

I offer that I already have and found, among others, Spacedaisy wanting.

Spacedaisy does a catch up post that Golden vehemently disagrees with and finds it weird.

Golden diverts away from his plan to microanalyse Daisy herself.

Golden gives her a town read.

The progression is illogical.
That’s because it’s not accurate in the least.

Put I give her a townread at the top.

Delete me diverting any plan to divert away from microanalysing her, because I have that plan.l and haven’t diverted away from it in the least. I could see a world in which daisy is pocketing me and I remain very open to the possibility, for now. I’ll have a firmer view either way only by microanalysis.

Add me reiterating my current read at the bottom.

Then you have the progression correct.

Semantics

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:49 pm**

You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:55 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:49 pm You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?

Ignorance. I explained it at length. Read the thread.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:58 pm**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:55 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:49 pm You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?
Ignorance. I explained it at length. Read the thread.

It wouldn't be hard for you to point it out.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:59 pm**

If I didn't know any better it sounds like you think I am fake in my sig read?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:00 pm**

[mention]MacDougall[/mention]
[mention]Scotty[/mention]
[mention]Golden[/mention]

It's pretty simple, musketeers. I need only one more thing to happen in order to win the game (and leave it), and that thing I need to do is like... it's a fuckin slam dunk.

So I could just do that, and just be done with it, orrrrrr I can stick around and haunt my friends through time.

T H E
C H O I C E
I S
Y O U R S

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:03 pm**

I was gonna say that I didn’t understand why people believe Turnip Head, but then again when he drew a wolf in One Hour Werewolf he just said he was a wolf. So maybe I should believe him too.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:04 pm**

or we could just lynch actually turnip head. it might be really funny.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:06 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:58 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:55 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:49 pm You can't have the wrong progression, call the progression illogical, and then say it's semantics.

You literally said I diverted away from my plan to microanalyse Daisy. That was a pure falsehood. That's not semantics.

Question: Why was sig your bottom read before we came into today?
Ignorance. I explained it at length. Read the thread.
It wouldn't be hard for you to point it out.

First came a gut ping.

Then I observed his townie tinfoil was absent. He was more stoic under pressure than in other games. He seemed informed.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:09 pm**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:59 pm If I didn't know any better it sounds like you think I am fake in my sig read?

As with Daisy, with you I have a town read that I am entirely willing to re-evaluate at any given time.

I don't know the why of any of your reads, whether through the fact you haven't explained them or the fact I missed them. From my perspective both explanations are possible. I was just asking you to provide that why. I wasn't being in the slightest bit combative but the fact that you are does ping me a little I have to admit.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:12 pm**

oh i missed eod

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:14 pm**

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm Let's do something more fun.

sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.

Who gets your vote and why?
Yes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.

this is fun

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:15 pm**

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:12 pmoh i missed eod

Nah you missed 'an event' that was not EoD.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:18 pm**

Aside from Scotty I don't trust anyone

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:23 pm**

Hello. I am infiltrating this game solely to reach out to potential replacement(s) for my own ongoing game, Courage (someone who isn't already playing in it, of course). I don't have a lot of options on the table in that regard. Contact me in private if interested. Thanks. Bye.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:25 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:15 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:12 pmoh i missed eod
Nah you missed 'an event' that was not EoD.

but i love events

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:27 pm**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:18 pm Aside from Scotty I don't trust anyone

Why would you trust scotty but not me.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:28 pm**

I think sig will come back.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:29 pm**

He was adamant he won't be killed and the way the host post is written sounds like his vanishing was self-inflicted.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:42 pm**

Im without internet if i dont fix it tomorrow ill ask to be replaced

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:42 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:27 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:18 pm Aside from Scotty I don't trust anyone
Why would you trust scotty but not me.

Your read of him is only part of why I trust him. I trust the way he is reading the game. I trust the way he is approaching the game.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:01 pm**

I wish i had time to read all the posts and contribute.
I dont like how most guys are going soft and tame. The feel i have about Mac is that hes baddie this game. Goldens defense reads as genuine.
Scotty is a null read last game he proved hes incredibly tough to read correctly and he puzzles me even more in this one.
The guys who ask to be voted or for their conditions to be met should have pointa deducted and be considered dangerous.s
I wont put a placeholder vote, i need to read more and i ask to be forgiven foe not commiting enough.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:03 pm**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:04 pm or we could just lynch actually turnip head. it might be really funny.

Is he scum though?
Are you?
It would be funny if you are both.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:07 pm**

Choutas wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:03 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:04 pm or we could just lynch actually turnip head. it might be really funny.
Is he scum though?
Are you?
It would be funny if you are both.

what was your goal in making this post?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:08 pm**

im town and turniphead is likely an indie like he says. im 90% confident

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:10 pm**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:08 pm im town and turniphead is likely an indie like he says. im 90% confident

How?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:13 pm**

I've been in the attic on account of a clogged AC drain pipe. I'll be with you all momentarily.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:40 pm**

Choutas wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:01 pm I wish i had time to read all the posts and contribute.
I dont like how most guys are going soft and tame. Wot. The feel i have about Mac is that hes baddie this game. Take off the tinfoil hat. Goldens defense reads as genuine.
Scotty is a null read last game he proved hes incredibly tough to read correctly and he puzzles me even more in this one. He's obviously town.
The guys who ask to be voted or for their conditions to be met should have pointa deducted and be considered dangerous.s
I wont put a placeholder vote, i need to read more and i ask to be forgiven foe not commiting enough.

Vote me then

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:41 pm**

Town doesn't need me and I don't need town. I'll probably let Kyle walk me on a leash but that's all I can muster.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm**

What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm**

DAY 1:
N/A

NIGHT 1:

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm**

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:15 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:09 pm I don’t agree with the recurring idea that we’ll just get rid of both signand inh to be safe. Quin’s posts should have been the catalyst for a decision, not a non-decision.
It's denial and fear-mongering with no real potential results IMO. I realize I'm not exactly unbiased, but I'd feel more comfortable if the town lynched people because of legitimate in-thread reasons when we have no flips to go off of, instead of contested info-dropping hearsay which won't truly be proven one way or the other until dead peoples' roles are revealed. The former is productive and can generate conversations, while the second won't actually give us any information while serving as a major distraction.

Yet the the latter has produced the former, no?

By the way, your script needs work.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:48 pm**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?

Correctly predict one more election.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:49 pm**

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:48 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?
Correctly predict one more election.

Did you correctly predict sig?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:50 pm**

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:49 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:48 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?
Correctly predict one more election.
Did you correctly predict sig?

Yup

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:50 pm**

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:18 pm The fact that both sig and INH have attacked the intel, rather than each other, bodes poorly.

That's what I've been saying.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:55 pm**

Mac, why’d you vote sig to get the item when he was bottom of your reads?

Epi, why’d you go for bribery?

Daisy, Luna, Kyle - also want to know why you voted for sig.

I’m starting with a review of this group of five.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:55 pm**

I guarantee baddies will be in there.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:00 pm**

Current gth rankings from most likely to be bad to least likely to be bad, before ISOs.

Luna
Kyle
Epi
Daisy
Mac

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:01 pm**

Mac is clearly bad lol

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:07 pm**

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:48 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?
Correctly predict one more election.

That seems like a rather easy wincon. I think you’re being a little misleading at best.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:12 pm**

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:50 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:49 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:48 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?
Correctly predict one more election.
Did you correctly predict sig?
Yup

At what point do you submit your prediction and in what format?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:14 pm**

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:55 pm Mac, why’d you vote sig to get the item when he was bottom of your reads?

Epi, why’d you go for bribery?

Daisy, Luna, Kyle - also want to know why you voted for sig.

I’m starting with a review of this group of five.

I was trying to win the election for a while and then I had a random change of heart when he made me feel like him winning would be a richer game experience at least by which time I had also coincidentally realised I had little chance of winning so I thought fuck it, I have no idea what the outcome of the night vote will be anyway and I am just being contrarian, give the kid his win.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:15 pm**

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:01 pm Mac is clearly bad lol

1. I am not, let alone clearly.
2. What is this based on?

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:16 pm**

I am also interested in the answers to Mac’s questions.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:17 pm**

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:07 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:48 pm
MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm What do you need to have happen in order to get your wincon?
Correctly predict one more election.
That seems like a rather easy wincon. I think you’re being a little misleading at best.

I know dude tell me about it

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:22 pm**

OK, I will tell you about it.

I’m a vote predictor. I get an extra vote on days following a night poll where I successfully predict the winner.

So why would your wincon be something that I should reasonably be expected to do a few times over?

Nah. You’re not telling the truth.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:22 pm**

This would be more fun for me if I could just continue my nihilistic roleplay instead of talking about my dumb role more

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:23 pm**

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:22 pm OK, I will tell you about it.

I’m a vote predictor. I get an extra vote on days following a night poll where I successfully predict the winner.

So why would your wincon be something that I should reasonably be expected to do a few times over?

Nah. You’re not telling the truth.

Let's get you elected Colin. Start the countdown.

Posted: **Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:24 pm**

The Syndicate

Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: RCMafia - Polls

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down