The Syndicate

Dammit. RIP me.


....I mean, early April Fools joke!

No, but seriously. I have no idea what happened there.

Metalmarsh89 wrote: It should. A fake info-drop is still an info-drop. Since real info-drops are against the rules, any info-drop should be assumed to be fake, unless addressed by the host. The circumstances tend to be messy. I've used a fake info-drop once, and I felt extremely bad for doing so, since I ruined DF's chances at winning Monopoly. I don't know if there were any hard feelings, but I think I owe DF an apology for that one.

No worries, my role hinting helped cause Dom to lose Doctor Who Mafia, so I can't complain about it happening to me. Sorry again Dom!

And yay BWT?

DFaraday wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote: It should. A fake info-drop is still an info-drop. Since real info-drops are against the rules, any info-drop should be assumed to be fake, unless addressed by the host. The circumstances tend to be messy. I've used a fake info-drop once, and I felt extremely bad for doing so, since I ruined DF's chances at winning Monopoly. I don't know if there were any hard feelings, but I think I owe DF an apology for that one.

No worries, my role hinting helped cause Dom to lose Doctor Who Mafia, so I can't complain about it happening to me. Sorry again Dom!

And yay BWT?

I guess we're even then since I was Dom's partner-in-crime in Dr. Who.

Is there a recruiter in this game?

Made wrote:Is there a recruiter in this game?

Not that I know of. There have been prizes though.

Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.

Dom wrote:hmmmm

Ricochet wrote:Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.

Dom wrote:hmmmm

If FZ. were still with us, I think she would say that this sounds kinda sour grapey of you.

Today I plan to look at people who used Llamas Vomp suspicion to push secondary Vomp based suspicions.

Why? I was merely rejoicing. That team is factually on a two-night fail streak.

Just a general heads up: Busy day(s) ahead (errands, test preparations, usual study), may affect even my usual afternoon or evening lurking hours.

Ricochet wrote:Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.

Dom wrote:hmmmm

why the evil eye?

I think SVS was just saying that saying they're having a "nightmare" of a game makes it almost sound like you're personally experiencing it. I've said stuff like that, so I don't put stock in that particular comment.

What did you mean with the to Dom?

EBWOP: Dome beat me to it.

*Dom, not Dome.

Ricochet wrote:Why? I was merely rejoicing. That team is factually on a two-night fail streak.

Just a general heads up: Busy day(s) ahead (errands, test preparations, usual study), may affect even my usual afternoon or evening lurking hours.

No one is disputing that...

Ricochet wrote:Why? I was merely rejoicing. That team is factually on a two-night fail streak.

Just a general heads up: Busy day(s) ahead (errands, test preparations, usual study), may affect even my usual afternoon or evening lurking hours.

We have more suitable smileys for rejoicing than that one.

Hmmm indeed.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Why? I was merely rejoicing. That team is factually on a two-night fail streak.

Just a general heads up: Busy day(s) ahead (errands, test preparations, usual study), may affect even my usual afternoon or evening lurking hours.

We have more suitable smileys for rejoicing than that one.

Hmmm indeed.

wait what are YOU saying?

Dom wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.

Dom wrote:hmmmm

why the evil eye?

Your reaction stood out from the rest made me curious, that's all. Why did you "hmm" at BWT's rezz? Are you not happy with it?

Ricochet wrote:

Dom wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.

Dom wrote:hmmmm

why the evil eye?

Your reaction stood out from the rest made me curious, that's all. Why did you "hmm" at BWT's rezz? Are you not happy with it?

I can't answer for Dom, but I, for one, am just a bit wary of anyone who comes back to life twice in one game.

DFaraday wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Dom wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.

Dom wrote:hmmmm

why the evil eye?

Your reaction stood out from the rest made me curious, that's all. Why did you "hmm" at BWT's rezz? Are you not happy with it?

I can't answer for Dom, but I, for one, am just a bit wary of anyone who comes back to life twice in one game.

Wary of him, of who rezzed him or of the situation?

I can see the surprise in someone having received a rezz prize and used it, but I don't see what's wary about the first two cases.

Made wrote:Is there a recruiter in this game?

No, I took that role out when I cut out 7+ roles.

So we have people implying that BWT must have come back from the Pet Sematary it would appear.

Do I have that right, Made? Was that the point of that question? And the intent behind the suspicious smiley face, Ricochet?

I've answered that earlier.

And wait, are you saying BWT rezzed himself? How?

I'll settle this debate then. Mostly because I'm just as curious as all of you as to how I came back.

@Hostess: Was me dying on Night 3 an hosting error on your part, or was I actually rezzed?

a hosting error*

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'll settle this debate then. Mostly because I'm just as curious as all of you as to how I came back.

@Hostess: Was me dying on Night 3 an hosting error on your part, or was I actually rezzed?

I'd be surprised if it was a hosting error if you truly don't know.

Ricochet wrote:I've answered that earlier.

And wait, are you saying BWT rezzed himself? How?

No I am not. I have no idea, I was trying to determine what others meant, and whether I believed them I saw your answer. I was seeking clarification.

And how would you get that interpretation from my question?

Black Rock wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'll settle this debate then. Mostly because I'm just as curious as all of you as to how I came back.

@Hostess: Was me dying on Night 3 an hosting error on your part, or was I actually rezzed?

I'd be surprised if it was a hosting error if you truly don't know.

I would be as well. But I've seen hosting errors occur this way, so I want to make sure.

The host has stated there is no recruiter in this game, so isn't this a moot discussion? BWT is still the same role he died as, right? I mean, unless something completely inexplicable and unforeseeable has happened... deus ex mafia

S~V~S wrote:And how would you get that interpretation from my question?

Because you said "BWT must have come back", not brought back or something else. If that's not what you mean, then I guess I didn't understand your sentence at all.

And just to be clear, do you need more clarification on my reaction to Dom's reaction? What kind of clarification, in that case? I had no intent besides finding his reaction peculiar and I now await his clarification on that.

Oh wait, you said other people imply. My bad.

It's true though, I've seen hosting errors involving killings and this is what it looks like. But it could be something else. I just don't think it impacts BWT's role either way.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'll settle this debate then. Mostly because I'm just as curious as all of you as to how I came back.

@Hostess: Was me dying on Night 3 an hosting error on your part, or was I actually rezzed?

No known hosting error(s) has/have been committed at this time.

Mongoose wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'll settle this debate then. Mostly because I'm just as curious as all of you as to how I came back.

@Hostess: Was me dying on Night 3 an hosting error on your part, or was I actually rezzed?

No known hosting error(s) has/have been committed at this time.

Well there we go then. All I can figure is someone won a rezz as a prize and rezzed me.

Oh hmm. I didn't think about prizes. I guess that's something to be aware of. Regardless, BWT is not on the poll.

Ture.

Where are you looking today, Rico?

Turnip Head wrote:Oh hmm. I didn't think about prizes. I guess that's something to be aware of. Regardless, BWT is not on the poll.

Were you planning on lynching him?

...

Turnip Head wrote:Where are you looking today, Rico?

Reexamining the situation after Vomps' lynch. Nothing sure, yet.

Now I could see an error in BWT not being on the poll, because the ressurection happened after Day 4 started and the poll was made, so maybe Mongoose didn't edit it.

Turnip Head wrote:...

I'll take that as a yes.

We only discuss people on the poll, TH?

Linki, do you think he should be on the poll?

Dom wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Why? I was merely rejoicing. That team is factually on a two-night fail streak.

Just a general heads up: Busy day(s) ahead (errands, test preparations, usual study), may affect even my usual afternoon or evening lurking hours.

We have more suitable smileys for rejoicing than that one.

Hmmm indeed.

wait what are YOU saying?

Sorry, I'm emphasizing Dom, not mocking you.

S~V~S wrote:We only discuss people on the poll, TH?

When we're talking about lynching someone, and the person not on the poll is basically a confirmed civvie... yes?

thellama73 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:...

I'll take that as a yes.

Stop it.

Turnip Head wrote:Oh hmm. I didn't think about prizes. I guess that's something to be aware of. Regardless, BWT is not on the poll.

Not surprising. The poll went up before BWT was rezzed.

Gotcha, TH.

But no calling me a baddie when I pop in here in the middle of a discussion you are having and tell you to stop talking about whatever it is you are discussing., k?

Turnip Head wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:...

I'll take that as a yes.

Stop it.

No.

SVS, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

TH, who are you looking at today?

I feel the thread is being pulled in a few different directions and am unsure who to trust until we get a baddie and we can more fruitfully examine voting records. I think it's possible the baddies wanted us to lynch Vomps and actively helped us do that; I also think it's possible the baddies had nothing at all to do with it and just let nature take its course.

I still find myself suspicious of SVS. Her last post might have really pinged me depending on what she meant, so I await her clarification.

I still think something is up with Made as well. I feel he stands out as a player who jumped hard onto Llama's case against Vomp with no questions asked.

Whoa. This whole page is some really weird reading.

Are people actually suspicious of bwt, or is there some sort of contextual nuance that I'm missing??

Can I take a really quick poll of how people are feeling about the following players? I'm planning to re-read them all before the end of the lynch, but I'd really like to be able to compare what I find with people's general impressions of them....

Bass, DF, Made, Rico, TH