Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
They're all on my list except Made, who is fine. ALso on my list are Blooper and BR. Starting my rereads now...Canucklehead wrote:Can I take a really quick poll of how people are feeling about the following players? I'm planning to re-read them all before the end of the lynch, but I'd really like to be able to compare what I find with people's general impressions of them....
Bass, DF, Made, Rico, TH
When did that happen?thellama73 wrote:They're all on my list except Made, who is fine.Canucklehead wrote:Can I take a really quick poll of how people are feeling about the following players? I'm planning to re-read them all before the end of the lynch, but I'd really like to be able to compare what I find with people's general impressions of them....
Bass, DF, Made, Rico, TH
I forgot about Blooper, but I agree that she also needs some looking into.thellama73 wrote:They're all on my list except Made, who is fine. ALso on my list are Blooper and BR. Starting my rereads now...Canucklehead wrote:Can I take a really quick poll of how people are feeling about the following players? I'm planning to re-read them all before the end of the lynch, but I'd really like to be able to compare what I find with people's general impressions of them....
Bass, DF, Made, Rico, TH
Bass - I am feeling this is his civvie game.Canucklehead wrote:Can I take a really quick poll of how people are feeling about the following players? I'm planning to re-read them all before the end of the lynch, but I'd really like to be able to compare what I find with people's general impressions of them....
Bass, DF, Made, Rico, TH
SVS hates stifling discussion. I have extensive personal experience with this.Turnip Head wrote:Roxy, my point about BWT was that he's the closest thing we have to a confirmed civ, and he isn't even on the poll, so we shouldn't keep discussing him when we have to talk about somebody to lynch. SVS came in with a semi-snarky comment about me stifling discussion. Llama's comment about it seemed tongue in cheek, but SVS seemed serious.
As a host that has made possible hosting errors like this, to the thread appears this way but the players concerned have known why.Turnip Head wrote:It's true though, I've seen hosting errors involving killings and this is what it looks like. But it could be something else. I just don't think it impacts BWT's role either way.
There needs to be a better blush around these parts.Agreed.Black Rock wrote:As a host that has made possible hosting errors like this, to the thread appears this way but the players concerned have known why.Turnip Head wrote:It's true though, I've seen hosting errors involving killings and this is what it looks like. But it could be something else. I just don't think it impacts BWT's role either way.
My point is I think it's a rez. No other point to this, I don't suspect BWT for being rezzed.
It was unexpected--- so I'm thinking about the situation-- do you think that's bad?Ricochet wrote:Your reaction stood out from the rest made me curious, that's all. Why did you "hmm" at BWT's rezz? Are you not happy with it?Dom wrote:why the evil eye?Ricochet wrote:Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.
Dom wrote:hmmmm
Why would you think it was a host error?birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'll settle this debate then. Mostly because I'm just as curious as all of you as to how I came back.
@Hostess: Was me dying on Night 3 an hosting error on your part, or was I actually rezzed?
No explain yourself.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Sorry, I'm emphasizing Dom, not mocking you.Dom wrote:wait what are YOU saying?Metalmarsh89 wrote:We have more suitable smileys for rejoicing than that one.Ricochet wrote:Why? I was merely rejoicing. That team is factually on a two-night fail streak.
Just a general heads up: Busy day(s) ahead (errands, test preparations, usual study), may affect even my usual afternoon or evening lurking hours.
Hmmm indeed.
I have no idea what you're looking for Dom.Dom wrote:It was unexpected--- so I'm thinking about the situation-- do you think that's bad?Ricochet wrote:Your reaction stood out from the rest made me curious, that's all. Why did you "hmm" at BWT's rezz? Are you not happy with it?Dom wrote:why the evil eye?Ricochet wrote:Awesome, BWT! Very phoenix-like, already. The odd night baddies are having a nightmare of a game, so far.
Dom wrote:hmmmm
Why would you think it was a host error?birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'll settle this debate then. Mostly because I'm just as curious as all of you as to how I came back.
@Hostess: Was me dying on Night 3 an hosting error on your part, or was I actually rezzed?
If you have no idea how you were rezzed, where did you get the impression that you were supposed to live?No explain yourself.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Sorry, I'm emphasizing Dom, not mocking you.Dom wrote:wait what are YOU saying?Metalmarsh89 wrote:We have more suitable smileys for rejoicing than that one.Ricochet wrote:Why? I was merely rejoicing. That team is factually on a two-night fail streak.
Just a general heads up: Busy day(s) ahead (errands, test preparations, usual study), may affect even my usual afternoon or evening lurking hours.
Hmmm indeed.
What about the smilies conflicts with his joy?
. I usually go 
or 
or 
or 
or 
or 
I did. I think I misinterpreted his explanation.Dom wrote:You thought his reaction to my post was part of his rejoice?
Turnip Head wrote:Roxy, my point about BWT was that he's the closest thing we have to a confirmed civ, and he isn't even on the poll, so we shouldn't keep discussing him when we have to talk about somebody to lynch.
thellama73 wrote:Turnip Head wrote:Roxy, my point about BWT was that he's the closest thing we have to a confirmed civ, and he isn't even on the poll, so we shouldn't keep discussing him when we have to talk about somebody to lynch. SVS came in with a semi-snarky comment about me stifling discussion. Llama's comment about it seemed tongue in cheek, but SVS seemed serious.
SVS hates stifling discussion. I have extensive personal experience with this.
Okay, so then I'm confused. Why was your post directed at me?S~V~S wrote:TH, I am thinking about the lynch. I was not talking about BWT, I am talking about the reaction some people had to his death, or lack thereof. I have no interest in lynching BWT, so his presence on the poll is irrelevant to me.
I think that is a valid path of exploration:shrug:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Dom, to answer your questions:
1) I asked because I've seen a similar thing happen before due to a host's error. So I wanted to know if it was that or if I had been rezzed.
2) I never got that impression. I was NKed, and then a few posts later, the hostess says I was rezzed. I have absolutely no idea what happened. My best guess is that someone rezzed me.
Linki: SVS, who do you think had a lack of reaction to my death?
Llama hasn't set my Spidey-senses off yet at all. So I look forward to seeing what you dig up.Long Con wrote:I still hold Metalmarsh as my main suspicion, but I'm almost afraid to say that I'm starting to suspect Llama as well. I have to go back and read to see what I am thinking here, something he was saying earlier set off my Spidey-sense.
BWT, way to be immortal!
Hi, Long Con!Long Con wrote:I still hold Metalmarsh as my main suspicion, but I'm almost afraid to say that I'm starting to suspect Llama as well. I have to go back and read to see what I am thinking here, something he was saying earlier set off my Spidey-sense.
BWT, way to be immortal!
Made wrote:I don't know what it is, but the previous page, (or last 40 or so post for those on weird page formats) just felt off to me too re:Canuck . I know what I was doing on that page, but just like early in the game( with everything surrounding RIco), the things people say just seems so on the nose. I'm known (among irl friends) for being really bad at picking up on subtlety, as well as having other notice when i'm low key saying something. That all said, It seems like every little thing anyone's doing this game is being spelled out, almost as if people want to be see as adding something to the conversation, but not really adding anything at all, just explaining subtleties.
Two people who I feel are doing this right now is
Dom- with his Juliet tier questioning
And
TH-Turnip Head wrote:Roxy, my point about BWT was that he's the closest thing we have to a confirmed civ, and he isn't even on the poll, so we shouldn't keep discussing him when we have to talk about somebody to lynch.
Iunno, thoughts?
I'll be back later, Job interview!!!
thellama73 wrote: Blooper - She's bad. Lynch her.
(this is the appropriate use of the evil eye) Lynch me, and you get rid of a(n albeit relatively inactive) Civ. But words are words.You are unfortunately too right about the first part - I have been more uninvolved in this game than in most of my past games due to RL issues, etc. In other games, I am quiet but at least involved in conversation to an extent and keep up as well as I can (uninvolved to me implies not responding to others and not even bothering to read and missing votes, so I wouldn't call myself that for the most part). Also, I like that I'm now a buildable children's playthingCanucklehead wrote: Ninjago: I think she's been sort of non-involved in every game I've played with her, but her posts this game are not only infrequent (which seems usual) but also thin on substance or new insights (which seems like an attempt to blend in)
I do love Legos.And why is that? What did you think I could have meant that was bad? It sincerely felt to me like you were intentionally pulling the thread away from discussing potential baddie reactions to BWTs survival. That, to me, is relevant discussion fodder for a lynch. So you coming in here and trying to squash that topic pinged the crap out of me, I must say. It felt like you were swooping in and rescuing people, tbh. Look, up in the sky! A flying Turnip!!Turnip Head wrote:I feel the thread is being pulled in a few different directions and am unsure who to trust until we get a baddie and we can more fruitfully examine voting records. I think it's possible the baddies wanted us to lynch Vomps and actively helped us do that; I also think it's possible the baddies had nothing at all to do with it and just let nature take its course.
I still find myself suspicious of SVS. Her last post might have really pinged me depending on what she meant, so I await her clarification.
I still think something is up with Made as well. I feel he stands out as a player who jumped hard onto Llama's case against Vomp with no questions asked.
I know I have.birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'm trying. I think the other civvies could learn something from me.
You sure extrapolated a lot of meaning from my simple desire to talk about things other than lynching a twice rezzed confirmed civ who can't be lynchedS~V~S wrote:And why is that? What did you think I could have meant that was bad? It sincerely felt to me like you were intentionally pulling the thread away from discussing potential baddie reactions to BWTs survival. That, to me, is relevant discussion fodder for a lynch. So you coming in here and trying to squash that topic pinged the crap out of me, I must say. It felt like you were swooping in and rescuing people, tbh. Look, up in the sky! A flying Turnip!!
So when I read this, I think to myself, "Okay, what is SVS really trying to ask me?" It seemed like maybe you misunderstood what I meant, but your next post makes it clear you understood me.S~V~S wrote:We only discuss people on the poll, TH?
Linki, do you think he should be on the poll?
When I read this post it seemed to me to come from a baddie mindset. You're not actually accusing me in this post, but your whole line of "no calling me a baddie when " really struck me. Why are you laying groundwork to come in here at some point in the future and stop discussion, and then on top of that state that I can't call you a baddie when that time comes?S~V~S wrote:Gotcha, TH.
But no calling me a baddie when I pop in here in the middle of a discussion you are having and tell you to stop talking about whatever it is you are discussing., k?
Turnip Head wrote:You sure extrapolated a lot of meaning from my simple desire to talk about things other than lynching a twice rezzed confirmed civ who can't be lynchedS~V~S wrote:And why is that? What did you think I could have meant that was bad? It sincerely felt to me like you were intentionally pulling the thread away from discussing potential baddie reactions to BWTs survival. That, to me, is relevant discussion fodder for a lynch. So you coming in here and trying to squash that topic pinged the crap out of me, I must say. It felt like you were swooping in and rescuing people, tbh. Look, up in the sky! A flying Turnip!!
That's okay because I read a lot of meaning into your post as well:
So when I read this, I think to myself, "Okay, what is SVS really trying to ask me?" It seemed like maybe you misunderstood what I meant, but your next post makes it clear you understood me.S~V~S wrote:We only discuss people on the poll, TH?
Linki, do you think he should be on the poll?
When I read this post it seemed to me to come from a baddie mindset. You're not actually accusing me in this post, but your whole line of "no calling me a baddie when " really struck me. Why are you laying groundwork to come in here at some point in the future and stop discussion, and then on top of that state that I can't call you a baddie when that time comes?S~V~S wrote:Gotcha, TH.
But no calling me a baddie when I pop in here in the middle of a discussion you are having and tell you to stop talking about whatever it is you are discussing., k?
It seems like you agree with me that BWT is not worth discussing for today's vote. So why do you find it suspicious that I would want to nip that in the bud before it ate up all of today's discussion? Do you really think I intentionally wanted people to stop talking about lynching BWT in order to protect the baddies from speaking their minds? That's just... I don't know SVS. Do you really believe that? Why wouldn't I just say something in BTSC if that were the case?
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Turnip Head wrote:You sure extrapolated a lot of meaning from my simple desire to talk about things other than lynching a twice rezzed confirmed civ who can't be lynchedS~V~S wrote:And why is that? What did you think I could have meant that was bad? It sincerely felt to me like you were intentionally pulling the thread away from discussing potential baddie reactions to BWTs survival. That, to me, is relevant discussion fodder for a lynch. So you coming in here and trying to squash that topic pinged the crap out of me, I must say. It felt like you were swooping in and rescuing people, tbh. Look, up in the sky! A flying Turnip!!
That's okay because I read a lot of meaning into your post as well:
So when I read this, I think to myself, "Okay, what is SVS really trying to ask me?" It seemed like maybe you misunderstood what I meant, but your next post makes it clear you understood me.S~V~S wrote:We only discuss people on the poll, TH?
Linki, do you think he should be on the poll?
When I read this post it seemed to me to come from a baddie mindset. You're not actually accusing me in this post, but your whole line of "no calling me a baddie when " really struck me. Why are you laying groundwork to come in here at some point in the future and stop discussion, and then on top of that state that I can't call you a baddie when that time comes?S~V~S wrote:Gotcha, TH.
But no calling me a baddie when I pop in here in the middle of a discussion you are having and tell you to stop talking about whatever it is you are discussing., k?
It seems like you agree with me that BWT is not worth discussing for today's vote. So why do you find it suspicious that I would want to nip that in the bud before it ate up all of today's discussion? Do you really think I intentionally wanted people to stop talking about lynching BWT in order to protect the baddies from speaking their minds? That's just... I don't know SVS. Do you really believe that? Why wouldn't I just say something in BTSC if that were the case?
You and SVS are forcing this topic a little too much. Unless you're trying to build something on SVS, let's move on.
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:Turnip Head wrote:You sure extrapolated a lot of meaning from my simple desire to talk about things other than lynching a twice rezzed confirmed civ who can't be lynchedS~V~S wrote:And why is that? What did you think I could have meant that was bad? It sincerely felt to me like you were intentionally pulling the thread away from discussing potential baddie reactions to BWTs survival. That, to me, is relevant discussion fodder for a lynch. So you coming in here and trying to squash that topic pinged the crap out of me, I must say. It felt like you were swooping in and rescuing people, tbh. Look, up in the sky! A flying Turnip!!
That's okay because I read a lot of meaning into your post as well:
So when I read this, I think to myself, "Okay, what is SVS really trying to ask me?" It seemed like maybe you misunderstood what I meant, but your next post makes it clear you understood me.S~V~S wrote:We only discuss people on the poll, TH?
Linki, do you think he should be on the poll?
When I read this post it seemed to me to come from a baddie mindset. You're not actually accusing me in this post, but your whole line of "no calling me a baddie when " really struck me. Why are you laying groundwork to come in here at some point in the future and stop discussion, and then on top of that state that I can't call you a baddie when that time comes?S~V~S wrote:Gotcha, TH.
But no calling me a baddie when I pop in here in the middle of a discussion you are having and tell you to stop talking about whatever it is you are discussing., k?
It seems like you agree with me that BWT is not worth discussing for today's vote. So why do you find it suspicious that I would want to nip that in the bud before it ate up all of today's discussion? Do you really think I intentionally wanted people to stop talking about lynching BWT in order to protect the baddies from speaking their minds? That's just... I don't know SVS. Do you really believe that? Why wouldn't I just say something in BTSC if that were the case?
You and SVS are forcing this topic a little too much. Unless you're trying to build something on SVS, let's move on.
Who's stifling discussion now?
I'm looking for me and SVS to either get on the same page or to continue airing our suspicions of each other. I'm not against discussing other things, but it seems odd that you expect me to drop this when SVS and I obviously have concerns about each other.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I don't understand what TH is looking for, and I'm afraid that it could be intentionally distracting from better topics of discussion.
I've been doing that a lot this game.Turnip Head wrote:But I feel like I've been misinterpreted literally all day and I can't figure out why, so maybe I need to step back from the thread for a bit.
linki. So, it sounds like we mostly agree, and that you just don't approve of me shutting down a discussion that could have potentially led to baddies shooting themselves in the foot. When really my post was more directed at my fellow civvies to encourage other avenues of discussion. It seems to have been wildly misinterpreted, but oh well.
I didn't say you were being rude, nor did I intend to be rude myself, nor did I tell you to go find my prior posts... that's just how you read my post I guess.S~V~S wrote:Why does everyone keep doing this? Am I being rude by asking people to say what they think now? People keep telling me to go find their prior posts.
And perhaps you are right. Note you are not on my short list, but i appear to be on yours.
You'll still be my hero, even if you lynch a civvie fan like me.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Llama hasn't set my Spidey-senses off yet at all. So I look forward to seeing what you dig up.Long Con wrote:I still hold Metalmarsh as my main suspicion, but I'm almost afraid to say that I'm starting to suspect Llama as well. I have to go back and read to see what I am thinking here, something he was saying earlier set off my Spidey-sense.
BWT, way to be immortal!
I'm trying. I think the other civvies could learn something from me.
Also, I'm still leaning strongest on Rico. I will probably be voting him unless someone can convince me of a better case against someone else.
Um....flase.Mongoose wrote:
Oh here's a video. The Academy's tribute to Kate Hepburn, the superior of the two Hepburns.
Sure thing! It's like I said in an earlier post - while at first I chalked up your general know-how to be really careful thread-reading and lurking (I did that a lot when I was new and depended on that to understand the game), it started appearing too...for lack of a better word, knowledgeable to be coincidental. The first instance that made me think along these lines, rather than coincidence/reading, was the Canuck gender thing. You had no prodding in-thread to correct this mistake that I noticed, which just happened to catch my eye. I applaud good playing and participation; however, just to let you know WHY you're garnering suspicion, there have been a few instances of newbies getting a baddie role early in their mafia careers, and they've been caught because they seemed to "know too much" (AKA getting info from BTSC and not in-thread) and didn't hide it well. Hope that answers your question, but I'm happy to address whatever else is necessary.Ricochet wrote:RL busyness has interfered with me being able to look into many things, at least today.
The evil eye (I see it more as a stink eye, tbh) I gave Dom was about his curious reaction to BWT's resurrection. Kinda like Llama felt, too. It felt very open to interpretation. Now I'm getting heat for doing that. When Dom gave me the stink eye for something as accidental as messing up Canuck's gender and I needed BTSC to correct something like that, nobody cared (or even endorsed that). Nothing further to add.
Blooper, if you could specify what you found strange in my behaviour so far or what you find strange about my level of gameplay being so un-newbie-like, I'd like to hear it. All I know is that I'm doing my best to play this game at my best, first game or not. The fact that it's actually a cause for suspicion completely befuddles me.