The Syndicate

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:23 pm**

Scotty wrote:So to @Sorsha and @Boomslang is a big reason you aren't looking to vote llama because you have a proclivity to not vote presumably silenced players?

I don't think llama could say anything here that would make me reach into my baseball bag and put on my practice glove any more. I kinda think I'm ready for the majors, tbh.

Scotty, Boomslang has already voted for Quin which is where I'm most likely to vote. llama may well be bad but I'm not convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt which I would have to be to vote someone who is silenced and hasn't been able to respond to suspicions.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:24 pm**

Hello all--

I've received word that Mongoose has lost power and will not be able to post on time. When she has power, she will post ASAP. Thank you for your patience here. We heart u

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:26 pm**

She is in the middle of an extremely severe storm that is headed this way. I am also worried I will lose power.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:49 pm**

Sorry, I slept in way too late. I'll be here soon.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:00 pm**

Long Con wrote:Quin, what do you think of me?

I think you could have been buddying me earlier on. If llama is correct about his theory that one of you, me, or INH are bad, I'd probably say it was you. Outside of that, I think you're civ, but just not as likely to be as INH.

On the matter of llama, Epi pointed out something along the lines of him being civ based on Wilgy's decision to defend DDL instead of him. If llama was the role blocker, then Wilgy chose to protect the scum doctor over the role blocker or overalls. Before I would have leaned turned my read around on llama based on the direction Wilgy went there, but now knowing the doctors full power, I'd say it makes sense to protect DDL over the role blocker or overalls if they were both bad.

And as Scotty said, if he's hinting at being the Denim Shirt, he'd survive today.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:35 pm**

Dom wrote:Hello all--

I've received word that Mongoose has lost power and will not be able to post on time. When she has power, she will post ASAP. Thank you for your patience here. We heart u

Damn. First she gets confused and now she has her ability blocked.

Stop targeting the host, people!

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:37 pm**

Quin wrote:
Long Con wrote:Quin, what do you think of me?
I think you could have been buddying me earlier on. If llama is correct about his theory that one of you, me, or INH are bad, I'd probably say it was you. Outside of that, I think you're civ, but just not as likely to be as INH.

On the matter of llama, Epi pointed out something along the lines of him being civ based on Wilgy's decision to defend DDL instead of him. If llama was the role blocker, then Wilgy chose to protect the scum doctor over the role blocker or overalls. Before I would have leaned turned my read around on llama based on the direction Wilgy went there, but now knowing the doctors full power, I'd say it makes sense to protect DDL over the role blocker or overalls if they were both bad.

And as Scotty said, if he's hinting at being the Denim Shirt, he'd survive today.

Wilgy was the blocker, as LC pointed out. I had the roles confused.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:41 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Long Con wrote:Quin, what do you think of me?
I think you could have been buddying me earlier on. If llama is correct about his theory that one of you, me, or INH are bad, I'd probably say it was you. Outside of that, I think you're civ, but just not as likely to be as INH.

On the matter of llama, Epi pointed out something along the lines of him being civ based on Wilgy's decision to defend DDL instead of him. If llama was the role blocker, then Wilgy chose to protect the scum doctor over the role blocker or overalls. Before I would have leaned turned my read around on llama based on the direction Wilgy went there, but now knowing the doctors full power, I'd say it makes sense to protect DDL over the role blocker or overalls if they were both bad.

And as Scotty said, if he's hinting at being the Denim Shirt, he'd survive today.
Wilgy was the blocker, as LC pointed out. I had the roles confused.

No he wasn't. He was the Skort.

Jhorts is the blocker.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:45 pm**

What the hell?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:45 pm**

\_(:T)_/

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:45 pm**

Mongoose wrote:DrWilgy - lynched Day 3 (Jhorts)

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:46 pm**

Once and for all.

Jhorts - Can block a player.
Skort - It's a skort!

Dragon D. Luffy - lynched Day 1 (JnCo)
DrWilgy - lynched Day 3 (Jhorts)

Okay, LC, what the hell?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:47 pm**

Mongoose wrote:DrWilgy has been lynched. He was The Skort.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:47 pm**

Mongoose wrote:DrWilgy has been lynched. He was The Skort.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:48 pm**

Secret power is to fuck with host posts.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:48 pm**

??? What? I said Wilgy was the blocker. Wilgy was Jhorts. Jhorts was the blocker.

What's going on?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:48 pm**

Well shit.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:49 pm**

Mongoose. What the hell?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:49 pm**

Oh, I see... Host post mistake.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:49 pm**

I don't know who is who or which way is up.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:50 pm**

If Wilgy is the blocker, that'd mean he still voted to protect the doctor over the overalls or a vanilla. I don't really see how it changes things too much.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:55 pm**

What were your thoughts about llama under the assumption that Wilgy was the blocker, Epi?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:11 pm**

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:21 pm**

Scotty wrote:So to @Sorsha and @Boomslang is a big reason you aren't looking to vote llama because you have a proclivity to not vote presumably silenced players?

I don't think llama could say anything here that would make me reach into my baseball bag and put on my practice glove any more. I kinda think I'm ready for the majors, tbh.

That and I do think he's the denim shirt. So I guess it doesn't matter if he's lynched today since he will still survive. I've been silenced and lynched while being civ and it sucks.

You believe he is bad?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:22 pm**

It hasn't been said yet but I suppose it deserves saying: Despite me being on a Llama list of half the living players who might be bad, his last direct opinion of me was "Long Con has been giving me generally good vibes all game and has been pretty helpful in terms of content."

As soon as I make a case against him, he votes for me.

It couldn't be more OMGUS if he tried. WTF Llama? Was your integrity silenced too?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:25 pm**

You are one of his axis of evil though.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:26 pm**

Is it HIS axis of evil? Was he the genesis of that feels-good-but-has-little-credibility theory?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:30 pm**

LC, if you think his axis of evil theory doesn't have credibility then who do you think is his baddie partner?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:35 pm**

I don't know what axis of evil means.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:36 pm**

Long Con wrote:Is it HIS axis of evil? Was he the genesis of that feels-good-but-has-little-credibility theory?

I believe so. This is the first mention o can see of it, from day 4:

thellama73 wrote:I'm eliminating Eloh and SD from my "willing to lynch" list today, and here's why.

INH, LC, and Quin all have terrible voting records and other reasons to suspect them. They have all voted with each other on every lynch. I do not believe that the two remaining baddies would have voted together on every lynch, so I believe that one, but not more than one, of them is bad.
If we find the bad one, I would be willing to eliminate the other two from my suspicions and look elsewhere. That would be enormously helpful information. Now the question is, which one?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:38 pm**

juliets wrote:LC, if you think his axis of evil theory doesn't have credibility then who do you think is his baddie partner?

I don't know who the last baddie is. I don't really see how the second half of your question follows the first in any logical way.

Why does the axis of evil theory have credibility?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:39 pm**

Quin wrote:I don't know what axis of evil means.

"The definition of axis of evil is a term that former United States President George W. Bush used to describe countries which he thought were involved with terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. An example of countries identifed by Bush as the axis of evil were Iran, Iraq and North Korea."

In this game it's you, inh and LC that llama believes are involved in poor denim fashion choices and murder.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:41 pm**

Sorsha wrote:
Scotty wrote:So to @Sorsha and @Boomslang is a big reason you aren't looking to vote llama because you have a proclivity to not vote presumably silenced players?

I don't think llama could say anything here that would make me reach into my baseball bag and put on my practice glove any more. I kinda think I'm ready for the majors, tbh.
That and I do think he's the denim shirt. So I guess it doesn't matter if he's lynched today since he will still survive. I've been silenced and lynched while being civ and it sucks.

You believe he is bad?

I think one or both of LC and llama are bad, yes.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:42 pm**

Sorsha wrote:
Long Con wrote:Is it HIS axis of evil? Was he the genesis of that feels-good-but-has-little-credibility theory?
I believe so. This is the first mention o can see of it, from day 4:

thellama73 wrote:I'm eliminating Eloh and SD from my "willing to lynch" list today, and here's why.

INH, LC, and Quin all have terrible voting records and other reasons to suspect them. They have all voted with each other on every lynch. I do not believe that the two remaining baddies would have voted together on every lynch, so I believe that one, but not more than one, of them is bad.
If we find the bad one, I would be willing to eliminate the other two from my suspicions and look elsewhere. That would be enormously helpful information. Now the question is, which one?

Thanks, Sorsh. This theory has been bandied about so much, I couldn't remember who started it.

" I do not believe that the two remaining baddies would have voted together on every lynch, so I believe that one, but not more than one, of them is bad."

Is it more, less, or equally logical to say " I do not believe that the two remaining baddies would have voted together on every lynch, so I believe that none of them are bad"?

How about "I believe that two baddies would vote together, but not three."

Which one has the most claim to credibility?

Spoiler alert: none of them have any great deal of credibility, it's just something Llama decided to say that somehow caught the hearts of some.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:43 pm**

Long Con wrote:
juliets wrote:LC, if you think his axis of evil theory doesn't have credibility then who do you think is his baddie partner?
I don't know who the last baddie is. I don't really see how the second half of your question follows the first in any logical way.

Why does the axis of evil theory have credibility?

Because they were all bad/suspicious votes

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:44 pm**

Scotty wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
Scotty wrote:So to @Sorsha and @Boomslang is a big reason you aren't looking to vote llama because you have a proclivity to not vote presumably silenced players?

I don't think llama could say anything here that would make me reach into my baseball bag and put on my practice glove any more. I kinda think I'm ready for the majors, tbh.
That and I do think he's the denim shirt. So I guess it doesn't matter if he's lynched today since he will still survive. I've been silenced and lynched while being civ and it sucks.

You believe he is bad?
I think one or both of LC and llama are bad, yes.

It's Llama.

I think you missed a question I asked you earlier, about a mysterious post you made.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:44 pm**

Sorsha wrote:
Long Con wrote:
juliets wrote:LC, if you think his axis of evil theory doesn't have credibility then who do you think is his baddie partner?
I don't know who the last baddie is. I don't really see how the second half of your question follows the first in any logical way.

Why does the axis of evil theory have credibility?
Because they were all bad/suspicious votes

How do you define a "suspicious vote"?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:45 pm**

Sorsha wrote:
Quin wrote:I don't know what axis of evil means.
"The definition of axis of evil is a term that former United States President George W. Bush used to describe countries which he thought were involved with terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. An example of countries identifed by Bush as the axis of evil were Iran, Iraq and North Korea."

In this game it's you, inh and LC that llama believes are involved in poor denim fashion choices and murder.

So, suspects?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:47 pm**

Long Con wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
Scotty wrote:So to @Sorsha and @Boomslang is a big reason you aren't looking to vote llama because you have a proclivity to not vote presumably silenced players?

I don't think llama could say anything here that would make me reach into my baseball bag and put on my practice glove any more. I kinda think I'm ready for the majors, tbh.
That and I do think he's the denim shirt. So I guess it doesn't matter if he's lynched today since he will still survive. I've been silenced and lynched while being civ and it sucks.

You believe he is bad?
I think one or both of LC and llama are bad, yes.
It's Llama.

I think you missed a question I asked you earlier, about a mysterious post you made.

Eh?

Was it this?

Long Con wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Damn I just realized too that I missed juliets' big ass post up there.
ass post

juliets' big ass

if so,

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:49 pm**

Cute, Scotty.

Long Con wrote:
Scotty wrote:And thanks for that, Denim suit. 10-4 ole buddy.
What did you mean by this, Scotty?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:50 pm**

Long Con wrote:Cute, Scotty.

Long Con wrote:
Scotty wrote:And thanks for that, Denim suit. 10-4 ole buddy.
What did you mean by this, Scotty?

does it mean something to you?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:51 pm**

I would like to know what llamas plan would be though, if we lynch one of you three and they flipped civ. I don't think we're in a position to just lynch through all three of you to see if he is correct.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:51 pm**

That Denim Suit guy is fucking weird.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:51 pm**

Scotty wrote:
Long Con wrote:Cute, Scotty.

Long Con wrote:
Scotty wrote:And thanks for that, Denim suit. 10-4 ole buddy.
What did you mean by this, Scotty?
does it mean something to you?

Is this going to be part two of the questions game?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:59 pm**

Anyway, it's getting late and I'm designing a website and I'm sick and drunk.

Voting llama. If he doesn't get lynched, then we'll know he was most likely the denim shirt. If not, then I'm personally hoping he's bad.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:59 pm**

hi team, I'm at a Village Inn charging my phone so I can have an alarm wake me up for tomorrow. Thanks for your patience. I'm in a bad mood because I just bought like 500 worth of food yesterday that I turned into freezer meals that I spent all day preparing, so at this point I'm going to lose it all. That's like 2 months of food if not more omg.

Anyway! Sorry to whine. Im cranky basically vecause im at Village Inn and cant eat pie hahhaa.

The host post was correct and I will updated the prayer list now.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 11:01 pm**

Mongoose wrote:hi team, I'm at a Village Inn charging my phone so I can have an alarm wake me up for tomorrow. Thanks for your patience. I'm in a bad mood because I just bought like 500 worth of food yesterday that I turned into freezer meals that I spent all day preparing, so at this point I'm going to lose it all. That's like 2 months of food if not more omg.

Anyway! Sorry to whine. Im cranky basically vecause im at Village Inn and cant eat pie hahhaa.

The host post was correct and I will updated the prayer list now.

wtf that sucks! I'm so sorry- wasted food is the worst

Do your thing.

And thanks for updating the prayer list- i'll keep you in mine.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 11:02 pm**

Mongoose wrote:hi team, I'm at a Village Inn charging my phone so I can have an alarm wake me up for tomorrow. Thanks for your patience. I'm in a bad mood because I just bought like 500 worth of food yesterday that I turned into freezer meals that I spent all day preparing, so at this point I'm going to lose it all. That's like 2 months of food if not more omg.

Anyway! Sorry to whine. Im cranky basically vecause im at Village Inn and cant eat pie hahhaa.

The host post was correct and I will updated the prayer list now.

Thanks, but what we really need clarified is the player list.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 11:02 pm**

Mongoose wrote:The host post was correct and I will updated the prayer list now.

Amen.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2017 11:03 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
Mongoose wrote:DrWilgy has been lynched. He was The Skort.

this is correct

The Syndicate

Felt Mafia 2 [ENDGAME]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Night 3]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Night 3]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 4]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 4]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 4]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Day 5]

Re: Felt Mafia 2 [Night 3]