The Syndicate

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:06 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:00 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:58 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:27 pm Marmot, I count four posts among your 31 which I would describe as of the spammy or irrelevant variety. You've been doing things at an atypical rate. Tell me about your level of investment in this game so far.
Just spotted this post while doing some very light ISOs.

I go back and forth between invested and uninvested. I don't have the time I used to to pour into this game, and posting in nothing but quotes but from another game is time consuming.

Why do you call it atypical?
I'm suggesting that you were trying harder than usual. A striking portion of your posts displayed investment and not silliness. I expect more silliness. What gives?

What's your point?

I prefer being unpredictable to being silly. I'm glad it's working.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:08 pm**

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:06 pm

What's your point?

I prefer being unpredictable to being silly. I'm glad it's working.

What was your point when you told me my posts were shorter than usual?

This is meta-gaming. It's happened in every Mafia thread to ever exist except the very first Mafia thread. If you're different than what I perceive to be your civilian norm, I'll talk about that.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:15 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:08 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:06 pm

What's your point?

I prefer being unpredictable to being silly. I'm glad it's working.
What was your point when you told me my posts were shorter than usual?

This is meta-gaming. It's happened in every Mafia thread to ever exist except the very first Mafia thread. If you're different than what I perceive to be your civilian norm, I'll talk about that.

You commented on your own playstyle first. I just followed up on it.

I still don't understand what you're getting it, and that bothers me. I find your point ambiguous. And also this meta-discussion is hurting my head.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:18 pm**

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:15 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:08 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:06 pm

What's your point?

I prefer being unpredictable to being silly. I'm glad it's working.
What was your point when you told me my posts were shorter than usual?

This is meta-gaming. It's happened in every Mafia thread to ever exist except the very first Mafia thread. If you're different than what I perceive to be your civilian norm, I'll talk about that.
You commented on your own playstyle first. I just followed up on it.

I still don't understand what you're getting it, and that bothers me. I find your point ambiguous. And also this meta-discussion is hurting my head.

I just told you what I'm getting at. I was concerned that your play was different from your civilian norm. That's an accusation. What is not to understand?

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:27 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:18 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:15 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:08 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:06 pm

What's your point?

I prefer being unpredictable to being silly. I'm glad it's working.
What was your point when you told me my posts were shorter than usual?

This is meta-gaming. It's happened in every Mafia thread to ever exist except the very first Mafia thread. If you're different than what I perceive to be your civilian norm, I'll talk about that.
You commented on your own playstyle first. I just followed up on it.

I still don't understand what you're getting it, and that bothers me. I find your point ambiguous. And also this meta-discussion is hurting my head.
I just told you what I'm getting at. I was concerned that your play was different from your civilian norm. That's an accusation. What is not to understand?

Now it's an accusation.

Until you bring alignment into the equation, it looks like an observation. When you say "If you're different than what I perceive to be your civilian norm, I'll talk about it", that doesn't tell me that you think that, just that you'll respond that way if you encounter it. That's what I find ambiguous, that you didn't state as such before.

The accusation is still vague. I don't think I've posted as much "silly" things as I usually do. I don't have a problem with it. I like to be more light-hearted when I'm getting too serious or involved. When I'm posting less overall, I don't feel as involved, so I'm probably less inclined to flood the thread with fluff.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:29 pm**

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:27 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:18 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:15 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:08 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:06 pm

What's your point?

I prefer being unpredictable to being silly. I'm glad it's working.
What was your point when you told me my posts were shorter than usual?

This is meta-gaming. It's happened in every Mafia thread to ever exist except the very first Mafia thread. If you're different than what I perceive to be your civilian norm, I'll talk about that.
You commented on your own playstyle first. I just followed up on it.

I still don't understand what you're getting it, and that bothers me. I find your point ambiguous. And also this meta-discussion is hurting my head.
I just told you what I'm getting at. I was concerned that your play was different from your civilian norm. That's an accusation. What is not to understand?
Now it's an accusation.

Until you bring alignment into the equation, it looks like an observation. When you say "If you're different than what I perceive to be your civilian norm, I'll talk about it", that doesn't tell me that you think that, just that you'll respond that way if you encounter it. That's what I find ambiguous, that you didn't state as such before.

The accusation is still vague. I don't think I've posted as much "silly" things as I usually do. I don't have a problem with it. I like to be more light-hearted when I'm getting too serious or involved. When I'm posting less overall, I don't feel as involved, so I'm probably less inclined to flood the thread with fluff.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:31 pm**

Notice the part where you say "if".

I didn't read that as an accusation, but as a qualifier. That didn't tell me what you were thinking in that moment, but what you would do if you thought that.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:36 pm**

Also, a wise man once told me.

Spoiler: show

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:49 pm**

I think Eloh is town.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:51 pm**

I think Long Con, JackofHearts and JJJ are town

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:52 pm**

dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:49 pm I think Eloh is town.

Care to give your 5 man baddie band?

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:55 pm**

we have 7 anti-town. I will give you 7 baddie names

nutella
dave
marmot
novaselinenever
quin
simon
speedchuck

that's gth right now

I have no idea what dom and rabbit8 are like, but for some reason, I feel okay about rabbit right now. cos he's fluffy.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:58 pm**

FYI

when I voted sig, there were 3 votes on birdwithteeth and 3 votes on Tony.

Wilgy was not a leading contender, so I don't know why both JoH and speedchuck are trying to encourage a dunya/wilgy w/w.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:00 pm**

dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:58 pm FYI

when I voted sig, there were 3 votes on birdwithteeth and 3 votes on Tony.

Wilgy was not a leading contender, so I don't know why both JoH and speedchuck are trying to encourage a dunya/wilgy w/w.

Wilgy had 3 votes on him for most of yesterday but a few moved within 6 hours of EOD after your case.

That said, I think you're probably town.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:01 pm**

I am NOT accustomed to lynching 0 posters on Day 2 with so much content in the thread. indeed, I hate it. so birdwithteeth11 was out.

I did NOT see any convincing case on TSP presented. so TSP was out. I still don't see it?

I do NOT feel Wilgy is bad at this point in time.

I DID see a case for sig, nutella and Dave. I started with sig, sig came online when I was starting to push on him and ignored me. He came online again and also ignored the thread (he was at 3 votes when I saw him online). I was not convinced to take my vote off sig. I felt he was intentionally avoiding being caught up in the heated discussion.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:02 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:00 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:58 pm FYI

when I voted sig, there were 3 votes on birdwithteeth and 3 votes on Tony.

Wilgy was not a leading contender, so I don't know why both JoH and speedchuck are trying to encourage a dunya/wilgy w/w.
Wilgy had 3 votes on him for most of yesterday but a few moved within 6 hours of EOD after your case.

That said, I think you're probably town.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:03 pm**

dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:01 pm I am NOT accustomed to lynching 0 posters on Day 2 with so much content in the thread. indeed, I hate it. so birdwithteeth11 was out.

I did NOT see any convincing case on TSP presented. so TSP was out. I still don't see it?

I do NOT feel Wilgy is bad at this point in time.

I DID see a case for sig, nutella and Dave. I started with sig, sig came online when I was starting to push on him and ignored me. He came online again and also ignored the thread (he was at 3 votes when I saw him online). I was not convinced to take my vote off sig. I felt he was intentionally avoiding being caught up in the heated discussion.

Can you restate the Nutella case and the Dave case now that you can talk more better?

I followed the Sig one but the others not so much.

Why do you think WIlgy is not bad?

Do you think TSP is good or just not have a convincing reason to think he's bad? Why?

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:06 pm**

dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:02 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:00 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:58 pm FYI

when I voted sig, there were 3 votes on birdwithteeth and 3 votes on Tony.

Wilgy was not a leading contender, so I don't know why both JoH and speedchuck are trying to encourage a dunya/wilgy w/w.
Wilgy had 3 votes on him for most of yesterday but a few moved within 6 hours of EOD after your case.

That said, I think you're probably town.

You and speedchuck are implying Wilgy was in danger and I moved the votes off him. This is inaccurate. The leaders of the lynch poll when Epignosis subbed me into this game were birdswithteeth (3 votes) and TSP (3 votes). I then voted for sig, and only much later in the day did I present my case (although I had a number of posts scattered throughout but building a case in rap lyrics isn't easy).

Wilgy was never 3 at that point. At some point after sig acquired 6 votes, Jay removed himself and joined the Wilgy bandwagon iirc and then Wilgy had 3 votes. He moved back to sig before end of day though.

I don't like words being put into my mouth, or events being said differently than they were. Let's be honest.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:09 pm**

Domt be so inappropriate [mention]Long Con[/mention] thatd disgusting.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:09 pm**

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:47 pm @dunya I tried to ask you earlier in battle speak but we're you spectating the thread prior to replacing in?

Loosely followed, but I did not spectate every page.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:10 pm**

Jay was on Wilgy for most of yesterday before you replaced in.

One more reason to have votes logged in the thread. (Wasn't sure if doing so yesterday would break my post restriction.)

Wilgy was absolutely at 3 votes while Tony was at 2-4 for a long period of time. It's an understandable mistake to make (assuming it was a mistake) given basically no called votes or anyone stating intention to vote for anyone.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:11 pm**

I had my vote on sig from the moment I was subbed in almost. nutella and Long Con were the first 2 to vote with me, respectively, much later in the day after speedchuck asked me to explain my sig vote (no one had cared up until that point). They did so very quickly, followed by you, JoH.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:11 pm**

Yes, I think Wilgy was at three votes with speedchuck, Jack and I for a long while prior to the sig case evolving. I don't think the point is especially important.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:12 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:10 pm Jay was on Wilgy for most of yesterday before you replaced in.

One more reason to have votes logged in the thread. (Wasn't sure if doing so yesterday would break my post restriction.)

Wilgy was absolutely at 3 votes while Tony was at 2-4 for a long period of time. It's an understandable mistake to make (assuming it was a mistake) given basically no called votes or anyone stating intention to vote for anyone.

I don't know what happened for the first day of Day 2; I'm telling you when I subbed in, the second day of Day 2, that's what the votes were like.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:13 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:15 pm Gth baddie team, taken into account new discussion on Lap, Eloh, Dunya.

Wilgy
Lap
Simon
Bird (Rabbit now?)
Speed

That last call was painful. I gotta believe someone on the Mac train was bad but I like all of them individually as town. Speed came in 30 from EOD, questioned Kyle's posts about Mac, then voted or kept his vote on Mac anyway.

Okay yeah totally, I never voted for Mac. In fact I never even voted at all in that night phase.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:13 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:11 pm Yes, I think Wilgy was at three votes with speedchuck, Jack and I for a long while prior to the sig case evolving. I don't think the point is especially important.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:16 pm**

[mention]lapluie[/mention] and [mention]novaselinenever[/mention], you've been fun to play with and I hope you stick around the site. Just wanted to say that.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:17 pm**

lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:09 pm Domt be so inappropriate @Long Con thatd disgusting.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:19 pm**

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:41 pm For now, my scum team consists of:

JaggedJimmyJay
JaggedJimmyJay
JaggedJimmyJay
JaggedJimmyJay
JaggedJimmyJay

Out of all 20 players this is what youve established?

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:21 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:16 pm @lapluie and @novaselinenever, you've been fun to play with and I hope you stick around the site. Just wanted to say that.

hey thanks! I definitely will be =]

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:26 pm**

I, to this point, don't understand the case on Sig.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:27 pm**

Dunya earned an early town read from me because of her actions yesterday. She put in the effort to make probably the most legible case of the entire phase, even when it wasn't really expected of her since she replaced into a garbage fire. The possibility of a mafia dunya brazenly swooping in like superman to rescue a teammate on jeopardy still exists but it seems less likely.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:31 pm**

Has there been a scum Dunya on this site?

Because IDK, the Sig lynch seems like something I'd do as scum. No one would blame me for anything because of the chaos realm, and I'd be praised for my boldness. But then, I am practically the bartender as mafia, placing Wine In Front Of Everyone.

Sig was hardly posting without the chaosrealm around, which is normal. Sig was waffley, which was normal. Sig was 'buddying' LC (I have yet to figure out what the heck buddying has to do with being mafia, or when it applies.)

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:32 pm**

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:26 pm I, to this point, don't understand the case on Sig.

To put it most succinctly:

He had posts. They looked like they were substantive. They weren't. It looked bad. He wasn't bad. Oops.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:34 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:16 pm @lapluie and @novaselinenever, you've been fun to play with and I hope you stick around the site. Just wanted to say that.

Is that a hint of sarcasm I sense ? lol. Thanks man, I've been enjoying the games here so far.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:35 pm**

novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:34 pm Is that a hint of sarcasm I sense ?

No way!

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:36 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:32 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:26 pm I, to this point, don't understand the case on Sig.
To put it most succinctly:

He had posts. They looked like they were substantive. They weren't. It looked bad. He wasn't bad. Oops.

This.

Big deal guys

speed and Quin acting like no one has ever been mislynched in the history of mafia.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:37 pm**

now that sig flipped town, let's look into how LC reacted to sig throughout their time together.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:40 pm**

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:31 pm Has there been a scum Dunya on this site?

Because IDK, the Sig lynch seems like something I'd do as scum. No one would blame me for anything because of the chaos realm, and I'd be praised for my boldness. But then, I am practically the bartender as mafia, placing Wine In Front Of Everyone.

Sig was hardly posting without the chaosrealm around, which is normal. Sig was waffley, which was normal. Sig was 'buddying' LC (I have yet to figure out what the heck buddying has to do with being mafia, or when it applies.)

Yeah I thought this was weird also, Tony was supposidly maybe lynched that time, but then more votes piled onto innocent sig .. I hate how Simon came at the very last to vote for sig & so did kyle ... ~_~
To take away the outnumbered votes off Tony.. that's what I've noticed so far. Nutella has been toyed around to vote according to a players curse choice so that's understandable. But the other nah. Not really a defenetive reason to vote for him imo.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:42 pm**

lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:40 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:31 pm Has there been a scum Dunya on this site?

Because IDK, the Sig lynch seems like something I'd do as scum. No one would blame me for anything because of the chaos realm, and I'd be praised for my boldness. But then, I am practically the bartender as mafia, placing Wine In Front Of Everyone.

Sig was hardly posting without the chaosrealm around, which is normal. Sig was waffley, which was normal. Sig was 'buddying' LC (I have yet to figure out what the heck buddying has to do with being mafia, or when it applies.)
Yeah I thought this was weird also, Tony was supposidly maybe lynched that time, but then more votes piled onto innocent sig .. I hate how Simon came at the very last to vote for sig & so did kyle ... ~_~
To take away the outnumbered votes off Tony.. that's what I've noticed so far. Nutella has been toyed around to vote according to a players curse choice so that's understandable. But the other nah. Not really a defenetive reason to vote for him imo.

what?

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:45 pm**

What? It's not hard to understand what was happening with her

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:46 pm**

lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:45 pm What? It's not hard to understand what was happening with her

her curse was to thank players for their "gifts", nothing about forced voting. Please explain what you mean.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:48 pm**

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:31 pm Has there been a scum Dunya on this site?

Because IDK, the Sig lynch seems like something I'd do as scum. No one would blame me for anything because of the chaos realm, and I'd be praised for my boldness. But then, I am practically the bartender as mafia, placing Wine In Front Of Everyone.

Sig was hardly posting without the chaosrealm around, which is normal. Sig was waffley, which was normal. Sig was 'buddying' LC (I have yet to figure out what the heck buddying has to do with being mafia, or when it applies.)

No, I have yet to score a scum role. JJJ has played and observed scum dunya before, ask him about me.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:48 pm**

dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:46 pm
lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:45 pm What? It's not hard to understand what was happening with her
her curse was to thank players for their "gifts", nothing about forced voting. Please explain what you mean.

Wait what? I totally had a different theory for this. I know she had been receiving gifts but when there was more numbers on tonys poll she decided to Join the lynch. . Back to sig's poll there was more votes then & she then decided to place vote on sig's lynch,I assumed she was forced to vote for the outnumbered polls by receiving some kind of voodoo gift.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:49 pm**

lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:48 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:46 pm
lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:45 pm What? It's not hard to understand what was happening with her
her curse was to thank players for their "gifts", nothing about forced voting. Please explain what you mean.
Wait what? I totally had a different theory for this. I know she had been receiving gifts but when there was more numbers on tonys poll she decided to Join the lynch. . Back to sig's poll there was more votes then & she then decided to place vote on sig's lynch,I assumed she was forced to vote for the outnumbered polls by receiving some kind of voodoo gift.

This is inaccurate. She wasn't forced to vote for anyone.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:49 pm**

That may be a redundant theory but meh it's what it looked like.

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:51 pm**

dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:49 pm
lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:48 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:46 pm
lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:45 pm What? It's not hard to understand what was happening with her
her curse was to thank players for their "gifts", nothing about forced voting. Please explain what you mean.
Wait what? I totally had a different theory for this. I know she had been receiving gifts but when there was more numbers on tonys poll she decided to Join the lynch. . Back to sig's poll there was more votes then & she then decided to place vote on sig's lynch,I assumed she was forced to vote for the outnumbered polls by receiving some kind of voodoo gift.
This is inaccurate. She wasn't forced to vote for anyone.

Did she explain after everything went back to normal?

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:53 pm**

lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:51 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:49 pm
lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:48 pm
dunya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:46 pm
lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:45 pm What? It's not hard to understand what was happening with her
her curse was to thank players for their "gifts", nothing about forced voting. Please explain what you mean.
Wait what? I totally had a different theory for this. I know she had been receiving gifts but when there was more numbers on tonys poll she decided to Join the lynch. . Back to sig's poll there was more votes then & she then decided to place vote on sig's lynch,I assumed she was forced to vote for the outnumbered polls by receiving some kind of voodoo gift.
This is inaccurate. She wasn't forced to vote for anyone.
Did she explain after everything went back to normal?

Indeed she did.

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 9:23 pm that sure was a stressful day phase, lol. I had it easier than some other people but it was still hard to phrase my posts. Had fun with it though. My curse was to "act like I had received a gift" (a reference to the Holiday Goodie Exchange which I ran this year).

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:55 pm**

oh yh I overlooked it then

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:56 pm**

lapluie wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:55 pm oh yh I overlooked it then

How do you feel about nutella now?

The Syndicate

Mortal Kombat Mafia [ENDGAME]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Mortal Kombat Mafia [Night 2]