Master Radishes wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 4:10 am
N3 was clearly Arbiter kill on Abi (a Landlord). Sabi was never a MK and so was something else.
N4 was probably a Landlord kill on Rico (an Arbiter). I don't get why a town vig kills Rico. So Dizzy was someone else, probably a townie with a personal tinfoil on Dizzy. Off the top of my head if I think of who might make that kill...
If a townie killed dizzy im gonna turn into the joker
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:09 pm
by Scotty
ANNOUNCEMENT:
Nothing happened.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:14 pm
by nutella
sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:21 am
I plan to dedicate some time today to the thread, I’ll barely be around tomorrow though.
I’m eyeing delta, first the case on them totally disappeared and I don’t recall seeing why, second them voting for me when I was emojied is a bit scummy.
tbh i kinda forgot about delta. not a great sign
well i guess i felt marginally better about them at the beginning of d4 but that did not really hold up bc he didnt continue to have thread presence really at all
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:41 pm
by leetic
Alright, another wolf flip, another time to look at interactions. Davos, as expected, has nothing.
NANOOK's only contribution of note is looking at the Porscha wagon. I'm sorry, but one out of six (or seven!) doesn't count for shit.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:44 pm
by leetic
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2024 6:04 pm
Nook, MR, Delta I think are good votes.
Lemon probably helps us resolve Nook, so I could vote there, but I'd rather just vote Nook.
MR I'm still most comfortable with voting.
Delta as an option last cycle felt correct and that feeling hasn't changed. This is just gut.
Cape's fine, but I'm starting to question if the wagon is just 'this is fine I guess.'
DM, Epi, Nut, Rico, Sig, WWA all are towny. Maybe I could put Leetic and Sloonei on that list as well, but perhaps get a towny borderline placement.
if you weren't mentioned, it's because my brain is empty and I have no thoughts.
Put Rico in a list of "towny" players. Otherwise, nothing really of note.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 3]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:45 pm
by leetic
Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:46 pm
Quick ISOs. This list is alphabetical btw.
Delta - Cheerful and cutesy first impression. Posts have mostly neutral/even tone. Will put them at mid now and change later after I've seen everyone. Could be scum.
Epignosis - Couple of takes. Feels alright.
falcon45ca - Couple of takes. Too many spaces. Feels alright.
leetic - Strong focus on pyxxy wagon and what happened. Feels alright/mid.
Long Con - Likes some posts. Probably first slot I feel OK putting in towns.
☆Princess Abigail☆ - Fighting for wolf pelt means this is probs town Abigail? Can see a few takes from rest of posts. Might be being a bit too generous.
Ricochet - Now that I've seen these wallposts, I've realized how obnoxious mine was. Sorry. ISO feels alright/pretty good.
sig - Not much there. Feels alight/mid.
Sloonei - It's kind of alright. Although the bar is set pretty low at this point. A bit wordy.
TonyStarkPrime - I remember Dyslexicon calling Tony town at least twice (not relevant but thought I'd mention it). After ISOing, feels mid.
Scrappy Doo - Definitely better than whatever Davos is doing. Towny tone. Feels alright.
Ordered list:
Long Con
Ricochet
Princess Abigail
Epignosis
falcon
Sloonei
Scrappy Doo
leetic
Tony
sig
Delta
Something like this.
I skimmed a lot so take it with salt.
Again, has Ricochet as towny. This is the only mention of them pre-flip.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:47 pm
by leetic
DM has absolutely nothing. A bit strange that someone with a much higher postcount has the exact same number of Ricochet interactions as Davos.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:48 pm
by WindwardAway
I'm out for the night so I'll be back later
Seems like a quiet Friday here
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 2:20 pm
Ah, it feels pretty suffocating to try and solve w/ 7 votes, but Goonies never say die
[VOTE:
Unvote] aubergine
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 2:15 pmMaster Radishes
-- for someone from East, therefore info-less on falcon, vote drop was sudden, without hint of inquiry or reading into others' takes and a bit of "nuh-uh" retort to falcon calling it opportunistic (even prodding him to vote back). not ideal elements. later more elaborate, dismissing falcon's "exasperation" as outweighed by poor tone, something I do meld with.
-- had a good impression of him otherwise - active in developing reads and opinionated on enough players and events - but this on its own is a mixed bag
For context, Falc and I go way back, so not entirely info-less in terms of what I'd expect from him. I didn't articulate it because sometimes wordless pressure is the best pressure, but basically I was trusting others who were iffy on Falc from the West thread (and hadn't seen anything from Falc that would lead me to dispute their views). And I was playing with wagons a bit (I think I made it 4 vs Lemon's 5). His reaction to my vote made me actually suspicious of him, though.
This is at least a slightly good look. I doubt a wolf asks their partner to clarify their read on another partner.
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:08 pm
All the recent votes irk me to degree.
Radishes dropped off falcon for, what, giving him breathing space?
Sloonei is full sheeping (on Epig yet again).
Yes to give him breathing space and also I do have some doubts now.
Another interaction that would be slightly unusual for partners, looks like Ricochet is trying to subtly nudge people off their partner and set up alternative targets.
Master Radishes wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:19 pm
Earlier I thought about faking being haiku restricted again, decided that'd be no fun, and considered faking being emoji restricted just for funsies.
Looks like I might be a prophet...for Rico.
The rest of their interactions are this meaningless fluff, so eh.
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:34 am
Weekend laze tis real and hit hard. I wanted nothing but study and sleep and cats and muvis tbh.
Hi ho.
Caught up to page 7 in the last hour. Gonna find another hour, later, to read the rest.
@Ricochet i know it's been a while since you last popped in, but when you catch up, I'd like to hear your take on the current wagons.
I'm curious what your thought process is, and tbh I keep forgetting you're in the game because I haven't seen anyone from West Facility mention having a read on you.
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm
So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
Falcon hasn't shared any townreads?
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 6:34 pm
"Opportunistic"
is such an overused word
never good reason
It's the cheapest and easiest go-to reason for a Wolf to use as (part of) a reason to cast a vote on someone.
Town probably use it sometimes as well, it's an understandable way to feel when you're feeling besieged.
But mostly wolfy.
[VOTE:
falcon] aubergine I do not feel like this is opportunistic, since I've made a case on you in the past, and have you in the red zone of my rainbow list.
I use the word more when I'm town, but regardless, I'm happy to join the "opportunism" :P
[VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
don't think falcon's doing himself any favors right now.
Surprisingly has like fifty posts after without mentioning falcon, but does vote them when their wagon is starting to pick up momentum. No stated reason beyond vague "don't think falcon's doing himself any favors" and presumed continuity with N0 read
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:33 pm
Has nobody stopped to consider that scum falcon killing players who SR him is about as subtle as a brick?
Fur reelz, I have way more panache than that
Ugh I hate that I town read this
Unvote
If it's multiball, then the kill may not have come from him.
To be fair, if it's multiball, then Caitlin dying early to nightkill doesn't clear you either.
I've seen wolf!Abbi kill town!Caitlin on N1 in a game before so I'd never clear her off of that
I think Abbi's been ok so far, though, and judging by what I've heard from her progression in the West Facility, she's probably town
Says they would "never clear" Abby based off the nightkill, still I think Abby was more depending on the bus. Otherwise townreads Abby
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm
So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
Falcon hasn't shared any townreads?
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
Asks falcon to respond to one of Ricochet's arguments. Otherwise, stays parked on falcon
oh yeah, falcon never replied to me there lmao
so i was happy to keep a vote on him if he wasn't going to counterargue with anything except that he was "towning his ass off" which he wasn't
I think I'll stop here. Yeah, unless Ricochet and WWA had this coordinated bussing effort on falcon, they're not partners.
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:34 am
Weekend laze tis real and hit hard. I wanted nothing but study and sleep and cats and muvis tbh.
Hi ho.
Caught up to page 7 in the last hour. Gonna find another hour, later, to read the rest.
@Ricochet i know it's been a while since you last popped in, but when you catch up, I'd like to hear your take on the current wagons.
I'm curious what your thought process is, and tbh I keep forgetting you're in the game because I haven't seen anyone from West Facility mention having a read on you.
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm
So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
Falcon hasn't shared any townreads?
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 6:34 pm
"Opportunistic"
is such an overused word
never good reason
It's the cheapest and easiest go-to reason for a Wolf to use as (part of) a reason to cast a vote on someone.
Town probably use it sometimes as well, it's an understandable way to feel when you're feeling besieged.
But mostly wolfy.
[VOTE:
falcon] aubergine I do not feel like this is opportunistic, since I've made a case on you in the past, and have you in the red zone of my rainbow list.
I use the word more when I'm town, but regardless, I'm happy to join the "opportunism" :P
[VOTE:
falcon] aubergine
don't think falcon's doing himself any favors right now.
Surprisingly has like fifty posts after without mentioning falcon, but does vote them when their wagon is starting to pick up momentum. No stated reason beyond vague "don't think falcon's doing himself any favors" and presumed continuity with N0 read
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:33 pm
Has nobody stopped to consider that scum falcon killing players who SR him is about as subtle as a brick?
Fur reelz, I have way more panache than that
Ugh I hate that I town read this
Unvote
If it's multiball, then the kill may not have come from him.
To be fair, if it's multiball, then Caitlin dying early to nightkill doesn't clear you either.
I've seen wolf!Abbi kill town!Caitlin on N1 in a game before so I'd never clear her off of that
I think Abbi's been ok so far, though, and judging by what I've heard from her progression in the West Facility, she's probably town
Says they would "never clear" Abby based off the nightkill, still I think Abby was more depending on the bus. Otherwise townreads Abby
Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm
So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
Falcon hasn't shared any townreads?
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
Asks falcon to respond to one of Ricochet's arguments. Otherwise, stays parked on falcon
oh yeah, falcon never replied to me there lmao
so i was happy to keep a vote on him if he wasn't going to counterargue with anything except that he was "towning his ass off" which he wasn't
I think I'll stop here. Yeah, unless Ricochet and WWA had this coordinated bussing effort on falcon, they're not partners.
Especially as WWA was if anything harder on falcon than Ricochet was, and had more of an excuse to join the other wagons since they could have followed the "only vote someone from the same thread" idea. I don't think a partner only interprets their partner's posts in a way that looks bad for another partner, even if they are willing to bus they want to leave it slightly open; I don't think falcon's lynch was assured at that point.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:06 pm
by nutella
La vida es un huevo ranchero en el sartén del universo
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:07 pm
by Master Radishes
Both of you are wrong
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:08 pm
by nutella
Aunque la mona se lleva en seda, mona se queda
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:08 pm
by leetic
Master Radishes wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:07 pm
Both of you are wrong
As are you.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:09 pm
by leetic
Is minic a bhris béal duine a shrón.
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:57 pm
by Sloonei
Dónde está la biblioteca?
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:03 pm
by Scotty
ANNOUNCEMENT:
———————————————
Darling thought it was all so boring.
They way people talked, and the things they said. What was the point of it all? It was all just noise.
The people coming up behind her, shaking their fists, waving their pitchforks. Just so much noise. She was good at shutting out noise. She knew right from wrong, and that was all there was to it, and she didn't much care if they liked it or not.
It was what it was.
As they got closer, she straightened up, and slowed her pace. Walked like the beauty queen she was, not giving them the satisfaction of looking over her shoulder, so they saw no sign of fear. By she saw no sign of the bullet.
Master Radishes wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:10 pm
Wait lmao how did I miss that post
?
The flip. I guess it happened as I was replying to a couple things and I only noticed because you said something.
Ah
Yeah lol
Tbh I think it was probably a good idea to clear them from the PoE at this point, so they wouldn't go into XyLo
But meh, town flip
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm
by leetic
Anyway, a bit of mechanical discussion. Scrappy clearly didn't have a lover aspect, so it is indeed possible that whoever controls Davos is already dead. I bring this up because, if Davos is a wolf, it's the only way I can see there being another wolf on my side to even the numbers (though that would still be unbalanced in my mind, as five minds are always more powerful than four, disregarding any powers they might have). Still, Brad is the only dead person who it could be without Davos being town (remember, Cape90's flip said they were the only person who could see both threads, so it can't be anyone from my side). Davos's behavior would not be unusual for Brad, as he was similarly unhelpful as a wolf when he was sent over to the other thread in Severance. Still though, I would not flip anyone from my side before flipping Davos, and I really thing there are more pertinent lynch targets than Davos (but vigs, do your thing!).
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm
by Scotty
Question 3:
{CLAIMED}
Nutella has guessed correctly (Summer Sh!t) and wins a prize!
