The Syndicate

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm Anyway, a bit of mechanical discussion. Scrappy clearly didn't have a lover aspect, so it is indeed possible that whoever controls Davos is already dead. I bring this up because, if Davos is a wolf, it's the only way I can see there being another wolf on my side to even the numbers (though that would still be unbalanced in my mind, as five minds are always more powerful than four, disregarding any powers they might have). Still, Brad is the only dead person who it could be without Davos being town (remember, Cape90's flip said they were the only person who could see both threads, so it can't be anyone from my side). Davos's behavior would not be unusual for Brad, as he was similarly unhelpful as a wolf when he was sent over to the other thread in Severance. Still though, I would not flip anyone from my side before flipping Davos, and I really thing there are more pertinent lynch targets than Davos (but vigs, do your thing!).

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm Question 3:

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:26 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm Anyway, a bit of mechanical discussion. Scrappy clearly didn't have a lover aspect, so it is indeed possible that whoever controls Davos is already dead. I bring this up because, if Davos is a wolf, it's the only way I can see there being another wolf on my side to even the numbers (though that would still be unbalanced in my mind, as five minds are always more powerful than four, disregarding any powers they might have). Still, Brad is the only dead person who it could be without Davos being town (remember, Cape90's flip said they were the only person who could see both threads, so it can't be anyone from my side). Davos's behavior would not be unusual for Brad, as he was similarly unhelpful as a wolf when he was sent over to the other thread in Severance. Still though, I would not flip anyone from my side before flipping Davos, and I really thing there are more pertinent lynch targets than Davos (but vigs, do your thing!).

I actually think Scrappy and Davos could be secret anonymous players who aren't in the player list, maybe
It was a thought I had earlier

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:28 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm Question 3:

@Scotty @S~V~S

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:26 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm Anyway, a bit of mechanical discussion. Scrappy clearly didn't have a lover aspect, so it is indeed possible that whoever controls Davos is already dead. I bring this up because, if Davos is a wolf, it's the only way I can see there being another wolf on my side to even the numbers (though that would still be unbalanced in my mind, as five minds are always more powerful than four, disregarding any powers they might have). Still, Brad is the only dead person who it could be without Davos being town (remember, Cape90's flip said they were the only person who could see both threads, so it can't be anyone from my side). Davos's behavior would not be unusual for Brad, as he was similarly unhelpful as a wolf when he was sent over to the other thread in Severance. Still though, I would not flip anyone from my side before flipping Davos, and I really thing there are more pertinent lynch targets than Davos (but vigs, do your thing!).

I actually think Scrappy and Davos could be secret anonymous players who aren't in the player list, maybe
It was a thought I had earlier

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm Assuming Ricochet was killed by the landlords, I doubt whoever doing so did so with the intent of shooting a wolf, as I don't think anyone expressed a strong wolfread of them as of late. I mean, it is possible they had mechanical evidence against Ricochet but never confronted them in-thread as they were afraid of crossfire, but that's pure speculation at this point. They may have been killed for their reads (or another standard reason like PR hunting, although I'm not sure how wolves would do this when claiming isn't allowed (again, discounting the possibility that they had mechanical evidence)) though unfortunately their D2 material is basically unreadable.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 3:27 am Haven’t caught up, starting later.

Can confirm Abigail’s was most pushy for pyxxy to be lynched, I think I called it the most “tar & feathered” treatment of suspecting pyxxy and pushing their lynch. One final post was in fact pleading to players to not drop off the wagon. This, more than rest, is the stuff that makes me doubt alignment, it would have been the only momentum for pyxxy to survive - unless Abigail is this bloodthirsty, busthirsty and disapproving of a teammate performance.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.

Wagons

Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.

Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.

So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon

falcon

West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times
West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned
D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment

Monroe
D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.

Lemon
D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.

tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:38 pm

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.

Wagons

Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.

Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.

So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon

falcon

West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times
West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned
D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment

Monroe
D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.

Lemon
D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.

tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply

So now we know the alignment of two of these people. I mean, if two of his partners were wagons, I guess it makes sense to put the townie in the middle? I still doubt it though

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm Assuming Ricochet was killed by the landlords, I doubt whoever doing so did so with the intent of shooting a wolf, as I don't think anyone expressed a strong wolfread of them as of late. I mean, it is possible they had mechanical evidence against Ricochet but never confronted them in-thread as they were afraid of crossfire, but that's pure speculation at this point. They may have been killed for their reads (or another standard reason like PR hunting, although I'm not sure how wolves would do this when claiming isn't allowed (again, discounting the possibility that they had mechanical evidence)) though unfortunately their D2 material is basically unreadable.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 2:15 pm Anyway, dumping the first batch.

Wagoners*

* given the VC at the time of submitting this
NB: not sure the poll reflects the vote chronology as well, but I'll just roll with the names as they appear

falcon

Monroe
-- seems to have parked on falcon just now, despite all their posts being bark back at Epignosis. I suppose it counts as self-pres?
-- just to add to their read, minus point for their recent post aimed at Epignosis, tone still aggro defensive and not the most respectable wording towards Epignosis, either

sig
pyxxy connection: labelled it as unlikely
much of what I've noted down from sig's activity is in fact case-making on falcon, arguments being that falcon is within wolf range and that the Western night kills could show pattern of clean-up in his aid. also admits mindmeld with leetic on the night kills angle. seems fine

Master Radishes
-- for someone from East, therefore info-less on falcon, vote drop was sudden, without hint of inquiry or reading into others' takes and a bit of "nuh-uh" retort to falcon calling it opportunistic (even prodding him to vote back). not ideal elements. later more elaborate, dismissing falcon's "exasperation" as outweighed by poor tone, something I do meld with.
-- had a good impression of him otherwise - active in developing reads and opinionated on enough players and events - but this on its own is a mixed bag

Windward
-- noted her more of a Lemon wagoner for much of D3; falcon switch comes down to disliking falcon's "opportunism" rebuttal at Radishes, it seems. bit cheeky to word it as "happy to join the opportunistic train". later camps reactive attitude, in principle, towards mafia lean. again, had more interest in others, but I can see how the view on falcon might have soured in time and treat the gameplay as wolf-likely
-- activity-wise, I'd rate Windward towny. ample material, not gonna develop full read at this time.

Long Con
pyxxy connection: labelled him sussworthy
-- it is accurate that LC has suss on falcon throughout West period
-- it is also accurate that his waffle on falcon came from trusting Abigail's tone/meta read, true both during West time and during D3 here
-- as far as coming back on falcon wagon, late on seems to make a read - not agreeing with his towning claim, finding his counter-suspicions omgusey. think it's adequate
-- didn't note down any pings from LC today tbh, though overall I find him a bit puzzling. his D3 is probably the better-looking phase of his activity thus far, engaged and opinionated more on the topics, but at times I also he's tagteaming others (much "starting to see this" responses), quite the buddy dynamic with Epignosis, lighthearted banter and focused replies in equal measures. ech, probably wouldn't focus on deciphering this for now

leetic
pyxxy connection: labeled him unlikely
-- pretty much wagons falcon for the nightkill angle; dismisses falcon's defense on that as wifom; don't recall him tackling any other point about falcon
-- really conflicted about leetic overall: was my topwolf pick and vote D1, the aggro-tone was prevalent; Abigail (in West) and Dizzy (in here) mentioned that this is normal leetic; then D2 he shifts into a Pyxxy Scientist (ISO'ing interactions), drop most of the prod and poke tone, a solving attitude I shared and in turned like;
-- now? I'm seeing way less of D2. announced ISOs from West D2, did not deliver; had to defend a bit re: gifting a player who flipped wolf, don't know if that's a topic of suss. informed the merged group of his Pyxxy Science findings, that's fair. couple more reads (Nanook for instance), no definitive wording. still, really slowed down performance. puzzling.

DrWilgy
-- seems to base and bank his falcon vote on lack of townspewing alone. I'd label this a tad narrowing
-- no developed read on his activity atm. word that came to mind, upon quick scroll, was "scrambled". perhaps within expectations.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:22 pm I have to close in an hour. Will try to finish a scan of the Darling wagoners.

Lemon wagoners probably not worth pursuing. And, in just two lines, there's nothing good looking left in there. I recall no serious push(es) from Nanook - just an instavote on sabi, due to lingering post-wolfflip, and then a tag vote right after Dizzy back and forth. Davos doesn't sound like making any trustworthy contribution all game and just plants votes. I trusted Scrappy more in West, I'd come back to whether Davos can be trusted, but not this phase, I suppose.

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:46 pm

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:22 pm I have to close in an hour. Will try to finish a scan of the Darling wagoners.

Lemon wagoners probably not worth pursuing. And, in just two lines, there's nothing good looking left in there. I recall no serious push(es) from Nanook - just an instavote on sabi, due to lingering post-wolfflip, and then a tag vote right after Dizzy back and forth. Davos doesn't sound like making any trustworthy contribution all game and just plants votes. I trusted Scrappy more in West, I'd come back to whether Davos can be trusted, but not this phase, I suppose.

Chooses to basically ignore the Lemon wagon, interesting. I would not be surprised if there was at least one Arbiter among them

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:32 pm

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:26 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm Anyway, a bit of mechanical discussion. Scrappy clearly didn't have a lover aspect, so it is indeed possible that whoever controls Davos is already dead. I bring this up because, if Davos is a wolf, it's the only way I can see there being another wolf on my side to even the numbers (though that would still be unbalanced in my mind, as five minds are always more powerful than four, disregarding any powers they might have). Still, Brad is the only dead person who it could be without Davos being town (remember, Cape90's flip said they were the only person who could see both threads, so it can't be anyone from my side). Davos's behavior would not be unusual for Brad, as he was similarly unhelpful as a wolf when he was sent over to the other thread in Severance. Still though, I would not flip anyone from my side before flipping Davos, and I really thing there are more pertinent lynch targets than Davos (but vigs, do your thing!).

I actually think Scrappy and Davos could be secret anonymous players who aren't in the player list, maybe
It was a thought I had earlier

The OP says Scrappy is a "Puppet". Besides, I'd expect both of them (but especially Davos) to have done a lot more if they're really separate people who aren't otherwise playing the game.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:58 pm No more analysis. Bed & sleep.

[VOTE: falcon] aubergine

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:48 pm Ok I'm gonna go back to paying attention to real life lol
Be back later!

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:47 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:32 pm

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:26 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:18 pm Anyway, a bit of mechanical discussion. Scrappy clearly didn't have a lover aspect, so it is indeed possible that whoever controls Davos is already dead. I bring this up because, if Davos is a wolf, it's the only way I can see there being another wolf on my side to even the numbers (though that would still be unbalanced in my mind, as five minds are always more powerful than four, disregarding any powers they might have). Still, Brad is the only dead person who it could be without Davos being town (remember, Cape90's flip said they were the only person who could see both threads, so it can't be anyone from my side). Davos's behavior would not be unusual for Brad, as he was similarly unhelpful as a wolf when he was sent over to the other thread in Severance. Still though, I would not flip anyone from my side before flipping Davos, and I really thing there are more pertinent lynch targets than Davos (but vigs, do your thing!).

I actually think Scrappy and Davos could be secret anonymous players who aren't in the player list, maybe
It was a thought I had earlier

The OP says Scrappy is a "Puppet". Besides, I'd expect both of them (but especially Davos) to have done a lot more if they're really separate people who aren't otherwise playing the game.

Yeah I know, their player titles also say as much
I figured Davos at least was probably a player
But scrappy seemed quite active, so idk?

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:40 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm Assuming Ricochet was killed by the landlords, I doubt whoever doing so did so with the intent of shooting a wolf, as I don't think anyone expressed a strong wolfread of them as of late. I mean, it is possible they had mechanical evidence against Ricochet but never confronted them in-thread as they were afraid of crossfire, but that's pure speculation at this point. They may have been killed for their reads (or another standard reason like PR hunting, although I'm not sure how wolves would do this when claiming isn't allowed (again, discounting the possibility that they had mechanical evidence)) though unfortunately their D2 material is basically unreadable.

I do kinda think Rico was assumed to be town by landlords considering they were fairly townread, at least from what I remember?

And maybe a given since majority of wolves had come from our side at that point, but probably just reaffirms the idea that majority of the wolves sit in the other thread because if Rico was killed for being townread, it was probably under the assumption of 'this thread has much more town in the remaining numbers than ours did'

at least maybe? Like I said it's probably a given with the amount of flipped wolves from our thread vs the other but it's what came to mind regardless

I dont know if all wolves from ours are gone, unsure if there would be an even split? but eh

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:53 pm

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:40 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm Assuming Ricochet was killed by the landlords, I doubt whoever doing so did so with the intent of shooting a wolf, as I don't think anyone expressed a strong wolfread of them as of late. I mean, it is possible they had mechanical evidence against Ricochet but never confronted them in-thread as they were afraid of crossfire, but that's pure speculation at this point. They may have been killed for their reads (or another standard reason like PR hunting, although I'm not sure how wolves would do this when claiming isn't allowed (again, discounting the possibility that they had mechanical evidence)) though unfortunately their D2 material is basically unreadable.

I do kinda think Rico was assumed to be town by landlords considering they were fairly townread, at least from what I remember?

And maybe a given since majority of wolves had come from our side at that point, but probably just reaffirms the idea that majority of the wolves sit in the other thread because if Rico was killed for being townread, it was probably under the assumption of 'this thread has much more town in the remaining numbers than ours did'

at least maybe? Like I said it's probably a given with the amount of flipped wolves from our thread vs the other but it's what came to mind regardless

I dont know if all wolves from ours are gone, unsure if there would be an even split? but eh

For balance, it's likely even or very close to even, as Severance was. There definitely isn't only one wolf in the other thread, that would be bastard as it would force town to either mislynch or lynch a (presumably non-hostile) ITP (unless there is a hostile ITP from that thread still at large).

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:57 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:53 pm

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:40 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm Assuming Ricochet was killed by the landlords, I doubt whoever doing so did so with the intent of shooting a wolf, as I don't think anyone expressed a strong wolfread of them as of late. I mean, it is possible they had mechanical evidence against Ricochet but never confronted them in-thread as they were afraid of crossfire, but that's pure speculation at this point. They may have been killed for their reads (or another standard reason like PR hunting, although I'm not sure how wolves would do this when claiming isn't allowed (again, discounting the possibility that they had mechanical evidence)) though unfortunately their D2 material is basically unreadable.

I do kinda think Rico was assumed to be town by landlords considering they were fairly townread, at least from what I remember?

And maybe a given since majority of wolves had come from our side at that point, but probably just reaffirms the idea that majority of the wolves sit in the other thread because if Rico was killed for being townread, it was probably under the assumption of 'this thread has much more town in the remaining numbers than ours did'

at least maybe? Like I said it's probably a given with the amount of flipped wolves from our thread vs the other but it's what came to mind regardless

I dont know if all wolves from ours are gone, unsure if there would be an even split? but eh

For balance, it's likely even or very close to even, as Severance was. There definitely isn't only one wolf in the other thread, that would be bastard as it would force town to either mislynch or lynch a (presumably non-hostile) ITP (unless there is a hostile ITP from that thread still at large).

I'm not suggesting a huge amount more on ours, maybe 1 more? Mainly just trying to factor in Cape being ITP from the other thread since in Severance, my thread had an extra player since I was ITP and then an even split for wolves. Here, threads were balanced, 1 puppet each side, and Cape just flipped ITP.

So I assume either we have one more mafia on our side or maybe a second third party? Just so things balanced out.

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:59 pm

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:57 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:53 pm

Delta wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:40 pm

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm Assuming Ricochet was killed by the landlords, I doubt whoever doing so did so with the intent of shooting a wolf, as I don't think anyone expressed a strong wolfread of them as of late. I mean, it is possible they had mechanical evidence against Ricochet but never confronted them in-thread as they were afraid of crossfire, but that's pure speculation at this point. They may have been killed for their reads (or another standard reason like PR hunting, although I'm not sure how wolves would do this when claiming isn't allowed (again, discounting the possibility that they had mechanical evidence)) though unfortunately their D2 material is basically unreadable.

I do kinda think Rico was assumed to be town by landlords considering they were fairly townread, at least from what I remember?

And maybe a given since majority of wolves had come from our side at that point, but probably just reaffirms the idea that majority of the wolves sit in the other thread because if Rico was killed for being townread, it was probably under the assumption of 'this thread has much more town in the remaining numbers than ours did'

at least maybe? Like I said it's probably a given with the amount of flipped wolves from our thread vs the other but it's what came to mind regardless

I dont know if all wolves from ours are gone, unsure if there would be an even split? but eh

For balance, it's likely even or very close to even, as Severance was. There definitely isn't only one wolf in the other thread, that would be bastard as it would force town to either mislynch or lynch a (presumably non-hostile) ITP (unless there is a hostile ITP from that thread still at large).

I'm not suggesting a huge amount more on ours, maybe 1 more? Mainly just trying to factor in Cape being ITP from the other thread since in Severance, my thread had an extra player since I was ITP and then an even split for wolves. Here, threads were balanced, 1 puppet each side, and Cape just flipped ITP.

So I assume either we have one more mafia on our side or maybe a second third party? Just so things balanced out.

It's likely we have an ITP on our side. But right now, the wolves are the bigger threat (unless there's a cult, but in that case the game would probably be already over)

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 08, 2024 9:12 pm I'm thinking DM/Wilgy/Nanook as my top SRs

DM/Nanook on one team
Wilgy on the other

only there's a wrench here because DM and Nanook have just been sitting on my wagon for the last 2 days and I don't think partners would do that
it'd be too obvious

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:03 pmim vindicated

leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:06 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:03 pmim vindicated

Granted, I did see a wolf kill their partner in a similar manner in World Flags… but I'll treat you as non-arbiter for now

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:18 pm I bet one of wilgy/nanook is arbiter and the other is landlord and that's that