The Syndicate

sig wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Sig is Mafia!!! Lynch him!!! I propose a swift orderly cfd!!

ANy reason for this or is it just part of your spidery senses?

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

What specifically do you stand by?



Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///

That it wasn't wise to vote for a double Lynch. It think when the vote was mad the odds were not in the civvies favor. It was good that we got an Indy last night I just hope we don't Lynch a civ tonight

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

I don't get why you don't want to answer my question. How would we get more information from one lynch as opposed to two?

Voting bass
If you give me a good enough answer I will move it.

I hope you guys are right about nutella, but I'm not voting there. I literally didn't have a read on her, and I am not going to jump on a bandwagon of her just because one was forming on someone else. In fact I think it's suspicious the amount of people doing that (while calling her blendy and accusing her of doing just that lol)

Sorry I didn't see it. I mean technically you would get more info from two lynches because we will find out two people's roles . So that statement I said was wrong. .

fingersplints wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

What specifically do you stand by?



Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///

That it wasn't wise to vote for a double Lynch. It think when the vote was mad the odds were not in the civvies favor. It was good that we got an Indy last night I just hope we don't Lynch a civ tonight

Wait so do you still stand by it? Because yesterday you said it was wrong

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

I don't get why you don't want to answer my question. How would we get more information from one lynch as opposed to two?

Voting bass
If you give me a good enough answer I will move it.

I hope you guys are right about nutella, but I'm not voting there. I literally didn't have a read on her, and I am not going to jump on a bandwagon of her just because one was forming on someone else. In fact I think it's suspicious the amount of people doing that (while calling her blendy and accusing her of doing just that lol)

Sorry I didn't see it. I mean technically you would get more info from two lynches because we will find out two people's roles . So that statement I said was wrong. .

Draconus wrote:I'd still like to know why Juliets, if anyone missed my earlier question. I ended up having to work today, so there won't be much free time

Sorsha wrote:As Epignosis commands! The bandwagon of Luke stops and the bandwagon of nutella begins! lol j/k :P

I can see the suspicion on both of them. I just looked at Lukes posts and he's been all over the place. Day 1 vote: Tranq for being a low poster. Day 2 vote: sig bandwagon. Day 3 votes: nutella and bug.

I missed that post Typhoony made on nutella until today. I'd be fine with voting for either of these players.

Also noticing that since juliets came under pressure yesterday she's been hopping on the bus to whatever is popular. Yesterday she voted nutella in one of the groups but today initially voted Luke and changed to nutella once the thread direction changed.

sig wrote:@Luke right know you have the most votes I could switch off of you, but I need you to do a few things first, mainly answer a few questions.

What are your current reads?
Who do you think is good?
Who do you think is bad?
Then could you defend your voting record? You've avoided many big wagons.
Day 1 voted Tranq
Day 2 You voted for me
Day 3 Nutella and Bug
Day 4 part 1 no vote.

So why did you vote for me Day 2 but not Day 3?
Why did you vote Nutella day 3 but not fay 4 part 1?

Besides joining mine and Nutella wagon you've avoided the major lynches and kept to the backround this is quite pingy to me.
I don't like your reasoning for my vote, and if Bulls/Zebra made such good points why not follow it the next day?
I believe you're scum and was told in BTSC to back off from my wagon a bit which is why you stopped voting for me.

Luke11646 wrote:

Tranq wrote:

sig wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Excuse me sigtown. Who would you vote for if you were scum, town or indy? Name three.

scum BUGLABUSH/Luke
town Bulls/Elohcin
indy I'd go with a bandwagon and flow with it.

sig wrote:Right know placing a vote for Luke I'd like him to answer my questions.

Sig why did you say that you would vote for me if you where scum yet you are voting for me right now?

My opinions change, know I think you're scum, I believe I already answered Tranq on this point and I'm surprised you don't actually defend yourself or answer any questions you just quote Tranq's post.

Sorsha wrote:

Draconus wrote:I'd still like to know why Juliets, if anyone missed my earlier question. I ended up having to work today, so there won't be much free time

This is what I got after going over her posts:

Sorsha wrote:As Epignosis commands! The bandwagon of Luke stops and the bandwagon of nutella begins! lol j/k :P

I can see the suspicion on both of them. I just looked at Lukes posts and he's been all over the place. Day 1 vote: Tranq for being a low poster. Day 2 vote: sig bandwagon. Day 3 votes: nutella and bug.

I missed that post Typhoony made on nutella until today. I'd be fine with voting for either of these players.

Also noticing that since juliets came under pressure yesterday she's been hopping on the bus to whatever is popular. Yesterday she voted nutella in one of the groups but today initially voted Luke and changed to nutella once the thread direction changed.

Maybe if you just look over her posts yourself, especially her interactions win Epi you'll get a better feel for her. There isn't any one thing I can say about juliets that screams baddie.... It's just the way she changed direction after pressure that is giving me a bad feeling about her.

I'm not 100% on her by any means. I could go for Luke though too I just don't want this to be a runaway vote.

TheFloyd73 wrote:I'm going to be away for the majority of the weekend.
I'm putting my vote on nutella for now.
Luke, you may want to answer these questions people are asking.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.

What specifically do you stand by?



Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///

That it wasn't wise to vote for a double Lynch. It think when the vote was mad the odds were not in the civvies favor. It was good that we got an Indy last night I just hope we don't Lynch a civ tonight

Matt F wrote:

Dom wrote:Who's bad Mac?
All nine of the people listed previously? That's not even possible.

Dom wrote: #5) You have named 9+ people to be "scum" with a high degree of certainty, however, there is a maximum of 8 baddies in the game... who are your suspects? Why are you inconsistent?

How do you know?

Linki - Is that right, Doc?

Long Con wrote:The game begins with 15 Civvies, 8 baddies, and 7 Independent roles. There are two baddie teams, the Circle of Decay, and the Witherdeath Cabal. The Circle of Decay has the opportunity to kill on odd nights, and the Witherdeath Cabal may kill on even nights.

Luke11646 wrote:I don't have any evidence but epi just feels off to me

Dom wrote:Anyone wanna vote Mac with me?

Matt F wrote:Thanks Dom. I was curious as to why you would think that when the role list doesn't show us who's who. M'bad.

Dr Wilgy - Lol. Who are you looking at today? sig?

MacDougall wrote:

Dom wrote:Anyone wanna vote Mac with me?

No. Nobody does. And it pains me.

HamburgerBoy wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Dom wrote:Anyone wanna vote Mac with me?

No. Nobody does. And it pains me.

Yeah I'll go for this.

Mac

sig wrote:Why?

I thought we had something special

Tranq wrote:So does nutella's vote for Luke still count?

DrWilgy wrote:

sig wrote:Why?

I thought we had something special

Tone reads yo! I tried to catch up, realized that wasn't working, so I'll use what I can to play in the now.

We do Sig, I love you as a player and as a friend! <3 But as long as we aren't on the same team, I gotta end the game as fast as possible so we can be on the same team next game!!

I suppose tone reads are really fragile though... Convince me you aren't bad yo!

Tranq wrote:So does nutella's vote for Luke still count?

MacDougall wrote:Dom and HB have voted for me before. Has anything untoward happened to either of you as a result?

If you want to lynch me you won't be hurt. Go ahead.

Long Con wrote:

Tranq wrote:So does nutella's vote for Luke still count?

Nope!

sig wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

sig wrote:Why?

I thought we had something special

Tone reads yo! I tried to catch up, realized that wasn't working, so I'll use what I can to play in the now.

We do Sig, I love you as a player and as a friend! <3 But as long as we aren't on the same team, I gotta end the game as fast as possible so we can be on the same team next game!!

I suppose tone reads are really fragile though... Convince me you aren't bad yo!

I would need to see bank account numbers and pictures before I can confirm the loving factor. :P

How could I convince you I'm not bad any questions you might have?

sig wrote:I'm a civilian since the argument against me is fundamentally wrong. This argument is based around a "scum slip". I said it appeared the scum was killing low posters and a few players attacked me for it. Mainly Zebra and Bulls. That is the center of suspicion on me, I've had several players clear me, as well as the fact I defended the points brought up against me.

There are several other arguments for lynches today besides the imo weakly constructed argument . Two of my voters have been tunneling on me. Bulls since day 1 and DFaraday since day 2, In DFaraday case they have posted very little and just dropped votes on me. I don't know why timmer 2.0 is voting for me and Luke is since I voted him and this is the other wagon.

So you see I'm not the best candidate for today's lynch especially since several players have expressed a desire to not lynch me.
The other argument used against me is based around how day 2 I defended myself suspiciously keep in mind I spent that entire phase defending myself from both Zebra and Bulls who were aggressively pursuing me as several people voted for me without truly looking over my defense.

plus I'm fun and they aren't.

LoRab wrote:Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.

Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Luke.

Matt F wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Luke.

Just yesterday you were surprised at the "mob" on Luke and now you vote for him?

Matt F wrote:Lol

Epignosis wrote:

Matt F wrote:Lol

I'm not laughing.