Page 37 of 76

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:17 am
by Scotty
[VOTE: Lap] aubergine for now.

I wanna hear from you!

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:21 am
by Golden
I feel like one of the doctors should protect me in the next night phase tbh. Just a request.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:23 am
by Kylemii
MacDougall wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:07 am God damn it

Image
what theme are you using? why is it baby blue

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:26 am
by Kylemii
Spacedaisy wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:13 am
Kylemii wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:59 am @Spacedaisy you voted for me earlier, and don't believe TH's claim then why wouldn't you just assume that i am also lying and TH's teammate
I can see a baddie team putting one player at risk, that is acceptable. I can't see them putting two people at risk for the same lie. I find TH less believable.
alright thank you, that makes sense.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:27 am
by Kylemii
um.... do we know what the elections actually do

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:29 am
by Golden
Kylemii wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:27 am um.... do we know what the elections actually do
I guess if sig was still here...

He got given the 'quill and wig' but we don't know what that means.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:30 am
by Spacedaisy
Nope. And Golden, after a second read through I could be mistaken in what I thought I saw about Epi. I could see it the way I thought or the way everyone else seems to have accepted that it was.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:32 am
by MacDougall
Golden wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:21 am I feel like one of the doctors should protect me in the next night phase tbh. Just a request.
Nah Scotty gets the grease.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:36 am
by Golden
Spacedaisy wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:30 am Nope. And Golden, after a second read through I could be mistaken in what I thought I saw about Epi. I could see it the way I thought or the way everyone else seems to have accepted that it was.
I go back and forth on Epi. I do believe usually that his "Epi tells" are mixed in with more regular scum finding, and the latter is lacking here. But there are some things he does which feel very town.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:58 am
by Quin
Golden wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:29 am
Kylemii wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:27 am um.... do we know what the elections actually do
I guess if sig was still here...

He got given the 'quill and wig' but we don't know what that means.
if you voted for me i'd have told you :beer:

which reminds me
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:49 am
Turnip Head wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:25 am @sig are you going to lead us through this shit or what dude. what do you have for us?
Nothing! :(

Though for real I've gotta go to the gym then I'll be back and get serious and do some real game solving.

Can't go into detail on what the Quill did, but it basically added something to one of my abilities.

My guess is each time we elect someone it either gives them an extra ability or arguments a current one. So smh y'all should've taken that election more serious last night, try to act less like American voters and more like idk voters from a responsible country. :p

bullshit

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:00 am
by Golden
Yeah sig was full of shit.

I campaigned for scotty for good reason.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:03 am
by lapluie
Ok who voted for me, coffees

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:04 am
by lapluie
lapluie wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:03 am Ok who voted for me, confess *

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:12 am
by Golden
lapluie wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:03 am Ok who voted for me, coffees
I haven’t yet, but what’s a good reason not to?

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:19 am
by lapluie
Spacedaisy wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:30 am @lapluie Can you give me your opinion on the following people:

TurnipHead
Kylemii
ColinisCool
Choutas
Lunalee
insertnamehere

Is there anything that you've seen that stands out to you?
Reading their post histories starting with turnip & downwards
~I feel like his posts aren't game related just a bunch of jibberjabber about random topics that have no contributions to the game whatsoever, pretty monotonous read. (If I'm wrong pls correct me sorry if I've offended you turnip).
~has put in thought & opinions, good read from kyle to be honest, he seems genuine. Have no bad feeling about him.
~he's fun to play mafia with when he's drunk & sober, mostly drunk. good guy... sometimes... still vague to read it's either good or bad. His posts give me the same opinion like last game, idk if it's a good or bad thing help.
~churro boi!! He's too quiet, pls post more & give more thought, I think he's capable of doing more but he seems reserved, his posts indicate some WiFi trouble & request a replacement so idunno, neutral!!
~good stuff, but some reason I feel like she's hiding something or is too worried to say but overall , neutral
~that long as heck weird font essay convinced me he's town..
that is all ... thanks

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:21 am
by lapluie
Golden wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:12 am
lapluie wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:03 am Ok who voted for me, coffees
I haven’t yet, but what’s a good reason not to?
That is a very good question.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:23 am
by lapluie
Scotty wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:17 am [VOTE: Lap] aubergine for now.

I wanna hear from you!
AGAIN?? ... Im habimgastrok

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:26 am
by lapluie
This is not a real vote but I always default for Choutas to see who voted who sorry

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:36 am
by Spacedaisy
lapluie wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:19 am
Spacedaisy wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:30 am @lapluie Can you give me your opinion on the following people:

TurnipHead
Kylemii
ColinisCool
Choutas
Lunalee
insertnamehere

Is there anything that you've seen that stands out to you?
Reading their post histories starting with turnip & downwards
~I feel like his posts aren't game related just a bunch of jibberjabber about random topics that have no contributions to the game whatsoever, pretty monotonous read. (If I'm wrong pls correct me sorry if I've offended you turnip).
~has put in thought & opinions, good read from kyle to be honest, he seems genuine. Have no bad feeling about him.
~he's fun to play mafia with when he's drunk & sober, mostly drunk. good guy... sometimes... still vague to read it's either good or bad. His posts give me the same opinion like last game, idk if it's a good or bad thing help.
~churro boi!! He's too quiet, pls post more & give more thought, I think he's capable of doing more but he seems reserved, his posts indicate some WiFi trouble & request a replacement so idunno, neutral!!
~good stuff, but some reason I feel like she's hiding something or is too worried to say but overall , neutral
~that long as heck weird font essay convinced me he's town..
that is all ... thanks
:hugs: Thanks lapluie!

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 5:42 am
by Spacedaisy
lapluie wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:26 am This is not a real vote but I always default for Choutas to see who voted who sorry
Why is Choutas this go to default vote?

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 0: It's 'TIME' to get started

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:03 am
by Golden
A brief Luna/sig interactive iso. Luna has a total of 19 posts before Quin dropped his bombshell, including:
Spoiler: show
Lunalee wrote: Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:22 am @sig , what's with that "poker face" smiley you keep using?

:suspish:
Lunalee wrote: Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:04 pm @sig , @Quin , if you're going to self-vote, at least give us a good reason to support you or not.
Lunalee wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:20 pm
sig wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:35 pm
speedchuck wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:33 pm Night is half over and I'm missing a loooooot of night actions.
Never submit night actions that's my policy. Why hide your actions? I never do I'll tell you straight up what I plan to do. Which is why a vote for sig is a vote for open night actions. No more hiding no more fear no more control. Vote Sig a player you can trust.
Sig, your campaigning is gold. I'm voting for you. I believe I can count on you to sign that Bill of Rights with the most beautiful signature

[VOTE: sig] aubergine
Lunalee wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:08 pm Haha, bravo sig. :clap:
These quotes account for my 'gut feel' of luna being a teammate of sig. They have a 'team banter' vibe to them.

After Quin's bombshell, Luna's next two posts are:
Spoiler: show
Lunalee wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:48 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:45 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:40 pmEither way the idea of lynching me since I said I couldn't be lynched doesn't seem townie.
And this is complete bullshit

I called your bluff and now you're worried.

Glad I called it.

I think there's a decent chance you are a baddie who gains in power over time, and you're trying to delay being lynched for some reason. You've made claims of being indestructible and said you weren't worried about your campaign putting a target on your back for that reason. You said you weren't worried about being lynched because you won't be lynched. But I can smell the fear on your breath from here.
This is what I was thinking. It might be safest to lynch sig.
Lunalee wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:11 pm Wait, why are you folks lynching sig? I need to catch up.
That's a very strange backtrack.

And then we get this progression:
Spoiler: show
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:14 pm
sig wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:33 am
Spoiler: show
MacDougall wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:07 am Sig is your apparent inability to be lynched literally just today that it won't work?
Oh it'll work whenever I want, but it would be a waste for it to be used today. I won't have enough time in this timeline to make it worthwhile basically.

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:12 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:09 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm Sig are you a civilian? Yes or no?

If you are a civilian what will be the outcome of lynching you today? Is the outcome positive or negative? Why?

If you are a civilian does your continued existence beyond day 3 reap any benefit to the civilian cause?

Yes

there's no outcome of lynching me today since it won't happen but if it did it would be negative since you'd loose a civ, but there wouldn't be some cataclysmic event

yes in the sense that I'd be here to post and engage. However, it's not like some role actives if I'm alive after day 3.

Also I think y'all might've read a little bit to deep into my d/n 1 posts. :p
So if we attempt to lynch you today, it just fails? Or it redirects? Does the second person get lynched instead? What do you expect the outcome to be? Just your continued existence and a fart video?

So you are saying that all of your role stops being relevant come day 3?

If you are a civilian then us wasting a lynch on you here is a bad idea. Given we have several other people who have role claimed, perhaps the civilian duty you have here is to actually just enlighten us as to what it is that you do?
1. Everything resets and I leave you all for a better land BUT I wouldn't have been lynched.

2. No my role is relevant until I use it

3. I told you I can't be lynched that's my role power. :shrug:

IF you try you fail and the timeline will be disrupted resulting in chaos. Or that's the theory anyway.

Also just to be clear if you tried to lynhc me day 3 it would also fail, but it would've been the optimal time for me to active my power. Or that's what I thought at first.
I don't really want to lynch sig today. I didn't know quite what to think of his claims earlier, but now I feel like he's being genuine.
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:16 pm Also, I thought it was basically confirmed that INH was third-party. Is that a problem for town? Why is he tied with sig? I feel like we can do better than this.
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm Let's do something more fun.

sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.

Who gets your vote and why?
Yes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.
I think potentially the worst look in here is 'I feel like we can do better than this' when we've been presented with a potential 50/50 shot. What's the size of the team - 3 or 4? So you'd have no more than a 25% shot the rest of the time...

Then:
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:30 pm [VOTE: Quin] aubergine [citation]
and
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:52 pm I'm going to put my vote on INH because I don't like how defensive he got about his role. But that makes a tie between him and sig. Ugh.
It's worth noting that last post is AFTER sig triggered the event but before it took place.

Looking through Luna's iso as a whole, I tend to find that she is team compatible with sig, and that's where my vote is going for now.

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:25 am
by ColinIsCool
MacDougall wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:23 am
Spacedaisy wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:45 pmMac, I proved myself to him. It had nothing to do with his role.

Golden, I was starting to worry about you.
How is this in any way accurate when he explicitly implied that you alignment claimed in some way that only he could tell?

I'm sick of being made to feel like I am being irrational when people keep doing things like this. The list of people actually applying rationalisation in this game is as short as Epi's penis.
Lmaoooooooooooo

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:30 am
by ColinIsCool
I feel kinda weird about how spirited Kyle’s defense of Turbup is, in that I can’t decide whether it absolutely rules them out as teammates or absolutely presents that to be the case.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:34 am
by ColinIsCool
I’ll try to reassess Luna and some others today. Imo the worst thing in that ISO is that backtrack.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:45 am
by MacDougall
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:30 am I feel kinda weird about how spirited Kyle’s defense of Turbup is, in that I can’t decide whether it absolutely rules them out as teammates or absolutely presents that to be the case.
Get off the fence and make a call. What does your heart say?

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:46 am
by ColinIsCool
MacDougall wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:45 am
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:30 am I feel kinda weird about how spirited Kyle’s defense of Turbup is, in that I can’t decide whether it absolutely rules them out as teammates or absolutely presents that to be the case.
Get off the fence and make a call. What does your heart say?
Not teammates. For now.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:51 am
by ColinIsCool
I think there have to be liars on this list.

Colin - Poll Predictor (gets extra vote)
Turnip Head - Indie Poll Predictor (wincon)
Golden - looks for Scotty
Scotty - doc
Epignosis - doc
MacDougall - doc
Quin - stump
Sig - lynch resetter (consensus scum?)
Insertnamehere - some kind of Indie

Am I missing anybody’s claim so far?

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:53 am
by MacDougall
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:51 am I think there have to be liars on this list.

Colin - Poll Predictor (gets extra vote)
Turnip Head - Indie Poll Predictor (wincon)
Golden - looks for Scotty
Scotty - doc
Epignosis - doc
MacDougall - doc
Quin - stump
Sig - lynch resetter (consensus scum?)
Insertnamehere - some kind of Indie

Am I missing anybody’s claim so far?
Epi revoked his claim. The rest seem relatively normal to me.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:55 am
by ColinIsCool
MacDougall wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:53 am
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:51 am I think there have to be liars on this list.

Colin - Poll Predictor (gets extra vote)
Turnip Head - Indie Poll Predictor (wincon)
Golden - looks for Scotty
Scotty - doc
Epignosis - doc
MacDougall - doc
Quin - stump
Sig - lynch resetter (consensus scum?)
Insertnamehere - some kind of Indie

Am I missing anybody’s claim so far?
Epi revoked his claim. The rest seem relatively normal to me.
GTH, is Epi scum?

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:40 am
by Epignosis
Golden wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:21 am I feel like one of the doctors should protect me in the next night phase tbh. Just a request.
Sorry. I already targeted you last Night. ;)

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:42 am
by Epignosis
lapluie wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:03 am Ok who voted for me, coffees
:eye:

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:31 am
by Scotty
MacDougall wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:32 am
Golden wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:21 am I feel like one of the doctors should protect me in the next night phase tbh. Just a request.
Nah Scotty gets the grease.
I got me covered!

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 0: It's 'TIME' to get started

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:48 am
by Lunalee
Golden wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:03 am A brief Luna/sig interactive iso. Luna has a total of 19 posts before Quin dropped his bombshell, including:
Spoiler: show
Lunalee wrote: Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:22 am @sig , what's with that "poker face" smiley you keep using?

:suspish:
Lunalee wrote: Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:04 pm @sig , @Quin , if you're going to self-vote, at least give us a good reason to support you or not.
Lunalee wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:20 pm
sig wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:35 pm
speedchuck wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:33 pm Night is half over and I'm missing a loooooot of night actions.
Never submit night actions that's my policy. Why hide your actions? I never do I'll tell you straight up what I plan to do. Which is why a vote for sig is a vote for open night actions. No more hiding no more fear no more control. Vote Sig a player you can trust.
Sig, your campaigning is gold. I'm voting for you. I believe I can count on you to sign that Bill of Rights with the most beautiful signature

[VOTE: sig] aubergine
Lunalee wrote: Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:08 pm Haha, bravo sig. :clap:
These quotes account for my 'gut feel' of luna being a teammate of sig. They have a 'team banter' vibe to them.

After Quin's bombshell, Luna's next two posts are:
Spoiler: show
Lunalee wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:48 pm
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:45 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:40 pmEither way the idea of lynching me since I said I couldn't be lynched doesn't seem townie.
And this is complete bullshit

I called your bluff and now you're worried.

Glad I called it.

I think there's a decent chance you are a baddie who gains in power over time, and you're trying to delay being lynched for some reason. You've made claims of being indestructible and said you weren't worried about your campaign putting a target on your back for that reason. You said you weren't worried about being lynched because you won't be lynched. But I can smell the fear on your breath from here.
This is what I was thinking. It might be safest to lynch sig.
Lunalee wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:11 pm Wait, why are you folks lynching sig? I need to catch up.
That's a very strange backtrack.

And then we get this progression:
Spoiler: show
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:14 pm
sig wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:33 am
Spoiler: show
MacDougall wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:07 am Sig is your apparent inability to be lynched literally just today that it won't work?
Oh it'll work whenever I want, but it would be a waste for it to be used today. I won't have enough time in this timeline to make it worthwhile basically.

MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:12 pm
sig wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:09 pm
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm Sig are you a civilian? Yes or no?

If you are a civilian what will be the outcome of lynching you today? Is the outcome positive or negative? Why?

If you are a civilian does your continued existence beyond day 3 reap any benefit to the civilian cause?

Yes

there's no outcome of lynching me today since it won't happen but if it did it would be negative since you'd loose a civ, but there wouldn't be some cataclysmic event

yes in the sense that I'd be here to post and engage. However, it's not like some role actives if I'm alive after day 3.

Also I think y'all might've read a little bit to deep into my d/n 1 posts. :p
So if we attempt to lynch you today, it just fails? Or it redirects? Does the second person get lynched instead? What do you expect the outcome to be? Just your continued existence and a fart video?

So you are saying that all of your role stops being relevant come day 3?

If you are a civilian then us wasting a lynch on you here is a bad idea. Given we have several other people who have role claimed, perhaps the civilian duty you have here is to actually just enlighten us as to what it is that you do?
1. Everything resets and I leave you all for a better land BUT I wouldn't have been lynched.

2. No my role is relevant until I use it

3. I told you I can't be lynched that's my role power. :shrug:

IF you try you fail and the timeline will be disrupted resulting in chaos. Or that's the theory anyway.

Also just to be clear if you tried to lynhc me day 3 it would also fail, but it would've been the optimal time for me to active my power. Or that's what I thought at first.
I don't really want to lynch sig today. I didn't know quite what to think of his claims earlier, but now I feel like he's being genuine.
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:16 pm Also, I thought it was basically confirmed that INH was third-party. Is that a problem for town? Why is he tied with sig? I feel like we can do better than this.
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:22 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm Let's do something more fun.

sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.

Who gets your vote and why?
Yes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.
I think potentially the worst look in here is 'I feel like we can do better than this' when we've been presented with a potential 50/50 shot. What's the size of the team - 3 or 4? So you'd have no more than a 25% shot the rest of the time...

Then:
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:30 pm [VOTE: Quin] aubergine [citation]
and
Lunalee wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:52 pm I'm going to put my vote on INH because I don't like how defensive he got about his role. But that makes a tie between him and sig. Ugh.
It's worth noting that last post is AFTER sig triggered the event but before it took place.

Looking through Luna's iso as a whole, I tend to find that she is team compatible with sig, and that's where my vote is going for now.

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine
Hi Golden. This is an excellent review of my posts. For some reason I completely forgot what was going on with sig when I hoped back in here and saw he was being lynched. My bad. I should have read my own posts it seems. Despite that misunderstanding, I want to clarify that if sig and I were mafia teammates in this game, I would have distanced myself from this whole Quin-sig-INH drama. And I would not have so openly posted my opinions on the matter. My scum-strategy when suspicion is being thrown on a teammate is to quietly step away.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:50 am
by speedchuck
Day ends in 11 hours and ten minutes.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:54 am
by Lunalee
Epignosis wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:34 am I would lynch either lapluie or INH. I stand by my Zeph thing and lapluie is tied to that. INH needs to work on his script. Also, I don't think he's a civilian. He called himself "not a threat to the civilians" and no amount of shit he can throw at me in his script means that's the same thing as addressing the civilians in the third person. He called himself "not a threat to the civilians."
Really? That long INH post sort of convinced me that even if he's not town, he at least has a townie win-con.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:01 am
by Lunalee
Quin wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:27 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:18 pm Do we really think there are three town-aligned doctors in this game?
nah
This bothers me too. Wasn't it MacDougal, Scotty, and Epi? One of them may get my vote today.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:42 am
by speedchuck
Choutas has requested replacement.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:01 pm
by speedchuck
Sprityo has replaced Choutas

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:20 pm
by sprityo
Take a fuckin sip, babes. I’m here

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:23 pm
by ColinIsCool
Lunalee wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:01 am
Quin wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:27 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:18 pm Do we really think there are three town-aligned doctors in this game?
nah
This bothers me too. Wasn't it MacDougal, Scotty, and Epi? One of them may get my vote today.
It looks like Epignosis walked back his claim as trying to attract a night kill

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:24 pm
by sprityo
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:51 am I think there have to be liars on this list.

Colin - Poll Predictor (gets extra vote)
Turnip Head - Indie Poll Predictor (wincon)
Golden - looks for Scotty
Scotty - doc
Epignosis - doc
MacDougall - doc
Quin - stump
Sig - lynch resetter (consensus scum?)
Insertnamehere - some kind of Indie

Am I missing anybody’s claim so far?
What in the fuck is this? What kind of madman has three doctors in a game?

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:26 pm
by ColinIsCool
sprityo wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:24 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:51 am I think there have to be liars on this list.

Colin - Poll Predictor (gets extra vote)
Turnip Head - Indie Poll Predictor (wincon)
Golden - looks for Scotty
Scotty - doc
Epignosis - doc
MacDougall - doc
Quin - stump
Sig - lynch resetter (consensus scum?)
Insertnamehere - some kind of Indie

Am I missing anybody’s claim so far?
What in the fuck is this? What kind of madman has three doctors in a game?
It might make more sense if you start at the beginning.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:29 pm
by sprityo
So I’m placing into a guy with little content under heavy suspicion, God’s why do I hate myself.


Let me get something tangible for you monsters to consume

Linki: this is the beginning. Might you be referencing the future? :eye:

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:36 pm
by Golden
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:34 am I’ll try to reassess Luna and some others today. Imo the worst thing in that ISO is that backtrack.
Yeah that is the worst bit I agree.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:39 pm
by Golden
Also, I kinda love that Luna’s choice to defend herself to me is a meta argument.

How did Luna handle her teammates in u pick, anyone?

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:40 pm
by Epignosis
ColinIsCool wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:23 pm
Lunalee wrote: Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:01 am
Quin wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:27 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:18 pm Do we really think there are three town-aligned doctors in this game?
nah
This bothers me too. Wasn't it MacDougal, Scotty, and Epi? One of them may get my vote today.
It looks like Epignosis walked back his claim as trying to attract a night kill
I officially suspect Lunalee for that post. "One of them may get my vote today" is a way of leaving her options open without specifying a preference for any one of us.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:46 pm
by sprityo
MacDougall wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:44 am I think given Quin has apparently got some role that allows him to check if two players are aligned, and he saw fit to infodump it on day 2, that he is pretty confident it won't result in his demise which as per my reaction what Golden did confuses me greatly and makes me feel even more uninformed, but given one is the person day one me was most confident was bad and the other is the person day one me was most confident was town I'm going to be leaving my vote on sig all damn day and nobody is going to tell me otherwise.
starting at day 2, this is the first interesting thing ive seen, i want to follow up on this if it didnt get properly addressed.
sprityo wrote:Scientist: You may select two players. You will learn if the players are aligned or not
I had this role in Phenon but nachomamma sadly got killed before he could use it.

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:50 pm
by sprityo
to follow up what i just posted, to toss in my two cents.

independents are basically guaranteed in this game, otherwise it wouldnt be fun. on top of that, it makes the Scientist role more reasonable if quin is as he says (or from what i've gathered mac had said just then) i havent gone back to see what quin ACTUALLY "claimed"

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:50 pm
by sprityo
Quin wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:49 am woah woah woah who said anything about this being my role

i've already roleclaimed
Quin wrote: Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:34 am
nutella wrote: Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:33 am honestly i have no fuckin idea how cool the rest of the town's roles are comparatively but mine seems pretty damn cool so let me live a few days k
i'm a stump.
this is incidentally probably why nutella was vanished last night by the way
nevermind, now i am confusion

Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:02 pm
by sprityo
Golden wrote: Mon Jun 18, 2018 5:13 pm Sig - it wasn’t a message. Quin said he’s giving it a Quin 100% reliability.

I keep going back and forth on what I think about Colin. Today pings me all over again.
is this serious? if so how does that make it actually reliable?