Re: The Hobbit Mafia: Day 6
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Did we settle on ho we're paying the 600 gold? A bunch of people said they weould kick in fifty, but was it enough? I don't want to get punished.
The Smuggler will claim his gold "by any means necessary" which doesn't sound particularly good for us.Boogs wrote:I could spare 50 if we need more. What happens if we don't get to the $600?
By my count it is me, you, Metalmarsh, Spaghetti, Blooper, Bullzeye and Vompatti, making only 350 gold so far.Boogs wrote:How much are we at?
Come on people participate and helpthellama73 wrote:By my count it is me, you, Metalmarsh, Spaghetti, Blooper, Bullzeye and Vompatti, making only 350 gold so far.Boogs wrote:How much are we at?
I would offer more, but I was recently robbed.
Vompatti, who are you suspicious of?Vompatti wrote:I'll pay 50 if I'm still alive. Heck, I'll even pay 100 (one hundred) if and only if you spare my life.
thellama73 wrote:HOST: How is this payment to be acomplished? Do we have to PM you? If so, when? I ant specifics so we don't get bushwacked.
Good question! You do not have to PM at all, I was planning on just reading the thread (tempted as I was to create just the scenario you mentioned, since I'm also a trained dog economist). I was planning on reading the thread to figure it out. And since I'm too lazy to count 12 names, I was planning on going with taking 50 from the people who voted to sneak in since there seems to be a consensus around that. Maybe I'm letting you off too easy, though?thellama73 wrote:The Smuggler will claim his gold "by any means necessary" which doesn't sound particularly good for us.Boogs wrote:I could spare 50 if we need more. What happens if we don't get to the $600?
What I'm worried about (as a trained economist) is a prisoner's dilemma scenario where we each have to PM our contribution. If that's the case, everyone, especially the baddies, has an incentive to claim they are contributing but not actually contribute, in which case bad things are unavoidable un less some selfless civ kicks in the whole 600 out of fear.
Currently, no. However, I will say that's partly because rl has been in the way more this weekend. I'm been idly considering replacing her since Friday, and will probably go ahead with it tomorrow if she hasn't taken any action by then.Turnip Head wrote:Daisy hasn't posted since Day 4.
Host: is Daisy in the process of being replaced?
I thought about this possibility too. I don't know Epi or his playstyle, but it did seem suspicious, didn't it.fingersplints wrote:I've been going back and forth in my head on this. Either, smaug is setting up Epi.Hedgeowl wrote:I am at a bit of loss where to look right now because while I thought Epi worth a look, Smaug killing Rey just feels like an easy set-up of him, since Rey was going on about Epi being bad. He's my top suspect for now though.
Or Epi is Smaug and thought we'd think that someone was trying to set him up by killing his most vocal adversary. I don't know Epi well but he seems to me the kind of ballsy player who do this sort of thing.
I think I might vote for Boogs due to my relative trust of CBK and her arguments and wariness of llama as of late. Maybe Boogs sees something I don't, but I can't commit to trusting the llama.Boogs wrote:I've got to decide now, and I trust Llama's judgement in this game and his play and he's leaning at Vompattii. I know BWT voted me and Capt bunny (big surprise) will vote me like he's said, so I'm going to have to Vompattii vote in order to prevent my possible lynch while I'm going to be busy before the poll ends at this point. I'm still watching my other names very closely and can hope one of them gets lynched if Vompattii does not.
Why not? I have never done anything to deceive you.Leamiteo wrote:I can't commit to trusting the llama.
I dunno, I haven't read the thread lately.Turnip Head wrote:Vompatti, who are you suspicious of?Vompatti wrote:I'll pay 50 if I'm still alive. Heck, I'll even pay 100 (one hundred) if and only if you spare my life.
Hm, I don't agree with much of it, because I'm not even sure what he's getting at (weird lynch... convenient that Mongoose turned up Bilbo??). All vague with lots of names and feelings and low-poster focus. It's probably true that there are quiet baddies. There always are. But I'm betting there's at least one vocal one. We are at too much of a disadvantage with a completely unknown team to start shooting in the dark, so if you have a reason to lynch a specific low-poster, let's hear it.thellama73 wrote:I agree with almost all of this, although I'm not convinced about Snow Dog. I think looking at low posters at this stage of the game makes a lot of sense. Having so many baddies lynched in a row has got to have shaken the other team and made them nervous. It would make all the sense in the world for them to clam up for fear of being next.Boogs wrote:Indeed it was at first. But, she's sliding by now as a low poster just like Lizzy, Hedgeowl, and a few others. I just really have a gut feeling the people we continuously are trying aren't getting us anywhere. I'd be happy with low poster getting lynched today to find the real Goblins or Smaug, as well as I personally obviously think something weird was still going on with the Mongoose lynch and think Snow is shady and bad still. I can't put my finger on it, but I just don't see how we were wrong about Mongoose and she conveniently turned up Bilbo... Something weird is going on. So I'd throw my vote to hopefully lynch Snow, Lizzy, Spacedaisy, or Hedgeowl today. I know you personally think Vompattii has something and strangely enough, we have been getting along very well in this game because we typically disagree. But I feel very much you are civ in this game and I won't throw a vote on you today or anytime soon. I think the Epignosis thing is a distraction also. I'm not sure He is civ, but I don't feel he's suspicious enough to get my vote just yet either.thellama73 wrote:Wasn't the main suspicion of SpaceDaisy the way she interacted with MP? If that is the case, I don't see how that makes her a candidate for the other goblin team.Boogs wrote:Speaking of low posters from my thoughts earlier, why have we squashed all discussion SpaceDaisy could be bad since Day 3? There was still a possibility she could have been on the other Goblin team. Just throwing out there people that should be brought up again we seemed to have forgotten are the real targets.
That one made me lol. Well done, sir.Epignosis wrote:
That was in reference to actual votes (mainly vomps and other random votes). There has been some rehashing of origins of old suspicions, except maybe the Epi/Smaug idea. But, again, I don't know what the heck to think about Epig.fingersplints wrote:I think there is more going on then "non-helpful gut feelings"
@llama, because of this.Leamiteo wrote:Captain Bunny Killer wrote:![]()
And making vague statements about something going on is not going to pass for hunting baddies, Boogs.
And I think I might be ready to bring up a llama suspicion again. Time to look back, but lets start with this exchange.reywas wrote:llama and epignosis are great places to begin discussion for the next lynch.
Llama has been at the top of my suspect list for the last two lynches. I have re-reading to do on him and others.
However, I just realized Boogs never answered the questions I asked.Leamiteo wrote:To the bold yes, and duh.Boogs wrote:I personally think some of the more blendy, less talkative, non committal people should be examined this next lynch also that are most likely on this other Goblin team. It's odd that we've gotten 3 of MP's team, and none of the other. I feel like they 4 are the ones more sitting back and just voting with the flow so I'm not sure Epignosis or llama is the way to go tomorrow. I'm kind of feeling Vompattii or Snow but I think some quiet people as stated like Lizzy and we seemed to have squashed all discussion that Daisy could have been bad and she hasn't been very talky lately. There's a start for me from those 4 to cast. I think the less obvious choices are where I'm going to find a Goblin.I said that earlier and therefore obviously agree. But I don't know why this automatically excludes Epi and llama. What is your logic in this reasoning? If I may ask for clarification. And what does Lizzy's input about Daisy have to do with us looking at her. That's like the point of the game, and people have been doing that all over the place. Why do you bring up Lizzy? Do you have any more specifics you could bring out? K thanks.
I just saw this, re-reading through llama's posts, that was night 3.thellama73 wrote:Did anyone else notice A Person's last minute vote-without-posting for Boogs? Ordinarily I would say it is too obvious, but it could be a desperation move of the last of the Moria Goblins.
AP did the same thing to me on night 4.Leamiteo wrote:Captain Bunny Killer wrote:![]()
And making vague statements about something going on is not going to pass for hunting baddies, Boogs.
And I think I might be ready to bring up a llama suspicion again. Time to look back, but lets start with this exchange.reywas wrote:llama and epignosis are great places to begin discussion for the next lynch.
Llama has been at the top of my suspect list for the last two lynches. I have re-reading to do on him and others.
Leamiteo wrote:But without any mention of anything? Surely you realized after the fact that the poll wasn't up.A Person wrote:i thought today was the last day of the poll so i voted randomlyLeamiteo wrote:@A Person: So you voted for me but haven't so much as addressed me or even mentioned me in any posts. What gives?
Works for me! Glad to have you in the game. Sorry to hear that work is so busy, I hope your trainees get into the swing of things quickly.Spacedaisy wrote:So.... I owe you all an apology and explanation.
My co manager fell and hurt herself on the job. Which means I am basically running the store by myself. I just got a co manager trainee two days ago, and my shift leader trainee is moved up to a fll fledged shift leader. But they are both still so new and unsure of themselves it still leaves me with a lot of work. I am on Day 8 of a nine day run right now. And quite honestly, I am just completely run down physically and mentally. That is why I have been AWOL. I really don't want replaced though. So if you will give me a chance I would like to continue.
Yes indeedy!insertnamehere wrote:I have no idea how much gold I actually own. How do I find out, just PM the host, or what?
I'm a little mystified about the case against Boogs as well. I guess other people are seeing something I am not.Turnip Head wrote:I don't think Boogs should be lynched, I've never understood the case on him and it seems to have snowballed to where he's getting votes just because he's been discussed the most at this point.
I'm voting Daisy. I know she's had a lot going on in RL apparently but I think she's flying low because all her teammates got lynched at the start of the game.
Vompatti wrote:That is correct and I stand by it regardless of the facts.Bullzeye wrote:I seem to remember you having a similar theory about Elo thoughVompatti wrote:My theory is that Mongoose is good and Mongoose voters are bad.
Vompatti wrote:By the way I still think llama is evil but that doesn't stop me from thoroughly agreeing with the review above.
I can't really say I would bet Vomps is good from all of this, but I think his play style cuts both ways. While it's easy to get away with devious behavior when you're zany, it's also easy to be a ping for an experienced leader in the game who can fall back on his "bad gut" on a player who's hard to read. Plus, it's convenient for unexperienced players to follow along, because they don't know how he usually is.Vompatti wrote:I woudln't mind going through the back way if you know what I mean.
Also, Mongoose wasn't bad? Who would have thought!